Late Pleistocene–Holocene evolution of the southern Marmara shelf and sub-basins: middle strand of the North Anatolian fault, southern Marmara Sea, Turkey

Although there are many research studies on the northern and southern branches of the North Anatolian fault, cutting through the deep basins of the Sea of Marmara in the north and creating a series of pull-apart basins on the southern mainland, little data is available about the geometrical and kine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine geophysical researches 2014-03, Vol.35 (1), p.69-85
Hauptverfasser: Vardar, Denizhan, Öztürk, Kurultay, Yaltırak, Cenk, Alpar, Bedri, Tur, Hüseyin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Marine geophysical researches
container_volume 35
creator Vardar, Denizhan
Öztürk, Kurultay
Yaltırak, Cenk
Alpar, Bedri
Tur, Hüseyin
description Although there are many research studies on the northern and southern branches of the North Anatolian fault, cutting through the deep basins of the Sea of Marmara in the north and creating a series of pull-apart basins on the southern mainland, little data is available about the geometrical and kinematical characteristics of the middle strand of the North Anatolian fault. The first detailed geometry of the middle strand of the North Anatolian fault along the southern Marmara shelf, including the Gemlik and Bandırma Bay, will be given in this study, by a combined interpretation of different seismic data sets. The characteristic features of its segments and their importance on the paleogeographic evolution of the southern shelf sub-basins were defined. The longest one of these faults, the Armutlu-Bandırma segment, is a 75-km long dextral strike-slip fault which connects the W–E trending Gençali segment in the east and NE–SW trending Kapıdağ-Edincik segment in the west. In this context, the Gemlik Bay opened as a pull-apart basin under the control of the middle strand whilst a new fault segment developed during the late Pleistocene, cutting through the eastern rim of the bay. In this region, a delta front forming the paleoshoreline of the Gemlik paleolake was cut and shifted approximately 60 ± 5 m by the new segment. The same offset on this fault was also measured on a natural scarp of acoustic basement to the west and integrated with this paleoshoreline forming the slightly descending topset–foreset reflections of the delta front. Therefore the new segment is believed to be active at least for the last 30,000 years. The annual lateral slip rate representing this period of time will be 2 mm, which is quite consistent with modern GPS measurements. Towards the west, the Bandırma Bay is a rectangular transpressional basin whilst the Erdek Bay is a passive basin under the control of NW–SE trending faults. When the water level of the paleo-Marmara lake dropped down to −90 m, the water levels of the suspended paleolakes of Bandırma and Gemlik on the southern shelf were −50.3 (−3.3 Global Isostatic Adjustment—GIA) and −60.5 (−3.3 GIA) m below the present mean sea level, respectively. As of today a similar example can be seen between the Sea of Marmara and the shallow freshwater lakes of Manyas and Uluabat. Similarly, the paleolakes of Gemlik and Bandirma were affected by the water level fluctuations at different time periods, even though both lakes were isolated fro
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11001-013-9210-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508760492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1508760492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-3b6d8a1648539362fe3e49f5a31b96c44a6073516a647e87c21bc70ae96feff73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0EEkPgAOwssWERB7vd_ml2URQI0vAjEdZWdU-Z6eCxg-1Gyo47sM3pOAkeJgsEYvWq5O89lfUIeSr4ieDcvCiiiWBcSDZ0gjN7j6yEMpJxZcV9suK8U0x2Uj0kj0q54m23A1-R2zVUpB8CzqWmCSP-_P7jIoXfI8VvKSx1TpEmT-sWaUlLkxzpW8g7yEDLFoOnEDe0LCMbocyxvKS7ebMJja55_3LnfZdy3dLTCDWFGSL1sIR6_G_kR4RjernkL3jzmDzwEAo-udMj8unV-eXZBVu_f_3m7HTNQJquMjnqjQWhe6vkIHXnUWI_eAVSjIOe-h40N1IJDbo3aM3UiXEyHHDQHr038og8P-Re5_R1wVLdbi4ThgAR01KcUNwazfuha-izv9CrtOTYrttTqu-tELJR4kBNOZWS0bvrPLff3TjB3b4vd-jLtb7cvi9nm6c7eEpj42fMfyT_1_QLlO6aFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1505448113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Late Pleistocene–Holocene evolution of the southern Marmara shelf and sub-basins: middle strand of the North Anatolian fault, southern Marmara Sea, Turkey</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Vardar, Denizhan ; Öztürk, Kurultay ; Yaltırak, Cenk ; Alpar, Bedri ; Tur, Hüseyin</creator><creatorcontrib>Vardar, Denizhan ; Öztürk, Kurultay ; Yaltırak, Cenk ; Alpar, Bedri ; Tur, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><description>Although there are many research studies on the northern and southern branches of the North Anatolian fault, cutting through the deep basins of the Sea of Marmara in the north and creating a series of pull-apart basins on the southern mainland, little data is available about the geometrical and kinematical characteristics of the middle strand of the North Anatolian fault. The first detailed geometry of the middle strand of the North Anatolian fault along the southern Marmara shelf, including the Gemlik and Bandırma Bay, will be given in this study, by a combined interpretation of different seismic data sets. The characteristic features of its segments and their importance on the paleogeographic evolution of the southern shelf sub-basins were defined. The longest one of these faults, the Armutlu-Bandırma segment, is a 75-km long dextral strike-slip fault which connects the W–E trending Gençali segment in the east and NE–SW trending Kapıdağ-Edincik segment in the west. In this context, the Gemlik Bay opened as a pull-apart basin under the control of the middle strand whilst a new fault segment developed during the late Pleistocene, cutting through the eastern rim of the bay. In this region, a delta front forming the paleoshoreline of the Gemlik paleolake was cut and shifted approximately 60 ± 5 m by the new segment. The same offset on this fault was also measured on a natural scarp of acoustic basement to the west and integrated with this paleoshoreline forming the slightly descending topset–foreset reflections of the delta front. Therefore the new segment is believed to be active at least for the last 30,000 years. The annual lateral slip rate representing this period of time will be 2 mm, which is quite consistent with modern GPS measurements. Towards the west, the Bandırma Bay is a rectangular transpressional basin whilst the Erdek Bay is a passive basin under the control of NW–SE trending faults. When the water level of the paleo-Marmara lake dropped down to −90 m, the water levels of the suspended paleolakes of Bandırma and Gemlik on the southern shelf were −50.3 (−3.3 Global Isostatic Adjustment—GIA) and −60.5 (−3.3 GIA) m below the present mean sea level, respectively. As of today a similar example can be seen between the Sea of Marmara and the shallow freshwater lakes of Manyas and Uluabat. Similarly, the paleolakes of Gemlik and Bandirma were affected by the water level fluctuations at different time periods, even though both lakes were isolated from the Sea of Marmara during the glacial periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3235</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11001-013-9210-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Evolution ; Fault lines ; Freshwater ; Freshwater lakes ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Holocene ; Marine ; Oceanography ; Offshore Engineering ; Original Research Paper ; Paleoshorelines ; Plate tectonics ; Pleistocene ; Seismology ; Shorelines ; Water level fluctuations ; Water levels</subject><ispartof>Marine geophysical researches, 2014-03, Vol.35 (1), p.69-85</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-3b6d8a1648539362fe3e49f5a31b96c44a6073516a647e87c21bc70ae96feff73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-3b6d8a1648539362fe3e49f5a31b96c44a6073516a647e87c21bc70ae96feff73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11001-013-9210-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11001-013-9210-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vardar, Denizhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öztürk, Kurultay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaltırak, Cenk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpar, Bedri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tur, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><title>Late Pleistocene–Holocene evolution of the southern Marmara shelf and sub-basins: middle strand of the North Anatolian fault, southern Marmara Sea, Turkey</title><title>Marine geophysical researches</title><addtitle>Mar Geophys Res</addtitle><description>Although there are many research studies on the northern and southern branches of the North Anatolian fault, cutting through the deep basins of the Sea of Marmara in the north and creating a series of pull-apart basins on the southern mainland, little data is available about the geometrical and kinematical characteristics of the middle strand of the North Anatolian fault. The first detailed geometry of the middle strand of the North Anatolian fault along the southern Marmara shelf, including the Gemlik and Bandırma Bay, will be given in this study, by a combined interpretation of different seismic data sets. The characteristic features of its segments and their importance on the paleogeographic evolution of the southern shelf sub-basins were defined. The longest one of these faults, the Armutlu-Bandırma segment, is a 75-km long dextral strike-slip fault which connects the W–E trending Gençali segment in the east and NE–SW trending Kapıdağ-Edincik segment in the west. In this context, the Gemlik Bay opened as a pull-apart basin under the control of the middle strand whilst a new fault segment developed during the late Pleistocene, cutting through the eastern rim of the bay. In this region, a delta front forming the paleoshoreline of the Gemlik paleolake was cut and shifted approximately 60 ± 5 m by the new segment. The same offset on this fault was also measured on a natural scarp of acoustic basement to the west and integrated with this paleoshoreline forming the slightly descending topset–foreset reflections of the delta front. Therefore the new segment is believed to be active at least for the last 30,000 years. The annual lateral slip rate representing this period of time will be 2 mm, which is quite consistent with modern GPS measurements. Towards the west, the Bandırma Bay is a rectangular transpressional basin whilst the Erdek Bay is a passive basin under the control of NW–SE trending faults. When the water level of the paleo-Marmara lake dropped down to −90 m, the water levels of the suspended paleolakes of Bandırma and Gemlik on the southern shelf were −50.3 (−3.3 Global Isostatic Adjustment—GIA) and −60.5 (−3.3 GIA) m below the present mean sea level, respectively. As of today a similar example can be seen between the Sea of Marmara and the shallow freshwater lakes of Manyas and Uluabat. Similarly, the paleolakes of Gemlik and Bandirma were affected by the water level fluctuations at different time periods, even though both lakes were isolated from the Sea of Marmara during the glacial periods.</description><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater lakes</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Holocene</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Offshore Engineering</subject><subject>Original Research Paper</subject><subject>Paleoshorelines</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Pleistocene</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>Shorelines</subject><subject>Water level fluctuations</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><issn>0025-3235</issn><issn>1573-0581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0EEkPgAOwssWERB7vd_ml2URQI0vAjEdZWdU-Z6eCxg-1Gyo47sM3pOAkeJgsEYvWq5O89lfUIeSr4ieDcvCiiiWBcSDZ0gjN7j6yEMpJxZcV9suK8U0x2Uj0kj0q54m23A1-R2zVUpB8CzqWmCSP-_P7jIoXfI8VvKSx1TpEmT-sWaUlLkxzpW8g7yEDLFoOnEDe0LCMbocyxvKS7ebMJja55_3LnfZdy3dLTCDWFGSL1sIR6_G_kR4RjernkL3jzmDzwEAo-udMj8unV-eXZBVu_f_3m7HTNQJquMjnqjQWhe6vkIHXnUWI_eAVSjIOe-h40N1IJDbo3aM3UiXEyHHDQHr038og8P-Re5_R1wVLdbi4ThgAR01KcUNwazfuha-izv9CrtOTYrttTqu-tELJR4kBNOZWS0bvrPLff3TjB3b4vd-jLtb7cvi9nm6c7eEpj42fMfyT_1_QLlO6aFA</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Vardar, Denizhan</creator><creator>Öztürk, Kurultay</creator><creator>Yaltırak, Cenk</creator><creator>Alpar, Bedri</creator><creator>Tur, Hüseyin</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Late Pleistocene–Holocene evolution of the southern Marmara shelf and sub-basins: middle strand of the North Anatolian fault, southern Marmara Sea, Turkey</title><author>Vardar, Denizhan ; Öztürk, Kurultay ; Yaltırak, Cenk ; Alpar, Bedri ; Tur, Hüseyin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-3b6d8a1648539362fe3e49f5a31b96c44a6073516a647e87c21bc70ae96feff73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater lakes</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Holocene</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Offshore Engineering</topic><topic>Original Research Paper</topic><topic>Paleoshorelines</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Pleistocene</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>Shorelines</topic><topic>Water level fluctuations</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vardar, Denizhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öztürk, Kurultay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaltırak, Cenk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpar, Bedri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tur, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Marine geophysical researches</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vardar, Denizhan</au><au>Öztürk, Kurultay</au><au>Yaltırak, Cenk</au><au>Alpar, Bedri</au><au>Tur, Hüseyin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Late Pleistocene–Holocene evolution of the southern Marmara shelf and sub-basins: middle strand of the North Anatolian fault, southern Marmara Sea, Turkey</atitle><jtitle>Marine geophysical researches</jtitle><stitle>Mar Geophys Res</stitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>69-85</pages><issn>0025-3235</issn><eissn>1573-0581</eissn><abstract>Although there are many research studies on the northern and southern branches of the North Anatolian fault, cutting through the deep basins of the Sea of Marmara in the north and creating a series of pull-apart basins on the southern mainland, little data is available about the geometrical and kinematical characteristics of the middle strand of the North Anatolian fault. The first detailed geometry of the middle strand of the North Anatolian fault along the southern Marmara shelf, including the Gemlik and Bandırma Bay, will be given in this study, by a combined interpretation of different seismic data sets. The characteristic features of its segments and their importance on the paleogeographic evolution of the southern shelf sub-basins were defined. The longest one of these faults, the Armutlu-Bandırma segment, is a 75-km long dextral strike-slip fault which connects the W–E trending Gençali segment in the east and NE–SW trending Kapıdağ-Edincik segment in the west. In this context, the Gemlik Bay opened as a pull-apart basin under the control of the middle strand whilst a new fault segment developed during the late Pleistocene, cutting through the eastern rim of the bay. In this region, a delta front forming the paleoshoreline of the Gemlik paleolake was cut and shifted approximately 60 ± 5 m by the new segment. The same offset on this fault was also measured on a natural scarp of acoustic basement to the west and integrated with this paleoshoreline forming the slightly descending topset–foreset reflections of the delta front. Therefore the new segment is believed to be active at least for the last 30,000 years. The annual lateral slip rate representing this period of time will be 2 mm, which is quite consistent with modern GPS measurements. Towards the west, the Bandırma Bay is a rectangular transpressional basin whilst the Erdek Bay is a passive basin under the control of NW–SE trending faults. When the water level of the paleo-Marmara lake dropped down to −90 m, the water levels of the suspended paleolakes of Bandırma and Gemlik on the southern shelf were −50.3 (−3.3 Global Isostatic Adjustment—GIA) and −60.5 (−3.3 GIA) m below the present mean sea level, respectively. As of today a similar example can be seen between the Sea of Marmara and the shallow freshwater lakes of Manyas and Uluabat. Similarly, the paleolakes of Gemlik and Bandirma were affected by the water level fluctuations at different time periods, even though both lakes were isolated from the Sea of Marmara during the glacial periods.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11001-013-9210-8</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3235
ispartof Marine geophysical researches, 2014-03, Vol.35 (1), p.69-85
issn 0025-3235
1573-0581
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508760492
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Evolution
Fault lines
Freshwater
Freshwater lakes
Geophysics/Geodesy
Holocene
Marine
Oceanography
Offshore Engineering
Original Research Paper
Paleoshorelines
Plate tectonics
Pleistocene
Seismology
Shorelines
Water level fluctuations
Water levels
title Late Pleistocene–Holocene evolution of the southern Marmara shelf and sub-basins: middle strand of the North Anatolian fault, southern Marmara Sea, Turkey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A41%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Late%20Pleistocene%E2%80%93Holocene%20evolution%20of%20the%20southern%20Marmara%20shelf%20and%20sub-basins:%20middle%20strand%20of%20the%20North%20Anatolian%20fault,%20southern%20Marmara%20Sea,%20Turkey&rft.jtitle=Marine%20geophysical%20researches&rft.au=Vardar,%20Denizhan&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=69-85&rft.issn=0025-3235&rft.eissn=1573-0581&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11001-013-9210-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1508760492%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1505448113&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true