Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?

Aims To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images. Methods This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2014-03, Vol.33 (3), p.307-311
Hauptverfasser: Kruger, Jennifer A., Dietz, Hans Peter, Budgett, Stephanie C., Dumoulin, Chantale L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 311
container_issue 3
container_start_page 307
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 33
creator Kruger, Jennifer A.
Dietz, Hans Peter
Budgett, Stephanie C.
Dumoulin, Chantale L.
description Aims To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images. Methods This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study for women with urinary incontinence. Seventy‐two women, ≥60 years who had attended or were going to attend physiotherapy for treatment of urinary incontinence, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria from the parent study were symptoms of stress, urge or both types of urinary incontinence. The predictive ability of the following digital parameters: direct palpation of a discontinuity of the LA muscle from insertion on the pubic ramus; palpation of the distance between the muscle insertion sites; palpation of LA strength; palpation of LA tone, were analyzed against findings from tomographic transperineal ultrasound images. Correlation between methods was measured using Cohen's kappa for each of the individual parameters. Results Seventeen women (24%) presented with a complete or partial avulsion of the puborectalis muscle as diagnosed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. Nine women (13%) had complete avulsions, one of which was bilateral. The predictive ability of the digital assessment parameters varied from poor (k = 0.187, 95% CI [0.02–0.36]) to moderate (k = 0.569, 95% CI [0.31–0.83]). The new parameter of ‘width between insertion sites’ performed best. Conclusions Adding the parameter of “width between insertion sites” appears to enhance our ability to detect avulsion of the levator ani (LA) muscle by digital examination however it does not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral avulsion. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:307–311, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.22386
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508423722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1508423722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-a6d70bd7a0bdcc98dd1998d9a2499d7f8efb3d7ba83ef62ccaebc026752559883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EotuFA38AWeJCD9k6dmwnJ1St6BaxLQhRwc1y4gm4JPbWdrrtv8fLtj0g9eCxPPre82geQm9KsigJocdOTwtKWS2eoVnJKSmElPI5mhHJWEErIQ_QYYxXhJCaVc1LdEBZxQRlfIaul37c6GCjd7iFtAVwOAXt4gaCdaAHPA35Hf3kDNb5GPvLptw2kKBLNst8jwe40cmHDNidehr1Ai-1w1vAdtwEfwM4_QbsjYkfXqEXvR4ivL6_5-jy9OP35Vmx_rL6tDxZF11FhSi0MJK0Rupcuq6pjSmbXBtNq6Yxsq-hb5mRra4Z9IJ2nYa2I1RITjlv6prN0fu9b_7_eoKY1GhjB8OgHfgpqpKTuqJM5sXN0bv_0Cs_BZen21GSVzzbZupoT3XBxxigV5tgRx3uVEnULgeVc1D_csjs23vHqR3BPJIPi8_A8R7Y2gHunnZSFyeXD5bFXmFjgttHhQ5_lJBMcvXjYqXYt9Xn859f1-qU_QWC6qJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507545675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kruger, Jennifer A. ; Dietz, Hans Peter ; Budgett, Stephanie C. ; Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jennifer A. ; Dietz, Hans Peter ; Budgett, Stephanie C. ; Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images. Methods This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study for women with urinary incontinence. Seventy‐two women, ≥60 years who had attended or were going to attend physiotherapy for treatment of urinary incontinence, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria from the parent study were symptoms of stress, urge or both types of urinary incontinence. The predictive ability of the following digital parameters: direct palpation of a discontinuity of the LA muscle from insertion on the pubic ramus; palpation of the distance between the muscle insertion sites; palpation of LA strength; palpation of LA tone, were analyzed against findings from tomographic transperineal ultrasound images. Correlation between methods was measured using Cohen's kappa for each of the individual parameters. Results Seventeen women (24%) presented with a complete or partial avulsion of the puborectalis muscle as diagnosed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. Nine women (13%) had complete avulsions, one of which was bilateral. The predictive ability of the digital assessment parameters varied from poor (k = 0.187, 95% CI [0.02–0.36]) to moderate (k = 0.569, 95% CI [0.31–0.83]). The new parameter of ‘width between insertion sites’ performed best. Conclusions Adding the parameter of “width between insertion sites” appears to enhance our ability to detect avulsion of the levator ani (LA) muscle by digital examination however it does not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral avulsion. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:307–311, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.22386</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23436235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>3D ultrasound ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; digital assessment ; Female ; Gynecological Examination - methods ; Humans ; levator ani muscle ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Contraction ; Older people ; Palpation ; Parturition ; Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging ; Pelvic Floor - injuries ; Pelvic Floor - physiopathology ; Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnosis ; Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging ; Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; trauma ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnosis ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnostic imaging ; Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2014-03, Vol.33 (3), p.307-311</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-a6d70bd7a0bdcc98dd1998d9a2499d7f8efb3d7ba83ef62ccaebc026752559883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-a6d70bd7a0bdcc98dd1998d9a2499d7f8efb3d7ba83ef62ccaebc026752559883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.22386$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.22386$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23436235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Hans Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budgett, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodynam</addtitle><description>Aims To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images. Methods This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study for women with urinary incontinence. Seventy‐two women, ≥60 years who had attended or were going to attend physiotherapy for treatment of urinary incontinence, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria from the parent study were symptoms of stress, urge or both types of urinary incontinence. The predictive ability of the following digital parameters: direct palpation of a discontinuity of the LA muscle from insertion on the pubic ramus; palpation of the distance between the muscle insertion sites; palpation of LA strength; palpation of LA tone, were analyzed against findings from tomographic transperineal ultrasound images. Correlation between methods was measured using Cohen's kappa for each of the individual parameters. Results Seventeen women (24%) presented with a complete or partial avulsion of the puborectalis muscle as diagnosed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. Nine women (13%) had complete avulsions, one of which was bilateral. The predictive ability of the digital assessment parameters varied from poor (k = 0.187, 95% CI [0.02–0.36]) to moderate (k = 0.569, 95% CI [0.31–0.83]). The new parameter of ‘width between insertion sites’ performed best. Conclusions Adding the parameter of “width between insertion sites” appears to enhance our ability to detect avulsion of the levator ani (LA) muscle by digital examination however it does not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral avulsion. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:307–311, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>3D ultrasound</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>digital assessment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecological Examination - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>levator ani muscle</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Palpation</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor - injuries</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>trauma</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnosis</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EotuFA38AWeJCD9k6dmwnJ1St6BaxLQhRwc1y4gm4JPbWdrrtv8fLtj0g9eCxPPre82geQm9KsigJocdOTwtKWS2eoVnJKSmElPI5mhHJWEErIQ_QYYxXhJCaVc1LdEBZxQRlfIaul37c6GCjd7iFtAVwOAXt4gaCdaAHPA35Hf3kDNb5GPvLptw2kKBLNst8jwe40cmHDNidehr1Ai-1w1vAdtwEfwM4_QbsjYkfXqEXvR4ivL6_5-jy9OP35Vmx_rL6tDxZF11FhSi0MJK0Rupcuq6pjSmbXBtNq6Yxsq-hb5mRra4Z9IJ2nYa2I1RITjlv6prN0fu9b_7_eoKY1GhjB8OgHfgpqpKTuqJM5sXN0bv_0Cs_BZen21GSVzzbZupoT3XBxxigV5tgRx3uVEnULgeVc1D_csjs23vHqR3BPJIPi8_A8R7Y2gHunnZSFyeXD5bFXmFjgttHhQ5_lJBMcvXjYqXYt9Xn859f1-qU_QWC6qJ0</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Kruger, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Dietz, Hans Peter</creator><creator>Budgett, Stephanie C.</creator><creator>Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?</title><author>Kruger, Jennifer A. ; Dietz, Hans Peter ; Budgett, Stephanie C. ; Dumoulin, Chantale L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4266-a6d70bd7a0bdcc98dd1998d9a2499d7f8efb3d7ba83ef62ccaebc026752559883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>3D ultrasound</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>digital assessment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecological Examination - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>levator ani muscle</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Palpation</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor - injuries</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>trauma</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnosis</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Hans Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budgett, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumoulin, Chantale L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kruger, Jennifer A.</au><au>Dietz, Hans Peter</au><au>Budgett, Stephanie C.</au><au>Dumoulin, Chantale L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodynam</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>307-311</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims To investigate the predictive ability of four digital assessment parameters to detect levator ani (LA) muscle defects (avulsion injury) and compare these to transperineal tomographic ultrasound images. Methods This was an observational study imbedded in a larger quasi‐experimental cohort study for women with urinary incontinence. Seventy‐two women, ≥60 years who had attended or were going to attend physiotherapy for treatment of urinary incontinence, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria from the parent study were symptoms of stress, urge or both types of urinary incontinence. The predictive ability of the following digital parameters: direct palpation of a discontinuity of the LA muscle from insertion on the pubic ramus; palpation of the distance between the muscle insertion sites; palpation of LA strength; palpation of LA tone, were analyzed against findings from tomographic transperineal ultrasound images. Correlation between methods was measured using Cohen's kappa for each of the individual parameters. Results Seventeen women (24%) presented with a complete or partial avulsion of the puborectalis muscle as diagnosed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. Nine women (13%) had complete avulsions, one of which was bilateral. The predictive ability of the digital assessment parameters varied from poor (k = 0.187, 95% CI [0.02–0.36]) to moderate (k = 0.569, 95% CI [0.31–0.83]). The new parameter of ‘width between insertion sites’ performed best. Conclusions Adding the parameter of “width between insertion sites” appears to enhance our ability to detect avulsion of the levator ani (LA) muscle by digital examination however it does not distinguish between unilateral or bilateral avulsion. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:307–311, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23436235</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.22386</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 2014-03, Vol.33 (3), p.307-311
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508423722
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 3D ultrasound
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
digital assessment
Female
Gynecological Examination - methods
Humans
levator ani muscle
Middle Aged
Muscle Contraction
Older people
Palpation
Parturition
Pelvic Floor - diagnostic imaging
Pelvic Floor - injuries
Pelvic Floor - physiopathology
Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnosis
Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging
Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology
Predictive Value of Tests
trauma
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography
Urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnosis
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - diagnostic imaging
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology
Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnosis
Urinary Incontinence, Urge - diagnostic imaging
Urinary Incontinence, Urge - physiopathology
title Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A09%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20transperineal%20ultrasound%20and%20digital%20detection%20of%20levator%20ani%20trauma.%20Can%20we%20improve%20the%20odds?&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Kruger,%20Jennifer%20A.&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=307-311&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.22386&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1508423722%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507545675&rft_id=info:pmid/23436235&rfr_iscdi=true