The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening
The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.7 (3), p.362-371 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 371 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 362 |
container_title | Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | McRONALD, Fiona E YADEGARFAR, Ghasem HANDS, Christopher J LIFFORD, Kate WHYNES, David KERR, Keith M PAGE, Richard PARMAR, Mahesh WALD, Nicholas WELLER, David WILLIAMSON, Paula R MYLES, Jonathan BALDWIN, David R HANSELL, David M DUFFY, Stephen W FIELD, John K DEVARAJ, Anand BRAIN, Kate E EISEN, Tim HOLEMANS, John A LEDSON, Martin SCREATON, Nicholas RINTOUL, Robert C |
description | The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P < 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model.
(i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1506418021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1506418021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b29a94021b26d3f235a4394047c554b39723513f350c8abb1e1d61277b40e2a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1P5CAUholx4_dfMNyYaGKV71LvJrN-bJzEiTrXhFI6g2lLhanJxj-_dO26VxwOz-GFB4BTjK4w5vIaFwxlgqD8aj5bPmeYZoggsQMOpgPMd79rlO-DwxjfEBJEEroH9gljDIucHIDP142Fq0e4GLo1fDHB2g6erx4XLxc38Kdt_TrofuMMXAZfu8ZCX8M7F-IWSnkpixzO-j54bTY2jsiHq1LxbI1vW9tVeut8F2HtA1z6fmj-7qcU162PwY9aN9GeTOsRWN3dvs4fssXT_a_5bJEZKottVpJCp48QXBJR0ZpQrhlNDZYbzllJizy1MK0pR0bqssQWVwKTPC8ZsiSxR-D869701PfBxq1qXTS2aXRn_RAV5kgwLFNCQsUXaoKPMdha9cG1OvxWGKlRvBqdqtGpGsUrTNUoPg2eThlD2drqe-yf6QScTYCORjd10J1x8T8nOZVcCvoH8wiJeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506418021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>McRONALD, Fiona E ; YADEGARFAR, Ghasem ; HANDS, Christopher J ; LIFFORD, Kate ; WHYNES, David ; KERR, Keith M ; PAGE, Richard ; PARMAR, Mahesh ; WALD, Nicholas ; WELLER, David ; WILLIAMSON, Paula R ; MYLES, Jonathan ; BALDWIN, David R ; HANSELL, David M ; DUFFY, Stephen W ; FIELD, John K ; DEVARAJ, Anand ; BRAIN, Kate E ; EISEN, Tim ; HOLEMANS, John A ; LEDSON, Martin ; SCREATON, Nicholas ; RINTOUL, Robert C</creator><creatorcontrib>McRONALD, Fiona E ; YADEGARFAR, Ghasem ; HANDS, Christopher J ; LIFFORD, Kate ; WHYNES, David ; KERR, Keith M ; PAGE, Richard ; PARMAR, Mahesh ; WALD, Nicholas ; WELLER, David ; WILLIAMSON, Paula R ; MYLES, Jonathan ; BALDWIN, David R ; HANSELL, David M ; DUFFY, Stephen W ; FIELD, John K ; DEVARAJ, Anand ; BRAIN, Kate E ; EISEN, Tim ; HOLEMANS, John A ; LEDSON, Martin ; SCREATON, Nicholas ; RINTOUL, Robert C</creatorcontrib><description>The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P < 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model.
(i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-6207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24441672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Early Detection of Cancer - standards ; Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Male ; Mass Screening - standards ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Social Class ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.7 (3), p.362-371</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b29a94021b26d3f235a4394047c554b39723513f350c8abb1e1d61277b40e2a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b29a94021b26d3f235a4394047c554b39723513f350c8abb1e1d61277b40e2a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3357,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28538586$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24441672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McRONALD, Fiona E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YADEGARFAR, Ghasem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANDS, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIFFORD, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHYNES, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KERR, Keith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAGE, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARMAR, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALD, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLER, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMSON, Paula R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MYLES, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALDWIN, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANSELL, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFFY, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELD, John K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEVARAJ, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAIN, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EISEN, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLEMANS, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEDSON, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCREATON, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RINTOUL, Robert C</creatorcontrib><title>The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening</title><title>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Cancer Prev Res (Phila)</addtitle><description>The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P < 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model.
(i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - standards</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Screening - standards</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>1940-6207</issn><issn>1940-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF1P5CAUholx4_dfMNyYaGKV71LvJrN-bJzEiTrXhFI6g2lLhanJxj-_dO26VxwOz-GFB4BTjK4w5vIaFwxlgqD8aj5bPmeYZoggsQMOpgPMd79rlO-DwxjfEBJEEroH9gljDIucHIDP142Fq0e4GLo1fDHB2g6erx4XLxc38Kdt_TrofuMMXAZfu8ZCX8M7F-IWSnkpixzO-j54bTY2jsiHq1LxbI1vW9tVeut8F2HtA1z6fmj-7qcU162PwY9aN9GeTOsRWN3dvs4fssXT_a_5bJEZKottVpJCp48QXBJR0ZpQrhlNDZYbzllJizy1MK0pR0bqssQWVwKTPC8ZsiSxR-D869701PfBxq1qXTS2aXRn_RAV5kgwLFNCQsUXaoKPMdha9cG1OvxWGKlRvBqdqtGpGsUrTNUoPg2eThlD2drqe-yf6QScTYCORjd10J1x8T8nOZVcCvoH8wiJeQ</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>McRONALD, Fiona E</creator><creator>YADEGARFAR, Ghasem</creator><creator>HANDS, Christopher J</creator><creator>LIFFORD, Kate</creator><creator>WHYNES, David</creator><creator>KERR, Keith M</creator><creator>PAGE, Richard</creator><creator>PARMAR, Mahesh</creator><creator>WALD, Nicholas</creator><creator>WELLER, David</creator><creator>WILLIAMSON, Paula R</creator><creator>MYLES, Jonathan</creator><creator>BALDWIN, David R</creator><creator>HANSELL, David M</creator><creator>DUFFY, Stephen W</creator><creator>FIELD, John K</creator><creator>DEVARAJ, Anand</creator><creator>BRAIN, Kate E</creator><creator>EISEN, Tim</creator><creator>HOLEMANS, John A</creator><creator>LEDSON, Martin</creator><creator>SCREATON, Nicholas</creator><creator>RINTOUL, Robert C</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening</title><author>McRONALD, Fiona E ; YADEGARFAR, Ghasem ; HANDS, Christopher J ; LIFFORD, Kate ; WHYNES, David ; KERR, Keith M ; PAGE, Richard ; PARMAR, Mahesh ; WALD, Nicholas ; WELLER, David ; WILLIAMSON, Paula R ; MYLES, Jonathan ; BALDWIN, David R ; HANSELL, David M ; DUFFY, Stephen W ; FIELD, John K ; DEVARAJ, Anand ; BRAIN, Kate E ; EISEN, Tim ; HOLEMANS, John A ; LEDSON, Martin ; SCREATON, Nicholas ; RINTOUL, Robert C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-b29a94021b26d3f235a4394047c554b39723513f350c8abb1e1d61277b40e2a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - standards</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Screening - standards</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McRONALD, Fiona E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YADEGARFAR, Ghasem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANDS, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LIFFORD, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHYNES, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KERR, Keith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAGE, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARMAR, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WALD, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WELLER, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLIAMSON, Paula R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MYLES, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BALDWIN, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANSELL, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUFFY, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELD, John K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEVARAJ, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAIN, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EISEN, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLEMANS, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEDSON, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCREATON, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RINTOUL, Robert C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McRONALD, Fiona E</au><au>YADEGARFAR, Ghasem</au><au>HANDS, Christopher J</au><au>LIFFORD, Kate</au><au>WHYNES, David</au><au>KERR, Keith M</au><au>PAGE, Richard</au><au>PARMAR, Mahesh</au><au>WALD, Nicholas</au><au>WELLER, David</au><au>WILLIAMSON, Paula R</au><au>MYLES, Jonathan</au><au>BALDWIN, David R</au><au>HANSELL, David M</au><au>DUFFY, Stephen W</au><au>FIELD, John K</au><au>DEVARAJ, Anand</au><au>BRAIN, Kate E</au><au>EISEN, Tim</au><au>HOLEMANS, John A</au><au>LEDSON, Martin</au><au>SCREATON, Nicholas</au><au>RINTOUL, Robert C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening</atitle><jtitle>Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Prev Res (Phila)</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>362-371</pages><issn>1940-6207</issn><eissn>1940-6215</eissn><abstract>The UK Lung Cancer Screening trial (UKLS) aims to evaluate low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer population screening in the United Kingdom. In UKLS, a large population sample ages 50 to 75 years is approached with a questionnaire to determine lung cancer risk. Those with an estimated risk of at least 5% of developing lung cancer in the next 5 years (using the Liverpool Lung project risk model) are invited to participate in the trial. Here, we present demographic, risk, and response rate data from the first 88,897 individuals approached. Of note, 23,794 individuals (26.8% of all approached) responded positively to the initial questionnaire; 12% of these were high risk. Higher socioeconomic status correlated positively with response, but inversely with risk (P < 0.001). The 50- to 55-year age group was least likely to participate, and at lowest cancer risk. Only 5% of clinic attendees were ages ≤60 years (compared with 47% of all 88,897 approached); this has implications for cost effectiveness. Among positive responders, there were more ex-smokers than expected from population figures (40% vs. 33%), and fewer current smokers (14% vs. 17.5%). Of note, 32.7% of current smokers and 18.4% of ex-smokers were designated as high risk. Overall, 1,452 of 23,794 positive responders (6.1%) were deemed high risk and attended a recruitment clinic. UKLS is the first LDCT population screening trial, selecting high-risk subjects using a validated individual risk prediction model.
(i) better recruitment from ex- rather than current smokers, (ii) few clinic attendees ages early 50s, and (iii) representative number of socioeconomically deprived people recruited, despite lower response rates.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>24441672</pmid><doi>10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1940-6207 |
ispartof | Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2014-03, Vol.7 (3), p.362-371 |
issn | 1940-6207 1940-6215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1506418021 |
source | MEDLINE; American Association for Cancer Research; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Early Detection of Cancer - standards Early Detection of Cancer - statistics & numerical data Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - epidemiology Male Mass Screening - standards Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Practice Guidelines as Topic Prevention and actions Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Social Class Surveys and Questionnaires United Kingdom - epidemiology |
title | The UK Lung Screen (UKLS): Demographic Profile of First 88,897 Approaches Provides Recommendations for Population Screening |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T04%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20UK%20Lung%20Screen%20(UKLS):%20Demographic%20Profile%20of%20First%2088,897%20Approaches%20Provides%20Recommendations%20for%20Population%20Screening&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20prevention%20research%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=McRONALD,%20Fiona%20E&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=362-371&rft.issn=1940-6207&rft.eissn=1940-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1506418021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506418021&rft_id=info:pmid/24441672&rfr_iscdi=true |