Ropivacaine, Articaine or Combination of Ropivacaine and Articaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded Study
: Initiation of epidural anesthesia with long-lasting local anesthetics consumes a significant amount of time, which could be problematic in busy obstetric anesthesia suites. We have hypothesized that a combination of articaine and ropivacaine provides faster onset and even an early recovery of senso...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) 2013-01, Vol.63 (1), p.85-91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 91 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier) |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Yurtlu, Derya Arslan Kaya, Kadir |
description | : Initiation of epidural anesthesia with long-lasting local anesthetics consumes a significant amount of time, which could be problematic in busy obstetric anesthesia suites. We have hypothesized that a combination of articaine and ropivacaine provides faster onset and even an early recovery of sensory-motor block characteristics.
: Sixty term parturients scheduled to have elective cesarean section were randomly allocated into three groups to receive either 20 mL 2% articaine (Group A), 10 mL 2% articaine + 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (Group AR) or 20 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (Group R) via lumbar epidural catheter. The onset time of sensory block to T10, T6 and maximum sensory block level, time to two segments regression from maximum sensory block level, onset time and duration of motor block were all recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative additional analgesic requirements were also recorded.
: Demographic data were similar. The onset times of sensorial block to T10 and T6 were significantly shorter in Groups A and AR in comparison with Group R (p < 0.05). The onset times of motor block were similar in all groups, but a more intense motor block was observed in Group R (p < 0.05). Two segments regression time and motor block durations were significantly shorter in Groups A and AR in comparison with Group R (p < 0.05). Intraoperative supplementary analgesic requirements were higher in Group A than in the other two groups (p < 0.05).
: A combination of 2% articaine and 0.75% ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia in a cesarean section should be preferred over epidural 0.75% ropivacaine alone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjane.2012.03.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1502336314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0104001413000237</els_id><sourcerecordid>1502336314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-5cb6e9774db3b8e50567e8ca0ed9d6af828a50bd3e731fc51165f03943b561e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1q3DAQhUVJaUKaJygUXeYidkaW5V0XcrHZ5qcQaEnaa6GfMdViS460XkhfJq8abTYte9UrHaRv5mjmEPKJQcmANeerUq-Ux7ICVpXASwDxjhwBg7oAYPXBnj4kJymtIEvGW17BB3JY1aIR0FZH5Pk-jG6jjHIez-girt2rpCHSZRi082rtgqeho3sgVd7usV2Gr0Znp6h6uvCY1r8xOUWdp0tMKqLy9AHNttEXquh9rg6D-4P2jP6IIY3bp012_xom3WNx2Ttv0dKH9WSfPpL3neoTnrydx-TX9dXP5W1x9_3m23JxVxjOWlEIoxtsZ7Paaq7nKEA0M5wbBWhb26huXs2VAG05zjjrjGCsER3wtuZaNCxfHpPTXd8xhscpjyAHlwz2fV5ymJJkAirOG87qjPIdavLnU8ROjtENKj5JBnIbjlzJ13DkNhwJXOZwctXnN4NJD2j_1fyNIgMXOwDzmBuHUSbj0Bu0LuYNSRvcfw1eABudohw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1502336314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ropivacaine, Articaine or Combination of Ropivacaine and Articaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Yurtlu, Derya Arslan ; Kaya, Kadir</creator><creatorcontrib>Yurtlu, Derya Arslan ; Kaya, Kadir</creatorcontrib><description>: Initiation of epidural anesthesia with long-lasting local anesthetics consumes a significant amount of time, which could be problematic in busy obstetric anesthesia suites. We have hypothesized that a combination of articaine and ropivacaine provides faster onset and even an early recovery of sensory-motor block characteristics.
: Sixty term parturients scheduled to have elective cesarean section were randomly allocated into three groups to receive either 20 mL 2% articaine (Group A), 10 mL 2% articaine + 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (Group AR) or 20 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (Group R) via lumbar epidural catheter. The onset time of sensory block to T10, T6 and maximum sensory block level, time to two segments regression from maximum sensory block level, onset time and duration of motor block were all recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative additional analgesic requirements were also recorded.
: Demographic data were similar. The onset times of sensorial block to T10 and T6 were significantly shorter in Groups A and AR in comparison with Group R (p < 0.05). The onset times of motor block were similar in all groups, but a more intense motor block was observed in Group R (p < 0.05). Two segments regression time and motor block durations were significantly shorter in Groups A and AR in comparison with Group R (p < 0.05). Intraoperative supplementary analgesic requirements were higher in Group A than in the other two groups (p < 0.05).
: A combination of 2% articaine and 0.75% ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia in a cesarean section should be preferred over epidural 0.75% ropivacaine alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0104-0014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0104-0014</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2012.03.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24565092</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Brazil: Elsevier Editora Ltda</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amides - adverse effects ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Epidural - adverse effects ; Anesthesia, Epidural - methods ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods ; Anesthetics ; Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects ; Carticaine ; Carticaine - adverse effects ; Cesarean Section ; Cesarean Section - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Epidural ; Female ; Humans ; Local/ropivacaine ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2013-01, Vol.63 (1), p.85-91</ispartof><rights>2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-5cb6e9774db3b8e50567e8ca0ed9d6af828a50bd3e731fc51165f03943b561e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-5cb6e9774db3b8e50567e8ca0ed9d6af828a50bd3e731fc51165f03943b561e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24565092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yurtlu, Derya Arslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Kadir</creatorcontrib><title>Ropivacaine, Articaine or Combination of Ropivacaine and Articaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded Study</title><title>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</title><addtitle>Braz J Anesthesiol</addtitle><description>: Initiation of epidural anesthesia with long-lasting local anesthetics consumes a significant amount of time, which could be problematic in busy obstetric anesthesia suites. We have hypothesized that a combination of articaine and ropivacaine provides faster onset and even an early recovery of sensory-motor block characteristics.
: Sixty term parturients scheduled to have elective cesarean section were randomly allocated into three groups to receive either 20 mL 2% articaine (Group A), 10 mL 2% articaine + 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (Group AR) or 20 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (Group R) via lumbar epidural catheter. The onset time of sensory block to T10, T6 and maximum sensory block level, time to two segments regression from maximum sensory block level, onset time and duration of motor block were all recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative additional analgesic requirements were also recorded.
: Demographic data were similar. The onset times of sensorial block to T10 and T6 were significantly shorter in Groups A and AR in comparison with Group R (p < 0.05). The onset times of motor block were similar in all groups, but a more intense motor block was observed in Group R (p < 0.05). Two segments regression time and motor block durations were significantly shorter in Groups A and AR in comparison with Group R (p < 0.05). Intraoperative supplementary analgesic requirements were higher in Group A than in the other two groups (p < 0.05).
: A combination of 2% articaine and 0.75% ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia in a cesarean section should be preferred over epidural 0.75% ropivacaine alone.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Epidural - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods</subject><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</subject><subject>Carticaine</subject><subject>Carticaine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Epidural</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Local/ropivacaine</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0104-0014</issn><issn>0104-0014</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1q3DAQhUVJaUKaJygUXeYidkaW5V0XcrHZ5qcQaEnaa6GfMdViS460XkhfJq8abTYte9UrHaRv5mjmEPKJQcmANeerUq-Ux7ICVpXASwDxjhwBg7oAYPXBnj4kJymtIEvGW17BB3JY1aIR0FZH5Pk-jG6jjHIez-girt2rpCHSZRi082rtgqeho3sgVd7usV2Gr0Znp6h6uvCY1r8xOUWdp0tMKqLy9AHNttEXquh9rg6D-4P2jP6IIY3bp012_xom3WNx2Ttv0dKH9WSfPpL3neoTnrydx-TX9dXP5W1x9_3m23JxVxjOWlEIoxtsZ7Paaq7nKEA0M5wbBWhb26huXs2VAG05zjjrjGCsER3wtuZaNCxfHpPTXd8xhscpjyAHlwz2fV5ymJJkAirOG87qjPIdavLnU8ROjtENKj5JBnIbjlzJ13DkNhwJXOZwctXnN4NJD2j_1fyNIgMXOwDzmBuHUSbj0Bu0LuYNSRvcfw1eABudohw</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Yurtlu, Derya Arslan</creator><creator>Kaya, Kadir</creator><general>Elsevier Editora Ltda</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Ropivacaine, Articaine or Combination of Ropivacaine and Articaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded Study</title><author>Yurtlu, Derya Arslan ; Kaya, Kadir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3195-5cb6e9774db3b8e50567e8ca0ed9d6af828a50bd3e731fc51165f03943b561e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Epidural - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods</topic><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</topic><topic>Carticaine</topic><topic>Carticaine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Epidural</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Local/ropivacaine</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yurtlu, Derya Arslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Kadir</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yurtlu, Derya Arslan</au><au>Kaya, Kadir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ropivacaine, Articaine or Combination of Ropivacaine and Articaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded Study</atitle><jtitle>Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)</jtitle><addtitle>Braz J Anesthesiol</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>85-91</pages><issn>0104-0014</issn><eissn>0104-0014</eissn><abstract>: Initiation of epidural anesthesia with long-lasting local anesthetics consumes a significant amount of time, which could be problematic in busy obstetric anesthesia suites. We have hypothesized that a combination of articaine and ropivacaine provides faster onset and even an early recovery of sensory-motor block characteristics.
: Sixty term parturients scheduled to have elective cesarean section were randomly allocated into three groups to receive either 20 mL 2% articaine (Group A), 10 mL 2% articaine + 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (Group AR) or 20 mL 0.75% ropivacaine (Group R) via lumbar epidural catheter. The onset time of sensory block to T10, T6 and maximum sensory block level, time to two segments regression from maximum sensory block level, onset time and duration of motor block were all recorded. Intraoperative and postoperative additional analgesic requirements were also recorded.
: Demographic data were similar. The onset times of sensorial block to T10 and T6 were significantly shorter in Groups A and AR in comparison with Group R (p < 0.05). The onset times of motor block were similar in all groups, but a more intense motor block was observed in Group R (p < 0.05). Two segments regression time and motor block durations were significantly shorter in Groups A and AR in comparison with Group R (p < 0.05). Intraoperative supplementary analgesic requirements were higher in Group A than in the other two groups (p < 0.05).
: A combination of 2% articaine and 0.75% ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia in a cesarean section should be preferred over epidural 0.75% ropivacaine alone.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Elsevier Editora Ltda</pub><pmid>24565092</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjane.2012.03.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0104-0014 |
ispartof | Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2013-01, Vol.63 (1), p.85-91 |
issn | 0104-0014 0104-0014 |
language | eng ; spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1502336314 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Adult Amides - adverse effects Anesthesia Anesthesia, Epidural - adverse effects Anesthesia, Epidural - methods Anesthesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects Anesthesia, Obstetrical - methods Anesthetics Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects Carticaine Carticaine - adverse effects Cesarean Section Cesarean Section - methods Double-Blind Method Epidural Female Humans Local/ropivacaine Pregnancy Prospective Studies |
title | Ropivacaine, Articaine or Combination of Ropivacaine and Articaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Section: a Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blinded Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T02%3A23%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ropivacaine,%20Articaine%20or%20Combination%20of%20Ropivacaine%20and%20Articaine%20for%20Epidural%20Anesthesia%20in%20Cesarean%20Section:%20a%20Randomized,%20Prospective,%20Double-Blinded%20Study&rft.jtitle=Brazilian%20journal%20of%20anesthesiology%20(Elsevier)&rft.au=Yurtlu,%20Derya%20Arslan&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=85-91&rft.issn=0104-0014&rft.eissn=0104-0014&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2012.03.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1502336314%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1502336314&rft_id=info:pmid/24565092&rft_els_id=S0104001413000237&rfr_iscdi=true |