The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients
Purpose Quality of life (QL) is a key outcome for advanced disease cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has developed the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire, a short version of the QLQ-C30 for palliative care. The aim of the present study is to validate the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2014-04, Vol.23 (3), p.849-855 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 855 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 849 |
container_title | Quality of life research |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Arraras, Juan Ignacio de la Vega, Fernando Arias Asin, Gemma Rico, Mikel Zarandona, Uxue Eito, Clara Cambra, Koldo Barrondo, Marta Errasti, Marta Verdún, Juan Rivadeneira, Jose Dominguez, Miguel Angel |
description | Purpose Quality of life (QL) is a key outcome for advanced disease cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has developed the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire, a short version of the QLQ-C30 for palliative care. The aim of the present study is to validate the QLQ-C15-PAL for use with Spanish patients with bone metastasis. Methods For this study, we used a consecutive sample of stage IV cancer patients with bone metastases who started radiotherapy with palliative intention. Two assessments were proposed for each patient: one on the first day of treatment and one a month after the end of the radiotherapy sessions. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability, and validity was undertaken. Results One hundred and sixteen patients completed the first questionnaire and seventy five completed the second. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all items met the standards for convergent validity, and all except the fatigue scale met the standards for divergent validity. Cronbach's coefficient met the 0.7 alpha criterion on all scales except pain (second assessment). Most QLQ-C15-PAL areas had low-to-moderate correlations with the other areas. Significant differences appeared in the comparisons between groups with regard to: patients who died before the second assessment (six areas); patients receiving chemotherapy before starting radiotherapy in the two assessments (three and four areas, respectively); the performance status in the two assessments (nine and eight areas); and the number of RT sessions received (four). Quality of life was better in the second assessment in nine areas. Conclusion The QLQ-C15-PAL is a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish patients. These results are in line with those of other validation studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11136-013-0511-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1507799640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24726383</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24726383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a50cb94eb00906fdd1b85c0da2a11607f27669054567b6dde20f5fb73781d64f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qGzEUhUVJSZykD9BFiqCbbNTeq18ru2DSHzCkSd1NN0Iz0iRj7BlXmink7StnkhK6KAgE0nfOvXyEvEX4gADmY0ZEoRmgYKAQmX1FZqiMYFxLe0BmYDVnVkhxRI5zXgPA3AI_JEdcAnBp7Iz8XN1HenV9u1rQm-UNW6Bi3y6X9NcY89D2XefbFC_ob79pg98_0DyM4YE2faLfd75r8z2t-i7SbRx8Lidmuitg7IZ8Sl43fpPjm6f7hPz4dLVafGHL689fF5dLVgsrB-YV1JWVsQKwoJsQsJqrGoLnHlGDabjR2oKSSptKhxA5NKqpjDBzDFo24oScT7271D_u7bZtruNm47vYj9mhAmOs1RIK-v4fdN2PqSvbPVIoADQvFE5UnfqcU2zcLrVbnx4cgtuLd5N4V8S7vXhnS-bdU_NYbWP4m3g2XQA-Abl8dXcxvRj9n9azKbTOQ59elBquxVyIP2k-lPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507130062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Arraras, Juan Ignacio ; de la Vega, Fernando Arias ; Asin, Gemma ; Rico, Mikel ; Zarandona, Uxue ; Eito, Clara ; Cambra, Koldo ; Barrondo, Marta ; Errasti, Marta ; Verdún, Juan ; Rivadeneira, Jose ; Dominguez, Miguel Angel</creator><creatorcontrib>Arraras, Juan Ignacio ; de la Vega, Fernando Arias ; Asin, Gemma ; Rico, Mikel ; Zarandona, Uxue ; Eito, Clara ; Cambra, Koldo ; Barrondo, Marta ; Errasti, Marta ; Verdún, Juan ; Rivadeneira, Jose ; Dominguez, Miguel Angel</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Quality of life (QL) is a key outcome for advanced disease cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has developed the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire, a short version of the QLQ-C30 for palliative care. The aim of the present study is to validate the QLQ-C15-PAL for use with Spanish patients with bone metastasis. Methods For this study, we used a consecutive sample of stage IV cancer patients with bone metastases who started radiotherapy with palliative intention. Two assessments were proposed for each patient: one on the first day of treatment and one a month after the end of the radiotherapy sessions. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability, and validity was undertaken. Results One hundred and sixteen patients completed the first questionnaire and seventy five completed the second. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all items met the standards for convergent validity, and all except the fatigue scale met the standards for divergent validity. Cronbach's coefficient met the 0.7 alpha criterion on all scales except pain (second assessment). Most QLQ-C15-PAL areas had low-to-moderate correlations with the other areas. Significant differences appeared in the comparisons between groups with regard to: patients who died before the second assessment (six areas); patients receiving chemotherapy before starting radiotherapy in the two assessments (three and four areas, respectively); the performance status in the two assessments (nine and eight areas); and the number of RT sessions received (four). Quality of life was better in the second assessment in nine areas. Conclusion The QLQ-C15-PAL is a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish patients. These results are in line with those of other validation studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0511-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24002479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Neoplasms - psychology ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; Bone Neoplasms - therapy ; Bones ; Brief Communication ; Cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Diseases ; Fatigue ; Female ; Humans ; Karnofsky Performance Status ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Oncology ; Pain ; Palliative care ; Palliative Care - psychology ; Patients ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - standards ; Public Health ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sociology ; Spain ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2014-04, Vol.23 (3), p.849-855</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a50cb94eb00906fdd1b85c0da2a11607f27669054567b6dde20f5fb73781d64f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a50cb94eb00906fdd1b85c0da2a11607f27669054567b6dde20f5fb73781d64f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24726383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24726383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24002479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arraras, Juan Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Vega, Fernando Arias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asin, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico, Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarandona, Uxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eito, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambra, Koldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrondo, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errasti, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdún, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivadeneira, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez, Miguel Angel</creatorcontrib><title>The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose Quality of life (QL) is a key outcome for advanced disease cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has developed the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire, a short version of the QLQ-C30 for palliative care. The aim of the present study is to validate the QLQ-C15-PAL for use with Spanish patients with bone metastasis. Methods For this study, we used a consecutive sample of stage IV cancer patients with bone metastases who started radiotherapy with palliative intention. Two assessments were proposed for each patient: one on the first day of treatment and one a month after the end of the radiotherapy sessions. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability, and validity was undertaken. Results One hundred and sixteen patients completed the first questionnaire and seventy five completed the second. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all items met the standards for convergent validity, and all except the fatigue scale met the standards for divergent validity. Cronbach's coefficient met the 0.7 alpha criterion on all scales except pain (second assessment). Most QLQ-C15-PAL areas had low-to-moderate correlations with the other areas. Significant differences appeared in the comparisons between groups with regard to: patients who died before the second assessment (six areas); patients receiving chemotherapy before starting radiotherapy in the two assessments (three and four areas, respectively); the performance status in the two assessments (nine and eight areas); and the number of RT sessions received (four). Quality of life was better in the second assessment in nine areas. Conclusion The QLQ-C15-PAL is a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish patients. These results are in line with those of other validation studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Brief Communication</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Karnofsky Performance Status</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative Care - psychology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1qGzEUhUVJSZykD9BFiqCbbNTeq18ru2DSHzCkSd1NN0Iz0iRj7BlXmink7StnkhK6KAgE0nfOvXyEvEX4gADmY0ZEoRmgYKAQmX1FZqiMYFxLe0BmYDVnVkhxRI5zXgPA3AI_JEdcAnBp7Iz8XN1HenV9u1rQm-UNW6Bi3y6X9NcY89D2XefbFC_ob79pg98_0DyM4YE2faLfd75r8z2t-i7SbRx8Lidmuitg7IZ8Sl43fpPjm6f7hPz4dLVafGHL689fF5dLVgsrB-YV1JWVsQKwoJsQsJqrGoLnHlGDabjR2oKSSptKhxA5NKqpjDBzDFo24oScT7271D_u7bZtruNm47vYj9mhAmOs1RIK-v4fdN2PqSvbPVIoADQvFE5UnfqcU2zcLrVbnx4cgtuLd5N4V8S7vXhnS-bdU_NYbWP4m3g2XQA-Abl8dXcxvRj9n9azKbTOQ59elBquxVyIP2k-lPs</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Arraras, Juan Ignacio</creator><creator>de la Vega, Fernando Arias</creator><creator>Asin, Gemma</creator><creator>Rico, Mikel</creator><creator>Zarandona, Uxue</creator><creator>Eito, Clara</creator><creator>Cambra, Koldo</creator><creator>Barrondo, Marta</creator><creator>Errasti, Marta</creator><creator>Verdún, Juan</creator><creator>Rivadeneira, Jose</creator><creator>Dominguez, Miguel Angel</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients</title><author>Arraras, Juan Ignacio ; de la Vega, Fernando Arias ; Asin, Gemma ; Rico, Mikel ; Zarandona, Uxue ; Eito, Clara ; Cambra, Koldo ; Barrondo, Marta ; Errasti, Marta ; Verdún, Juan ; Rivadeneira, Jose ; Dominguez, Miguel Angel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-a50cb94eb00906fdd1b85c0da2a11607f27669054567b6dde20f5fb73781d64f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Brief Communication</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Karnofsky Performance Status</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative Care - psychology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arraras, Juan Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Vega, Fernando Arias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asin, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rico, Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarandona, Uxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eito, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambra, Koldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrondo, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errasti, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdún, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivadeneira, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez, Miguel Angel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arraras, Juan Ignacio</au><au>de la Vega, Fernando Arias</au><au>Asin, Gemma</au><au>Rico, Mikel</au><au>Zarandona, Uxue</au><au>Eito, Clara</au><au>Cambra, Koldo</au><au>Barrondo, Marta</au><au>Errasti, Marta</au><au>Verdún, Juan</au><au>Rivadeneira, Jose</au><au>Dominguez, Miguel Angel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>849</spage><epage>855</epage><pages>849-855</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose Quality of life (QL) is a key outcome for advanced disease cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has developed the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire, a short version of the QLQ-C30 for palliative care. The aim of the present study is to validate the QLQ-C15-PAL for use with Spanish patients with bone metastasis. Methods For this study, we used a consecutive sample of stage IV cancer patients with bone metastases who started radiotherapy with palliative intention. Two assessments were proposed for each patient: one on the first day of treatment and one a month after the end of the radiotherapy sessions. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability, and validity was undertaken. Results One hundred and sixteen patients completed the first questionnaire and seventy five completed the second. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all items met the standards for convergent validity, and all except the fatigue scale met the standards for divergent validity. Cronbach's coefficient met the 0.7 alpha criterion on all scales except pain (second assessment). Most QLQ-C15-PAL areas had low-to-moderate correlations with the other areas. Significant differences appeared in the comparisons between groups with regard to: patients who died before the second assessment (six areas); patients receiving chemotherapy before starting radiotherapy in the two assessments (three and four areas, respectively); the performance status in the two assessments (nine and eight areas); and the number of RT sessions received (four). Quality of life was better in the second assessment in nine areas. Conclusion The QLQ-C15-PAL is a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish patients. These results are in line with those of other validation studies.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>24002479</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-013-0511-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-9343 |
ispartof | Quality of life research, 2014-04, Vol.23 (3), p.849-855 |
issn | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1507799640 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bone Neoplasms - psychology Bone Neoplasms - secondary Bone Neoplasms - therapy Bones Brief Communication Cancer Chemotherapy Diseases Fatigue Female Humans Karnofsky Performance Status Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastasis Middle Aged Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasm Staging Oncology Pain Palliative care Palliative Care - psychology Patients Psychometrics Psychometrics - instrumentation Psychometrics - standards Public Health Quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Quality of Life Research Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Reproducibility of Results Sociology Spain Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Validation studies Validity |
title | The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A49%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20EORTC%20QLQ-C15-PAL%20questionnaire:%20validation%20study%20for%20Spanish%20bone%20metastases%20patients&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Arraras,%20Juan%20Ignacio&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=849&rft.epage=855&rft.pages=849-855&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-013-0511-9&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24726383%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507130062&rft_id=info:pmid/24002479&rft_jstor_id=24726383&rfr_iscdi=true |