Utility of controlled attenuation parameter measurement for assessing liver steatosis in Japanese patients with chronic liver diseases

Aim Steatosis is a common histological feature of chronic liver disease, especially alcoholic and non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, as well as chronic hepatitis C. A recent study showed that evaluating the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) with transient elastography was an efficient way of no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology research 2013-11, Vol.43 (11), p.1182-1189
Hauptverfasser: Masaki, Keiichi, Takaki, Shintaro, Hyogo, Hideyuki, Kobayashi, Tomoki, Fukuhara, Takayuki, Naeshiro, Noriaki, Honda, Yoji, Nakahara, Takashi, Ohno, Atsushi, Miyaki, Daisuke, Murakami, Eisuke, Nagaoki, Yuko, Kawaoka, Tomokazu, Tsuge, Masataka, Hiraga, Nobuhiko, Hiramatsu, Akira, Imamura, Michio, Kawakami, Yoshiiku, Aikata, Hiroshi, Ochi, Hidenori, Takahashi, Shoichi, Arihiro, Koji, Chayama, Kazuaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim Steatosis is a common histological feature of chronic liver disease, especially alcoholic and non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, as well as chronic hepatitis C. A recent study showed that evaluating the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) with transient elastography was an efficient way of non‐invasively determining the severity of hepatic steatosis. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the utility of CAP for diagnosing steatosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Methods One hundred and fifty‐five consecutive patients with suspected chronic liver disease underwent steatosis diagnosis using CAP, blood sample analyses, computed tomography for assessing the liver/spleen ratio and liver biopsy. Steatosis was graded according to the percentage of fat‐containing hepatocytes: S0, less than 5%; S1, 5–33%; S2, 34–66%; and S3: more than 66%. Results The CAP was significantly correlated with steatosis grade, and there were significant differences between the CAP value of the S0 patients and those of the patients with other grades of steatosis. S0 and S1–3 hepatic steatosis were considered to represent mild and significant steatosis, respectively. The CAP values of the patients with mild and significant steatosis were significantly different (P 
ISSN:1386-6346
1872-034X
DOI:10.1111/hepr.12094