Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial

Summary Background Women at low risk of pregnancy complications benefit from continuity of midwifery care, but no trial evidence exists for women with identified risk factors. We aimed to assess the clinical and cost outcomes of caseload midwifery care for women irrespective of risk factors. Methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The Lancet (British edition) 2013-11, Vol.382 (9906), p.1723-1732
Hauptverfasser:	Tracy, Sally K, Prof, Hartz, Donna L, PhD, Tracy, Mark B, FRACP, Allen, Jyai, BMid, Forti, Amanda, RM, Hall, Bev, MIPH, White, Jan, RM, Lainchbury, Anne, MMid, Stapleton, Helen, PhD, Beckmann, Michael, FRANZCOG, Bisits, Andrew, FRANZCOG, Homer, Caroline, Prof, Foureur, Maralyn, Prof, Welsh, Alec, Prof, Kildea, Sue, Prof
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adolescent Adult analgesia Biological and medical sciences biomedical research cesarean section Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data cost effectiveness Cost-Benefit Analysis Female General aspects Health participants Hospitals Humans Internal Medicine Maternal Age Medical research Medical sciences Middle Aged Midwifery Midwifery - economics Midwifery - methods midwives Obstetrics odds ratio Postpartum period Pregnancy pregnancy complications Pregnancy Complications - economics Pregnancy Complications - therapy Pregnancy Outcome pregnant women premature birth Prenatal Care - economics Prenatal Care - methods Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine randomized clinical trials risk Risk Factors Womens health Young Adult
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!