Are bioresorbable polylactate devices comparable to titanium devices for stabilizing Le Fort I advancement?
Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether skeletal and dental outcomes following Le Fort I surgery differed when stabilization was performed with polylactate bioresorbable devices or titanium devices. Fifty-seven patients with preoperative records and at least 1 year postoperative r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2014-04, Vol.43 (4), p.437-444 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 444 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 437 |
| container_title | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Blakey, G.H Rossouw, E Turvey, T.A Phillips, C Proffit, W.R White, R.P |
| description | Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether skeletal and dental outcomes following Le Fort I surgery differed when stabilization was performed with polylactate bioresorbable devices or titanium devices. Fifty-seven patients with preoperative records and at least 1 year postoperative records were identified and grouped according to the stabilization method. All cephalometric X-rays were traced and digitized by a single operator. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the postsurgical change between the two stabilization methods. Twenty-seven patients received bioresorbable devices (group R), while 30 received titanium devices (group M). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to gender, race/ethnicity, age, or dental and skeletal movements during surgery. Subtle postsurgical differences were noted, but were not statistically significant. Stabilization of Le Fort I advancement with polylactate bioresorbable and titanium devices produced similar clinical outcomes at 1 year following surgery. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1506417749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S090150271301117X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1506417749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3fd9897ea08299a835d9490259af63b17ff32fb5f0a7ff5c0878db5a7f09f69c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxa0K1C6lX4AD8pFLlrGdf5YQqKooVFqJAyBxsxxnjJwm8WI7Ky2fHqdbeuDAyfbMe0_j3xDyisGWAavfDls3-GnLgYlc2ALUZ2TDhJQFAIdnZAMSWFEBby7IixgHAJCibc7JBS953Yqq3ZD764C0cz5g9KHT3Yh078fjqE3SCWmPB2cwUuOnvQ4P7eRpcknPbpme2tYHGpPu3Oh-u_kn3SG99SHRO6r7g54NTjinDy_Jc6vHiFeP5yX5fvvx283nYvfl093N9a4wZVWlQthetrJBDS2XUuc5e1lK4JXUthYda6wV3HaVBZ2vlYG2afuuyg-QtpZGXJI3p9x98L8WjElNLhocRz2jX6JiFdQla5pSZik_SU3wMQa0ah_cpMNRMVArZDWoFbJaIa-1DDmbXj_mL92E_ZPlL9UseHcSYP7lwWFQ0TjMGHoX0CTVe_f__Pf_2M3oZmf0eI9HjINfwpz5KaYiV6C-rmtet8wEMMaaH-IPF4qj4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1506417749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are bioresorbable polylactate devices comparable to titanium devices for stabilizing Le Fort I advancement?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Blakey, G.H ; Rossouw, E ; Turvey, T.A ; Phillips, C ; Proffit, W.R ; White, R.P</creator><creatorcontrib>Blakey, G.H ; Rossouw, E ; Turvey, T.A ; Phillips, C ; Proffit, W.R ; White, R.P</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether skeletal and dental outcomes following Le Fort I surgery differed when stabilization was performed with polylactate bioresorbable devices or titanium devices. Fifty-seven patients with preoperative records and at least 1 year postoperative records were identified and grouped according to the stabilization method. All cephalometric X-rays were traced and digitized by a single operator. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the postsurgical change between the two stabilization methods. Twenty-seven patients received bioresorbable devices (group R), while 30 received titanium devices (group M). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to gender, race/ethnicity, age, or dental and skeletal movements during surgery. Subtle postsurgical differences were noted, but were not statistically significant. Stabilization of Le Fort I advancement with polylactate bioresorbable and titanium devices produced similar clinical outcomes at 1 year following surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24268358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Absorbable Implants ; advancement ; bioresorbable ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Bone Transplantation ; Cephalometry ; Female ; Humans ; Internal Fixators ; Lactic Acid ; Le Fort ; Male ; Maxilla - surgery ; Osteotomy, Le Fort - instrumentation ; Polyesters ; Polymers ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Titanium ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014-04, Vol.43 (4), p.437-444</ispartof><rights>International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2013 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3fd9897ea08299a835d9490259af63b17ff32fb5f0a7ff5c0878db5a7f09f69c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3fd9897ea08299a835d9490259af63b17ff32fb5f0a7ff5c0878db5a7f09f69c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S090150271301117X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24268358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blakey, G.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossouw, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turvey, T.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proffit, W.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, R.P</creatorcontrib><title>Are bioresorbable polylactate devices comparable to titanium devices for stabilizing Le Fort I advancement?</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether skeletal and dental outcomes following Le Fort I surgery differed when stabilization was performed with polylactate bioresorbable devices or titanium devices. Fifty-seven patients with preoperative records and at least 1 year postoperative records were identified and grouped according to the stabilization method. All cephalometric X-rays were traced and digitized by a single operator. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the postsurgical change between the two stabilization methods. Twenty-seven patients received bioresorbable devices (group R), while 30 received titanium devices (group M). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to gender, race/ethnicity, age, or dental and skeletal movements during surgery. Subtle postsurgical differences were noted, but were not statistically significant. Stabilization of Le Fort I advancement with polylactate bioresorbable and titanium devices produced similar clinical outcomes at 1 year following surgery.</description><subject>Absorbable Implants</subject><subject>advancement</subject><subject>bioresorbable</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Fixators</subject><subject>Lactic Acid</subject><subject>Le Fort</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy, Le Fort - instrumentation</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxa0K1C6lX4AD8pFLlrGdf5YQqKooVFqJAyBxsxxnjJwm8WI7Ky2fHqdbeuDAyfbMe0_j3xDyisGWAavfDls3-GnLgYlc2ALUZ2TDhJQFAIdnZAMSWFEBby7IixgHAJCibc7JBS953Yqq3ZD764C0cz5g9KHT3Yh078fjqE3SCWmPB2cwUuOnvQ4P7eRpcknPbpme2tYHGpPu3Oh-u_kn3SG99SHRO6r7g54NTjinDy_Jc6vHiFeP5yX5fvvx283nYvfl093N9a4wZVWlQthetrJBDS2XUuc5e1lK4JXUthYda6wV3HaVBZ2vlYG2afuuyg-QtpZGXJI3p9x98L8WjElNLhocRz2jX6JiFdQla5pSZik_SU3wMQa0ah_cpMNRMVArZDWoFbJaIa-1DDmbXj_mL92E_ZPlL9UseHcSYP7lwWFQ0TjMGHoX0CTVe_f__Pf_2M3oZmf0eI9HjINfwpz5KaYiV6C-rmtet8wEMMaaH-IPF4qj4g</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Blakey, G.H</creator><creator>Rossouw, E</creator><creator>Turvey, T.A</creator><creator>Phillips, C</creator><creator>Proffit, W.R</creator><creator>White, R.P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Are bioresorbable polylactate devices comparable to titanium devices for stabilizing Le Fort I advancement?</title><author>Blakey, G.H ; Rossouw, E ; Turvey, T.A ; Phillips, C ; Proffit, W.R ; White, R.P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3fd9897ea08299a835d9490259af63b17ff32fb5f0a7ff5c0878db5a7f09f69c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Absorbable Implants</topic><topic>advancement</topic><topic>bioresorbable</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Fixators</topic><topic>Lactic Acid</topic><topic>Le Fort</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy, Le Fort - instrumentation</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blakey, G.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossouw, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turvey, T.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proffit, W.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, R.P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blakey, G.H</au><au>Rossouw, E</au><au>Turvey, T.A</au><au>Phillips, C</au><au>Proffit, W.R</au><au>White, R.P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are bioresorbable polylactate devices comparable to titanium devices for stabilizing Le Fort I advancement?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>437-444</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether skeletal and dental outcomes following Le Fort I surgery differed when stabilization was performed with polylactate bioresorbable devices or titanium devices. Fifty-seven patients with preoperative records and at least 1 year postoperative records were identified and grouped according to the stabilization method. All cephalometric X-rays were traced and digitized by a single operator. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the postsurgical change between the two stabilization methods. Twenty-seven patients received bioresorbable devices (group R), while 30 received titanium devices (group M). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to gender, race/ethnicity, age, or dental and skeletal movements during surgery. Subtle postsurgical differences were noted, but were not statistically significant. Stabilization of Le Fort I advancement with polylactate bioresorbable and titanium devices produced similar clinical outcomes at 1 year following surgery.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24268358</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
| ispartof | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2014-04, Vol.43 (4), p.437-444 |
| issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1506417749 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Absorbable Implants advancement bioresorbable Bone Plates Bone Screws Bone Transplantation Cephalometry Female Humans Internal Fixators Lactic Acid Le Fort Male Maxilla - surgery Osteotomy, Le Fort - instrumentation Polyesters Polymers Retrospective Studies Surgery Titanium Young Adult |
| title | Are bioresorbable polylactate devices comparable to titanium devices for stabilizing Le Fort I advancement? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A44%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20bioresorbable%20polylactate%20devices%20comparable%20to%20titanium%20devices%20for%20stabilizing%20Le%20Fort%20I%20advancement?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Blakey,%20G.H&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=437-444&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1506417749%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1506417749&rft_id=info:pmid/24268358&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S090150271301117X&rfr_iscdi=true |