Defect closure in the paranasal region: an enduring challenge

Background The paranasal region constitutes a demanding issue for the reconstructive surgeon. Its complex anatomy, with concavity in close contact with convexity, and a high density of functional and aesthetically important facial components demands specific concern. Due to such complexity, numerous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of dermatology 2014-03, Vol.53 (3), p.362-368
Hauptverfasser: Riml, Stefan, Larcher, Lorenz, Grohmann, Martin, Kompatscher, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 368
container_issue 3
container_start_page 362
container_title International journal of dermatology
container_volume 53
creator Riml, Stefan
Larcher, Lorenz
Grohmann, Martin
Kompatscher, Peter
description Background The paranasal region constitutes a demanding issue for the reconstructive surgeon. Its complex anatomy, with concavity in close contact with convexity, and a high density of functional and aesthetically important facial components demands specific concern. Due to such complexity, numerous procedures for the reconstruction of paranasal defects have been published, including skin grafts and flaps in random pattern or axial style from the glabella, upper lid, nasal root, or cheek. Objectives In this review, we recall classical reconstructive procedures and compare them with innovative procedures that could possibly gain importance in the following years. Methods We contrast the pros and cons concerning donor site morbidity, surgical elaborateness, and functional and aesthetic outcome, and substantiate our findings with photographic results from our own patient material. Results and Conclusion The reconstruction of paranasal defects remains a challenge; nevertheless, the growing toolbox of reconstructive instruments facilitates a perfect reconstructive result.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijd.12411
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1503541142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1503541142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-e0f64d8db0c4ec2966c749bee14aefed03c462dcd84c0d79dd835fcc586bf2533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwkAQhjdGI4ge_AOmRz0U9qtLa-JBQT4M0cQoHjfb3SkUS4u7bZR_b7XCzblMJnnmmcyL0DnBXVJXL12ZLqGckAPUJkwEPheMHqI2xoT4EQ6iFjpxblWPjBJ-jFqUM4oFidroZggJ6NLTWeEqC16ae-USvI2yKldOZZ6FRVrk157KPchNZdN84emlyjLIF3CKjhKVOTj76x30Orp_GUz82dN4Orid-ZoJRnzAieAmNDHWHDSNhNB9HsUAhKv6vMFMc0GNNiHX2PQjY0IWJFoHoYgTGjDWQZeNd2OLjwpcKdep05BlKoeicpIEmAX1_5zW6FWDals4ZyGRG5uuld1KguVPWrJOS_6mVbMXf9oqXoPZk7t4aqDXAJ9pBtv_TXL6MNwp_WYjdSV87TeUfZeiz_qBfHscy8nzfMJGd6Gcs28ixoJJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1503541142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defect closure in the paranasal region: an enduring challenge</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Riml, Stefan ; Larcher, Lorenz ; Grohmann, Martin ; Kompatscher, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Riml, Stefan ; Larcher, Lorenz ; Grohmann, Martin ; Kompatscher, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Background The paranasal region constitutes a demanding issue for the reconstructive surgeon. Its complex anatomy, with concavity in close contact with convexity, and a high density of functional and aesthetically important facial components demands specific concern. Due to such complexity, numerous procedures for the reconstruction of paranasal defects have been published, including skin grafts and flaps in random pattern or axial style from the glabella, upper lid, nasal root, or cheek. Objectives In this review, we recall classical reconstructive procedures and compare them with innovative procedures that could possibly gain importance in the following years. Methods We contrast the pros and cons concerning donor site morbidity, surgical elaborateness, and functional and aesthetic outcome, and substantiate our findings with photographic results from our own patient material. Results and Conclusion The reconstruction of paranasal defects remains a challenge; nevertheless, the growing toolbox of reconstructive instruments facilitates a perfect reconstructive result.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-9059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-4632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24320619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cheek - surgery ; Esthetics ; Eyelids - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Lip - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nose - surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Skin Transplantation - methods ; Surgical Flaps</subject><ispartof>International journal of dermatology, 2014-03, Vol.53 (3), p.362-368</ispartof><rights>2013 The International Society of Dermatology</rights><rights>2013 The International Society of Dermatology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-e0f64d8db0c4ec2966c749bee14aefed03c462dcd84c0d79dd835fcc586bf2533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-e0f64d8db0c4ec2966c749bee14aefed03c462dcd84c0d79dd835fcc586bf2533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijd.12411$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijd.12411$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24320619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riml, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larcher, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kompatscher, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Defect closure in the paranasal region: an enduring challenge</title><title>International journal of dermatology</title><addtitle>Int J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background The paranasal region constitutes a demanding issue for the reconstructive surgeon. Its complex anatomy, with concavity in close contact with convexity, and a high density of functional and aesthetically important facial components demands specific concern. Due to such complexity, numerous procedures for the reconstruction of paranasal defects have been published, including skin grafts and flaps in random pattern or axial style from the glabella, upper lid, nasal root, or cheek. Objectives In this review, we recall classical reconstructive procedures and compare them with innovative procedures that could possibly gain importance in the following years. Methods We contrast the pros and cons concerning donor site morbidity, surgical elaborateness, and functional and aesthetic outcome, and substantiate our findings with photographic results from our own patient material. Results and Conclusion The reconstruction of paranasal defects remains a challenge; nevertheless, the growing toolbox of reconstructive instruments facilitates a perfect reconstructive result.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cheek - surgery</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Eyelids - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lip - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nose - surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Skin Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><issn>0011-9059</issn><issn>1365-4632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwkAQhjdGI4ge_AOmRz0U9qtLa-JBQT4M0cQoHjfb3SkUS4u7bZR_b7XCzblMJnnmmcyL0DnBXVJXL12ZLqGckAPUJkwEPheMHqI2xoT4EQ6iFjpxblWPjBJ-jFqUM4oFidroZggJ6NLTWeEqC16ae-USvI2yKldOZZ6FRVrk157KPchNZdN84emlyjLIF3CKjhKVOTj76x30Orp_GUz82dN4Orid-ZoJRnzAieAmNDHWHDSNhNB9HsUAhKv6vMFMc0GNNiHX2PQjY0IWJFoHoYgTGjDWQZeNd2OLjwpcKdep05BlKoeicpIEmAX1_5zW6FWDals4ZyGRG5uuld1KguVPWrJOS_6mVbMXf9oqXoPZk7t4aqDXAJ9pBtv_TXL6MNwp_WYjdSV87TeUfZeiz_qBfHscy8nzfMJGd6Gcs28ixoJJ</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Riml, Stefan</creator><creator>Larcher, Lorenz</creator><creator>Grohmann, Martin</creator><creator>Kompatscher, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Defect closure in the paranasal region: an enduring challenge</title><author>Riml, Stefan ; Larcher, Lorenz ; Grohmann, Martin ; Kompatscher, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3631-e0f64d8db0c4ec2966c749bee14aefed03c462dcd84c0d79dd835fcc586bf2533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cheek - surgery</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Eyelids - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lip - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nose - surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Skin Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riml, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larcher, Lorenz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grohmann, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kompatscher, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riml, Stefan</au><au>Larcher, Lorenz</au><au>Grohmann, Martin</au><au>Kompatscher, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defect closure in the paranasal region: an enduring challenge</atitle><jtitle>International journal of dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>362-368</pages><issn>0011-9059</issn><eissn>1365-4632</eissn><abstract>Background The paranasal region constitutes a demanding issue for the reconstructive surgeon. Its complex anatomy, with concavity in close contact with convexity, and a high density of functional and aesthetically important facial components demands specific concern. Due to such complexity, numerous procedures for the reconstruction of paranasal defects have been published, including skin grafts and flaps in random pattern or axial style from the glabella, upper lid, nasal root, or cheek. Objectives In this review, we recall classical reconstructive procedures and compare them with innovative procedures that could possibly gain importance in the following years. Methods We contrast the pros and cons concerning donor site morbidity, surgical elaborateness, and functional and aesthetic outcome, and substantiate our findings with photographic results from our own patient material. Results and Conclusion The reconstruction of paranasal defects remains a challenge; nevertheless, the growing toolbox of reconstructive instruments facilitates a perfect reconstructive result.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24320619</pmid><doi>10.1111/ijd.12411</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-9059
ispartof International journal of dermatology, 2014-03, Vol.53 (3), p.362-368
issn 0011-9059
1365-4632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1503541142
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Cheek - surgery
Esthetics
Eyelids - surgery
Female
Humans
Lip - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Nose - surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Skin Transplantation - methods
Surgical Flaps
title Defect closure in the paranasal region: an enduring challenge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defect%20closure%20in%20the%20paranasal%20region:%20an%20enduring%20challenge&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20dermatology&rft.au=Riml,%20Stefan&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=362-368&rft.issn=0011-9059&rft.eissn=1365-4632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijd.12411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1503541142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1503541142&rft_id=info:pmid/24320619&rfr_iscdi=true