Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases
Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic inf...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.654-660 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 660 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 654 |
container_title | Gynecologic oncology |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Bai, Huimin Yang, Jiaxin Cao, Dongyan Huang, Huifang Xiang, Yang Wu, Ming Cui, Quancai Chen, Jie Lang, Jinghe Shen, Keng |
description | Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. Results A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P < 0.0001, = 0.0041, and = 0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P < 0.0001, = 0.0020, and = 0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P = 0.0137 and = 0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P = 0.1187 and = 0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P = 0.0810 and = 0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR. Conclusion Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508422253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825813013966</els_id><sourcerecordid>1508422253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-b932ebe896ab8ada1488592d12703e73f7357e96534125d5a1cbff99d65a3cb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFX4CEfOSS4LHjbIwEUlVBQarUQ9uz5diTlZck3trJovx7HLZw4MJpLPk9j9_3CHkLrAQG9Yd9ueyWMZScgSiBl0zwF2QDTMmibqR6STaMKVY0XDbn5CKlPWNMMOCvyDmvKuAAfEOe7o4mLtSMjs4TxjkV6WCiH3f0EINFN0dMtAuR9uFnsYvGIcXRhQGn6E1P0xTDsE4TbT58pFc05quQDmgnf8QsmN1CQ0dBCmpNwvSanHWmT_jmeV6Sx69fHq6_Fbd3N9-vr24LWzVsKlolOLbYqNq0jXEGqiaH4g74lgncim4r5BZVLUWOIp00YNuuU8rV0gjb1uKSvD-9m4M8zZgmPfhkse_NiGFOGiRrKs65FFkqTlKbf54idvoQ_ZC5aGB6Za33-jdrvbLWwHVmnV3vnhfM7YDur-cP3Cz4dBJgjnn0GHWyHsdM1ceMR7vg_7Pg8z9-2_vRW9P_wAXTPsxxzAQ16JQN-n6te20bcstC1bX4BVt-puE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508422253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bai, Huimin ; Yang, Jiaxin ; Cao, Dongyan ; Huang, Huifang ; Xiang, Yang ; Wu, Ming ; Cui, Quancai ; Chen, Jie ; Lang, Jinghe ; Shen, Keng</creator><creatorcontrib>Bai, Huimin ; Yang, Jiaxin ; Cao, Dongyan ; Huang, Huifang ; Xiang, Yang ; Wu, Ming ; Cui, Quancai ; Chen, Jie ; Lang, Jinghe ; Shen, Keng</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. Results A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P < 0.0001, = 0.0041, and = 0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P < 0.0001, = 0.0020, and = 0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P = 0.0137 and = 0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P = 0.1187 and = 0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P = 0.0810 and = 0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR. Conclusion Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24412112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology ; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery ; Endometrial stromal sarcoma ; ESS ; Female ; Fertility Preservation - methods ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Low grade ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Ovary - surgery ; Pregnancy ; Prognosis ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - pathology ; Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - surgery ; Treatment ; Uterus - surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.654-660</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-b932ebe896ab8ada1488592d12703e73f7357e96534125d5a1cbff99d65a3cb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-b932ebe896ab8ada1488592d12703e73f7357e96534125d5a1cbff99d65a3cb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825813013966$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24412112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bai, Huimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Dongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Quancai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Jinghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Keng</creatorcontrib><title>Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. Results A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P < 0.0001, = 0.0041, and = 0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P < 0.0001, = 0.0020, and = 0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P = 0.0137 and = 0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P = 0.1187 and = 0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P = 0.0810 and = 0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR. Conclusion Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Endometrial stromal sarcoma</subject><subject>ESS</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low grade</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovary - surgery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - pathology</subject><subject>Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Uterus - surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFX4CEfOSS4LHjbIwEUlVBQarUQ9uz5diTlZck3trJovx7HLZw4MJpLPk9j9_3CHkLrAQG9Yd9ueyWMZScgSiBl0zwF2QDTMmibqR6STaMKVY0XDbn5CKlPWNMMOCvyDmvKuAAfEOe7o4mLtSMjs4TxjkV6WCiH3f0EINFN0dMtAuR9uFnsYvGIcXRhQGn6E1P0xTDsE4TbT58pFc05quQDmgnf8QsmN1CQ0dBCmpNwvSanHWmT_jmeV6Sx69fHq6_Fbd3N9-vr24LWzVsKlolOLbYqNq0jXEGqiaH4g74lgncim4r5BZVLUWOIp00YNuuU8rV0gjb1uKSvD-9m4M8zZgmPfhkse_NiGFOGiRrKs65FFkqTlKbf54idvoQ_ZC5aGB6Za33-jdrvbLWwHVmnV3vnhfM7YDur-cP3Cz4dBJgjnn0GHWyHsdM1ceMR7vg_7Pg8z9-2_vRW9P_wAXTPsxxzAQ16JQN-n6te20bcstC1bX4BVt-puE</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Bai, Huimin</creator><creator>Yang, Jiaxin</creator><creator>Cao, Dongyan</creator><creator>Huang, Huifang</creator><creator>Xiang, Yang</creator><creator>Wu, Ming</creator><creator>Cui, Quancai</creator><creator>Chen, Jie</creator><creator>Lang, Jinghe</creator><creator>Shen, Keng</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases</title><author>Bai, Huimin ; Yang, Jiaxin ; Cao, Dongyan ; Huang, Huifang ; Xiang, Yang ; Wu, Ming ; Cui, Quancai ; Chen, Jie ; Lang, Jinghe ; Shen, Keng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-b932ebe896ab8ada1488592d12703e73f7357e96534125d5a1cbff99d65a3cb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Endometrial stromal sarcoma</topic><topic>ESS</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low grade</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovary - surgery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - pathology</topic><topic>Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Uterus - surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bai, Huimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Dongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Quancai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Jinghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Keng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bai, Huimin</au><au>Yang, Jiaxin</au><au>Cao, Dongyan</au><au>Huang, Huifang</au><au>Xiang, Yang</au><au>Wu, Ming</au><au>Cui, Quancai</au><au>Chen, Jie</au><au>Lang, Jinghe</au><au>Shen, Keng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>654</spage><epage>660</epage><pages>654-660</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. Results A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P < 0.0001, = 0.0041, and = 0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P < 0.0001, = 0.0020, and = 0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P = 0.0137 and = 0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P = 0.1187 and = 0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P = 0.0810 and = 0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR. Conclusion Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24412112</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.032</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-8258 |
ispartof | Gynecologic oncology, 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.654-660 |
issn | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508422253 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery Endometrial stromal sarcoma ESS Female Fertility Preservation - methods Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Low grade Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Obstetrics and Gynecology Ovary - surgery Pregnancy Prognosis Radiotherapy, Adjuvant Recurrence Retrospective Studies Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - pathology Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - surgery Treatment Uterus - surgery Young Adult |
title | Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A06%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ovary%20and%20uterus-sparing%20procedures%20for%20low-grade%20endometrial%20stromal%20sarcoma:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20of%20153%20cases&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Bai,%20Huimin&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=654&rft.epage=660&rft.pages=654-660&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1508422253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508422253&rft_id=info:pmid/24412112&rft_els_id=S0090825813013966&rfr_iscdi=true |