Differences in effects of grazing by deposit-feeders Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Gastropoda:Prosobranchia) and Corophium arenarium Crawford (Amphipoda) on sediment microalgal populations. 2. Quantitative effects

An earlier study showed that the growth rate of the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) in microcosms is reduced at high population densities, but that the presence of the amphipod Corophium arenarium Crawford does not affect snail growth rate. In the present study, the effect of these two grazing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology 1988-01, Vol.118 (1), p.43-53
1. Verfasser: Morrisey, D J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology
container_volume 118
creator Morrisey, D J
description An earlier study showed that the growth rate of the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) in microcosms is reduced at high population densities, but that the presence of the amphipod Corophium arenarium Crawford does not affect snail growth rate. In the present study, the effect of these two grazing species on sediment microalgal numbers was measured in the same microcosms. Contrary to the findings of many previous studies, low levels of grazing did not lead to an increase in microalgal standing stock.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0022-0981(88)90121-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15019794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15019794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p116t-83f421def967c033460b64f5414c76c3106e015b743752974300b1520ef861813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQzAEkyuMPOOwJpYcUOw8n4YYKFCQkQIJztUnWxSixg-2A4C_5I1zxOM3ujHZnNFF0zNmCMy5OGUvThNUVj6tqXjOe8qTeiWb_9F6079wLY4wXqZhFXxdKSrKkW3KgNFDYWu_ASNhY_FR6A80HdDQap3wiiTqyDq4_OmsahTD1b0gQ35PWqP0c4hU6b81oOjy7t8aZxqJunxXOAXUHSxO0ZzUNgMES7XZaWnyXxnYQnw9B257OwWhw1KmBtIdBtdZgv8EeRjNOPXpltFtAuoCHKbgqH5g3-ot-GO1K7B0d_eJB9HR1-bi8Tm7vVjfL89tk5Fz4pMpknvKOZC3KlmVZLlgjclnkPG9L0WacCQodNWWelUVaB2CsCZ0xkpXgFc8OopOfv6M1rxM5vx6Ua6nvUZOZ3JoXjNdlnWffLjJ_Mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15019794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in effects of grazing by deposit-feeders Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Gastropoda:Prosobranchia) and Corophium arenarium Crawford (Amphipoda) on sediment microalgal populations. 2. Quantitative effects</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Morrisey, D J</creator><creatorcontrib>Morrisey, D J</creatorcontrib><description>An earlier study showed that the growth rate of the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) in microcosms is reduced at high population densities, but that the presence of the amphipod Corophium arenarium Crawford does not affect snail growth rate. In the present study, the effect of these two grazing species on sediment microalgal numbers was measured in the same microcosms. Contrary to the findings of many previous studies, low levels of grazing did not lead to an increase in microalgal standing stock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0022-0981(88)90121-9</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Corophium arenarium ; Hydrobia ulvae ; Marine</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 1988-01, Vol.118 (1), p.43-53</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morrisey, D J</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in effects of grazing by deposit-feeders Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Gastropoda:Prosobranchia) and Corophium arenarium Crawford (Amphipoda) on sediment microalgal populations. 2. Quantitative effects</title><title>Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology</title><description>An earlier study showed that the growth rate of the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) in microcosms is reduced at high population densities, but that the presence of the amphipod Corophium arenarium Crawford does not affect snail growth rate. In the present study, the effect of these two grazing species on sediment microalgal numbers was measured in the same microcosms. Contrary to the findings of many previous studies, low levels of grazing did not lead to an increase in microalgal standing stock.</description><subject>Corophium arenarium</subject><subject>Hydrobia ulvae</subject><subject>Marine</subject><issn>0022-0981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQzAEkyuMPOOwJpYcUOw8n4YYKFCQkQIJztUnWxSixg-2A4C_5I1zxOM3ujHZnNFF0zNmCMy5OGUvThNUVj6tqXjOe8qTeiWb_9F6079wLY4wXqZhFXxdKSrKkW3KgNFDYWu_ASNhY_FR6A80HdDQap3wiiTqyDq4_OmsahTD1b0gQ35PWqP0c4hU6b81oOjy7t8aZxqJunxXOAXUHSxO0ZzUNgMES7XZaWnyXxnYQnw9B257OwWhw1KmBtIdBtdZgv8EeRjNOPXpltFtAuoCHKbgqH5g3-ot-GO1K7B0d_eJB9HR1-bi8Tm7vVjfL89tk5Fz4pMpknvKOZC3KlmVZLlgjclnkPG9L0WacCQodNWWelUVaB2CsCZ0xkpXgFc8OopOfv6M1rxM5vx6Ua6nvUZOZ3JoXjNdlnWffLjJ_Mw</recordid><startdate>19880101</startdate><enddate>19880101</enddate><creator>Morrisey, D J</creator><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880101</creationdate><title>Differences in effects of grazing by deposit-feeders Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Gastropoda:Prosobranchia) and Corophium arenarium Crawford (Amphipoda) on sediment microalgal populations. 2. Quantitative effects</title><author>Morrisey, D J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p116t-83f421def967c033460b64f5414c76c3106e015b743752974300b1520ef861813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Corophium arenarium</topic><topic>Hydrobia ulvae</topic><topic>Marine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morrisey, D J</creatorcontrib><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morrisey, D J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in effects of grazing by deposit-feeders Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Gastropoda:Prosobranchia) and Corophium arenarium Crawford (Amphipoda) on sediment microalgal populations. 2. Quantitative effects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology</jtitle><date>1988-01-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>43-53</pages><issn>0022-0981</issn><abstract>An earlier study showed that the growth rate of the prosobranch Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) in microcosms is reduced at high population densities, but that the presence of the amphipod Corophium arenarium Crawford does not affect snail growth rate. In the present study, the effect of these two grazing species on sediment microalgal numbers was measured in the same microcosms. Contrary to the findings of many previous studies, low levels of grazing did not lead to an increase in microalgal standing stock.</abstract><doi>10.1016/0022-0981(88)90121-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0981
ispartof Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology, 1988-01, Vol.118 (1), p.43-53
issn 0022-0981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15019794
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Corophium arenarium
Hydrobia ulvae
Marine
title Differences in effects of grazing by deposit-feeders Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Gastropoda:Prosobranchia) and Corophium arenarium Crawford (Amphipoda) on sediment microalgal populations. 2. Quantitative effects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T19%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20effects%20of%20grazing%20by%20deposit-feeders%20Hydrobia%20ulvae%20(Pennant)%20(Gastropoda:Prosobranchia)%20and%20Corophium%20arenarium%20Crawford%20(Amphipoda)%20on%20sediment%20microalgal%20populations.%202.%20Quantitative%20effects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20marine%20biology%20and%20ecology&rft.au=Morrisey,%20D%20J&rft.date=1988-01-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=43-53&rft.issn=0022-0981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0022-0981(88)90121-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E15019794%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15019794&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true