Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy
Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biops...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of cancer (1990) 2014-03, Vol.50 (5), p.920-927 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 927 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 920 |
container_title | European journal of cancer (1990) |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Yu, Stanley K.T Chand, Manish Tait, Diana M Brown, Gina |
description | Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biopsy in detecting mucinous adenocarcinoma was also assessed. Methods The proportion of patients downstaged in the mrMucinous and adenocarcinoma groups was compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test independence of mucinous status and baseline MRI and clinical variables on survival. Differences in survival for mucinous versus non-mucinous tumours were tested for significance using the Mantel-Cox log rank test. Results 60/330 (18%) patients were correctly diagnosed with mucinous rectal cancer based on pre treatment MRI compared with 15/330 (5%) on initial biopsy (diagnostic odds ratio = 4.67, p < 0.05). All 60 (100%) patients undergoing surgery for mrMucinous tumours were confirmed as such on final histopathology. Significantly fewer mrMucinous tumours showed ypT downstaging when compared with non-mucinous tumours (14/60 (23%) versus 111/270 (40%), p = 0.01). Three-year survival outcomes for patients for MRI detected mucinous tumours were significantly worse: disease free survival (DFS) was 48% versus 71%, p = 0.006 and OS was 69% versus 79% p = 0.04. MRI Mucin was an independent variable for poor DFS (hazard ratios (HR)) 0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.89). Conclusions MRI diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma is diagnostically superior to preoperative biopsy and occurs in up to 20% of rectal cancer patients. It is an independent imaging biomarker for response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognosis. MRI documentation of mucinous status will enable future pursuit of treatment strategies in this poor prognostic subgroup. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1504143679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804913011015</els_id><sourcerecordid>1504143679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cf8b3aa8691a3df3d02a13d4f3189a3a5f684cf9f63ee5204ccba06baf5f77583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxZ1f_gAfJRfAyY9JJf4EIy6KrsOJBPYfqpDKb2e6kTXoW5hf5N612xhU8eKlA1Xv18V6K4oXgG8FF_Wa3wZ2BTcmF3Ihyw3nzqFiJtunWvK3Kx8WKd1W3brnqzorznHecEK3iT4uzUinFeVuvip-fYRtw9oYlzDFAMMj8CFsftsyi8wEtG_fGh7jPBDEzDMxAWhIjMJ8ZBOaDxQkphPmB23uqpztMzMXEpriEFLch5t8ce0zRzCmGjGyOVMY4YYLZ3yMztzjGBNbH-ZZy0-FZ8cTBkPH56b0ovn94_-3q4_rmy_Wnq8ubtVFKzGvj2l4CtHUnQFonLS9BSKucFG0HEipXt8q4ztUSsSq5MqYHXvfgKtc0VSsvitfHvrTtjz3mWY8-GxwGCEgSaFFxJZSsm46g5RFqUsw5odNTovPTQQuuF4P0Ti8G6cUgLUpN8hPp5an_vh_RPlD-OEKAVycAZAODS2SJz39xdFopumX62yMOSY17j0ln45Hss36xSdvo_7_Hu3_oZvDB08Q7PGDexX0KpLMWOhNBf12-0vKThOSCelbyF4gvyMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504143679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Yu, Stanley K.T ; Chand, Manish ; Tait, Diana M ; Brown, Gina</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Stanley K.T ; Chand, Manish ; Tait, Diana M ; Brown, Gina</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biopsy in detecting mucinous adenocarcinoma was also assessed. Methods The proportion of patients downstaged in the mrMucinous and adenocarcinoma groups was compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test independence of mucinous status and baseline MRI and clinical variables on survival. Differences in survival for mucinous versus non-mucinous tumours were tested for significance using the Mantel-Cox log rank test. Results 60/330 (18%) patients were correctly diagnosed with mucinous rectal cancer based on pre treatment MRI compared with 15/330 (5%) on initial biopsy (diagnostic odds ratio = 4.67, p < 0.05). All 60 (100%) patients undergoing surgery for mrMucinous tumours were confirmed as such on final histopathology. Significantly fewer mrMucinous tumours showed ypT downstaging when compared with non-mucinous tumours (14/60 (23%) versus 111/270 (40%), p = 0.01). Three-year survival outcomes for patients for MRI detected mucinous tumours were significantly worse: disease free survival (DFS) was 48% versus 71%, p = 0.006 and OS was 69% versus 79% p = 0.04. MRI Mucin was an independent variable for poor DFS (hazard ratios (HR)) 0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.89). Conclusions MRI diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma is diagnostically superior to preoperative biopsy and occurs in up to 20% of rectal cancer patients. It is an independent imaging biomarker for response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognosis. MRI documentation of mucinous status will enable future pursuit of treatment strategies in this poor prognostic subgroup.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24440086</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adenocarcinoma - therapy ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mucinous ; Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) ; Multivariate Analysis ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Preoperative Period ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Rectal ; Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Response ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2014-03, Vol.50 (5), p.920-927</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cf8b3aa8691a3df3d02a13d4f3189a3a5f684cf9f63ee5204ccba06baf5f77583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cf8b3aa8691a3df3d02a13d4f3189a3a5f684cf9f63ee5204ccba06baf5f77583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28692199$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24440086$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Stanley K.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chand, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Diana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gina</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biopsy in detecting mucinous adenocarcinoma was also assessed. Methods The proportion of patients downstaged in the mrMucinous and adenocarcinoma groups was compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test independence of mucinous status and baseline MRI and clinical variables on survival. Differences in survival for mucinous versus non-mucinous tumours were tested for significance using the Mantel-Cox log rank test. Results 60/330 (18%) patients were correctly diagnosed with mucinous rectal cancer based on pre treatment MRI compared with 15/330 (5%) on initial biopsy (diagnostic odds ratio = 4.67, p < 0.05). All 60 (100%) patients undergoing surgery for mrMucinous tumours were confirmed as such on final histopathology. Significantly fewer mrMucinous tumours showed ypT downstaging when compared with non-mucinous tumours (14/60 (23%) versus 111/270 (40%), p = 0.01). Three-year survival outcomes for patients for MRI detected mucinous tumours were significantly worse: disease free survival (DFS) was 48% versus 71%, p = 0.006 and OS was 69% versus 79% p = 0.04. MRI Mucin was an independent variable for poor DFS (hazard ratios (HR)) 0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.89). Conclusions MRI diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma is diagnostically superior to preoperative biopsy and occurs in up to 20% of rectal cancer patients. It is an independent imaging biomarker for response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognosis. MRI documentation of mucinous status will enable future pursuit of treatment strategies in this poor prognostic subgroup.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mucinous</subject><subject>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Preoperative Period</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Rectal</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Response</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2LFDEQbURxZ1f_gAfJRfAyY9JJf4EIy6KrsOJBPYfqpDKb2e6kTXoW5hf5N612xhU8eKlA1Xv18V6K4oXgG8FF_Wa3wZ2BTcmF3Ihyw3nzqFiJtunWvK3Kx8WKd1W3brnqzorznHecEK3iT4uzUinFeVuvip-fYRtw9oYlzDFAMMj8CFsftsyi8wEtG_fGh7jPBDEzDMxAWhIjMJ8ZBOaDxQkphPmB23uqpztMzMXEpriEFLch5t8ce0zRzCmGjGyOVMY4YYLZ3yMztzjGBNbH-ZZy0-FZ8cTBkPH56b0ovn94_-3q4_rmy_Wnq8ubtVFKzGvj2l4CtHUnQFonLS9BSKucFG0HEipXt8q4ztUSsSq5MqYHXvfgKtc0VSsvitfHvrTtjz3mWY8-GxwGCEgSaFFxJZSsm46g5RFqUsw5odNTovPTQQuuF4P0Ti8G6cUgLUpN8hPp5an_vh_RPlD-OEKAVycAZAODS2SJz39xdFopumX62yMOSY17j0ln45Hss36xSdvo_7_Hu3_oZvDB08Q7PGDexX0KpLMWOhNBf12-0vKThOSCelbyF4gvyMo</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Yu, Stanley K.T</creator><creator>Chand, Manish</creator><creator>Tait, Diana M</creator><creator>Brown, Gina</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy</title><author>Yu, Stanley K.T ; Chand, Manish ; Tait, Diana M ; Brown, Gina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cf8b3aa8691a3df3d02a13d4f3189a3a5f684cf9f63ee5204ccba06baf5f77583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mucinous</topic><topic>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Preoperative Period</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Rectal</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Response</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Stanley K.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chand, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Diana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Gina</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Stanley K.T</au><au>Chand, Manish</au><au>Tait, Diana M</au><au>Brown, Gina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>920</spage><epage>927</epage><pages>920-927</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Mucinous adenocarcinomas represent a potentially poor prognostic subgroup identifiable by imaging. We compared outcomes between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected rectal mucinous carcinoma and adenocarcinomas. The diagnostic performance of MRI compared with initial biopsy in detecting mucinous adenocarcinoma was also assessed. Methods The proportion of patients downstaged in the mrMucinous and adenocarcinoma groups was compared. Cox proportional hazard models were used to test independence of mucinous status and baseline MRI and clinical variables on survival. Differences in survival for mucinous versus non-mucinous tumours were tested for significance using the Mantel-Cox log rank test. Results 60/330 (18%) patients were correctly diagnosed with mucinous rectal cancer based on pre treatment MRI compared with 15/330 (5%) on initial biopsy (diagnostic odds ratio = 4.67, p < 0.05). All 60 (100%) patients undergoing surgery for mrMucinous tumours were confirmed as such on final histopathology. Significantly fewer mrMucinous tumours showed ypT downstaging when compared with non-mucinous tumours (14/60 (23%) versus 111/270 (40%), p = 0.01). Three-year survival outcomes for patients for MRI detected mucinous tumours were significantly worse: disease free survival (DFS) was 48% versus 71%, p = 0.006 and OS was 69% versus 79% p = 0.04. MRI Mucin was an independent variable for poor DFS (hazard ratios (HR)) 0.58 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.89). Conclusions MRI diagnosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma is diagnostically superior to preoperative biopsy and occurs in up to 20% of rectal cancer patients. It is an independent imaging biomarker for response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and prognosis. MRI documentation of mucinous status will enable future pursuit of treatment strategies in this poor prognostic subgroup.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24440086</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8049 |
ispartof | European journal of cancer (1990), 2014-03, Vol.50 (5), p.920-927 |
issn | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1504143679 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis Adenocarcinoma - surgery Adenocarcinoma - therapy Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - diagnosis Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - surgery Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous - therapy Biological and medical sciences Cancer Chemoradiotherapy Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Mucinous Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) Multivariate Analysis Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data Pharmacology. Drug treatments Preoperative Period Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Rectal Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Rectal Neoplasms - therapy Reproducibility of Results Response Sensitivity and Specificity Survival Survival Analysis Time Factors Tumors |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging defined mucinous rectal carcinoma is an independent imaging biomarker for poor prognosis and poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T18%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20defined%20mucinous%20rectal%20carcinoma%20is%20an%20independent%20imaging%20biomarker%20for%20poor%20prognosis%20and%20poor%20response%20to%20preoperative%20chemoradiotherapy&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Yu,%20Stanley%20K.T&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=920&rft.epage=927&rft.pages=920-927&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1504143679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504143679&rft_id=info:pmid/24440086&rft_els_id=S0959804913011015&rfr_iscdi=true |