Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?
Aims To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images. Methods This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurourology and urodynamics 2014-03, Vol.33 (3), p.307-311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 307 |
container_title | Neurourology and urodynamics |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Kruger, Jennifer A. Dietz, Hans Peter Budgett, Stephanie C. Dumoulin, Chantale L. |
description | Aims
To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images.
Methods
This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study for women with urinary incontinence. Seventy‐two women, ≥60 years who had attended or were going to attend physiotherapy for treatment of urinary incontinence, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria from the parent study were symptoms of stress, urge or both types of urinary incontinence. The predictive ability of the following digital parameters: direct palpation of a discontinuity of the LA muscle from insertion on the pubic ramus; palpation of the distance between the muscle insertion sites; palpation of LA strength; palpation of LA tone, were analyzed against findings from tomographic transperineal ultrasound images. Correlation between methods was measured using Cohen's kappa for each of the individual parameters.
Results
Seventeen women (24%) presented with a complete or partial avulsion of the puborectalis muscle as diagnosed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. Nine women (13%) had complete avulsions, one of which was bilateral. The predictive ability of the digital assessment parameters varied from poor (k = 0.187, 95% CI [0.02–0.36]) to moderate (k = 0.569, 95% CI [0.31–0.83]). The new parameter of ‘width between insertion sites’ performed best.
Conclusions
Adding the parameter of “width between insertion sites” appears to enhance our ability to detect avulsion of the levator ani (LA) muscle by digital examination however it does not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral avulsion. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:307–311, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nau.22386 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508423722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1508423722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-a6d70bd7a0bdcc98dd1998d9a2499d7f8efb3d7ba83ef62ccaebc026752559883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EotuFA38AWeJCD9k6dmwnJ1St6BaxLQhRwc1y4gm4JPbWdrrtv8fLtj0g9eCxPPre82geQm9KsigJocdOTwtKWS2eoVnJKSmElPI5mhHJWEErIQ_QYYxXhJCaVc1LdEBZxQRlfIaul37c6GCjd7iFtAVwOAXt4gaCdaAHPA35Hf3kDNb5GPvLptw2kKBLNst8jwe40cmHDNidehr1Ai-1w1vAdtwEfwM4_QbsjYkfXqEXvR4ivL6_5-jy9OP35Vmx_rL6tDxZF11FhSi0MJK0Rupcuq6pjSmbXBtNq6Yxsq-hb5mRra4Z9IJ2nYa2I1RITjlv6prN0fu9b_7_eoKY1GhjB8OgHfgpqpKTuqJM5sXN0bv_0Cs_BZen21GSVzzbZupoT3XBxxigV5tgRx3uVEnULgeVc1D_csjs23vHqR3BPJIPi8_A8R7Y2gHunnZSFyeXD5bFXmFjgttHhQ5_lJBMcvXjYqXYt9Xn859f1-qU_QWC6qJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507545675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kruger, Jennifer A. ; Dietz, Hans Peter ; Budgett, Stephanie C. ; Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jennifer A. ; Dietz, Hans Peter ; Budgett, Stephanie C. ; Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images.
Methods
This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study for women with urinary incontinence. Seventy‐two women, ≥60 years who had attended or were going to attend physiotherapy for treatment of urinary incontinence, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria from the parent study were symptoms of stress, urge or both types of urinary incontinence. The predictive ability of the following digital parameters: direct palpation of a discontinuity of the LA muscle from insertion on the pubic ramus; palpation of the distance between the muscle insertion sites; palpation of LA strength; palpation of LA tone, were analyzed against findings from tomographic transperineal ultrasound images. Correlation between methods was measured using Cohen's kappa for each of the individual parameters.
Results
Seventeen women (24%) presented with a complete or partial avulsion of the puborectalis muscle as diagnosed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. Nine women (13%) had complete avulsions, one of which was bilateral. The predictive ability of the digital assessment parameters varied from poor (k = 0.187, 95% CI [0.02–0.36]) to moderate (k = 0.569, 95% CI [0.31–0.83]). The new parameter of ‘width between insertion sites’ performed best.
Conclusions
Adding the parameter of “width between insertion sites” appears to enhance our ability to detect avulsion of the levator ani (LA) muscle by digital examination however it does not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral avulsion. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:307–311, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.22386</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23436235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>3D ultrasound ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; digital assessment ; Female ; Gynecological Examination - methods ; Humans ; levator ani muscle ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Contraction ; Older people ; Palpation ; Parturition ; Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging ; Pelvic Floor - injuries ; Pelvic Floor - physiopathology ; Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnosis ; Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging ; Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; trauma ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnosis ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnostic imaging ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2014-03, Vol.33 (3), p.307-311</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-a6d70bd7a0bdcc98dd1998d9a2499d7f8efb3d7ba83ef62ccaebc026752559883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-a6d70bd7a0bdcc98dd1998d9a2499d7f8efb3d7ba83ef62ccaebc026752559883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.22386$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.22386$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23436235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Hans Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budgett, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodynam</addtitle><description>Aims
To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images.
Methods
This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study for women with urinary incontinence. Seventy‐two women, ≥60 years who had attended or were going to attend physiotherapy for treatment of urinary incontinence, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria from the parent study were symptoms of stress, urge or both types of urinary incontinence. The predictive ability of the following digital parameters: direct palpation of a discontinuity of the LA muscle from insertion on the pubic ramus; palpation of the distance between the muscle insertion sites; palpation of LA strength; palpation of LA tone, were analyzed against findings from tomographic transperineal ultrasound images. Correlation between methods was measured using Cohen's kappa for each of the individual parameters.
Results
Seventeen women (24%) presented with a complete or partial avulsion of the puborectalis muscle as diagnosed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. Nine women (13%) had complete avulsions, one of which was bilateral. The predictive ability of the digital assessment parameters varied from poor (k = 0.187, 95% CI [0.02–0.36]) to moderate (k = 0.569, 95% CI [0.31–0.83]). The new parameter of ‘width between insertion sites’ performed best.
Conclusions
Adding the parameter of “width between insertion sites” appears to enhance our ability to detect avulsion of the levator ani (LA) muscle by digital examination however it does not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral avulsion. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:307–311, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>3D ultrasound</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>digital assessment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecological Examination - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>levator ani muscle</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Palpation</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor - injuries</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>trauma</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EotuFA38AWeJCD9k6dmwnJ1St6BaxLQhRwc1y4gm4JPbWdrrtv8fLtj0g9eCxPPre82geQm9KsigJocdOTwtKWS2eoVnJKSmElPI5mhHJWEErIQ_QYYxXhJCaVc1LdEBZxQRlfIaul37c6GCjd7iFtAVwOAXt4gaCdaAHPA35Hf3kDNb5GPvLptw2kKBLNst8jwe40cmHDNidehr1Ai-1w1vAdtwEfwM4_QbsjYkfXqEXvR4ivL6_5-jy9OP35Vmx_rL6tDxZF11FhSi0MJK0Rupcuq6pjSmbXBtNq6Yxsq-hb5mRra4Z9IJ2nYa2I1RITjlv6prN0fu9b_7_eoKY1GhjB8OgHfgpqpKTuqJM5sXN0bv_0Cs_BZen21GSVzzbZupoT3XBxxigV5tgRx3uVEnULgeVc1D_csjs23vHqR3BPJIPi8_A8R7Y2gHunnZSFyeXD5bFXmFjgttHhQ5_lJBMcvXjYqXYt9Xn859f1-qU_QWC6qJ0</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Kruger, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Dietz, Hans Peter</creator><creator>Budgett, Stephanie C.</creator><creator>Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?</title><author>Kruger, Jennifer A. ; Dietz, Hans Peter ; Budgett, Stephanie C. ; Dumoulin, Chantale L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-a6d70bd7a0bdcc98dd1998d9a2499d7f8efb3d7ba83ef62ccaebc026752559883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>3D ultrasound</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>digital assessment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecological Examination - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>levator ani muscle</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Palpation</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor - injuries</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>trauma</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Hans Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budgett, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kruger, Jennifer A.</au><au>Dietz, Hans Peter</au><au>Budgett, Stephanie C.</au><au>Dumoulin, Chantale L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodynam</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>307-311</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims
To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images.
Methods
This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study for women with urinary incontinence. Seventy‐two women, ≥60 years who had attended or were going to attend physiotherapy for treatment of urinary incontinence, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria from the parent study were symptoms of stress, urge or both types of urinary incontinence. The predictive ability of the following digital parameters: direct palpation of a discontinuity of the LA muscle from insertion on the pubic ramus; palpation of the distance between the muscle insertion sites; palpation of LA strength; palpation of LA tone, were analyzed against findings from tomographic transperineal ultrasound images. Correlation between methods was measured using Cohen's kappa for each of the individual parameters.
Results
Seventeen women (24%) presented with a complete or partial avulsion of the puborectalis muscle as diagnosed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. Nine women (13%) had complete avulsions, one of which was bilateral. The predictive ability of the digital assessment parameters varied from poor (k = 0.187, 95% CI [0.02–0.36]) to moderate (k = 0.569, 95% CI [0.31–0.83]). The new parameter of ‘width between insertion sites’ performed best.
Conclusions
Adding the parameter of “width between insertion sites” appears to enhance our ability to detect avulsion of the levator ani (LA) muscle by digital examination however it does not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral avulsion. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:307–311, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23436235</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.22386</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-2467 |
ispartof | Neurourology and urodynamics, 2014-03, Vol.33 (3), p.307-311 |
issn | 0733-2467 1520-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508423722 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | 3D ultrasound Aged Aged, 80 and over digital assessment Female Gynecological Examination - methods Humans levator ani muscle Middle Aged Muscle Contraction Older people Palpation Parturition Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging Pelvic Floor - injuries Pelvic Floor - physiopathology Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnosis Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology Predictive Value of Tests trauma Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography Urinary incontinence Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnosis Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnostic imaging Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology |
title | Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A09%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20transperineal%20ultrasound%20and%20digital%20detection%20of%20levator%20ani%20trauma.%20Can%20we%20improve%20the%20odds?&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Kruger,%20Jennifer%20A.&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=307-311&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.22386&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1508423722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507545675&rft_id=info:pmid/23436235&rfr_iscdi=true |