The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening

The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.7 (3), p.362-371
Hauptverfasser: McRONALD, Fiona E, YADEGARFAR, Ghasem, HANDS, Christopher J, LIFFORD, Kate, WHYNES, David, KERR, Keith M, PAGE, Richard, PARMAR, Mahesh, WALD, Nicholas, WELLER, David, WILLIAMSON, Paula R, MYLES, Jonathan, BALDWIN, David R, HANSELL, David M, DUFFY, Stephen W, FIELD, John K, DEVARAJ, Anand, BRAIN, Kate E, EISEN, Tim, HOLEMANS, John A, LEDSON, Martin, SCREATON, Nicholas, RINTOUL, Robert C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 371
container_issue 3
container_start_page 362
container_title Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)
container_volume 7
creator McRONALD, Fiona E
YADEGARFAR, Ghasem
HANDS, Christopher J
LIFFORD, Kate
WHYNES, David
KERR, Keith M
PAGE, Richard
PARMAR, Mahesh
WALD, Nicholas
WELLER, David
WILLIAMSON, Paula R
MYLES, Jonathan
BALDWIN, David R
HANSELL, David M
DUFFY, Stephen W
FIELD, John K
DEVARAJ, Anand
BRAIN, Kate E
EISEN, Tim
HOLEMANS, John A
LEDSON, Martin
SCREATON, Nicholas
RINTOUL, Robert C
description The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P < 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model. (i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1506418021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1506418021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b29a94021b26d3f235a4394047c554b39723513f350c8abb1e1d61277b40e2a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1P5CAUholx4_dfMNyYaGKV71LvJrN-bJzEiTrXhFI6g2lLhanJxj-_dO26VxwOz-GFB4BTjK4w5vIaFwxlgqD8aj5bPmeYZoggsQMOpgPMd79rlO-DwxjfEBJEEroH9gljDIucHIDP142Fq0e4GLo1fDHB2g6erx4XLxc38Kdt_TrofuMMXAZfu8ZCX8M7F-IWSnkpixzO-j54bTY2jsiHq1LxbI1vW9tVeut8F2HtA1z6fmj-7qcU162PwY9aN9GeTOsRWN3dvs4fssXT_a_5bJEZKottVpJCp48QXBJR0ZpQrhlNDZYbzllJizy1MK0pR0bqssQWVwKTPC8ZsiSxR-D869701PfBxq1qXTS2aXRn_RAV5kgwLFNCQsUXaoKPMdha9cG1OvxWGKlRvBqdqtGpGsUrTNUoPg2eThlD2drqe-yf6QScTYCORjd10J1x8T8nOZVcCvoH8wiJeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506418021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>McRONALD, Fiona E ; YADEGARFAR, Ghasem ; HANDS, Christopher J ; LIFFORD, Kate ; WHYNES, David ; KERR, Keith M ; PAGE, Richard ; PARMAR, Mahesh ; WALD, Nicholas ; WELLER, David ; WILLIAMSON, Paula R ; MYLES, Jonathan ; BALDWIN, David R ; HANSELL, David M ; DUFFY, Stephen W ; FIELD, John K ; DEVARAJ, Anand ; BRAIN, Kate E ; EISEN, Tim ; HOLEMANS, John A ; LEDSON, Martin ; SCREATON, Nicholas ; RINTOUL, Robert C</creator><creatorcontrib>McRONALD, Fiona E ; YADEGARFAR, Ghasem ; HANDS, Christopher J ; LIFFORD, Kate ; WHYNES, David ; KERR, Keith M ; PAGE, Richard ; PARMAR, Mahesh ; WALD, Nicholas ; WELLER, David ; WILLIAMSON, Paula R ; MYLES, Jonathan ; BALDWIN, David R ; HANSELL, David M ; DUFFY, Stephen W ; FIELD, John K ; DEVARAJ, Anand ; BRAIN, Kate E ; EISEN, Tim ; HOLEMANS, John A ; LEDSON, Martin ; SCREATON, Nicholas ; RINTOUL, Robert C</creatorcontrib><description>The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P &lt; 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model. (i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-6207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24441672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Early Detection of Cancer - standards ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Male ; Mass Screening - standards ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Social Class ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.7 (3), p.362-371</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b29a94021b26d3f235a4394047c554b39723513f350c8abb1e1d61277b40e2a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b29a94021b26d3f235a4394047c554b39723513f350c8abb1e1d61277b40e2a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3357,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28538586$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24441672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McRONALD, Fiona E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YADEGARFAR, Ghasem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANDS, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIFFORD, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHYNES, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KERR, Keith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAGE, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARMAR, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALD, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLER, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMSON, Paula R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MYLES, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALDWIN, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANSELL, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFFY, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELD, John K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEVARAJ, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAIN, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EISEN, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLEMANS, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEDSON, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCREATON, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RINTOUL, Robert C</creatorcontrib><title>The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening</title><title>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Cancer Prev Res (Phila)</addtitle><description>The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P &lt; 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model. (i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - standards</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>1940-6207</issn><issn>1940-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF1P5CAUholx4_dfMNyYaGKV71LvJrN-bJzEiTrXhFI6g2lLhanJxj-_dO26VxwOz-GFB4BTjK4w5vIaFwxlgqD8aj5bPmeYZoggsQMOpgPMd79rlO-DwxjfEBJEEroH9gljDIucHIDP142Fq0e4GLo1fDHB2g6erx4XLxc38Kdt_TrofuMMXAZfu8ZCX8M7F-IWSnkpixzO-j54bTY2jsiHq1LxbI1vW9tVeut8F2HtA1z6fmj-7qcU162PwY9aN9GeTOsRWN3dvs4fssXT_a_5bJEZKottVpJCp48QXBJR0ZpQrhlNDZYbzllJizy1MK0pR0bqssQWVwKTPC8ZsiSxR-D869701PfBxq1qXTS2aXRn_RAV5kgwLFNCQsUXaoKPMdha9cG1OvxWGKlRvBqdqtGpGsUrTNUoPg2eThlD2drqe-yf6QScTYCORjd10J1x8T8nOZVcCvoH8wiJeQ</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>McRONALD, Fiona E</creator><creator>YADEGARFAR, Ghasem</creator><creator>HANDS, Christopher J</creator><creator>LIFFORD, Kate</creator><creator>WHYNES, David</creator><creator>KERR, Keith M</creator><creator>PAGE, Richard</creator><creator>PARMAR, Mahesh</creator><creator>WALD, Nicholas</creator><creator>WELLER, David</creator><creator>WILLIAMSON, Paula R</creator><creator>MYLES, Jonathan</creator><creator>BALDWIN, David R</creator><creator>HANSELL, David M</creator><creator>DUFFY, Stephen W</creator><creator>FIELD, John K</creator><creator>DEVARAJ, Anand</creator><creator>BRAIN, Kate E</creator><creator>EISEN, Tim</creator><creator>HOLEMANS, John A</creator><creator>LEDSON, Martin</creator><creator>SCREATON, Nicholas</creator><creator>RINTOUL, Robert C</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening</title><author>McRONALD, Fiona E ; YADEGARFAR, Ghasem ; HANDS, Christopher J ; LIFFORD, Kate ; WHYNES, David ; KERR, Keith M ; PAGE, Richard ; PARMAR, Mahesh ; WALD, Nicholas ; WELLER, David ; WILLIAMSON, Paula R ; MYLES, Jonathan ; BALDWIN, David R ; HANSELL, David M ; DUFFY, Stephen W ; FIELD, John K ; DEVARAJ, Anand ; BRAIN, Kate E ; EISEN, Tim ; HOLEMANS, John A ; LEDSON, Martin ; SCREATON, Nicholas ; RINTOUL, Robert C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b29a94021b26d3f235a4394047c554b39723513f350c8abb1e1d61277b40e2a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - standards</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McRONALD, Fiona E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YADEGARFAR, Ghasem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANDS, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIFFORD, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHYNES, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KERR, Keith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAGE, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARMAR, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALD, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLER, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMSON, Paula R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MYLES, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALDWIN, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANSELL, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFFY, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELD, John K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEVARAJ, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAIN, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EISEN, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLEMANS, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEDSON, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCREATON, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RINTOUL, Robert C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McRONALD, Fiona E</au><au>YADEGARFAR, Ghasem</au><au>HANDS, Christopher J</au><au>LIFFORD, Kate</au><au>WHYNES, David</au><au>KERR, Keith M</au><au>PAGE, Richard</au><au>PARMAR, Mahesh</au><au>WALD, Nicholas</au><au>WELLER, David</au><au>WILLIAMSON, Paula R</au><au>MYLES, Jonathan</au><au>BALDWIN, David R</au><au>HANSELL, David M</au><au>DUFFY, Stephen W</au><au>FIELD, John K</au><au>DEVARAJ, Anand</au><au>BRAIN, Kate E</au><au>EISEN, Tim</au><au>HOLEMANS, John A</au><au>LEDSON, Martin</au><au>SCREATON, Nicholas</au><au>RINTOUL, Robert C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening</atitle><jtitle>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Prev Res (Phila)</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>362-371</pages><issn>1940-6207</issn><eissn>1940-6215</eissn><abstract>The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P &lt; 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model. (i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>24441672</pmid><doi>10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1940-6207
ispartof Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.7 (3), p.362-371
issn 1940-6207
1940-6215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1506418021
source MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Early Detection of Cancer - standards
Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis
Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology
Male
Mass Screening - standards
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prevention and actions
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Social Class
Surveys and Questionnaires
United Kingdom - epidemiology
title The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T04%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20UK%20Lung%20Screen%20(UKLS):%20Demographic%20Profile%20of%20First%2088,897%20Approaches%20Provides%20Recommendations%20for%20Population%20Screening&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20prevention%20research%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=McRONALD,%20Fiona%20E&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=362-371&rft.issn=1940-6207&rft.eissn=1940-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1506418021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506418021&rft_id=info:pmid/24441672&rfr_iscdi=true