Bayesian networks for fMRI: A primer
Bayesian network analysis is an attractive approach for studying the functional integration of brain networks, as it includes both the locations of connections between regions of the brain (functional connectivity) and more importantly the direction of the causal relationship between the regions (di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2014-02, Vol.86, p.573-582 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 582 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 573 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Mumford, Jeanette A. Ramsey, Joseph D. |
description | Bayesian network analysis is an attractive approach for studying the functional integration of brain networks, as it includes both the locations of connections between regions of the brain (functional connectivity) and more importantly the direction of the causal relationship between the regions (directed functional connectivity). Further, these approaches are more attractive than other functional connectivity analyses in that they can often operate on larger sets of nodes and run searches over a wide range of candidate networks. An important study by Smith et al. (2011) illustrated that many Bayesian network approaches did not perform well in identifying the directionality of connections in simulated single-subject data. Since then, new Bayesian network approaches have been developed that have overcome the failures in the Smith work. Additionally, an important discovery was made that shows a preprocessing step used in the Smith data puts some of the Bayesian network methods at a disadvantage. This work provides a review of Bayesian network analyses, focusing on the methods used in the Smith work as well as methods developed since 2011 that have improved estimation performance. Importantly, only approaches that have been specifically designed for fMRI data perform well, as they have been tailored to meet the challenges of fMRI data. Although this work does not suggest a single best model, it describes the class of models that perform best and highlights the features of these models that allow them to perform well on fMRI data. Specifically, methods that rely on non-Gaussianity to direct causal relationships in the network perform well.
•Review of Bayesian network analysis, in a general framework•Recently discovered problems of Bayesian network analyses in fMRI are discussed.•Review improvements in Bayesian network analysis for fMRI•Direct readers to most appropriate class of Bayesian network analyses for fMRI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500798301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811913010392</els_id><sourcerecordid>1500798301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-db2e469fcb11a0e7ca4c96968363fb23ac7cae72d9cd9b3d8cfd3701368a7eae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMofv8FKajgTefJR9vEu234MZgIotchTU8lc2tnsir-e1M2FbzxKuHkOW_OeQhJKAwo0PxyNmiw861bmBccMKA8lgfAYIvsU1BZqrKCbff3jKeSUrVHDkKYAYCiQu6SPSaoAMXVPjkbmU8MzjRJg6uP1r-GpG59Ut8_Tq6SYbL0boH-iOzUZh7weHMekueb66fxXTp9uJ2Mh9PUijxbpVXJUOSqtiWlBrCwRliVq1zynNcl48bGEhasUrZSJa-krStexOlzaQo0yA_JxTp36du3DsNKL1ywOJ-bBtsuaJoBFEry2PIvKhQUTMpMRPT0DzprO9_ERWIgywqZU9oHyjVlfRuCx1r3uxv_qSnoXrqe6V_pupfev0TpsfVk80FXLrD6afy2HIHzDWCCNfPam8a68MvJDLiAPmi05jBKfnfodbAOG4uV82hXumrd_9N8AZkwoiU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1525786111</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bayesian networks for fMRI: A primer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Mumford, Jeanette A. ; Ramsey, Joseph D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Jeanette A. ; Ramsey, Joseph D.</creatorcontrib><description>Bayesian network analysis is an attractive approach for studying the functional integration of brain networks, as it includes both the locations of connections between regions of the brain (functional connectivity) and more importantly the direction of the causal relationship between the regions (directed functional connectivity). Further, these approaches are more attractive than other functional connectivity analyses in that they can often operate on larger sets of nodes and run searches over a wide range of candidate networks. An important study by Smith et al. (2011) illustrated that many Bayesian network approaches did not perform well in identifying the directionality of connections in simulated single-subject data. Since then, new Bayesian network approaches have been developed that have overcome the failures in the Smith work. Additionally, an important discovery was made that shows a preprocessing step used in the Smith data puts some of the Bayesian network methods at a disadvantage. This work provides a review of Bayesian network analyses, focusing on the methods used in the Smith work as well as methods developed since 2011 that have improved estimation performance. Importantly, only approaches that have been specifically designed for fMRI data perform well, as they have been tailored to meet the challenges of fMRI data. Although this work does not suggest a single best model, it describes the class of models that perform best and highlights the features of these models that allow them to perform well on fMRI data. Specifically, methods that rely on non-Gaussianity to direct causal relationships in the network perform well.
•Review of Bayesian network analysis, in a general framework•Recently discovered problems of Bayesian network analyses in fMRI are discussed.•Review improvements in Bayesian network analysis for fMRI•Direct readers to most appropriate class of Bayesian network analyses for fMRI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24140939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian networks ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - physiology ; Causality ; Computer Simulation ; Connectivity ; Connectome - methods ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Graphs ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Methods ; Models, Neurological ; Models, Statistical ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Network analysis ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; Random variables ; Reproducibility of Results ; Resting state ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Single subject ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2014-02, Vol.86, p.573-582</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 1, 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-db2e469fcb11a0e7ca4c96968363fb23ac7cae72d9cd9b3d8cfd3701368a7eae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-db2e469fcb11a0e7ca4c96968363fb23ac7cae72d9cd9b3d8cfd3701368a7eae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811913010392$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28503400$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24140939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Jeanette A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Joseph D.</creatorcontrib><title>Bayesian networks for fMRI: A primer</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Bayesian network analysis is an attractive approach for studying the functional integration of brain networks, as it includes both the locations of connections between regions of the brain (functional connectivity) and more importantly the direction of the causal relationship between the regions (directed functional connectivity). Further, these approaches are more attractive than other functional connectivity analyses in that they can often operate on larger sets of nodes and run searches over a wide range of candidate networks. An important study by Smith et al. (2011) illustrated that many Bayesian network approaches did not perform well in identifying the directionality of connections in simulated single-subject data. Since then, new Bayesian network approaches have been developed that have overcome the failures in the Smith work. Additionally, an important discovery was made that shows a preprocessing step used in the Smith data puts some of the Bayesian network methods at a disadvantage. This work provides a review of Bayesian network analyses, focusing on the methods used in the Smith work as well as methods developed since 2011 that have improved estimation performance. Importantly, only approaches that have been specifically designed for fMRI data perform well, as they have been tailored to meet the challenges of fMRI data. Although this work does not suggest a single best model, it describes the class of models that perform best and highlights the features of these models that allow them to perform well on fMRI data. Specifically, methods that rely on non-Gaussianity to direct causal relationships in the network perform well.
•Review of Bayesian network analysis, in a general framework•Recently discovered problems of Bayesian network analyses in fMRI are discussed.•Review improvements in Bayesian network analysis for fMRI•Direct readers to most appropriate class of Bayesian network analyses for fMRI.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian networks</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Connectome - methods</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Graphs</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Models, Neurological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Resting state</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Single subject</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMofv8FKajgTefJR9vEu234MZgIotchTU8lc2tnsir-e1M2FbzxKuHkOW_OeQhJKAwo0PxyNmiw861bmBccMKA8lgfAYIvsU1BZqrKCbff3jKeSUrVHDkKYAYCiQu6SPSaoAMXVPjkbmU8MzjRJg6uP1r-GpG59Ut8_Tq6SYbL0boH-iOzUZh7weHMekueb66fxXTp9uJ2Mh9PUijxbpVXJUOSqtiWlBrCwRliVq1zynNcl48bGEhasUrZSJa-krStexOlzaQo0yA_JxTp36du3DsNKL1ywOJ-bBtsuaJoBFEry2PIvKhQUTMpMRPT0DzprO9_ERWIgywqZU9oHyjVlfRuCx1r3uxv_qSnoXrqe6V_pupfev0TpsfVk80FXLrD6afy2HIHzDWCCNfPam8a68MvJDLiAPmi05jBKfnfodbAOG4uV82hXumrd_9N8AZkwoiU</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Mumford, Jeanette A.</creator><creator>Ramsey, Joseph D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Bayesian networks for fMRI: A primer</title><author>Mumford, Jeanette A. ; Ramsey, Joseph D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-db2e469fcb11a0e7ca4c96968363fb23ac7cae72d9cd9b3d8cfd3701368a7eae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian networks</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Connectome - methods</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Graphs</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Models, Neurological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Resting state</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Single subject</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Jeanette A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Joseph D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mumford, Jeanette A.</au><au>Ramsey, Joseph D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bayesian networks for fMRI: A primer</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>573</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>573-582</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Bayesian network analysis is an attractive approach for studying the functional integration of brain networks, as it includes both the locations of connections between regions of the brain (functional connectivity) and more importantly the direction of the causal relationship between the regions (directed functional connectivity). Further, these approaches are more attractive than other functional connectivity analyses in that they can often operate on larger sets of nodes and run searches over a wide range of candidate networks. An important study by Smith et al. (2011) illustrated that many Bayesian network approaches did not perform well in identifying the directionality of connections in simulated single-subject data. Since then, new Bayesian network approaches have been developed that have overcome the failures in the Smith work. Additionally, an important discovery was made that shows a preprocessing step used in the Smith data puts some of the Bayesian network methods at a disadvantage. This work provides a review of Bayesian network analyses, focusing on the methods used in the Smith work as well as methods developed since 2011 that have improved estimation performance. Importantly, only approaches that have been specifically designed for fMRI data perform well, as they have been tailored to meet the challenges of fMRI data. Although this work does not suggest a single best model, it describes the class of models that perform best and highlights the features of these models that allow them to perform well on fMRI data. Specifically, methods that rely on non-Gaussianity to direct causal relationships in the network perform well.
•Review of Bayesian network analysis, in a general framework•Recently discovered problems of Bayesian network analyses in fMRI are discussed.•Review improvements in Bayesian network analysis for fMRI•Direct readers to most appropriate class of Bayesian network analyses for fMRI.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24140939</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.020</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2014-02, Vol.86, p.573-582 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500798301 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Bayesian networks Biological and medical sciences Brain - physiology Causality Computer Simulation Connectivity Connectome - methods Functional magnetic resonance imaging Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Graphs Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Methods Models, Neurological Models, Statistical Nerve Net - physiology Network analysis NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods Random variables Reproducibility of Results Resting state Sensitivity and Specificity Single subject Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Bayesian networks for fMRI: A primer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A28%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bayesian%20networks%20for%20fMRI:%20A%20primer&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Mumford,%20Jeanette%20A.&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=573&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=573-582&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500798301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1525786111&rft_id=info:pmid/24140939&rft_els_id=S1053811913010392&rfr_iscdi=true |