A randomised crossover comparison of manikin ventilation through Soft Seal®, i‐gel™ and AuraOnce™ supraglottic airway devices by surf lifeguards

A randomised crossover comparison of manikin ventilation through Soft Seal®, i‐gel™ and AuraOnce™ supraglottic airway devices by surf lifeguards

Summary Forty surf lifeguards attempted to ventilate a manikin through one out of three supraglottic airways inserted in random order: the Portex® Soft Seal®; the Intersurgical® i‐gel™; and the Ambu® AuraOnce™. We recorded the time to ventilate and the proportion of inflations that were successful,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia 2014-04, Vol.69 (4), p.343-347
Hauptverfasser: Adelborg, K., Al‐Mashhadi, R. H., Nielsen, L. H., Dalgas, C., Mortensen, M. B., Løfgren, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adult
Airway management
Airway Management - methods
Algorithms
Anesthesia
Certification
Cross-Over Studies
Denmark
Educational Status
Female
First Aid
Humans
Life Support Care - manpower
Lifeguards
Linear Models
Male
Manikins
Near Drowning - therapy
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Ventilation
Young Adult
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Forty surf lifeguards attempted to ventilate a manikin through one out of three supraglottic airways inserted in random order: the Portex® Soft Seal®; the Intersurgical® i‐gel™; and the Ambu® AuraOnce™. We recorded the time to ventilate and the proportion of inflations that were successful, without and then with concurrent chest compressions. The mean (SD) time to ventilate with the Soft Seal, i‐gel and AuraOnce was 35.2 (7.2)s, 15.6 (3.3)s and 35.1 (8.5) s, respectively, p 
ISSN:0003-2409
1365-2044
DOI:10.1111/anae.12545