Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases

Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic inf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.654-660
Hauptverfasser: Bai, Huimin, Yang, Jiaxin, Cao, Dongyan, Huang, Huifang, Xiang, Yang, Wu, Ming, Cui, Quancai, Chen, Jie, Lang, Jinghe, Shen, Keng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 660
container_issue 3
container_start_page 654
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 132
creator Bai, Huimin
Yang, Jiaxin
Cao, Dongyan
Huang, Huifang
Xiang, Yang
Wu, Ming
Cui, Quancai
Chen, Jie
Lang, Jinghe
Shen, Keng
description Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. Results A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P < 0.0001, = 0.0041, and = 0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P < 0.0001, = 0.0020, and = 0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P = 0.0137 and = 0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P = 0.1187 and = 0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P = 0.0810 and = 0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR. Conclusion Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508422253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825813013966</els_id><sourcerecordid>1508422253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-b932ebe896ab8ada1488592d12703e73f7357e96534125d5a1cbff99d65a3cb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFX4CEfOSS4LHjbIwEUlVBQarUQ9uz5diTlZck3trJovx7HLZw4MJpLPk9j9_3CHkLrAQG9Yd9ueyWMZScgSiBl0zwF2QDTMmibqR6STaMKVY0XDbn5CKlPWNMMOCvyDmvKuAAfEOe7o4mLtSMjs4TxjkV6WCiH3f0EINFN0dMtAuR9uFnsYvGIcXRhQGn6E1P0xTDsE4TbT58pFc05quQDmgnf8QsmN1CQ0dBCmpNwvSanHWmT_jmeV6Sx69fHq6_Fbd3N9-vr24LWzVsKlolOLbYqNq0jXEGqiaH4g74lgncim4r5BZVLUWOIp00YNuuU8rV0gjb1uKSvD-9m4M8zZgmPfhkse_NiGFOGiRrKs65FFkqTlKbf54idvoQ_ZC5aGB6Za33-jdrvbLWwHVmnV3vnhfM7YDur-cP3Cz4dBJgjnn0GHWyHsdM1ceMR7vg_7Pg8z9-2_vRW9P_wAXTPsxxzAQ16JQN-n6te20bcstC1bX4BVt-puE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1508422253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bai, Huimin ; Yang, Jiaxin ; Cao, Dongyan ; Huang, Huifang ; Xiang, Yang ; Wu, Ming ; Cui, Quancai ; Chen, Jie ; Lang, Jinghe ; Shen, Keng</creator><creatorcontrib>Bai, Huimin ; Yang, Jiaxin ; Cao, Dongyan ; Huang, Huifang ; Xiang, Yang ; Wu, Ming ; Cui, Quancai ; Chen, Jie ; Lang, Jinghe ; Shen, Keng</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. Results A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P &lt; 0.0001, = 0.0041, and = 0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P &lt; 0.0001, = 0.0020, and = 0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P = 0.0137 and = 0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P = 0.1187 and = 0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P = 0.0810 and = 0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR. Conclusion Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24412112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology ; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery ; Endometrial stromal sarcoma ; ESS ; Female ; Fertility Preservation - methods ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Low grade ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Ovary - surgery ; Pregnancy ; Prognosis ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - pathology ; Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - surgery ; Treatment ; Uterus - surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.654-660</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-b932ebe896ab8ada1488592d12703e73f7357e96534125d5a1cbff99d65a3cb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-b932ebe896ab8ada1488592d12703e73f7357e96534125d5a1cbff99d65a3cb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825813013966$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24412112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bai, Huimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Dongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Quancai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Jinghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Keng</creatorcontrib><title>Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. Results A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P &lt; 0.0001, = 0.0041, and = 0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P &lt; 0.0001, = 0.0020, and = 0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P = 0.0137 and = 0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P = 0.1187 and = 0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P = 0.0810 and = 0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR. Conclusion Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Endometrial stromal sarcoma</subject><subject>ESS</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low grade</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovary - surgery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - pathology</subject><subject>Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Uterus - surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERbeFX4CEfOSS4LHjbIwEUlVBQarUQ9uz5diTlZck3trJovx7HLZw4MJpLPk9j9_3CHkLrAQG9Yd9ueyWMZScgSiBl0zwF2QDTMmibqR6STaMKVY0XDbn5CKlPWNMMOCvyDmvKuAAfEOe7o4mLtSMjs4TxjkV6WCiH3f0EINFN0dMtAuR9uFnsYvGIcXRhQGn6E1P0xTDsE4TbT58pFc05quQDmgnf8QsmN1CQ0dBCmpNwvSanHWmT_jmeV6Sx69fHq6_Fbd3N9-vr24LWzVsKlolOLbYqNq0jXEGqiaH4g74lgncim4r5BZVLUWOIp00YNuuU8rV0gjb1uKSvD-9m4M8zZgmPfhkse_NiGFOGiRrKs65FFkqTlKbf54idvoQ_ZC5aGB6Za33-jdrvbLWwHVmnV3vnhfM7YDur-cP3Cz4dBJgjnn0GHWyHsdM1ceMR7vg_7Pg8z9-2_vRW9P_wAXTPsxxzAQ16JQN-n6te20bcstC1bX4BVt-puE</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Bai, Huimin</creator><creator>Yang, Jiaxin</creator><creator>Cao, Dongyan</creator><creator>Huang, Huifang</creator><creator>Xiang, Yang</creator><creator>Wu, Ming</creator><creator>Cui, Quancai</creator><creator>Chen, Jie</creator><creator>Lang, Jinghe</creator><creator>Shen, Keng</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases</title><author>Bai, Huimin ; Yang, Jiaxin ; Cao, Dongyan ; Huang, Huifang ; Xiang, Yang ; Wu, Ming ; Cui, Quancai ; Chen, Jie ; Lang, Jinghe ; Shen, Keng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-b932ebe896ab8ada1488592d12703e73f7357e96534125d5a1cbff99d65a3cb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Endometrial stromal sarcoma</topic><topic>ESS</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low grade</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovary - surgery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - pathology</topic><topic>Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Uterus - surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bai, Huimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Dongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Huifang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Quancai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Jinghe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Keng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bai, Huimin</au><au>Yang, Jiaxin</au><au>Cao, Dongyan</au><au>Huang, Huifang</au><au>Xiang, Yang</au><au>Wu, Ming</au><au>Cui, Quancai</au><au>Chen, Jie</au><au>Lang, Jinghe</au><au>Shen, Keng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>654</spage><epage>660</epage><pages>654-660</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To discuss the optimal treatment options for low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods Medical records of consecutive patients with LG-ESS in our institute were collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. Results A total of 153 cases of LG-ESS were included. The 5-year relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and survival after relapse (SAR) rates were 66.1%, 95.8% and 82.9%, respectively. Ovary-sparing procedures, positive resection-margins, and myomectomy were the independent adverse factors for relapse (P &lt; 0.0001, = 0.0041, and = 0.0075, respectively). Post-menopause, cervical involvement, and positive lymphovascular space involvement were significantly associated with survival (P &lt; 0.0001, = 0.0020, and = 0.0163, respectively). Distance recurrence and macroscopically residual tumors negatively affected SAR (P = 0.0137 and = 0.0004, respectively). No benefit was found for lymphadenectomy in terms of both RFS and OS (P = 0.1187 and = 0.5138, respectively). Initial ovary-sparing procedures and myomectomy had no impact on OS (P = 0.0810 and = 0.8845, respectively). Adjuvant treatment had a slightly beneficial effect both on OS and SAR. Conclusion Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and complete resection of the macroscopic lesion should be treated as the initial and salvage mainstay treatments for LG-ESS patients. Ovary-sparing procedures could be considered for young women without cervical involvement; however, long-term follow-up should be mandatory. Myomectomy should only be conserved for young patients with a strong desire for future fertility, with fully informed consent; hysterectomy was recommended after the completion of pregnancy and delivery. However, the roles of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant treatment deserve further investigation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24412112</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.032</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2014-03, Vol.132 (3), p.654-660
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508422253
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology
Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery
Endometrial stromal sarcoma
ESS
Female
Fertility Preservation - methods
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Low grade
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovary - surgery
Pregnancy
Prognosis
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - pathology
Sarcoma, Endometrial Stromal - surgery
Treatment
Uterus - surgery
Young Adult
title Ovary and uterus-sparing procedures for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study of 153 cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A06%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ovary%20and%20uterus-sparing%20procedures%20for%20low-grade%20endometrial%20stromal%20sarcoma:%20A%20retrospective%20study%20of%20153%20cases&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Bai,%20Huimin&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=654&rft.epage=660&rft.pages=654-660&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1508422253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1508422253&rft_id=info:pmid/24412112&rft_els_id=S0090825813013966&rfr_iscdi=true