Evaluation of pelleting as a pre-processing step for effective biomass deconstruction and fermentation
•Biomass pelleting is an effective biomass densification method required for biofuels production.•Biomass pelleting leads to partial deconstruction of the complex biomass structure and facilitates bioethanol production.•Pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biochemical engineering journal 2013-08, Vol.77, p.198-207 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 207 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Biochemical engineering journal |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Guragain, Yadhu N. Wilson, Jonathan Staggenborg, Scott McKinney, Leland Wang, Donghai Vadlani, Praveen V. |
description | •Biomass pelleting is an effective biomass densification method required for biofuels production.•Biomass pelleting leads to partial deconstruction of the complex biomass structure and facilitates bioethanol production.•Pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses without affecting the quality of sugars for fermentation.•Ethanol yield on the basis of released sugars did not differ significantly between pelleted and unpelleted samples.•Schematic diagram for complete utilization of lignocellulosic biomass is proposed.
Densification of bulky forages by pelleting reduces their transportation, handling, and storage costs. Because of high shearing force and frictional heating during the pelleting process, it is hypothesized that pelleting of lignocellulosic biomass could also partially deconstruct its complex structure and facilitate bioethanol production. In this study, pelleted wheat straw, corn stover, big bluestem, and sorghum stalk were evaluated for sugars and ethanol production, and compared with those of unpelleted biomasses. Mass recovery after alkali pretreatment increased by 14%, 11%, 2%, and 5%, respectively, in unpelleted biomasses. Lignin content reduced significantly more in pelleted samples for all types of biomass, except sorghum stalk. Volumetric productivity of enzymatic hydrolysis was 23%, 21%, 20% and 12% higher, respectively, in pelleted samples; ethanol yield on the basis of released sugars did not differ significantly between pelleted and unpelleted samples. These results indicate that the pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses without affecting the quality of sugars for fermentation. However, overall yield of ethanol from the raw biomass was not significantly higher in pelleted biomasses because of higher mass loss during pretreatment process. In our study, we propose a schematic for complete utilization of various byproducts for enhanced economic viability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bej.2013.05.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500783867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1369703X13001642</els_id><sourcerecordid>2000098270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-206d3872a16f30b0a505d668a35c604b1bc0fb2475d387773c41763fc774849d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhk1poUnaB-ipuhRysTOSLMlLTyGkbSCQQxvITcjyKGjxWq7Gu5C3j5wNPaYnCfHNr5lvquoLh4YD1xfbpsdtI4DLBlQDvH1XnfDOyFps1MP7cpd6UxuQDx-rU6ItAGhpzEkVrg9u3LslpomlwGYcR1zi9MgcMcfmjPWck0ei9Y0WnFlImWEI6Jd4QNbHtHNEbECfJlry3r9EuWlgAfMOp-Ul-1P1IbiR8PPreVbd_7j-c_Wrvr37eXN1eVt7JWCpBehBdkY4roOEHpwCNWjdOam8hrbnvYfQi9aoFTNG-pYbLYM3pu3azSDPqvNjbun67x5psbtIvgzlJkx7sqIMDptOFBP_Q7kCMJ3stCkoP6I-J6KMwc457lx-shzsqt9ubdFvV_0WlC36S82313hH3o0hu8lH-lcojFZSKF64r0cuuGTdYy7M_e8SpEujqgWz_v79SGARd4iYLfmIk8ch5rIFO6T4Rh_PEzyjUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500783867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of pelleting as a pre-processing step for effective biomass deconstruction and fermentation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Guragain, Yadhu N. ; Wilson, Jonathan ; Staggenborg, Scott ; McKinney, Leland ; Wang, Donghai ; Vadlani, Praveen V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guragain, Yadhu N. ; Wilson, Jonathan ; Staggenborg, Scott ; McKinney, Leland ; Wang, Donghai ; Vadlani, Praveen V.</creatorcontrib><description>•Biomass pelleting is an effective biomass densification method required for biofuels production.•Biomass pelleting leads to partial deconstruction of the complex biomass structure and facilitates bioethanol production.•Pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses without affecting the quality of sugars for fermentation.•Ethanol yield on the basis of released sugars did not differ significantly between pelleted and unpelleted samples.•Schematic diagram for complete utilization of lignocellulosic biomass is proposed.
Densification of bulky forages by pelleting reduces their transportation, handling, and storage costs. Because of high shearing force and frictional heating during the pelleting process, it is hypothesized that pelleting of lignocellulosic biomass could also partially deconstruct its complex structure and facilitate bioethanol production. In this study, pelleted wheat straw, corn stover, big bluestem, and sorghum stalk were evaluated for sugars and ethanol production, and compared with those of unpelleted biomasses. Mass recovery after alkali pretreatment increased by 14%, 11%, 2%, and 5%, respectively, in unpelleted biomasses. Lignin content reduced significantly more in pelleted samples for all types of biomass, except sorghum stalk. Volumetric productivity of enzymatic hydrolysis was 23%, 21%, 20% and 12% higher, respectively, in pelleted samples; ethanol yield on the basis of released sugars did not differ significantly between pelleted and unpelleted samples. These results indicate that the pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses without affecting the quality of sugars for fermentation. However, overall yield of ethanol from the raw biomass was not significantly higher in pelleted biomasses because of higher mass loss during pretreatment process. In our study, we propose a schematic for complete utilization of various byproducts for enhanced economic viability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-703X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-295X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2013.05.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Alkali pretreatment ; alkali treatment ; Andropogon gerardii ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomass ; Biomass deconstruction ; Biotechnology ; byproducts ; corn stover ; economic sustainability ; Enzymatic hydrolysis ; ethanol ; Ethanol fermentation ; ethanol production ; fermentation ; forage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; heat ; lignin ; lignocellulose ; Lignocellulosic biomass ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; Microbial engineering. Fermentation and microbial culture technology ; Pelleting ; Sorghum ; sugars ; transportation ; Triticum aestivum ; wheat straw</subject><ispartof>Biochemical engineering journal, 2013-08, Vol.77, p.198-207</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-206d3872a16f30b0a505d668a35c604b1bc0fb2475d387773c41763fc774849d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-206d3872a16f30b0a505d668a35c604b1bc0fb2475d387773c41763fc774849d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X13001642$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27653251$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guragain, Yadhu N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staggenborg, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinney, Leland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Donghai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadlani, Praveen V.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of pelleting as a pre-processing step for effective biomass deconstruction and fermentation</title><title>Biochemical engineering journal</title><description>•Biomass pelleting is an effective biomass densification method required for biofuels production.•Biomass pelleting leads to partial deconstruction of the complex biomass structure and facilitates bioethanol production.•Pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses without affecting the quality of sugars for fermentation.•Ethanol yield on the basis of released sugars did not differ significantly between pelleted and unpelleted samples.•Schematic diagram for complete utilization of lignocellulosic biomass is proposed.
Densification of bulky forages by pelleting reduces their transportation, handling, and storage costs. Because of high shearing force and frictional heating during the pelleting process, it is hypothesized that pelleting of lignocellulosic biomass could also partially deconstruct its complex structure and facilitate bioethanol production. In this study, pelleted wheat straw, corn stover, big bluestem, and sorghum stalk were evaluated for sugars and ethanol production, and compared with those of unpelleted biomasses. Mass recovery after alkali pretreatment increased by 14%, 11%, 2%, and 5%, respectively, in unpelleted biomasses. Lignin content reduced significantly more in pelleted samples for all types of biomass, except sorghum stalk. Volumetric productivity of enzymatic hydrolysis was 23%, 21%, 20% and 12% higher, respectively, in pelleted samples; ethanol yield on the basis of released sugars did not differ significantly between pelleted and unpelleted samples. These results indicate that the pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses without affecting the quality of sugars for fermentation. However, overall yield of ethanol from the raw biomass was not significantly higher in pelleted biomasses because of higher mass loss during pretreatment process. In our study, we propose a schematic for complete utilization of various byproducts for enhanced economic viability.</description><subject>Alkali pretreatment</subject><subject>alkali treatment</subject><subject>Andropogon gerardii</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>Biomass deconstruction</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>byproducts</subject><subject>corn stover</subject><subject>economic sustainability</subject><subject>Enzymatic hydrolysis</subject><subject>ethanol</subject><subject>Ethanol fermentation</subject><subject>ethanol production</subject><subject>fermentation</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>lignin</subject><subject>lignocellulose</subject><subject>Lignocellulosic biomass</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>Microbial engineering. Fermentation and microbial culture technology</subject><subject>Pelleting</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>sugars</subject><subject>transportation</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>wheat straw</subject><issn>1369-703X</issn><issn>1873-295X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFq3DAQhk1poUnaB-ipuhRysTOSLMlLTyGkbSCQQxvITcjyKGjxWq7Gu5C3j5wNPaYnCfHNr5lvquoLh4YD1xfbpsdtI4DLBlQDvH1XnfDOyFps1MP7cpd6UxuQDx-rU6ItAGhpzEkVrg9u3LslpomlwGYcR1zi9MgcMcfmjPWck0ei9Y0WnFlImWEI6Jd4QNbHtHNEbECfJlry3r9EuWlgAfMOp-Ul-1P1IbiR8PPreVbd_7j-c_Wrvr37eXN1eVt7JWCpBehBdkY4roOEHpwCNWjdOam8hrbnvYfQi9aoFTNG-pYbLYM3pu3azSDPqvNjbun67x5psbtIvgzlJkx7sqIMDptOFBP_Q7kCMJ3stCkoP6I-J6KMwc457lx-shzsqt9ubdFvV_0WlC36S82313hH3o0hu8lH-lcojFZSKF64r0cuuGTdYy7M_e8SpEujqgWz_v79SGARd4iYLfmIk8ch5rIFO6T4Rh_PEzyjUA</recordid><startdate>20130815</startdate><enddate>20130815</enddate><creator>Guragain, Yadhu N.</creator><creator>Wilson, Jonathan</creator><creator>Staggenborg, Scott</creator><creator>McKinney, Leland</creator><creator>Wang, Donghai</creator><creator>Vadlani, Praveen V.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130815</creationdate><title>Evaluation of pelleting as a pre-processing step for effective biomass deconstruction and fermentation</title><author>Guragain, Yadhu N. ; Wilson, Jonathan ; Staggenborg, Scott ; McKinney, Leland ; Wang, Donghai ; Vadlani, Praveen V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-206d3872a16f30b0a505d668a35c604b1bc0fb2475d387773c41763fc774849d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alkali pretreatment</topic><topic>alkali treatment</topic><topic>Andropogon gerardii</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>Biomass deconstruction</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>byproducts</topic><topic>corn stover</topic><topic>economic sustainability</topic><topic>Enzymatic hydrolysis</topic><topic>ethanol</topic><topic>Ethanol fermentation</topic><topic>ethanol production</topic><topic>fermentation</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>lignin</topic><topic>lignocellulose</topic><topic>Lignocellulosic biomass</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>Microbial engineering. Fermentation and microbial culture technology</topic><topic>Pelleting</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>sugars</topic><topic>transportation</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>wheat straw</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guragain, Yadhu N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staggenborg, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinney, Leland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Donghai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadlani, Praveen V.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biochemical engineering journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guragain, Yadhu N.</au><au>Wilson, Jonathan</au><au>Staggenborg, Scott</au><au>McKinney, Leland</au><au>Wang, Donghai</au><au>Vadlani, Praveen V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of pelleting as a pre-processing step for effective biomass deconstruction and fermentation</atitle><jtitle>Biochemical engineering journal</jtitle><date>2013-08-15</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><spage>198</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>198-207</pages><issn>1369-703X</issn><eissn>1873-295X</eissn><abstract>•Biomass pelleting is an effective biomass densification method required for biofuels production.•Biomass pelleting leads to partial deconstruction of the complex biomass structure and facilitates bioethanol production.•Pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses without affecting the quality of sugars for fermentation.•Ethanol yield on the basis of released sugars did not differ significantly between pelleted and unpelleted samples.•Schematic diagram for complete utilization of lignocellulosic biomass is proposed.
Densification of bulky forages by pelleting reduces their transportation, handling, and storage costs. Because of high shearing force and frictional heating during the pelleting process, it is hypothesized that pelleting of lignocellulosic biomass could also partially deconstruct its complex structure and facilitate bioethanol production. In this study, pelleted wheat straw, corn stover, big bluestem, and sorghum stalk were evaluated for sugars and ethanol production, and compared with those of unpelleted biomasses. Mass recovery after alkali pretreatment increased by 14%, 11%, 2%, and 5%, respectively, in unpelleted biomasses. Lignin content reduced significantly more in pelleted samples for all types of biomass, except sorghum stalk. Volumetric productivity of enzymatic hydrolysis was 23%, 21%, 20% and 12% higher, respectively, in pelleted samples; ethanol yield on the basis of released sugars did not differ significantly between pelleted and unpelleted samples. These results indicate that the pelleting process led to better enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomasses without affecting the quality of sugars for fermentation. However, overall yield of ethanol from the raw biomass was not significantly higher in pelleted biomasses because of higher mass loss during pretreatment process. In our study, we propose a schematic for complete utilization of various byproducts for enhanced economic viability.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.bej.2013.05.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-703X |
ispartof | Biochemical engineering journal, 2013-08, Vol.77, p.198-207 |
issn | 1369-703X 1873-295X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500783867 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Alkali pretreatment alkali treatment Andropogon gerardii Biological and medical sciences biomass Biomass deconstruction Biotechnology byproducts corn stover economic sustainability Enzymatic hydrolysis ethanol Ethanol fermentation ethanol production fermentation forage Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology heat lignin lignocellulose Lignocellulosic biomass Methods. Procedures. Technologies Microbial engineering. Fermentation and microbial culture technology Pelleting Sorghum sugars transportation Triticum aestivum wheat straw |
title | Evaluation of pelleting as a pre-processing step for effective biomass deconstruction and fermentation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T08%3A33%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20pelleting%20as%20a%20pre-processing%20step%20for%20effective%20biomass%20deconstruction%20and%20fermentation&rft.jtitle=Biochemical%20engineering%20journal&rft.au=Guragain,%20Yadhu%20N.&rft.date=2013-08-15&rft.volume=77&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=198-207&rft.issn=1369-703X&rft.eissn=1873-295X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bej.2013.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2000098270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500783867&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1369703X13001642&rfr_iscdi=true |