Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients

Aims and objectives.  To investigate the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Burden Scale in family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. Background.  In Turkey, there is a need for a multi‐dimensional instrument to evaluate the caregiver burden in people who provide car...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical nursing 2014-02, Vol.23 (3-4), p.352-360
Hauptverfasser: Cil Akinci, Ayse, Pinar, Rukiye
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 360
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 352
container_title Journal of clinical nursing
container_volume 23
creator Cil Akinci, Ayse
Pinar, Rukiye
description Aims and objectives.  To investigate the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Burden Scale in family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. Background.  In Turkey, there is a need for a multi‐dimensional instrument to evaluate the caregiver burden in people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases. Design.  A methodological study. Methods.  The study sample consisted of 161 family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. The forward‐backward translation method was used to develop the Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale. The reliability was based on internal consistency investigated by Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlation. The factorial construct validity of the scale was tested with confirmatory factor analysis. By means of convergent and divergent validity, correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) and correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and the Maslach Burnout Scale were investigated. Results.  Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlations results suggested that there was good internal reliability. We found five underlying factors similar to original Scale’s five‐factor solution. The confirmatory factor analysis five‐factor model represented an acceptable fit. Factor loadings were significant, with standardised loadings ranging from 0·43–0·81. By means of divergent validity, all sub‐dimension scores and the total score of the Caregiver Burden Scale were negatively correlated with the SF‐36, whereas there was a positive correlation with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation subscales of the Maslach Burnout Scale as expected. Conclusion.  These results suggest that the Caregiver Burden Scale is a reliable and valid instrument which can be used with confidence in Turkish caregivers for haemodialysis patients to screen caregiver burden. Relevance to clinical practice.  The burden experienced by people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases can be evaluated with the Caregiver Burden Scale. Additionally, the Caregiver Burden Scale can be used in the evaluation of the effectiveness of attempts to decrease caregiver burden.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04235.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1505252764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1492700730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-d332d007664d374fa71e9620caeab69357a7278e648b5d6fb447e348463fcda93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokPhFZAlNmwS_O9kgwQRFIahFaLA0nJip_XUSaZ2ApO3x2HaWbABb2zL535X1wcAiFGO03q1zTEVPCMSkZwgTHLECOX5_gFYHR8eghUqBckwEvIEPIlxixCmhNDH4IRQXAhOxAr479o748YZ6t7AYL3TtfPLfWjh5RRuXLyGlQ72yv20Ab6dgrE9_Npob6Huhv4KtrpzfobNPROXymttu8E47efoItzp0dl-jE_Bo1b7aJ_d7afg2_t3l9WHbHNx9rF6s8kaJkqeGUqJQUgKwQyVrNUS2zQJarTVtSgpl1oSWVjBipob0daMSUtZwQRtG6NLegpeHnJ3YbidbBxV52Jjvde9HaaoMEeccCIF-zfKyvSZSFKU0Bd_odthCn0aZKFYUXBBRaKKA9WEIcZgW7ULrtNhVhipRZ7aqsWRWhypRZ76I0_tU-nzuwZT3VlzLLy3lYDXB-CX83b-72C1vqjOl2MKyA4BLo52fwzQ4UYJSSVXP87P1Lr68mn9WWxUQX8DG9e21g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1494885636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Cil Akinci, Ayse ; Pinar, Rukiye</creator><creatorcontrib>Cil Akinci, Ayse ; Pinar, Rukiye</creatorcontrib><description>Aims and objectives.  To investigate the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Burden Scale in family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. Background.  In Turkey, there is a need for a multi‐dimensional instrument to evaluate the caregiver burden in people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases. Design.  A methodological study. Methods.  The study sample consisted of 161 family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. The forward‐backward translation method was used to develop the Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale. The reliability was based on internal consistency investigated by Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlation. The factorial construct validity of the scale was tested with confirmatory factor analysis. By means of convergent and divergent validity, correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) and correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and the Maslach Burnout Scale were investigated. Results.  Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlations results suggested that there was good internal reliability. We found five underlying factors similar to original Scale’s five‐factor solution. The confirmatory factor analysis five‐factor model represented an acceptable fit. Factor loadings were significant, with standardised loadings ranging from 0·43–0·81. By means of divergent validity, all sub‐dimension scores and the total score of the Caregiver Burden Scale were negatively correlated with the SF‐36, whereas there was a positive correlation with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation subscales of the Maslach Burnout Scale as expected. Conclusion.  These results suggest that the Caregiver Burden Scale is a reliable and valid instrument which can be used with confidence in Turkish caregivers for haemodialysis patients to screen caregiver burden. Relevance to clinical practice.  The burden experienced by people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases can be evaluated with the Caregiver Burden Scale. Additionally, the Caregiver Burden Scale can be used in the evaluation of the effectiveness of attempts to decrease caregiver burden.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04235.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23186526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>caregiver burden ; Caregivers ; Caregivers - psychology ; end-stage renal disease ; Family - psychology ; Female ; haemodialysis ; Hemodialysis ; Humans ; Male ; Nursing ; Palliative care ; Reliability ; Renal Dialysis ; Stress, Psychological ; Turkey ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2014-02, Vol.23 (3-4), p.352-360</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-d332d007664d374fa71e9620caeab69357a7278e648b5d6fb447e348463fcda93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-d332d007664d374fa71e9620caeab69357a7278e648b5d6fb447e348463fcda93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2702.2012.04235.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2702.2012.04235.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23186526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cil Akinci, Ayse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinar, Rukiye</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aims and objectives.  To investigate the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Burden Scale in family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. Background.  In Turkey, there is a need for a multi‐dimensional instrument to evaluate the caregiver burden in people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases. Design.  A methodological study. Methods.  The study sample consisted of 161 family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. The forward‐backward translation method was used to develop the Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale. The reliability was based on internal consistency investigated by Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlation. The factorial construct validity of the scale was tested with confirmatory factor analysis. By means of convergent and divergent validity, correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) and correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and the Maslach Burnout Scale were investigated. Results.  Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlations results suggested that there was good internal reliability. We found five underlying factors similar to original Scale’s five‐factor solution. The confirmatory factor analysis five‐factor model represented an acceptable fit. Factor loadings were significant, with standardised loadings ranging from 0·43–0·81. By means of divergent validity, all sub‐dimension scores and the total score of the Caregiver Burden Scale were negatively correlated with the SF‐36, whereas there was a positive correlation with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation subscales of the Maslach Burnout Scale as expected. Conclusion.  These results suggest that the Caregiver Burden Scale is a reliable and valid instrument which can be used with confidence in Turkish caregivers for haemodialysis patients to screen caregiver burden. Relevance to clinical practice.  The burden experienced by people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases can be evaluated with the Caregiver Burden Scale. Additionally, the Caregiver Burden Scale can be used in the evaluation of the effectiveness of attempts to decrease caregiver burden.</description><subject>caregiver burden</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Caregivers - psychology</subject><subject>end-stage renal disease</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>haemodialysis</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAURi0EokPhFZAlNmwS_O9kgwQRFIahFaLA0nJip_XUSaZ2ApO3x2HaWbABb2zL535X1wcAiFGO03q1zTEVPCMSkZwgTHLECOX5_gFYHR8eghUqBckwEvIEPIlxixCmhNDH4IRQXAhOxAr479o748YZ6t7AYL3TtfPLfWjh5RRuXLyGlQ72yv20Ab6dgrE9_Npob6Huhv4KtrpzfobNPROXymttu8E47efoItzp0dl-jE_Bo1b7aJ_d7afg2_t3l9WHbHNx9rF6s8kaJkqeGUqJQUgKwQyVrNUS2zQJarTVtSgpl1oSWVjBipob0daMSUtZwQRtG6NLegpeHnJ3YbidbBxV52Jjvde9HaaoMEeccCIF-zfKyvSZSFKU0Bd_odthCn0aZKFYUXBBRaKKA9WEIcZgW7ULrtNhVhipRZ7aqsWRWhypRZ76I0_tU-nzuwZT3VlzLLy3lYDXB-CX83b-72C1vqjOl2MKyA4BLo52fwzQ4UYJSSVXP87P1Lr68mn9WWxUQX8DG9e21g</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Cil Akinci, Ayse</creator><creator>Pinar, Rukiye</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients</title><author>Cil Akinci, Ayse ; Pinar, Rukiye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4695-d332d007664d374fa71e9620caeab69357a7278e648b5d6fb447e348463fcda93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>caregiver burden</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Caregivers - psychology</topic><topic>end-stage renal disease</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>haemodialysis</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cil Akinci, Ayse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinar, Rukiye</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cil Akinci, Ayse</au><au>Pinar, Rukiye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>360</epage><pages>352-360</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aims and objectives.  To investigate the validity and reliability of the Caregiver Burden Scale in family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. Background.  In Turkey, there is a need for a multi‐dimensional instrument to evaluate the caregiver burden in people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases. Design.  A methodological study. Methods.  The study sample consisted of 161 family members who provide primary care for haemodialysis patients. The forward‐backward translation method was used to develop the Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale. The reliability was based on internal consistency investigated by Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlation. The factorial construct validity of the scale was tested with confirmatory factor analysis. By means of convergent and divergent validity, correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36) and correlation between Caregiver Burden Scale and the Maslach Burnout Scale were investigated. Results.  Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlations results suggested that there was good internal reliability. We found five underlying factors similar to original Scale’s five‐factor solution. The confirmatory factor analysis five‐factor model represented an acceptable fit. Factor loadings were significant, with standardised loadings ranging from 0·43–0·81. By means of divergent validity, all sub‐dimension scores and the total score of the Caregiver Burden Scale were negatively correlated with the SF‐36, whereas there was a positive correlation with the emotional exhaustion and depersonalisation subscales of the Maslach Burnout Scale as expected. Conclusion.  These results suggest that the Caregiver Burden Scale is a reliable and valid instrument which can be used with confidence in Turkish caregivers for haemodialysis patients to screen caregiver burden. Relevance to clinical practice.  The burden experienced by people who provide care for patients with chronic diseases can be evaluated with the Caregiver Burden Scale. Additionally, the Caregiver Burden Scale can be used in the evaluation of the effectiveness of attempts to decrease caregiver burden.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23186526</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04235.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-1067
ispartof Journal of clinical nursing, 2014-02, Vol.23 (3-4), p.352-360
issn 0962-1067
1365-2702
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1505252764
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects caregiver burden
Caregivers
Caregivers - psychology
end-stage renal disease
Family - psychology
Female
haemodialysis
Hemodialysis
Humans
Male
Nursing
Palliative care
Reliability
Renal Dialysis
Stress, Psychological
Turkey
Validity
title Validity and reliability of Turkish Caregiver Burden Scale among family caregivers of haemodialysis patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20Turkish%20Caregiver%20Burden%20Scale%20among%20family%20caregivers%20of%20haemodialysis%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Cil%20Akinci,%20Ayse&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=360&rft.pages=352-360&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04235.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492700730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1494885636&rft_id=info:pmid/23186526&rfr_iscdi=true