The Norwegian Healthier Goats programme – A financial cost–benefit analysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the profitability to dairy goat farmers of participating in the Healthier Goats disease control and eradication programme (HG), which was initiated in 2001 and is still running. HG includes the control and eradication of caprine arthritis encephalitis (CAE), cas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive veterinary medicine 2014-05, Vol.114 (2), p.96-105
Hauptverfasser: Nagel-Alne, G. Elise, Asheim, Leif J., Hardaker, J. Brian, Sølverød, Liv, Lindheim, Dag, Valle, Paul S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue 2
container_start_page 96
container_title Preventive veterinary medicine
container_volume 114
creator Nagel-Alne, G. Elise
Asheim, Leif J.
Hardaker, J. Brian
Sølverød, Liv
Lindheim, Dag
Valle, Paul S.
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the profitability to dairy goat farmers of participating in the Healthier Goats disease control and eradication programme (HG), which was initiated in 2001 and is still running. HG includes the control and eradication of caprine arthritis encephalitis (CAE), caseous lymphadenitis (CLA) and paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in Norwegian goat herds. The profitability of participation was estimated in a financial cost–benefit analysis (CBA) using partial budgeting to quantify the economic consequences of infectious disease control through HG versus taking no action. Historical data were collected from 24 enrolled dairy goat herds and 21 herds not enrolled in HG, and supplemented with information from a questionnaire distributed to the same farmers. Expert opinions were collected to arrive at the best possible estimates. For some input parameters there were uncertainty due to imperfect knowledge, thus these parameters were modelled as PERT probability distributions and a stochastic simulation model was built. The CBA model was used to generate distributions of net present value (NPV) of farmers’ net cash flows for choosing to enroll versus not enrolling. This was done for three selected milk quota levels of 30000L, 50000L and 70000L, and both for before and after the introduction of a reduced milk price for the non-enrolled. The NPVs were calculated over time horizons of 5, 10 and 20 years using an inflation-adjusted discount rate of 2.8% per annum. The results show that participation in HG on average was profitable over a time horizon of 10 years or longer for quota levels of 50000L and 70000L, although not without risk of having a negative NPV. If farmers had to pay all the costs themselves, participation in HG would have been profitable only for a time horizon beyond 20 years. In 2012, a reduced milk price was introduced for farmers not enrolled in HG, changing the decision criteria for farmers, and thus, the CBA. When the analysis was altered to account for these changes, the expected NPV was positive over five years for the 50000L quota, indicating an increased profitability of enrolling in HG. The sensitivity analysis showed that particular attention should be paid to work load and investment costs when planning for disease control programmes in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508676871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167587714000403</els_id><sourcerecordid>1508676871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-33cc2e48d609e4bbac3a0a71dd14799b4ffed85990e98a82306c5bf6b26425d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtOwzAQQC0EgvK5AnjJJmHsJLazrCqgSBVsYG05zgRc5VPstIgdd-CGnARXBbasRpp583uEXDBIGTBxtUxXHjc4dlinHFieAk8B-B6ZMCWzhEkm9skkkjIplJRH5DiEJQAIoYpDcsTzQqlSygl5eHxBej_4N3x2pqdzNO344tDT28GMga788OxN1yH9-vikU9q43vTWmZbaIYwxV2GPjRup6U37Hlw4JQeNaQOe_cQT8nRz_TibJ4uH27vZdJHYTLIxyTJrOeaqFlBiXlXGZgaMZHXNclmWVd40WKuiLAFLZRTPQNiiakTFRc6LGrITcrmbGy98XWMYdeeCxbY1PQ7roFkBSkihJIuo3KHWDyF4bPTKu874d81Ab23qpf6zqbc2NXAdbcbO858l62pb--371ReB6Q7A-OomatPBOuwt1s6jHXU9uH-XfAOgDYyN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508676871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Norwegian Healthier Goats programme – A financial cost–benefit analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Nagel-Alne, G. Elise ; Asheim, Leif J. ; Hardaker, J. Brian ; Sølverød, Liv ; Lindheim, Dag ; Valle, Paul S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagel-Alne, G. Elise ; Asheim, Leif J. ; Hardaker, J. Brian ; Sølverød, Liv ; Lindheim, Dag ; Valle, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the profitability to dairy goat farmers of participating in the Healthier Goats disease control and eradication programme (HG), which was initiated in 2001 and is still running. HG includes the control and eradication of caprine arthritis encephalitis (CAE), caseous lymphadenitis (CLA) and paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in Norwegian goat herds. The profitability of participation was estimated in a financial cost–benefit analysis (CBA) using partial budgeting to quantify the economic consequences of infectious disease control through HG versus taking no action. Historical data were collected from 24 enrolled dairy goat herds and 21 herds not enrolled in HG, and supplemented with information from a questionnaire distributed to the same farmers. Expert opinions were collected to arrive at the best possible estimates. For some input parameters there were uncertainty due to imperfect knowledge, thus these parameters were modelled as PERT probability distributions and a stochastic simulation model was built. The CBA model was used to generate distributions of net present value (NPV) of farmers’ net cash flows for choosing to enroll versus not enrolling. This was done for three selected milk quota levels of 30000L, 50000L and 70000L, and both for before and after the introduction of a reduced milk price for the non-enrolled. The NPVs were calculated over time horizons of 5, 10 and 20 years using an inflation-adjusted discount rate of 2.8% per annum. The results show that participation in HG on average was profitable over a time horizon of 10 years or longer for quota levels of 50000L and 70000L, although not without risk of having a negative NPV. If farmers had to pay all the costs themselves, participation in HG would have been profitable only for a time horizon beyond 20 years. In 2012, a reduced milk price was introduced for farmers not enrolled in HG, changing the decision criteria for farmers, and thus, the CBA. When the analysis was altered to account for these changes, the expected NPV was positive over five years for the 50000L quota, indicating an increased profitability of enrolling in HG. The sensitivity analysis showed that particular attention should be paid to work load and investment costs when planning for disease control programmes in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24588977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods ; Animals ; Caprine arthritis encephalitis ; Caseous lymphadenitis ; Communicable Disease Control - methods ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost–benefit ; Dairying ; Eradication ; Goat ; Goat Diseases - epidemiology ; Goat Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Goats ; Johne's disease ; Norway - epidemiology ; Stochastic simulation</subject><ispartof>Preventive veterinary medicine, 2014-05, Vol.114 (2), p.96-105</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-33cc2e48d609e4bbac3a0a71dd14799b4ffed85990e98a82306c5bf6b26425d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-33cc2e48d609e4bbac3a0a71dd14799b4ffed85990e98a82306c5bf6b26425d03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2058-9601</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24588977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagel-Alne, G. Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asheim, Leif J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardaker, J. Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sølverød, Liv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindheim, Dag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><title>The Norwegian Healthier Goats programme – A financial cost–benefit analysis</title><title>Preventive veterinary medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate the profitability to dairy goat farmers of participating in the Healthier Goats disease control and eradication programme (HG), which was initiated in 2001 and is still running. HG includes the control and eradication of caprine arthritis encephalitis (CAE), caseous lymphadenitis (CLA) and paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in Norwegian goat herds. The profitability of participation was estimated in a financial cost–benefit analysis (CBA) using partial budgeting to quantify the economic consequences of infectious disease control through HG versus taking no action. Historical data were collected from 24 enrolled dairy goat herds and 21 herds not enrolled in HG, and supplemented with information from a questionnaire distributed to the same farmers. Expert opinions were collected to arrive at the best possible estimates. For some input parameters there were uncertainty due to imperfect knowledge, thus these parameters were modelled as PERT probability distributions and a stochastic simulation model was built. The CBA model was used to generate distributions of net present value (NPV) of farmers’ net cash flows for choosing to enroll versus not enrolling. This was done for three selected milk quota levels of 30000L, 50000L and 70000L, and both for before and after the introduction of a reduced milk price for the non-enrolled. The NPVs were calculated over time horizons of 5, 10 and 20 years using an inflation-adjusted discount rate of 2.8% per annum. The results show that participation in HG on average was profitable over a time horizon of 10 years or longer for quota levels of 50000L and 70000L, although not without risk of having a negative NPV. If farmers had to pay all the costs themselves, participation in HG would have been profitable only for a time horizon beyond 20 years. In 2012, a reduced milk price was introduced for farmers not enrolled in HG, changing the decision criteria for farmers, and thus, the CBA. When the analysis was altered to account for these changes, the expected NPV was positive over five years for the 50000L quota, indicating an increased profitability of enrolling in HG. The sensitivity analysis showed that particular attention should be paid to work load and investment costs when planning for disease control programmes in the future.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Caprine arthritis encephalitis</subject><subject>Caseous lymphadenitis</subject><subject>Communicable Disease Control - methods</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Cost–benefit</subject><subject>Dairying</subject><subject>Eradication</subject><subject>Goat</subject><subject>Goat Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Goat Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Johne's disease</subject><subject>Norway - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stochastic simulation</subject><issn>0167-5877</issn><issn>1873-1716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtOwzAQQC0EgvK5AnjJJmHsJLazrCqgSBVsYG05zgRc5VPstIgdd-CGnARXBbasRpp583uEXDBIGTBxtUxXHjc4dlinHFieAk8B-B6ZMCWzhEkm9skkkjIplJRH5DiEJQAIoYpDcsTzQqlSygl5eHxBej_4N3x2pqdzNO344tDT28GMga788OxN1yH9-vikU9q43vTWmZbaIYwxV2GPjRup6U37Hlw4JQeNaQOe_cQT8nRz_TibJ4uH27vZdJHYTLIxyTJrOeaqFlBiXlXGZgaMZHXNclmWVd40WKuiLAFLZRTPQNiiakTFRc6LGrITcrmbGy98XWMYdeeCxbY1PQ7roFkBSkihJIuo3KHWDyF4bPTKu874d81Ab23qpf6zqbc2NXAdbcbO858l62pb--371ReB6Q7A-OomatPBOuwt1s6jHXU9uH-XfAOgDYyN</recordid><startdate>20140501</startdate><enddate>20140501</enddate><creator>Nagel-Alne, G. Elise</creator><creator>Asheim, Leif J.</creator><creator>Hardaker, J. Brian</creator><creator>Sølverød, Liv</creator><creator>Lindheim, Dag</creator><creator>Valle, Paul S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2058-9601</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140501</creationdate><title>The Norwegian Healthier Goats programme – A financial cost–benefit analysis</title><author>Nagel-Alne, G. Elise ; Asheim, Leif J. ; Hardaker, J. Brian ; Sølverød, Liv ; Lindheim, Dag ; Valle, Paul S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-33cc2e48d609e4bbac3a0a71dd14799b4ffed85990e98a82306c5bf6b26425d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Caprine arthritis encephalitis</topic><topic>Caseous lymphadenitis</topic><topic>Communicable Disease Control - methods</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Cost–benefit</topic><topic>Dairying</topic><topic>Eradication</topic><topic>Goat</topic><topic>Goat Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Goat Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Johne's disease</topic><topic>Norway - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stochastic simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagel-Alne, G. Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asheim, Leif J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardaker, J. Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sølverød, Liv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindheim, Dag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagel-Alne, G. Elise</au><au>Asheim, Leif J.</au><au>Hardaker, J. Brian</au><au>Sølverød, Liv</au><au>Lindheim, Dag</au><au>Valle, Paul S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Norwegian Healthier Goats programme – A financial cost–benefit analysis</atitle><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><date>2014-05-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>96-105</pages><issn>0167-5877</issn><eissn>1873-1716</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate the profitability to dairy goat farmers of participating in the Healthier Goats disease control and eradication programme (HG), which was initiated in 2001 and is still running. HG includes the control and eradication of caprine arthritis encephalitis (CAE), caseous lymphadenitis (CLA) and paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in Norwegian goat herds. The profitability of participation was estimated in a financial cost–benefit analysis (CBA) using partial budgeting to quantify the economic consequences of infectious disease control through HG versus taking no action. Historical data were collected from 24 enrolled dairy goat herds and 21 herds not enrolled in HG, and supplemented with information from a questionnaire distributed to the same farmers. Expert opinions were collected to arrive at the best possible estimates. For some input parameters there were uncertainty due to imperfect knowledge, thus these parameters were modelled as PERT probability distributions and a stochastic simulation model was built. The CBA model was used to generate distributions of net present value (NPV) of farmers’ net cash flows for choosing to enroll versus not enrolling. This was done for three selected milk quota levels of 30000L, 50000L and 70000L, and both for before and after the introduction of a reduced milk price for the non-enrolled. The NPVs were calculated over time horizons of 5, 10 and 20 years using an inflation-adjusted discount rate of 2.8% per annum. The results show that participation in HG on average was profitable over a time horizon of 10 years or longer for quota levels of 50000L and 70000L, although not without risk of having a negative NPV. If farmers had to pay all the costs themselves, participation in HG would have been profitable only for a time horizon beyond 20 years. In 2012, a reduced milk price was introduced for farmers not enrolled in HG, changing the decision criteria for farmers, and thus, the CBA. When the analysis was altered to account for these changes, the expected NPV was positive over five years for the 50000L quota, indicating an increased profitability of enrolling in HG. The sensitivity analysis showed that particular attention should be paid to work load and investment costs when planning for disease control programmes in the future.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24588977</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2058-9601</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5877
ispartof Preventive veterinary medicine, 2014-05, Vol.114 (2), p.96-105
issn 0167-5877
1873-1716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508676871
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal Husbandry - methods
Animals
Caprine arthritis encephalitis
Caseous lymphadenitis
Communicable Disease Control - methods
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost–benefit
Dairying
Eradication
Goat
Goat Diseases - epidemiology
Goat Diseases - prevention & control
Goats
Johne's disease
Norway - epidemiology
Stochastic simulation
title The Norwegian Healthier Goats programme – A financial cost–benefit analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A34%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Norwegian%20Healthier%20Goats%20programme%20%E2%80%93%20A%20financial%20cost%E2%80%93benefit%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20veterinary%20medicine&rft.au=Nagel-Alne,%20G.%20Elise&rft.date=2014-05-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=96-105&rft.issn=0167-5877&rft.eissn=1873-1716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1508676871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508676871&rft_id=info:pmid/24588977&rft_els_id=S0167587714000403&rfr_iscdi=true