Characterization of associations and development of atazanavir resistance after unplanned treatment interruptions

Objectives Although current guidelines recommend resistance testing prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) reinitiation after treatment interruptions, virological failure of first‐line ritonavir‐boosted, protease‐inhibitor (PI/r)‐containing ART is associated with low emergent PI resistance. In patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HIV medicine 2014-04, Vol.15 (4), p.224-232
Hauptverfasser: Tinago, W, O'Halloran, JA, O'Halloran, RM, Macken, A, Lambert, JS, Sheehan, GJ, Mallon, PWG
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 4
container_start_page 224
container_title HIV medicine
container_volume 15
creator Tinago, W
O'Halloran, JA
O'Halloran, RM
Macken, A
Lambert, JS
Sheehan, GJ
Mallon, PWG
description Objectives Although current guidelines recommend resistance testing prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) reinitiation after treatment interruptions, virological failure of first‐line ritonavir‐boosted, protease‐inhibitor (PI/r)‐containing ART is associated with low emergent PI resistance. In patients experiencing unscheduled treatment interruptions (UTrIs) on ritonavir‐boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) ART regimens, we hypothesized low emergence of PI mutations conferring resistance to ATV/r. Methods In a retrospective assessment of HIV‐infected patients initiating ATV/r‐containing ART, using logistic regression we determined factors associated with UTrI, the prevalence of emergent resistance mutations and virological response after ART reinitiation. Results A total of 202 patients [median age 33 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29–40 years); 52% female; median CD4 count 184 cells/μL (IQR 107–280 cells/μL); median HIV RNA 4.6 log10 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL (IQR 3.2–5.1 copies/mL)] initiated ATV/r between 2004 and 2009; 80 (43%) were ART naïve. One hundred and ten patients (55%) underwent 195 UTrIs after a median (IQR) 25 (10–52) weeks on ART, with a median (IQR) UTrI duration of 10 (3–31) weeks. Fifty‐four of 110 patients (49%) underwent more than one UTrI. The commonest reasons for UTrI were nonadherence (52.7%) and drug intolerance (20%). Baseline HIV RNA > 100 000 copies\mL [odds ratio (OR) 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–9.95] and being HCV positive, an injecting drug user or on methadone (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3–4.4) were independently associated with UTrI. In 39 patients with at least two resistance assays during UTrIs, 72 new mutations emerged; four nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and 66 protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations. All emergent PI resistance mutations were minor mutations. At least 65% of patients were re‐suppressed on ATV/r reinitiation. Conclusions In this PI‐treated cohort, UTrIs are common. All emergent PI resistance mutations were minor and ATV/r retained activity and efficacy when reintroduced, even after several UTrIs, raising questions regarding the need for routine genotypic resistance assays in PI/r‐treated patients prior to ART reinitiation after UTrI.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/hiv.12107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1504143543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1504143543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3257-a2697598815aaa91caa7cd232eeb2edf5f3faab447451ee5e639ca8ce07a57143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EglIYeAGUEYa0_o2bEVVAkZBYgDW6dW5Uo9RJ7aSofXpMCmzcxdf6jo-sj5ArRicsznRltxPGGdVHZMRkNksZz8XxsMuUZxk_I-chfFDKtMjpKTnjkjMlNB2RzXwFHkyH3u6hs41LmiqBEBpjh2tIwJVJiVusm3aNrhvyDvbgYGt94jHY0IEzmEAVLUnv2hqcwzLpPEI3PLEuJr5vB-EFOamgDnj5c47J28P963yRPr88Ps3vnlMjuNIp8CzXKp_NmAKAnBkAbUouOOKSY1mpSlQASym1VAxRYSZyAzODVIPSTIoxuTl4W99segxdsbbBYB1_h00fCqaojJiSIqK3B9T4JgSPVdF6uwa_KxgtvhsuYsPF0HBkr3-0_XKN5R_5W2kEpgfg09a4-99ULJ7eD8ov5yWI1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504143543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of associations and development of atazanavir resistance after unplanned treatment interruptions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Tinago, W ; O'Halloran, JA ; O'Halloran, RM ; Macken, A ; Lambert, JS ; Sheehan, GJ ; Mallon, PWG</creator><creatorcontrib>Tinago, W ; O'Halloran, JA ; O'Halloran, RM ; Macken, A ; Lambert, JS ; Sheehan, GJ ; Mallon, PWG</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Although current guidelines recommend resistance testing prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) reinitiation after treatment interruptions, virological failure of first‐line ritonavir‐boosted, protease‐inhibitor (PI/r)‐containing ART is associated with low emergent PI resistance. In patients experiencing unscheduled treatment interruptions (UTrIs) on ritonavir‐boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) ART regimens, we hypothesized low emergence of PI mutations conferring resistance to ATV/r. Methods In a retrospective assessment of HIV‐infected patients initiating ATV/r‐containing ART, using logistic regression we determined factors associated with UTrI, the prevalence of emergent resistance mutations and virological response after ART reinitiation. Results A total of 202 patients [median age 33 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29–40 years); 52% female; median CD4 count 184 cells/μL (IQR 107–280 cells/μL); median HIV RNA 4.6 log10 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL (IQR 3.2–5.1 copies/mL)] initiated ATV/r between 2004 and 2009; 80 (43%) were ART naïve. One hundred and ten patients (55%) underwent 195 UTrIs after a median (IQR) 25 (10–52) weeks on ART, with a median (IQR) UTrI duration of 10 (3–31) weeks. Fifty‐four of 110 patients (49%) underwent more than one UTrI. The commonest reasons for UTrI were nonadherence (52.7%) and drug intolerance (20%). Baseline HIV RNA &gt; 100 000 copies\mL [odds ratio (OR) 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–9.95] and being HCV positive, an injecting drug user or on methadone (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3–4.4) were independently associated with UTrI. In 39 patients with at least two resistance assays during UTrIs, 72 new mutations emerged; four nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and 66 protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations. All emergent PI resistance mutations were minor mutations. At least 65% of patients were re‐suppressed on ATV/r reinitiation. Conclusions In this PI‐treated cohort, UTrIs are common. All emergent PI resistance mutations were minor and ATV/r retained activity and efficacy when reintroduced, even after several UTrIs, raising questions regarding the need for routine genotypic resistance assays in PI/r‐treated patients prior to ART reinitiation after UTrI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-2662</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-1293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hiv.12107</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24215370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-HIV Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Atazanavir Sulfate ; Cohort Studies ; Drug Resistance, Viral ; Female ; Genes, Viral ; genotypic resistance ; HIV - drug effects ; HIV - genetics ; HIV Infections - drug therapy ; HIV Infections - virology ; HIV Protease Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Male ; Medication Adherence ; Mutation ; Oligopeptides - administration &amp; dosage ; protease inhibitor mutations ; Pyridines - administration &amp; dosage ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Ritonavir - administration &amp; dosage ; unscheduled treatment interruptions ; Viral Load ; viral supression</subject><ispartof>HIV medicine, 2014-04, Vol.15 (4), p.224-232</ispartof><rights>2013 British HIV Association</rights><rights>2013 British HIV Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3257-a2697598815aaa91caa7cd232eeb2edf5f3faab447451ee5e639ca8ce07a57143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3257-a2697598815aaa91caa7cd232eeb2edf5f3faab447451ee5e639ca8ce07a57143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhiv.12107$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhiv.12107$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tinago, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Halloran, JA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Halloran, RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macken, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, JS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, GJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallon, PWG</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of associations and development of atazanavir resistance after unplanned treatment interruptions</title><title>HIV medicine</title><addtitle>HIV Med</addtitle><description>Objectives Although current guidelines recommend resistance testing prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) reinitiation after treatment interruptions, virological failure of first‐line ritonavir‐boosted, protease‐inhibitor (PI/r)‐containing ART is associated with low emergent PI resistance. In patients experiencing unscheduled treatment interruptions (UTrIs) on ritonavir‐boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) ART regimens, we hypothesized low emergence of PI mutations conferring resistance to ATV/r. Methods In a retrospective assessment of HIV‐infected patients initiating ATV/r‐containing ART, using logistic regression we determined factors associated with UTrI, the prevalence of emergent resistance mutations and virological response after ART reinitiation. Results A total of 202 patients [median age 33 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29–40 years); 52% female; median CD4 count 184 cells/μL (IQR 107–280 cells/μL); median HIV RNA 4.6 log10 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL (IQR 3.2–5.1 copies/mL)] initiated ATV/r between 2004 and 2009; 80 (43%) were ART naïve. One hundred and ten patients (55%) underwent 195 UTrIs after a median (IQR) 25 (10–52) weeks on ART, with a median (IQR) UTrI duration of 10 (3–31) weeks. Fifty‐four of 110 patients (49%) underwent more than one UTrI. The commonest reasons for UTrI were nonadherence (52.7%) and drug intolerance (20%). Baseline HIV RNA &gt; 100 000 copies\mL [odds ratio (OR) 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–9.95] and being HCV positive, an injecting drug user or on methadone (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3–4.4) were independently associated with UTrI. In 39 patients with at least two resistance assays during UTrIs, 72 new mutations emerged; four nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and 66 protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations. All emergent PI resistance mutations were minor mutations. At least 65% of patients were re‐suppressed on ATV/r reinitiation. Conclusions In this PI‐treated cohort, UTrIs are common. All emergent PI resistance mutations were minor and ATV/r retained activity and efficacy when reintroduced, even after several UTrIs, raising questions regarding the need for routine genotypic resistance assays in PI/r‐treated patients prior to ART reinitiation after UTrI.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-HIV Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Atazanavir Sulfate</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Viral</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes, Viral</subject><subject>genotypic resistance</subject><subject>HIV - drug effects</subject><subject>HIV - genetics</subject><subject>HIV Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>HIV Infections - virology</subject><subject>HIV Protease Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medication Adherence</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Oligopeptides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>protease inhibitor mutations</subject><subject>Pyridines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ritonavir - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>unscheduled treatment interruptions</subject><subject>Viral Load</subject><subject>viral supression</subject><issn>1464-2662</issn><issn>1468-1293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAURi0EglIYeAGUEYa0_o2bEVVAkZBYgDW6dW5Uo9RJ7aSofXpMCmzcxdf6jo-sj5ArRicsznRltxPGGdVHZMRkNksZz8XxsMuUZxk_I-chfFDKtMjpKTnjkjMlNB2RzXwFHkyH3u6hs41LmiqBEBpjh2tIwJVJiVusm3aNrhvyDvbgYGt94jHY0IEzmEAVLUnv2hqcwzLpPEI3PLEuJr5vB-EFOamgDnj5c47J28P963yRPr88Ps3vnlMjuNIp8CzXKp_NmAKAnBkAbUouOOKSY1mpSlQASym1VAxRYSZyAzODVIPSTIoxuTl4W99segxdsbbBYB1_h00fCqaojJiSIqK3B9T4JgSPVdF6uwa_KxgtvhsuYsPF0HBkr3-0_XKN5R_5W2kEpgfg09a4-99ULJ7eD8ov5yWI1w</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Tinago, W</creator><creator>O'Halloran, JA</creator><creator>O'Halloran, RM</creator><creator>Macken, A</creator><creator>Lambert, JS</creator><creator>Sheehan, GJ</creator><creator>Mallon, PWG</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Characterization of associations and development of atazanavir resistance after unplanned treatment interruptions</title><author>Tinago, W ; O'Halloran, JA ; O'Halloran, RM ; Macken, A ; Lambert, JS ; Sheehan, GJ ; Mallon, PWG</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3257-a2697598815aaa91caa7cd232eeb2edf5f3faab447451ee5e639ca8ce07a57143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-HIV Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Atazanavir Sulfate</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Viral</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes, Viral</topic><topic>genotypic resistance</topic><topic>HIV - drug effects</topic><topic>HIV - genetics</topic><topic>HIV Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>HIV Infections - virology</topic><topic>HIV Protease Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medication Adherence</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Oligopeptides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>protease inhibitor mutations</topic><topic>Pyridines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ritonavir - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>unscheduled treatment interruptions</topic><topic>Viral Load</topic><topic>viral supression</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tinago, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Halloran, JA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Halloran, RM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macken, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, JS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, GJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallon, PWG</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>HIV medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tinago, W</au><au>O'Halloran, JA</au><au>O'Halloran, RM</au><au>Macken, A</au><au>Lambert, JS</au><au>Sheehan, GJ</au><au>Mallon, PWG</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of associations and development of atazanavir resistance after unplanned treatment interruptions</atitle><jtitle>HIV medicine</jtitle><addtitle>HIV Med</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>224-232</pages><issn>1464-2662</issn><eissn>1468-1293</eissn><abstract>Objectives Although current guidelines recommend resistance testing prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART) reinitiation after treatment interruptions, virological failure of first‐line ritonavir‐boosted, protease‐inhibitor (PI/r)‐containing ART is associated with low emergent PI resistance. In patients experiencing unscheduled treatment interruptions (UTrIs) on ritonavir‐boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) ART regimens, we hypothesized low emergence of PI mutations conferring resistance to ATV/r. Methods In a retrospective assessment of HIV‐infected patients initiating ATV/r‐containing ART, using logistic regression we determined factors associated with UTrI, the prevalence of emergent resistance mutations and virological response after ART reinitiation. Results A total of 202 patients [median age 33 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29–40 years); 52% female; median CD4 count 184 cells/μL (IQR 107–280 cells/μL); median HIV RNA 4.6 log10 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL (IQR 3.2–5.1 copies/mL)] initiated ATV/r between 2004 and 2009; 80 (43%) were ART naïve. One hundred and ten patients (55%) underwent 195 UTrIs after a median (IQR) 25 (10–52) weeks on ART, with a median (IQR) UTrI duration of 10 (3–31) weeks. Fifty‐four of 110 patients (49%) underwent more than one UTrI. The commonest reasons for UTrI were nonadherence (52.7%) and drug intolerance (20%). Baseline HIV RNA &gt; 100 000 copies\mL [odds ratio (OR) 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–9.95] and being HCV positive, an injecting drug user or on methadone (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3–4.4) were independently associated with UTrI. In 39 patients with at least two resistance assays during UTrIs, 72 new mutations emerged; four nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) and 66 protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations. All emergent PI resistance mutations were minor mutations. At least 65% of patients were re‐suppressed on ATV/r reinitiation. Conclusions In this PI‐treated cohort, UTrIs are common. All emergent PI resistance mutations were minor and ATV/r retained activity and efficacy when reintroduced, even after several UTrIs, raising questions regarding the need for routine genotypic resistance assays in PI/r‐treated patients prior to ART reinitiation after UTrI.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>24215370</pmid><doi>10.1111/hiv.12107</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-2662
ispartof HIV medicine, 2014-04, Vol.15 (4), p.224-232
issn 1464-2662
1468-1293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1504143543
source MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Anti-HIV Agents - administration & dosage
Atazanavir Sulfate
Cohort Studies
Drug Resistance, Viral
Female
Genes, Viral
genotypic resistance
HIV - drug effects
HIV - genetics
HIV Infections - drug therapy
HIV Infections - virology
HIV Protease Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Humans
Male
Medication Adherence
Mutation
Oligopeptides - administration & dosage
protease inhibitor mutations
Pyridines - administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Ritonavir - administration & dosage
unscheduled treatment interruptions
Viral Load
viral supression
title Characterization of associations and development of atazanavir resistance after unplanned treatment interruptions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A04%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20associations%20and%20development%20of%20atazanavir%20resistance%20after%20unplanned%20treatment%20interruptions&rft.jtitle=HIV%20medicine&rft.au=Tinago,%20W&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=224-232&rft.issn=1464-2662&rft.eissn=1468-1293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hiv.12107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1504143543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504143543&rft_id=info:pmid/24215370&rfr_iscdi=true