Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy

Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biops...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2014-03, Vol.50 (5), p.920-927
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Stanley K.T, Chand, Manish, Tait, Diana M, Brown, Gina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 927
container_issue 5
container_start_page 920
container_title European journal of cancer (1990)
container_volume 50
creator Yu, Stanley K.T
Chand, Manish
Tait, Diana M
Brown, Gina
description Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biopsy in detecting mucinous adenocarcinoma was also assessed. Methods The proportion of patients downstaged in the mrMucinous and adenocarcinoma groups was compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test independence of mucinous status and baseline MRI and clinical variables on survival. Differences in survival for mucinous versus non-mucinous tumours were tested for significance using the Mantel-Cox log rank test. Results 60/330 (18%) patients were correctly diagnosed with mucinous rectal cancer based on pre treatment MRI compared with 15/330 (5%) on initial biopsy (diagnostic odds ratio = 4.67, p < 0.05). All 60 (100%) patients undergoing surgery for mrMucinous tumours were confirmed as such on final histopathology. Significantly fewer mrMucinous tumours showed ypT downstaging when compared with non-mucinous tumours (14/60 (23%) versus 111/270 (40%), p = 0.01). Three-year survival outcomes for patients for MRI detected mucinous tumours were significantly worse: disease free survival (DFS) was 48% versus 71%, p = 0.006 and OS was 69% versus 79% p = 0.04. MRI Mucin was an independent variable for poor DFS (hazard ratios (HR)) 0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.89). Conclusions MRI diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma is diagnostically superior to preoperative biopsy and occurs in up to 20% of rectal cancer patients. It is an independent imaging biomarker for response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognosis. MRI documentation of mucinous status will enable future pursuit of treatment strategies in this poor prognostic subgroup.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1504143679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804913011015</els_id><sourcerecordid>1504143679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cf8b3aa8691a3df3d02a13d4f3189a3a5f684cf9f63ee5204ccba06baf5f77583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxZ1f_gAfJRfAyY9JJf4EIy6KrsOJBPYfqpDKb2e6kTXoW5hf5N612xhU8eKlA1Xv18V6K4oXgG8FF_Wa3wZ2BTcmF3Ihyw3nzqFiJtunWvK3Kx8WKd1W3brnqzorznHecEK3iT4uzUinFeVuvip-fYRtw9oYlzDFAMMj8CFsftsyi8wEtG_fGh7jPBDEzDMxAWhIjMJ8ZBOaDxQkphPmB23uqpztMzMXEpriEFLch5t8ce0zRzCmGjGyOVMY4YYLZ3yMztzjGBNbH-ZZy0-FZ8cTBkPH56b0ovn94_-3q4_rmy_Wnq8ubtVFKzGvj2l4CtHUnQFonLS9BSKucFG0HEipXt8q4ztUSsSq5MqYHXvfgKtc0VSsvitfHvrTtjz3mWY8-GxwGCEgSaFFxJZSsm46g5RFqUsw5odNTovPTQQuuF4P0Ti8G6cUgLUpN8hPp5an_vh_RPlD-OEKAVycAZAODS2SJz39xdFopumX62yMOSY17j0ln45Hss36xSdvo_7_Hu3_oZvDB08Q7PGDexX0KpLMWOhNBf12-0vKThOSCelbyF4gvyMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504143679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Yu, Stanley K.T ; Chand, Manish ; Tait, Diana M ; Brown, Gina</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Stanley K.T ; Chand, Manish ; Tait, Diana M ; Brown, Gina</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biopsy in detecting mucinous adenocarcinoma was also assessed. Methods The proportion of patients downstaged in the mrMucinous and adenocarcinoma groups was compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test independence of mucinous status and baseline MRI and clinical variables on survival. Differences in survival for mucinous versus non-mucinous tumours were tested for significance using the Mantel-Cox log rank test. Results 60/330 (18%) patients were correctly diagnosed with mucinous rectal cancer based on pre treatment MRI compared with 15/330 (5%) on initial biopsy (diagnostic odds ratio = 4.67, p &lt; 0.05). All 60 (100%) patients undergoing surgery for mrMucinous tumours were confirmed as such on final histopathology. Significantly fewer mrMucinous tumours showed ypT downstaging when compared with non-mucinous tumours (14/60 (23%) versus 111/270 (40%), p = 0.01). Three-year survival outcomes for patients for MRI detected mucinous tumours were significantly worse: disease free survival (DFS) was 48% versus 71%, p = 0.006 and OS was 69% versus 79% p = 0.04. MRI Mucin was an independent variable for poor DFS (hazard ratios (HR)) 0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.89). Conclusions MRI diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma is diagnostically superior to preoperative biopsy and occurs in up to 20% of rectal cancer patients. It is an independent imaging biomarker for response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognosis. MRI documentation of mucinous status will enable future pursuit of treatment strategies in this poor prognostic subgroup.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24440086</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adenocarcinoma - therapy ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mucinous ; Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) ; Multivariate Analysis ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Preoperative Period ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Rectal ; Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Response ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2014-03, Vol.50 (5), p.920-927</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cf8b3aa8691a3df3d02a13d4f3189a3a5f684cf9f63ee5204ccba06baf5f77583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cf8b3aa8691a3df3d02a13d4f3189a3a5f684cf9f63ee5204ccba06baf5f77583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28692199$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24440086$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Stanley K.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chand, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Diana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gina</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biopsy in detecting mucinous adenocarcinoma was also assessed. Methods The proportion of patients downstaged in the mrMucinous and adenocarcinoma groups was compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test independence of mucinous status and baseline MRI and clinical variables on survival. Differences in survival for mucinous versus non-mucinous tumours were tested for significance using the Mantel-Cox log rank test. Results 60/330 (18%) patients were correctly diagnosed with mucinous rectal cancer based on pre treatment MRI compared with 15/330 (5%) on initial biopsy (diagnostic odds ratio = 4.67, p &lt; 0.05). All 60 (100%) patients undergoing surgery for mrMucinous tumours were confirmed as such on final histopathology. Significantly fewer mrMucinous tumours showed ypT downstaging when compared with non-mucinous tumours (14/60 (23%) versus 111/270 (40%), p = 0.01). Three-year survival outcomes for patients for MRI detected mucinous tumours were significantly worse: disease free survival (DFS) was 48% versus 71%, p = 0.006 and OS was 69% versus 79% p = 0.04. MRI Mucin was an independent variable for poor DFS (hazard ratios (HR)) 0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.89). Conclusions MRI diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma is diagnostically superior to preoperative biopsy and occurs in up to 20% of rectal cancer patients. It is an independent imaging biomarker for response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognosis. MRI documentation of mucinous status will enable future pursuit of treatment strategies in this poor prognostic subgroup.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mucinous</subject><subject>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Preoperative Period</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Rectal</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Response</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxZ1f_gAfJRfAyY9JJf4EIy6KrsOJBPYfqpDKb2e6kTXoW5hf5N612xhU8eKlA1Xv18V6K4oXgG8FF_Wa3wZ2BTcmF3Ihyw3nzqFiJtunWvK3Kx8WKd1W3brnqzorznHecEK3iT4uzUinFeVuvip-fYRtw9oYlzDFAMMj8CFsftsyi8wEtG_fGh7jPBDEzDMxAWhIjMJ8ZBOaDxQkphPmB23uqpztMzMXEpriEFLch5t8ce0zRzCmGjGyOVMY4YYLZ3yMztzjGBNbH-ZZy0-FZ8cTBkPH56b0ovn94_-3q4_rmy_Wnq8ubtVFKzGvj2l4CtHUnQFonLS9BSKucFG0HEipXt8q4ztUSsSq5MqYHXvfgKtc0VSsvitfHvrTtjz3mWY8-GxwGCEgSaFFxJZSsm46g5RFqUsw5odNTovPTQQuuF4P0Ti8G6cUgLUpN8hPp5an_vh_RPlD-OEKAVycAZAODS2SJz39xdFopumX62yMOSY17j0ln45Hss36xSdvo_7_Hu3_oZvDB08Q7PGDexX0KpLMWOhNBf12-0vKThOSCelbyF4gvyMo</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Yu, Stanley K.T</creator><creator>Chand, Manish</creator><creator>Tait, Diana M</creator><creator>Brown, Gina</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy</title><author>Yu, Stanley K.T ; Chand, Manish ; Tait, Diana M ; Brown, Gina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cf8b3aa8691a3df3d02a13d4f3189a3a5f684cf9f63ee5204ccba06baf5f77583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mucinous</topic><topic>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Preoperative Period</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Rectal</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Response</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Stanley K.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chand, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Diana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gina</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Stanley K.T</au><au>Chand, Manish</au><au>Tait, Diana M</au><au>Brown, Gina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>920</spage><epage>927</epage><pages>920-927</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biopsy in detecting mucinous adenocarcinoma was also assessed. Methods The proportion of patients downstaged in the mrMucinous and adenocarcinoma groups was compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test independence of mucinous status and baseline MRI and clinical variables on survival. Differences in survival for mucinous versus non-mucinous tumours were tested for significance using the Mantel-Cox log rank test. Results 60/330 (18%) patients were correctly diagnosed with mucinous rectal cancer based on pre treatment MRI compared with 15/330 (5%) on initial biopsy (diagnostic odds ratio = 4.67, p &lt; 0.05). All 60 (100%) patients undergoing surgery for mrMucinous tumours were confirmed as such on final histopathology. Significantly fewer mrMucinous tumours showed ypT downstaging when compared with non-mucinous tumours (14/60 (23%) versus 111/270 (40%), p = 0.01). Three-year survival outcomes for patients for MRI detected mucinous tumours were significantly worse: disease free survival (DFS) was 48% versus 71%, p = 0.006 and OS was 69% versus 79% p = 0.04. MRI Mucin was an independent variable for poor DFS (hazard ratios (HR)) 0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.89). Conclusions MRI diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma is diagnostically superior to preoperative biopsy and occurs in up to 20% of rectal cancer patients. It is an independent imaging biomarker for response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognosis. MRI documentation of mucinous status will enable future pursuit of treatment strategies in this poor prognostic subgroup.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24440086</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8049
ispartof European journal of cancer (1990), 2014-03, Vol.50 (5), p.920-927
issn 0959-8049
1879-0852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1504143679
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adenocarcinoma - therapy
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - diagnosis
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Cancer
Chemoradiotherapy
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mucinous
Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)
Multivariate Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Preoperative Period
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Rectal
Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Rectal Neoplasms - therapy
Reproducibility of Results
Response
Sensitivity and Specificity
Survival
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Tumors
title Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T18%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20defined%20mucinous%20rectal%20carcinoma%20is%20an%20independent%20imaging%20biomarker%20for%20poor%20prognosis%20and%20poor%20response%20to%20preoperative%20chemoradiotherapy&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Yu,%20Stanley%20K.T&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=920&rft.epage=927&rft.pages=920-927&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1504143679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504143679&rft_id=info:pmid/24440086&rft_els_id=S0959804913011015&rfr_iscdi=true