comparative study between enteric parasites of Coyotes in a protected and suburban habitat
Coyotes (Canis latrans) have inhabited Florida (USA) since the 1960s and are currently found throughout the state. Our objective was to obtain information on enteric parasites of coyotes from two different habitats. Fresh coyote fecal samples were collected from protected and suburban habitats in Pi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Urban ecosystems 2014-03, Vol.17 (1), p.1-10 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 10 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Urban ecosystems |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Grigione, M.M Burman, P Clavio, S Harper, S.J Manning, D.L Sarno, R.J |
| description | Coyotes (Canis latrans) have inhabited Florida (USA) since the 1960s and are currently found throughout the state. Our objective was to obtain information on enteric parasites of coyotes from two different habitats. Fresh coyote fecal samples were collected from protected and suburban habitats in Pinellas County, Florida, USA (27ᵒ54′ N, 82ᵒ41′W) from May 2005 to March 2007. A standard fecal flotation examination and formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation protocol were utilized on fecal samples from both habitats. Five newly documented coyote parasites were documented: one cestode (Hymenolepis spp.), one nematode (Ascaris spp.), and three protozoa (Balantidium coli, Blastocystis spp., and Entamoeba histolytica). Nine hitherto unreported parasites for FL coyotes were also discovered: two cestodes (Diphyllobothrium latum and Dipylidium caninum), two nematodes (Toxocara canis and Uncinaria stenocephala), one trematode (Paragonimus spp.), and four protozoa (Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia canis, Cystoisospora spp., and Sarcocystis cruzi). The protected area supported significantly more undocumented (i.e., newly identified) parasites for FL coyotes, and Protozoa as compared to the suburban area. Florida coyotes are likely more susceptible to infection by novel parasites because of their rapid range expansion and lack of acquired immunity. In addition, rapid habitat loss and urbanization in Florida may increase the probability of disease transmission between wild and domestic canids. We suggest preventative measures that may lower the risk of parasitic infection and promote co-existence with coyotes in urban landscapes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11252-013-0302-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508758970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3237394391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ca60019165608f0021fdb56de5f83405ee0b2eb73802f47f0b7bc3ac75c1a3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhU1oINukP6CnCnLJxemMZFnKsSxtUgj0kM0lFyHJo63Drr2V5Ib995VxDiWHnObBfG94vKmqzwjXCKC-JkQueQ0oahDAa3VSrVAqUWPb8A9Fgxa1RinPqo8pPQMUl9ar6smP-4ONNvd_iaU8dUfmKL8QDYyGTLH3bF6nPlNiY2Dr8TjOsh-YZYdYtM_UMTt0LE1uis4O7Ld1fbb5ojoNdpfo0-s8rzY_vm_Wd_X9r9uf62_3tRdK5NrbtqS5wVa2oAMAx9A52XYkgxYNSCJwnJwSGnhoVACnnBfWK-nRChLn1dVytqT5M1HKZt8nT7udHWickkEJWkl9o6Cgl2_Q53GKQwk3U41oUaIoFC6Uj2NKkYI5xH5v49EgmLlss5RtStlmLtuo4uGLJxV22FL87_I7pi-LKdjR2G3sk3l84IANzL_BVoh_MQGKug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504361513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>comparative study between enteric parasites of Coyotes in a protected and suburban habitat</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Grigione, M.M ; Burman, P ; Clavio, S ; Harper, S.J ; Manning, D.L ; Sarno, R.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Grigione, M.M ; Burman, P ; Clavio, S ; Harper, S.J ; Manning, D.L ; Sarno, R.J</creatorcontrib><description>Coyotes (Canis latrans) have inhabited Florida (USA) since the 1960s and are currently found throughout the state. Our objective was to obtain information on enteric parasites of coyotes from two different habitats. Fresh coyote fecal samples were collected from protected and suburban habitats in Pinellas County, Florida, USA (27ᵒ54′ N, 82ᵒ41′W) from May 2005 to March 2007. A standard fecal flotation examination and formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation protocol were utilized on fecal samples from both habitats. Five newly documented coyote parasites were documented: one cestode (Hymenolepis spp.), one nematode (Ascaris spp.), and three protozoa (Balantidium coli, Blastocystis spp., and Entamoeba histolytica). Nine hitherto unreported parasites for FL coyotes were also discovered: two cestodes (Diphyllobothrium latum and Dipylidium caninum), two nematodes (Toxocara canis and Uncinaria stenocephala), one trematode (Paragonimus spp.), and four protozoa (Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia canis, Cystoisospora spp., and Sarcocystis cruzi). The protected area supported significantly more undocumented (i.e., newly identified) parasites for FL coyotes, and Protozoa as compared to the suburban area. Florida coyotes are likely more susceptible to infection by novel parasites because of their rapid range expansion and lack of acquired immunity. In addition, rapid habitat loss and urbanization in Florida may increase the probability of disease transmission between wild and domestic canids. We suggest preventative measures that may lower the risk of parasitic infection and promote co-existence with coyotes in urban landscapes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-8155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11252-013-0302-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>acetates ; Ascaris ; Balantidium coli ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Blastocystis ; Canis ; Canis latrans ; Carnivores ; Cestoda ; Comparative studies ; Coyotes ; Cryptosporidium ; Diphyllobothrium ; Diphyllobothrium latum ; Dipylidium caninum ; Disease transmission ; Ecology ; Entamoeba histolytica ; Environmental Management ; Feces ; Flotation ; Giardia ; Giardia canis ; habitat destruction ; Habitat loss ; Habitats ; Hymenolepis ; immunity ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Nematoda ; Paragonimus ; Parasites ; risk ; Sarcocystis ; Sarcocystis cruzi ; Statistical analysis ; Suburban areas ; Toxocara ; Toxocara canis ; Uncinaria ; Uncinaria stenocephala ; Urban areas ; Urban Ecology ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Urban ecosystems, 2014-03, Vol.17 (1), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ca60019165608f0021fdb56de5f83405ee0b2eb73802f47f0b7bc3ac75c1a3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ca60019165608f0021fdb56de5f83405ee0b2eb73802f47f0b7bc3ac75c1a3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11252-013-0302-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11252-013-0302-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grigione, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burman, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavio, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, D.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarno, R.J</creatorcontrib><title>comparative study between enteric parasites of Coyotes in a protected and suburban habitat</title><title>Urban ecosystems</title><addtitle>Urban Ecosyst</addtitle><description>Coyotes (Canis latrans) have inhabited Florida (USA) since the 1960s and are currently found throughout the state. Our objective was to obtain information on enteric parasites of coyotes from two different habitats. Fresh coyote fecal samples were collected from protected and suburban habitats in Pinellas County, Florida, USA (27ᵒ54′ N, 82ᵒ41′W) from May 2005 to March 2007. A standard fecal flotation examination and formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation protocol were utilized on fecal samples from both habitats. Five newly documented coyote parasites were documented: one cestode (Hymenolepis spp.), one nematode (Ascaris spp.), and three protozoa (Balantidium coli, Blastocystis spp., and Entamoeba histolytica). Nine hitherto unreported parasites for FL coyotes were also discovered: two cestodes (Diphyllobothrium latum and Dipylidium caninum), two nematodes (Toxocara canis and Uncinaria stenocephala), one trematode (Paragonimus spp.), and four protozoa (Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia canis, Cystoisospora spp., and Sarcocystis cruzi). The protected area supported significantly more undocumented (i.e., newly identified) parasites for FL coyotes, and Protozoa as compared to the suburban area. Florida coyotes are likely more susceptible to infection by novel parasites because of their rapid range expansion and lack of acquired immunity. In addition, rapid habitat loss and urbanization in Florida may increase the probability of disease transmission between wild and domestic canids. We suggest preventative measures that may lower the risk of parasitic infection and promote co-existence with coyotes in urban landscapes.</description><subject>acetates</subject><subject>Ascaris</subject><subject>Balantidium coli</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Blastocystis</subject><subject>Canis</subject><subject>Canis latrans</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Cestoda</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Coyotes</subject><subject>Cryptosporidium</subject><subject>Diphyllobothrium</subject><subject>Diphyllobothrium latum</subject><subject>Dipylidium caninum</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Entamoeba histolytica</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Giardia</subject><subject>Giardia canis</subject><subject>habitat destruction</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hymenolepis</subject><subject>immunity</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>Paragonimus</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Sarcocystis</subject><subject>Sarcocystis cruzi</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>Toxocara</subject><subject>Toxocara canis</subject><subject>Uncinaria</subject><subject>Uncinaria stenocephala</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban Ecology</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>1083-8155</issn><issn>1573-1642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhU1oINukP6CnCnLJxemMZFnKsSxtUgj0kM0lFyHJo63Drr2V5Ib995VxDiWHnObBfG94vKmqzwjXCKC-JkQueQ0oahDAa3VSrVAqUWPb8A9Fgxa1RinPqo8pPQMUl9ar6smP-4ONNvd_iaU8dUfmKL8QDYyGTLH3bF6nPlNiY2Dr8TjOsh-YZYdYtM_UMTt0LE1uis4O7Ld1fbb5ojoNdpfo0-s8rzY_vm_Wd_X9r9uf62_3tRdK5NrbtqS5wVa2oAMAx9A52XYkgxYNSCJwnJwSGnhoVACnnBfWK-nRChLn1dVytqT5M1HKZt8nT7udHWickkEJWkl9o6Cgl2_Q53GKQwk3U41oUaIoFC6Uj2NKkYI5xH5v49EgmLlss5RtStlmLtuo4uGLJxV22FL87_I7pi-LKdjR2G3sk3l84IANzL_BVoh_MQGKug</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Grigione, M.M</creator><creator>Burman, P</creator><creator>Clavio, S</creator><creator>Harper, S.J</creator><creator>Manning, D.L</creator><creator>Sarno, R.J</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>comparative study between enteric parasites of Coyotes in a protected and suburban habitat</title><author>Grigione, M.M ; Burman, P ; Clavio, S ; Harper, S.J ; Manning, D.L ; Sarno, R.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ca60019165608f0021fdb56de5f83405ee0b2eb73802f47f0b7bc3ac75c1a3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>acetates</topic><topic>Ascaris</topic><topic>Balantidium coli</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Blastocystis</topic><topic>Canis</topic><topic>Canis latrans</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Cestoda</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Coyotes</topic><topic>Cryptosporidium</topic><topic>Diphyllobothrium</topic><topic>Diphyllobothrium latum</topic><topic>Dipylidium caninum</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Entamoeba histolytica</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Giardia</topic><topic>Giardia canis</topic><topic>habitat destruction</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hymenolepis</topic><topic>immunity</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>Paragonimus</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Sarcocystis</topic><topic>Sarcocystis cruzi</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>Toxocara</topic><topic>Toxocara canis</topic><topic>Uncinaria</topic><topic>Uncinaria stenocephala</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban Ecology</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grigione, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burman, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavio, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, D.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarno, R.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grigione, M.M</au><au>Burman, P</au><au>Clavio, S</au><au>Harper, S.J</au><au>Manning, D.L</au><au>Sarno, R.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>comparative study between enteric parasites of Coyotes in a protected and suburban habitat</atitle><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle><stitle>Urban Ecosyst</stitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>1083-8155</issn><eissn>1573-1642</eissn><abstract>Coyotes (Canis latrans) have inhabited Florida (USA) since the 1960s and are currently found throughout the state. Our objective was to obtain information on enteric parasites of coyotes from two different habitats. Fresh coyote fecal samples were collected from protected and suburban habitats in Pinellas County, Florida, USA (27ᵒ54′ N, 82ᵒ41′W) from May 2005 to March 2007. A standard fecal flotation examination and formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation protocol were utilized on fecal samples from both habitats. Five newly documented coyote parasites were documented: one cestode (Hymenolepis spp.), one nematode (Ascaris spp.), and three protozoa (Balantidium coli, Blastocystis spp., and Entamoeba histolytica). Nine hitherto unreported parasites for FL coyotes were also discovered: two cestodes (Diphyllobothrium latum and Dipylidium caninum), two nematodes (Toxocara canis and Uncinaria stenocephala), one trematode (Paragonimus spp.), and four protozoa (Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia canis, Cystoisospora spp., and Sarcocystis cruzi). The protected area supported significantly more undocumented (i.e., newly identified) parasites for FL coyotes, and Protozoa as compared to the suburban area. Florida coyotes are likely more susceptible to infection by novel parasites because of their rapid range expansion and lack of acquired immunity. In addition, rapid habitat loss and urbanization in Florida may increase the probability of disease transmission between wild and domestic canids. We suggest preventative measures that may lower the risk of parasitic infection and promote co-existence with coyotes in urban landscapes.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s11252-013-0302-7</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1083-8155 |
| ispartof | Urban ecosystems, 2014-03, Vol.17 (1), p.1-10 |
| issn | 1083-8155 1573-1642 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508758970 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | acetates Ascaris Balantidium coli Biomedical and Life Sciences Blastocystis Canis Canis latrans Carnivores Cestoda Comparative studies Coyotes Cryptosporidium Diphyllobothrium Diphyllobothrium latum Dipylidium caninum Disease transmission Ecology Entamoeba histolytica Environmental Management Feces Flotation Giardia Giardia canis habitat destruction Habitat loss Habitats Hymenolepis immunity Life Sciences Nature Conservation Nematoda Paragonimus Parasites risk Sarcocystis Sarcocystis cruzi Statistical analysis Suburban areas Toxocara Toxocara canis Uncinaria Uncinaria stenocephala Urban areas Urban Ecology Urbanization |
| title | comparative study between enteric parasites of Coyotes in a protected and suburban habitat |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A55%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=comparative%20study%20between%20enteric%20parasites%20of%20Coyotes%20in%20a%20protected%20and%20suburban%20habitat&rft.jtitle=Urban%20ecosystems&rft.au=Grigione,%20M.M&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=1083-8155&rft.eissn=1573-1642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11252-013-0302-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3237394391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504361513&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |