Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients

Backgound Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves acute cardiac hemodynamics. Objective To investigate if CRT with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP], St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) can offer further hemodynamic bene...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2014-03, Vol.11 (3), p.394-401
Hauptverfasser: Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD, Ćalović, Žarko, MD, Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD, Cuko, Amarild, MD, McSpadden, Luke C., PhD, Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD, Romano, Enrico, BEng, Saviano, Massimo, MD, Baldi, Mario, MD, Pappone, Alessia, MD, Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD, Giannelli, Luigi, MD, Ionescu, Bogdan, MD, Petretta, Andrea, MD, Vitale, Raffaele, MD, Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD, Tavazzi, Luigi, MD, Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 401
container_issue 3
container_start_page 394
container_title Heart rhythm
container_volume 11
creator Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD
Ćalović, Žarko, MD
Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD
Cuko, Amarild, MD
McSpadden, Luke C., PhD
Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD
Romano, Enrico, BEng
Saviano, Massimo, MD
Baldi, Mario, MD
Pappone, Alessia, MD
Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD
Giannelli, Luigi, MD
Ionescu, Bogdan, MD
Petretta, Andrea, MD
Vitale, Raffaele, MD
Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD
Tavazzi, Luigi, MD
Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD
description Backgound Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves acute cardiac hemodynamics. Objective To investigate if CRT with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP], St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) can offer further hemodynamic benefits to patients. Methods Forty-four consecutive patients (80% men, New York Heart Association III, end-systolic volume 180 ± 77 mL, ejection fraction 27% ± 6%, and QRS duration 152 ± 17 ms) receiving a CRT device implant (Unify Quadra MP or Quadra Assura MP and Quartet LV lead, St Jude Medical) underwent intraoperative assessment of LV hemodynamics by using a pressure-volume loop system (Inca, CD Leycom). A pacing protocol was performed, including 9 biventricular pacing interventions with conventional CRT (CONV) using distal and proximal LV electrodes and various MPP configurations. Each pacing intervention was performed twice in randomized order with right ventricular pacing (BASELINE) repeated after every intervention. Results Evaluable recordings were obtained in 42 patients. Relative to BASELINE, the best MPP intervention significantly increased the rate of pressure change (dP/dtmax ; 15.9% ± 10.0% vs 13.5% ± 8.8%; P < .001), stroke work (27.2% ± 42.5% vs 19.4% ± 32.2%; P = .018), stroke volume (10.4% ± 22.5% vs 4.1% ± 13.1%; P = .003), and ejection fraction (10.5% ± 20.9% vs 5.3% ± 13.2%; P = .003) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Moreover, the best MPP intervention improved acute diastolic function, significantly decreasing −dP/dtmin (−13.5% ± 10.2% vs −10.6% ± 6.8%; P = .011), relaxation time constant (−7.5% ± 9.0% vs −4.8% ± 7.2%; P = .012), and end-diastolic pressure (−18.2% ± 22.4% vs −8.7% ± 21.4%; P < .001) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Conclusions CRT with MPP can significantly improve acute LV hemodynamic parameters assessed with pressure-volume loop measurements as compared with CONV.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1501835134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1547527113013805</els_id><sourcerecordid>1501835134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-53516577d0ecf818ac2f8c858c4b0e4a7c9f4a38aa6c4b6a8a500e7bdf487fea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsuO1TAMrRCIecAXIKEs2bTETR-5C5DQCBikQSyAdeSbujSXNilJekflS_hc0rkDCzZIlmJZ5_jEPs6yZ8AL4NC8PBSDj8NUlBxEAVDwUjzIzqGum1zIFh5uedXmddnCWXYRwoHzctdw8Tg7K6tyBxXAefbr4zJGMztjIxupj-xINnqjlxE9m1Eb-42ZafbuSIGhXiKxgSbXrRYno5mnMDsbiGEIlKJjtyYObE71sHjKj25cJmKjc3NgxjKNvjN4x1utHryz5idG4yyLA3mc16QZTfpCeJI96nEM9PT-vcy-vnv75eo6v_n0_sPVm5tcV1DFvBY1NHXbdpx0L0GiLnupZS11tedUYat3fYVCIjap0qDEmnNq911fybYnFJfZi1PfNOOPhUJUkwmaxhEtuSUoqDnIJCKqBBUnqPYuBE-9mr2Z0K8KuNosUQd1Z4naLFEAKlmSWM_vBZb9RN1fzh8PEuDVCUBpzKMhr4JOK9DUGU86qs6Z_wi8_oevR2ONxvE7rRQObvE2bVCBCqXi6vN2FdtRgEhNJK_Fb2pduQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501835134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD ; Ćalović, Žarko, MD ; Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD ; Cuko, Amarild, MD ; McSpadden, Luke C., PhD ; Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD ; Romano, Enrico, BEng ; Saviano, Massimo, MD ; Baldi, Mario, MD ; Pappone, Alessia, MD ; Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD ; Giannelli, Luigi, MD ; Ionescu, Bogdan, MD ; Petretta, Andrea, MD ; Vitale, Raffaele, MD ; Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD ; Tavazzi, Luigi, MD ; Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD ; Ćalović, Žarko, MD ; Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD ; Cuko, Amarild, MD ; McSpadden, Luke C., PhD ; Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD ; Romano, Enrico, BEng ; Saviano, Massimo, MD ; Baldi, Mario, MD ; Pappone, Alessia, MD ; Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD ; Giannelli, Luigi, MD ; Ionescu, Bogdan, MD ; Petretta, Andrea, MD ; Vitale, Raffaele, MD ; Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD ; Tavazzi, Luigi, MD ; Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Backgound Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves acute cardiac hemodynamics. Objective To investigate if CRT with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP], St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) can offer further hemodynamic benefits to patients. Methods Forty-four consecutive patients (80% men, New York Heart Association III, end-systolic volume 180 ± 77 mL, ejection fraction 27% ± 6%, and QRS duration 152 ± 17 ms) receiving a CRT device implant (Unify Quadra MP or Quadra Assura MP and Quartet LV lead, St Jude Medical) underwent intraoperative assessment of LV hemodynamics by using a pressure-volume loop system (Inca, CD Leycom). A pacing protocol was performed, including 9 biventricular pacing interventions with conventional CRT (CONV) using distal and proximal LV electrodes and various MPP configurations. Each pacing intervention was performed twice in randomized order with right ventricular pacing (BASELINE) repeated after every intervention. Results Evaluable recordings were obtained in 42 patients. Relative to BASELINE, the best MPP intervention significantly increased the rate of pressure change (dP/dtmax ; 15.9% ± 10.0% vs 13.5% ± 8.8%; P &lt; .001), stroke work (27.2% ± 42.5% vs 19.4% ± 32.2%; P = .018), stroke volume (10.4% ± 22.5% vs 4.1% ± 13.1%; P = .003), and ejection fraction (10.5% ± 20.9% vs 5.3% ± 13.2%; P = .003) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Moreover, the best MPP intervention improved acute diastolic function, significantly decreasing −dP/dtmin (−13.5% ± 10.2% vs −10.6% ± 6.8%; P = .011), relaxation time constant (−7.5% ± 9.0% vs −4.8% ± 7.2%; P = .012), and end-diastolic pressure (−18.2% ± 22.4% vs −8.7% ± 21.4%; P &lt; .001) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Conclusions CRT with MPP can significantly improve acute LV hemodynamic parameters assessed with pressure-volume loop measurements as compared with CONV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24291411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods ; Cardiac resynchronization therapy ; Cardiovascular ; Female ; Heart failure ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Heart Ventricles ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Male ; MultiPoint Pacing ; Pacemaker, Artificial ; Pressure-volume loops ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2014-03, Vol.11 (3), p.394-401</ispartof><rights>Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>2014 Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-53516577d0ecf818ac2f8c858c4b0e4a7c9f4a38aa6c4b6a8a500e7bdf487fea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-53516577d0ecf818ac2f8c858c4b0e4a7c9f4a38aa6c4b6a8a500e7bdf487fea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527113013805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24291411$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ćalović, Žarko, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuko, Amarild, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSpadden, Luke C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, Enrico, BEng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saviano, Massimo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldi, Mario, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappone, Alessia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannelli, Luigi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionescu, Bogdan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petretta, Andrea, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, Raffaele, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavazzi, Luigi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Backgound Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves acute cardiac hemodynamics. Objective To investigate if CRT with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP], St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) can offer further hemodynamic benefits to patients. Methods Forty-four consecutive patients (80% men, New York Heart Association III, end-systolic volume 180 ± 77 mL, ejection fraction 27% ± 6%, and QRS duration 152 ± 17 ms) receiving a CRT device implant (Unify Quadra MP or Quadra Assura MP and Quartet LV lead, St Jude Medical) underwent intraoperative assessment of LV hemodynamics by using a pressure-volume loop system (Inca, CD Leycom). A pacing protocol was performed, including 9 biventricular pacing interventions with conventional CRT (CONV) using distal and proximal LV electrodes and various MPP configurations. Each pacing intervention was performed twice in randomized order with right ventricular pacing (BASELINE) repeated after every intervention. Results Evaluable recordings were obtained in 42 patients. Relative to BASELINE, the best MPP intervention significantly increased the rate of pressure change (dP/dtmax ; 15.9% ± 10.0% vs 13.5% ± 8.8%; P &lt; .001), stroke work (27.2% ± 42.5% vs 19.4% ± 32.2%; P = .018), stroke volume (10.4% ± 22.5% vs 4.1% ± 13.1%; P = .003), and ejection fraction (10.5% ± 20.9% vs 5.3% ± 13.2%; P = .003) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Moreover, the best MPP intervention improved acute diastolic function, significantly decreasing −dP/dtmin (−13.5% ± 10.2% vs −10.6% ± 6.8%; P = .011), relaxation time constant (−7.5% ± 9.0% vs −4.8% ± 7.2%; P = .012), and end-diastolic pressure (−18.2% ± 22.4% vs −8.7% ± 21.4%; P &lt; .001) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Conclusions CRT with MPP can significantly improve acute LV hemodynamic parameters assessed with pressure-volume loop measurements as compared with CONV.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac resynchronization therapy</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MultiPoint Pacing</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial</subject><subject>Pressure-volume loops</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsuO1TAMrRCIecAXIKEs2bTETR-5C5DQCBikQSyAdeSbujSXNilJekflS_hc0rkDCzZIlmJZ5_jEPs6yZ8AL4NC8PBSDj8NUlBxEAVDwUjzIzqGum1zIFh5uedXmddnCWXYRwoHzctdw8Tg7K6tyBxXAefbr4zJGMztjIxupj-xINnqjlxE9m1Eb-42ZafbuSIGhXiKxgSbXrRYno5mnMDsbiGEIlKJjtyYObE71sHjKj25cJmKjc3NgxjKNvjN4x1utHryz5idG4yyLA3mc16QZTfpCeJI96nEM9PT-vcy-vnv75eo6v_n0_sPVm5tcV1DFvBY1NHXbdpx0L0GiLnupZS11tedUYat3fYVCIjap0qDEmnNq911fybYnFJfZi1PfNOOPhUJUkwmaxhEtuSUoqDnIJCKqBBUnqPYuBE-9mr2Z0K8KuNosUQd1Z4naLFEAKlmSWM_vBZb9RN1fzh8PEuDVCUBpzKMhr4JOK9DUGU86qs6Z_wi8_oevR2ONxvE7rRQObvE2bVCBCqXi6vN2FdtRgEhNJK_Fb2pduQA</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Ćalović, Žarko, MD</creator><creator>Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD</creator><creator>Cuko, Amarild, MD</creator><creator>McSpadden, Luke C., PhD</creator><creator>Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD</creator><creator>Romano, Enrico, BEng</creator><creator>Saviano, Massimo, MD</creator><creator>Baldi, Mario, MD</creator><creator>Pappone, Alessia, MD</creator><creator>Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD</creator><creator>Giannelli, Luigi, MD</creator><creator>Ionescu, Bogdan, MD</creator><creator>Petretta, Andrea, MD</creator><creator>Vitale, Raffaele, MD</creator><creator>Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD</creator><creator>Tavazzi, Luigi, MD</creator><creator>Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients</title><author>Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD ; Ćalović, Žarko, MD ; Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD ; Cuko, Amarild, MD ; McSpadden, Luke C., PhD ; Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD ; Romano, Enrico, BEng ; Saviano, Massimo, MD ; Baldi, Mario, MD ; Pappone, Alessia, MD ; Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD ; Giannelli, Luigi, MD ; Ionescu, Bogdan, MD ; Petretta, Andrea, MD ; Vitale, Raffaele, MD ; Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD ; Tavazzi, Luigi, MD ; Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-53516577d0ecf818ac2f8c858c4b0e4a7c9f4a38aa6c4b6a8a500e7bdf487fea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac resynchronization therapy</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MultiPoint Pacing</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial</topic><topic>Pressure-volume loops</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ćalović, Žarko, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuko, Amarild, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSpadden, Luke C., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romano, Enrico, BEng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saviano, Massimo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldi, Mario, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappone, Alessia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannelli, Luigi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionescu, Bogdan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petretta, Andrea, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitale, Raffaele, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tavazzi, Luigi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pappone, Carlo, MD, PhD</au><au>Ćalović, Žarko, MD</au><au>Vicedomini, Gabriele, MD</au><au>Cuko, Amarild, MD</au><au>McSpadden, Luke C., PhD</au><au>Ryu, Kyungmoo, PhD</au><au>Romano, Enrico, BEng</au><au>Saviano, Massimo, MD</au><au>Baldi, Mario, MD</au><au>Pappone, Alessia, MD</au><au>Ciaccio, Cristiano, MD</au><au>Giannelli, Luigi, MD</au><au>Ionescu, Bogdan, MD</au><au>Petretta, Andrea, MD</au><au>Vitale, Raffaele, MD</au><au>Fundaliotis, Angelica, MD</au><au>Tavazzi, Luigi, MD</au><au>Santinelli, Vincenzo, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>401</epage><pages>394-401</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Backgound Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves acute cardiac hemodynamics. Objective To investigate if CRT with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing in a single coronary sinus branch (MultiPoint Pacing [MPP], St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) can offer further hemodynamic benefits to patients. Methods Forty-four consecutive patients (80% men, New York Heart Association III, end-systolic volume 180 ± 77 mL, ejection fraction 27% ± 6%, and QRS duration 152 ± 17 ms) receiving a CRT device implant (Unify Quadra MP or Quadra Assura MP and Quartet LV lead, St Jude Medical) underwent intraoperative assessment of LV hemodynamics by using a pressure-volume loop system (Inca, CD Leycom). A pacing protocol was performed, including 9 biventricular pacing interventions with conventional CRT (CONV) using distal and proximal LV electrodes and various MPP configurations. Each pacing intervention was performed twice in randomized order with right ventricular pacing (BASELINE) repeated after every intervention. Results Evaluable recordings were obtained in 42 patients. Relative to BASELINE, the best MPP intervention significantly increased the rate of pressure change (dP/dtmax ; 15.9% ± 10.0% vs 13.5% ± 8.8%; P &lt; .001), stroke work (27.2% ± 42.5% vs 19.4% ± 32.2%; P = .018), stroke volume (10.4% ± 22.5% vs 4.1% ± 13.1%; P = .003), and ejection fraction (10.5% ± 20.9% vs 5.3% ± 13.2%; P = .003) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Moreover, the best MPP intervention improved acute diastolic function, significantly decreasing −dP/dtmin (−13.5% ± 10.2% vs −10.6% ± 6.8%; P = .011), relaxation time constant (−7.5% ± 9.0% vs −4.8% ± 7.2%; P = .012), and end-diastolic pressure (−18.2% ± 22.4% vs −8.7% ± 21.4%; P &lt; .001) as compared with the best CONV intervention. Conclusions CRT with MPP can significantly improve acute LV hemodynamic parameters assessed with pressure-volume loop measurements as compared with CONV.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24291411</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.023</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1547-5271
ispartof Heart rhythm, 2014-03, Vol.11 (3), p.394-401
issn 1547-5271
1556-3871
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1501835134
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Cardiovascular
Female
Heart failure
Heart Failure - physiopathology
Heart Failure - therapy
Heart Ventricles
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
MultiPoint Pacing
Pacemaker, Artificial
Pressure-volume loops
Treatment Outcome
title Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A58%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multipoint%20left%20ventricular%20pacing%20improves%20acute%20hemodynamic%20response%20assessed%20with%20pressure-volume%20loops%20in%20cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy%20patients&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Pappone,%20Carlo,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=401&rft.pages=394-401&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1501835134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501835134&rft_id=info:pmid/24291411&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1547527113013805&rfr_iscdi=true