An evaluation of advanced combined cycles
► Thermo-economic analyses of advanced IGCC with CO2 capture. ► Gasification plants with advanced combined cycles are compared. ► Gas turbine required for 8% reduction in heat rate goal over H class IGCC. ► Spray intercooling and pressure ratio of 50 added features of this advanced gas turbine. ► Le...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied energy 2013-02, Vol.102, p.1178-1186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1186 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1178 |
container_title | Applied energy |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Rao, Ashok D. Francuz, David J. |
description | ► Thermo-economic analyses of advanced IGCC with CO2 capture. ► Gasification plants with advanced combined cycles are compared. ► Gas turbine required for 8% reduction in heat rate goal over H class IGCC. ► Spray intercooling and pressure ratio of 50 added features of this advanced gas turbine. ► Levelized cost of electricity by 8% over IGCC utilizing the H class gas turbine.
The main objective of this investigation is to identify and assess advanced improvements to the combined cycle such as gas turbine firing temperature, pressure ratio, combustion techniques, intercooling, enhanced blade cooling schemes and supercritical steam cycles that will lead to significant performance improvements in coal based power systems. This assessment is conducted in the context of conceptual designs that advance state-of-art combined cycles and result in an 8% reduction in heat rate over a coal based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant utilizing an H class gas turbine technology with steam cooling. This efficiency goal for the study was set by the United States Department of Energy. H class gas turbines are commercially offered by General Electric (GE), Mitsubishi and Siemens for natural gas based combined cycle applications with 60% efficiency (LHV) and it is expected that such machines will be offered for syngas applications within the next 5–10years, while our investigation looks further beyond that time frame. The levelized cost of electricity for an IGCC utilizing the H class gas turbine is $86/MWh while that for the advanced IGCC identified in this investigation consisting of an intercooled gas turbine with a firing temperature that is 340°C higher is $79/MWh which is a significant 8% reduction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.035 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1505345558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306261912004801</els_id><sourcerecordid>1505345558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-98558414f5d0238c67088485e86e6016b0c0601a13e109a24dd2bdedbc5cd6ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwFyALEgwJZyd2nY2q4kuqxACdLce-VK7SpNhppf57HAVYme6G572Ph5BrChkFKh42md5hi359zBhQloHIIOcnZELljKUlpfKUTCAHkTJBy3NyEcIGABhlMCH38zbBg272unddm3R1ou1BtwZtYrpt5dqhOZoGwyU5q3UT8OqnTsnq-elz8Zou31_eFvNlavKy7NNSci4LWtTcAsulETOQspAcpUARz63AQKya5kih1KywllUWbWW4sQJNPiV349yd7772GHq1dcFg0-gWu31QlAPPCx63RFSMqPFdCB5rtfNuq_1RUVCDG7VRv27U4EaBUNFNDN7-7NDB6Kb28WMX_tJMzIYnisjdjFytO6XXPjKrjzhIDP4kZ3kkHkcCo5KDQ6-CcTj4cx5Nr2zn_jvmG_x5hNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1505345558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of advanced combined cycles</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Rao, Ashok D. ; Francuz, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rao, Ashok D. ; Francuz, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>► Thermo-economic analyses of advanced IGCC with CO2 capture. ► Gasification plants with advanced combined cycles are compared. ► Gas turbine required for 8% reduction in heat rate goal over H class IGCC. ► Spray intercooling and pressure ratio of 50 added features of this advanced gas turbine. ► Levelized cost of electricity by 8% over IGCC utilizing the H class gas turbine.
The main objective of this investigation is to identify and assess advanced improvements to the combined cycle such as gas turbine firing temperature, pressure ratio, combustion techniques, intercooling, enhanced blade cooling schemes and supercritical steam cycles that will lead to significant performance improvements in coal based power systems. This assessment is conducted in the context of conceptual designs that advance state-of-art combined cycles and result in an 8% reduction in heat rate over a coal based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant utilizing an H class gas turbine technology with steam cooling. This efficiency goal for the study was set by the United States Department of Energy. H class gas turbines are commercially offered by General Electric (GE), Mitsubishi and Siemens for natural gas based combined cycle applications with 60% efficiency (LHV) and it is expected that such machines will be offered for syngas applications within the next 5–10years, while our investigation looks further beyond that time frame. The levelized cost of electricity for an IGCC utilizing the H class gas turbine is $86/MWh while that for the advanced IGCC identified in this investigation consisting of an intercooled gas turbine with a firing temperature that is 340°C higher is $79/MWh which is a significant 8% reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.035</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APENDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced Brayton cycles ; Advanced combined cycles ; Advanced gas turbines ; Advanced power cycles ; Applied sciences ; CO2 capture ; coal ; combustion ; cooling ; electricity costs ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Engines and turbines ; Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc ; Exact sciences and technology ; gasification ; heat ; IGCC ; natural gas ; steam ; synthesis gas ; temperature ; turbines</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 2013-02, Vol.102, p.1178-1186</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-98558414f5d0238c67088485e86e6016b0c0601a13e109a24dd2bdedbc5cd6ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-98558414f5d0238c67088485e86e6016b0c0601a13e109a24dd2bdedbc5cd6ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26755844$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rao, Ashok D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francuz, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of advanced combined cycles</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>► Thermo-economic analyses of advanced IGCC with CO2 capture. ► Gasification plants with advanced combined cycles are compared. ► Gas turbine required for 8% reduction in heat rate goal over H class IGCC. ► Spray intercooling and pressure ratio of 50 added features of this advanced gas turbine. ► Levelized cost of electricity by 8% over IGCC utilizing the H class gas turbine.
The main objective of this investigation is to identify and assess advanced improvements to the combined cycle such as gas turbine firing temperature, pressure ratio, combustion techniques, intercooling, enhanced blade cooling schemes and supercritical steam cycles that will lead to significant performance improvements in coal based power systems. This assessment is conducted in the context of conceptual designs that advance state-of-art combined cycles and result in an 8% reduction in heat rate over a coal based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant utilizing an H class gas turbine technology with steam cooling. This efficiency goal for the study was set by the United States Department of Energy. H class gas turbines are commercially offered by General Electric (GE), Mitsubishi and Siemens for natural gas based combined cycle applications with 60% efficiency (LHV) and it is expected that such machines will be offered for syngas applications within the next 5–10years, while our investigation looks further beyond that time frame. The levelized cost of electricity for an IGCC utilizing the H class gas turbine is $86/MWh while that for the advanced IGCC identified in this investigation consisting of an intercooled gas turbine with a firing temperature that is 340°C higher is $79/MWh which is a significant 8% reduction.</description><subject>Advanced Brayton cycles</subject><subject>Advanced combined cycles</subject><subject>Advanced gas turbines</subject><subject>Advanced power cycles</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>CO2 capture</subject><subject>coal</subject><subject>combustion</subject><subject>cooling</subject><subject>electricity costs</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Engines and turbines</subject><subject>Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>gasification</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>IGCC</subject><subject>natural gas</subject><subject>steam</subject><subject>synthesis gas</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>turbines</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwFyALEgwJZyd2nY2q4kuqxACdLce-VK7SpNhppf57HAVYme6G572Ph5BrChkFKh42md5hi359zBhQloHIIOcnZELljKUlpfKUTCAHkTJBy3NyEcIGABhlMCH38zbBg272unddm3R1ou1BtwZtYrpt5dqhOZoGwyU5q3UT8OqnTsnq-elz8Zou31_eFvNlavKy7NNSci4LWtTcAsulETOQspAcpUARz63AQKya5kih1KywllUWbWW4sQJNPiV349yd7772GHq1dcFg0-gWu31QlAPPCx63RFSMqPFdCB5rtfNuq_1RUVCDG7VRv27U4EaBUNFNDN7-7NDB6Kb28WMX_tJMzIYnisjdjFytO6XXPjKrjzhIDP4kZ3kkHkcCo5KDQ6-CcTj4cx5Nr2zn_jvmG_x5hNA</recordid><startdate>20130201</startdate><enddate>20130201</enddate><creator>Rao, Ashok D.</creator><creator>Francuz, David J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130201</creationdate><title>An evaluation of advanced combined cycles</title><author>Rao, Ashok D. ; Francuz, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-98558414f5d0238c67088485e86e6016b0c0601a13e109a24dd2bdedbc5cd6ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Advanced Brayton cycles</topic><topic>Advanced combined cycles</topic><topic>Advanced gas turbines</topic><topic>Advanced power cycles</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>CO2 capture</topic><topic>coal</topic><topic>combustion</topic><topic>cooling</topic><topic>electricity costs</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Engines and turbines</topic><topic>Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>gasification</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>IGCC</topic><topic>natural gas</topic><topic>steam</topic><topic>synthesis gas</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rao, Ashok D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francuz, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rao, Ashok D.</au><au>Francuz, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of advanced combined cycles</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>2013-02-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>102</volume><spage>1178</spage><epage>1186</epage><pages>1178-1186</pages><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><coden>APENDX</coden><abstract>► Thermo-economic analyses of advanced IGCC with CO2 capture. ► Gasification plants with advanced combined cycles are compared. ► Gas turbine required for 8% reduction in heat rate goal over H class IGCC. ► Spray intercooling and pressure ratio of 50 added features of this advanced gas turbine. ► Levelized cost of electricity by 8% over IGCC utilizing the H class gas turbine.
The main objective of this investigation is to identify and assess advanced improvements to the combined cycle such as gas turbine firing temperature, pressure ratio, combustion techniques, intercooling, enhanced blade cooling schemes and supercritical steam cycles that will lead to significant performance improvements in coal based power systems. This assessment is conducted in the context of conceptual designs that advance state-of-art combined cycles and result in an 8% reduction in heat rate over a coal based Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant utilizing an H class gas turbine technology with steam cooling. This efficiency goal for the study was set by the United States Department of Energy. H class gas turbines are commercially offered by General Electric (GE), Mitsubishi and Siemens for natural gas based combined cycle applications with 60% efficiency (LHV) and it is expected that such machines will be offered for syngas applications within the next 5–10years, while our investigation looks further beyond that time frame. The levelized cost of electricity for an IGCC utilizing the H class gas turbine is $86/MWh while that for the advanced IGCC identified in this investigation consisting of an intercooled gas turbine with a firing temperature that is 340°C higher is $79/MWh which is a significant 8% reduction.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.035</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-2619 |
ispartof | Applied energy, 2013-02, Vol.102, p.1178-1186 |
issn | 0306-2619 1872-9118 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1505345558 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Advanced Brayton cycles Advanced combined cycles Advanced gas turbines Advanced power cycles Applied sciences CO2 capture coal combustion cooling electricity costs Energy Energy. Thermal use of fuels Engines and turbines Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc Exact sciences and technology gasification heat IGCC natural gas steam synthesis gas temperature turbines |
title | An evaluation of advanced combined cycles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A02%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20advanced%20combined%20cycles&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=Rao,%20Ashok%20D.&rft.date=2013-02-01&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=1178&rft.epage=1186&rft.pages=1178-1186&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft.coden=APENDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1505345558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1505345558&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0306261912004801&rfr_iscdi=true |