Atypical femoral fractures: retrospective radiological study of 319 femoral fractures and presentation of clinical cases

Summary There is still no clarity on the etiology and epidemiology of atypical femoral fractures. The purpose is to show, after a radiological review, that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the sam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoporosis international 2014-03, Vol.25 (3), p.993-997
Hauptverfasser: Bottai, V., Giannotti, S., Dell’osso, G., De Paola, G., Menconi, A., Falossi, F., Raffaetà, G., Guido, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 997
container_issue 3
container_start_page 993
container_title Osteoporosis international
container_volume 25
creator Bottai, V.
Giannotti, S.
Dell’osso, G.
De Paola, G.
Menconi, A.
Falossi, F.
Raffaetà, G.
Guido, G.
description Summary There is still no clarity on the etiology and epidemiology of atypical femoral fractures. The purpose is to show, after a radiological review, that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the same anatomical site. Introduction At present, it is difficult to define the true incidence of atypical fractures associated with bisphosphonate. Our purpose is to show that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the same anatomical site. Methods The authors analyzed 319 femoral fracture Rxs of patients over 60 who have had access to the PS of Clinical Orthopaedics and Traumatology II of the University of Pisa from January 2011 to February 2013. The atypical fractures have been investigated from clinical point of view, biohumoral exams, densitometry and contralateral femur X-rays, and in one case using SPECT-Tc. Results The total number of femoral fractures was 319. The medial femur fractures were 60 (46 females and 14 males), and the lateral ones were 316 (237 females and 79 males). Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures were 40 (29 females and 11 males). Among these cases, two atypical fracture cases were related to female patients, one was 79 years old and the other was 77. Conclusions The most recent literature reports that the incidence of atypical fractures is 0.6 %. However, taking into consideration only the fracture locations suitable for the identification of atypical fractures, the percentage rises to 5 %. To date, there is still no clarity on the exact etiology of fractures even if it seems to be related to a bone mineral component alteration.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00198-013-2546-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1505339340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1505339340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p245t-96ded993dd1b4cba725f52eb3d4e4cc23c0b60b04cdcf953bcb46fec5dcf3d9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkU1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXatIk7cabLH6B4EXBW8jHVLq0TU1Scf-9qasgepoZ5nmH4X0ROib4nGBcXQSMiVjmmNC84KzMlztoThhNkyj5LppjQatcMPIyQwchrHHSCFHto1nBSEU5Lefo4ypuhsaoNquhc36qXpk4egiXmYfoXRjAxOYdMq9s41r3-kWHONpN5uqMEvFfmqneZkNqoI8qNq6fSNM2_ZfWqADhEO3Vqg1w9F0X6Pnm-ml1lz883t6vrh7yoWA85qK0YIWg1hLNjFZVwWtegKaWATOmoAbrEmvMjDW14FQbzcoaDE8jtULTBTrb3h28exshRNk1wUDbqh7cGCThmFMqKMMJPf2Drt3o-_SdJEwkw_Bk7gKdfFOj7sDKwTed8hv542kCii0Q0qp_Bf_rDJZTcHIbnEzBySk4uaSfa86LvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1497350143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atypical femoral fractures: retrospective radiological study of 319 femoral fractures and presentation of clinical cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Bottai, V. ; Giannotti, S. ; Dell’osso, G. ; De Paola, G. ; Menconi, A. ; Falossi, F. ; Raffaetà, G. ; Guido, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bottai, V. ; Giannotti, S. ; Dell’osso, G. ; De Paola, G. ; Menconi, A. ; Falossi, F. ; Raffaetà, G. ; Guido, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary There is still no clarity on the etiology and epidemiology of atypical femoral fractures. The purpose is to show, after a radiological review, that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the same anatomical site. Introduction At present, it is difficult to define the true incidence of atypical fractures associated with bisphosphonate. Our purpose is to show that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the same anatomical site. Methods The authors analyzed 319 femoral fracture Rxs of patients over 60 who have had access to the PS of Clinical Orthopaedics and Traumatology II of the University of Pisa from January 2011 to February 2013. The atypical fractures have been investigated from clinical point of view, biohumoral exams, densitometry and contralateral femur X-rays, and in one case using SPECT-Tc. Results The total number of femoral fractures was 319. The medial femur fractures were 60 (46 females and 14 males), and the lateral ones were 316 (237 females and 79 males). Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures were 40 (29 females and 11 males). Among these cases, two atypical fracture cases were related to female patients, one was 79 years old and the other was 77. Conclusions The most recent literature reports that the incidence of atypical fractures is 0.6 %. However, taking into consideration only the fracture locations suitable for the identification of atypical fractures, the percentage rises to 5 %. To date, there is still no clarity on the exact etiology of fractures even if it seems to be related to a bone mineral component alteration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2546-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24173536</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - adverse effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use ; Diphosphonates - adverse effects ; Diphosphonates - therapeutic use ; Drug therapy ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - chemically induced ; Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Fractures ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporosis - drug therapy ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Rheumatology</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2014-03, Vol.25 (3), p.993-997</ispartof><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2013</rights><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p245t-96ded993dd1b4cba725f52eb3d4e4cc23c0b60b04cdcf953bcb46fec5dcf3d9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00198-013-2546-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00198-013-2546-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24173536$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bottai, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannotti, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell’osso, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Paola, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menconi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falossi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffaetà, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guido, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Atypical femoral fractures: retrospective radiological study of 319 femoral fractures and presentation of clinical cases</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>Summary There is still no clarity on the etiology and epidemiology of atypical femoral fractures. The purpose is to show, after a radiological review, that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the same anatomical site. Introduction At present, it is difficult to define the true incidence of atypical fractures associated with bisphosphonate. Our purpose is to show that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the same anatomical site. Methods The authors analyzed 319 femoral fracture Rxs of patients over 60 who have had access to the PS of Clinical Orthopaedics and Traumatology II of the University of Pisa from January 2011 to February 2013. The atypical fractures have been investigated from clinical point of view, biohumoral exams, densitometry and contralateral femur X-rays, and in one case using SPECT-Tc. Results The total number of femoral fractures was 319. The medial femur fractures were 60 (46 females and 14 males), and the lateral ones were 316 (237 females and 79 males). Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures were 40 (29 females and 11 males). Among these cases, two atypical fracture cases were related to female patients, one was 79 years old and the other was 77. Conclusions The most recent literature reports that the incidence of atypical fractures is 0.6 %. However, taking into consideration only the fracture locations suitable for the identification of atypical fractures, the percentage rises to 5 %. To date, there is still no clarity on the exact etiology of fractures even if it seems to be related to a bone mineral component alteration.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Diphosphonates - adverse effects</subject><subject>Diphosphonates - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - chemically induced</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkU1LxDAQhoMo7rr6A7xIwYuXatIk7cabLH6B4EXBW8jHVLq0TU1Scf-9qasgepoZ5nmH4X0ROib4nGBcXQSMiVjmmNC84KzMlztoThhNkyj5LppjQatcMPIyQwchrHHSCFHto1nBSEU5Lefo4ypuhsaoNquhc36qXpk4egiXmYfoXRjAxOYdMq9s41r3-kWHONpN5uqMEvFfmqneZkNqoI8qNq6fSNM2_ZfWqADhEO3Vqg1w9F0X6Pnm-ml1lz883t6vrh7yoWA85qK0YIWg1hLNjFZVwWtegKaWATOmoAbrEmvMjDW14FQbzcoaDE8jtULTBTrb3h28exshRNk1wUDbqh7cGCThmFMqKMMJPf2Drt3o-_SdJEwkw_Bk7gKdfFOj7sDKwTed8hv542kCii0Q0qp_Bf_rDJZTcHIbnEzBySk4uaSfa86LvQ</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Bottai, V.</creator><creator>Giannotti, S.</creator><creator>Dell’osso, G.</creator><creator>De Paola, G.</creator><creator>Menconi, A.</creator><creator>Falossi, F.</creator><creator>Raffaetà, G.</creator><creator>Guido, G.</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Atypical femoral fractures: retrospective radiological study of 319 femoral fractures and presentation of clinical cases</title><author>Bottai, V. ; Giannotti, S. ; Dell’osso, G. ; De Paola, G. ; Menconi, A. ; Falossi, F. ; Raffaetà, G. ; Guido, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p245t-96ded993dd1b4cba725f52eb3d4e4cc23c0b60b04cdcf953bcb46fec5dcf3d9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Diphosphonates - adverse effects</topic><topic>Diphosphonates - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - chemically induced</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bottai, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannotti, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell’osso, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Paola, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menconi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falossi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffaetà, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guido, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bottai, V.</au><au>Giannotti, S.</au><au>Dell’osso, G.</au><au>De Paola, G.</au><au>Menconi, A.</au><au>Falossi, F.</au><au>Raffaetà, G.</au><au>Guido, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atypical femoral fractures: retrospective radiological study of 319 femoral fractures and presentation of clinical cases</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><stitle>Osteoporos Int</stitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>993</spage><epage>997</epage><pages>993-997</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Summary There is still no clarity on the etiology and epidemiology of atypical femoral fractures. The purpose is to show, after a radiological review, that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the same anatomical site. Introduction At present, it is difficult to define the true incidence of atypical fractures associated with bisphosphonate. Our purpose is to show that the incidence of atypical fractures is higher than that reported in the literature when compared to “typical” fractures that occurred in the same anatomical site. Methods The authors analyzed 319 femoral fracture Rxs of patients over 60 who have had access to the PS of Clinical Orthopaedics and Traumatology II of the University of Pisa from January 2011 to February 2013. The atypical fractures have been investigated from clinical point of view, biohumoral exams, densitometry and contralateral femur X-rays, and in one case using SPECT-Tc. Results The total number of femoral fractures was 319. The medial femur fractures were 60 (46 females and 14 males), and the lateral ones were 316 (237 females and 79 males). Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures were 40 (29 females and 11 males). Among these cases, two atypical fracture cases were related to female patients, one was 79 years old and the other was 77. Conclusions The most recent literature reports that the incidence of atypical fractures is 0.6 %. However, taking into consideration only the fracture locations suitable for the identification of atypical fractures, the percentage rises to 5 %. To date, there is still no clarity on the exact etiology of fractures even if it seems to be related to a bone mineral component alteration.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>24173536</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00198-013-2546-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-941X
ispartof Osteoporosis international, 2014-03, Vol.25 (3), p.993-997
issn 0937-941X
1433-2965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1505339340
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Density Conservation Agents - adverse effects
Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use
Diphosphonates - adverse effects
Diphosphonates - therapeutic use
Drug therapy
Endocrinology
Female
Femoral Fractures - chemically induced
Femoral Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Femoral Fractures - surgery
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods
Fractures
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Article
Orthopedics
Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis - drug therapy
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Rheumatology
title Atypical femoral fractures: retrospective radiological study of 319 femoral fractures and presentation of clinical cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atypical%20femoral%20fractures:%20retrospective%20radiological%20study%20of%20319%20femoral%20fractures%20and%20presentation%20of%20clinical%20cases&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Bottai,%20V.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=993&rft.epage=997&rft.pages=993-997&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-013-2546-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1505339340%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1497350143&rft_id=info:pmid/24173536&rfr_iscdi=true