Prevalence of Arrhythmias Late After the Fontan Operation

The extracardiac conduit (ECC) modification of the Fontan procedure has been theorized to reduce the risk of sinus node dysfunction and atrial arrhythmia compared with the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) Fontan. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of early and late arrhythmias in patients w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2014-04, Vol.113 (7), p.1184-1188
Hauptverfasser: Lasa, Javier J., MD, Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE, Daga, Ankana, MD, Shah, Maully, MBBS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1188
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1184
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 113
creator Lasa, Javier J., MD
Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE
Daga, Ankana, MD
Shah, Maully, MBBS
description The extracardiac conduit (ECC) modification of the Fontan procedure has been theorized to reduce the risk of sinus node dysfunction and atrial arrhythmia compared with the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) Fontan. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of early and late arrhythmias in patients who underwent ECC and ILT Fontan from a similar era with long-term follow-up at a single institution. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent ECC or ILT Fontan from 1995 to 2005 at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Bradyarrhythmias (including sinus node dysfunction), tachyarrhythmias, and pacemaker burden prevalence was determined throughout early (30 days) postoperative periods. Of 434 patients undergoing the Fontan procedure during the study period, a total of 87 and 106 patients who underwent ECC and ILT Fontan, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in risk of sinus node dysfunction or tachyarrhythmia in both early and late postoperative periods. Although the overall risk of late postoperative pacemaker therapy was lower for the ECC cohort (4.9% vs 15.7%, p = 0.03), when adjusting for follow-up time, no significant difference was observed (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 15.2, p = 0.16). In conclusion, the overall prevalence of late postoperative arrhythmias observed after contemporary Fontan modifications is low. Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia, a potentially fatal complication of the atriopulmonary Fontan operation was infrequently encountered in both ECC and ILT Fontan cohorts. Pacemaker use was higher in the ILT group, although this difference may be explained by differences in follow-up time. Despite the low prevalence of arrhythmias after contemporary Fontan modifications, ongoing surveillance is warranted as the onset of arrhythmias may emerge after longer follow-up time.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508415700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914914000514</els_id><sourcerecordid>3559692361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-12a5ba7a4602e4fff4da1f605194f1264620e87ff0d451eab6337928d14b23913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5QGL3vptiqdpKcvyrC4KgysoJ5DJl1h0vbHmGQW5t-bZkaFvXhKAk-9qXqKsdcIFQKqd31lxt6a0FUcsK6QV8DlE7bCddOW2GL9lK0AgJctivaKvYixz09EqZ6zKy4k1qKBFWu_BnowA02WitkVmxD2p7QfvYnF1iQqNi5RKNKeirt5SmYq7g8UTPLz9JI9c2aI9OpyXrMfdx-_334ut_efvtxutqWVKFKJ3MidaYxQwEk450Rn0CmQ2AqHXAnFgdaNc9DlpsjsVF03LV93KHa8znNcs5tz7iHMv44Ukx59tDQMZqL5GDVKWAuUDUBG3z5C-_kYptydRiVki42CJlPyTNkwxxjI6UPwowknjaAXt7rXF7d6cauR6-w21725pB93I3V_q_7IzMCHM0BZx4OnoKP1i9nOB7JJd7P_7xfvHyXYwU_emuEnnSj-m0bHXKC_LQte9osi37Lu-jdAU564</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1645917607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of Arrhythmias Late After the Fontan Operation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Lasa, Javier J., MD ; Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE ; Daga, Ankana, MD ; Shah, Maully, MBBS</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasa, Javier J., MD ; Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE ; Daga, Ankana, MD ; Shah, Maully, MBBS</creatorcontrib><description>The extracardiac conduit (ECC) modification of the Fontan procedure has been theorized to reduce the risk of sinus node dysfunction and atrial arrhythmia compared with the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) Fontan. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of early and late arrhythmias in patients who underwent ECC and ILT Fontan from a similar era with long-term follow-up at a single institution. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent ECC or ILT Fontan from 1995 to 2005 at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Bradyarrhythmias (including sinus node dysfunction), tachyarrhythmias, and pacemaker burden prevalence was determined throughout early (&lt;30 days) and late (&gt;30 days) postoperative periods. Of 434 patients undergoing the Fontan procedure during the study period, a total of 87 and 106 patients who underwent ECC and ILT Fontan, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in risk of sinus node dysfunction or tachyarrhythmia in both early and late postoperative periods. Although the overall risk of late postoperative pacemaker therapy was lower for the ECC cohort (4.9% vs 15.7%, p = 0.03), when adjusting for follow-up time, no significant difference was observed (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 15.2, p = 0.16). In conclusion, the overall prevalence of late postoperative arrhythmias observed after contemporary Fontan modifications is low. Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia, a potentially fatal complication of the atriopulmonary Fontan operation was infrequently encountered in both ECC and ILT Fontan cohorts. Pacemaker use was higher in the ILT group, although this difference may be explained by differences in follow-up time. Despite the low prevalence of arrhythmias after contemporary Fontan modifications, ongoing surveillance is warranted as the onset of arrhythmias may emerge after longer follow-up time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24513470</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCDAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - epidemiology ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiovascular ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children &amp; youth ; Confidence intervals ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fontan Procedure - adverse effects ; Heart ; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology ; Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Morphology ; Multivariate analysis ; Philadelphia - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications ; Postoperative period ; Prevalence ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sinuses ; Time Factors ; Variables</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2014-04, Vol.113 (7), p.1184-1188</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 1, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-12a5ba7a4602e4fff4da1f605194f1264620e87ff0d451eab6337928d14b23913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-12a5ba7a4602e4fff4da1f605194f1264620e87ff0d451eab6337928d14b23913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1645917607?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24513470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasa, Javier J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daga, Ankana, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Maully, MBBS</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of Arrhythmias Late After the Fontan Operation</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>The extracardiac conduit (ECC) modification of the Fontan procedure has been theorized to reduce the risk of sinus node dysfunction and atrial arrhythmia compared with the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) Fontan. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of early and late arrhythmias in patients who underwent ECC and ILT Fontan from a similar era with long-term follow-up at a single institution. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent ECC or ILT Fontan from 1995 to 2005 at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Bradyarrhythmias (including sinus node dysfunction), tachyarrhythmias, and pacemaker burden prevalence was determined throughout early (&lt;30 days) and late (&gt;30 days) postoperative periods. Of 434 patients undergoing the Fontan procedure during the study period, a total of 87 and 106 patients who underwent ECC and ILT Fontan, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in risk of sinus node dysfunction or tachyarrhythmia in both early and late postoperative periods. Although the overall risk of late postoperative pacemaker therapy was lower for the ECC cohort (4.9% vs 15.7%, p = 0.03), when adjusting for follow-up time, no significant difference was observed (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 15.2, p = 0.16). In conclusion, the overall prevalence of late postoperative arrhythmias observed after contemporary Fontan modifications is low. Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia, a potentially fatal complication of the atriopulmonary Fontan operation was infrequently encountered in both ECC and ILT Fontan cohorts. Pacemaker use was higher in the ILT group, although this difference may be explained by differences in follow-up time. Despite the low prevalence of arrhythmias after contemporary Fontan modifications, ongoing surveillance is warranted as the onset of arrhythmias may emerge after longer follow-up time.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - epidemiology</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fontan Procedure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Philadelphia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5QGL3vptiqdpKcvyrC4KgysoJ5DJl1h0vbHmGQW5t-bZkaFvXhKAk-9qXqKsdcIFQKqd31lxt6a0FUcsK6QV8DlE7bCddOW2GL9lK0AgJctivaKvYixz09EqZ6zKy4k1qKBFWu_BnowA02WitkVmxD2p7QfvYnF1iQqNi5RKNKeirt5SmYq7g8UTPLz9JI9c2aI9OpyXrMfdx-_334ut_efvtxutqWVKFKJ3MidaYxQwEk450Rn0CmQ2AqHXAnFgdaNc9DlpsjsVF03LV93KHa8znNcs5tz7iHMv44Ukx59tDQMZqL5GDVKWAuUDUBG3z5C-_kYptydRiVki42CJlPyTNkwxxjI6UPwowknjaAXt7rXF7d6cauR6-w21725pB93I3V_q_7IzMCHM0BZx4OnoKP1i9nOB7JJd7P_7xfvHyXYwU_emuEnnSj-m0bHXKC_LQte9osi37Lu-jdAU564</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Lasa, Javier J., MD</creator><creator>Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE</creator><creator>Daga, Ankana, MD</creator><creator>Shah, Maully, MBBS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Prevalence of Arrhythmias Late After the Fontan Operation</title><author>Lasa, Javier J., MD ; Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE ; Daga, Ankana, MD ; Shah, Maully, MBBS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-12a5ba7a4602e4fff4da1f605194f1264620e87ff0d451eab6337928d14b23913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - epidemiology</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fontan Procedure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Philadelphia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasa, Javier J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daga, Ankana, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Maully, MBBS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasa, Javier J., MD</au><au>Glatz, Andrew C., MD, MSCE</au><au>Daga, Ankana, MD</au><au>Shah, Maully, MBBS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of Arrhythmias Late After the Fontan Operation</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1184</spage><epage>1188</epage><pages>1184-1188</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><coden>AJCDAG</coden><abstract>The extracardiac conduit (ECC) modification of the Fontan procedure has been theorized to reduce the risk of sinus node dysfunction and atrial arrhythmia compared with the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) Fontan. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of early and late arrhythmias in patients who underwent ECC and ILT Fontan from a similar era with long-term follow-up at a single institution. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients who underwent ECC or ILT Fontan from 1995 to 2005 at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Bradyarrhythmias (including sinus node dysfunction), tachyarrhythmias, and pacemaker burden prevalence was determined throughout early (&lt;30 days) and late (&gt;30 days) postoperative periods. Of 434 patients undergoing the Fontan procedure during the study period, a total of 87 and 106 patients who underwent ECC and ILT Fontan, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in risk of sinus node dysfunction or tachyarrhythmia in both early and late postoperative periods. Although the overall risk of late postoperative pacemaker therapy was lower for the ECC cohort (4.9% vs 15.7%, p = 0.03), when adjusting for follow-up time, no significant difference was observed (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 0.6 to 15.2, p = 0.16). In conclusion, the overall prevalence of late postoperative arrhythmias observed after contemporary Fontan modifications is low. Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia, a potentially fatal complication of the atriopulmonary Fontan operation was infrequently encountered in both ECC and ILT Fontan cohorts. Pacemaker use was higher in the ILT group, although this difference may be explained by differences in follow-up time. Despite the low prevalence of arrhythmias after contemporary Fontan modifications, ongoing surveillance is warranted as the onset of arrhythmias may emerge after longer follow-up time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24513470</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.025</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 2014-04, Vol.113 (7), p.1184-1188
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1508415700
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Age
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - epidemiology
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - etiology
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiovascular
Child
Child, Preschool
Children & youth
Confidence intervals
Electrocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fontan Procedure - adverse effects
Heart
Heart Conduction System - physiopathology
Heart Defects, Congenital - surgery
Hospitals
Humans
Infant
Male
Morphology
Multivariate analysis
Philadelphia - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications
Postoperative period
Prevalence
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sinuses
Time Factors
Variables
title Prevalence of Arrhythmias Late After the Fontan Operation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A46%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20Arrhythmias%20Late%20After%20the%20Fontan%20Operation&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Lasa,%20Javier%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1184&rft.epage=1188&rft.pages=1184-1188&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft.coden=AJCDAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3559692361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1645917607&rft_id=info:pmid/24513470&rft_els_id=S0002914914000514&rfr_iscdi=true