Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health

Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of hygiene and environmental health 2013-08, Vol.216 (5), p.599-605
Hauptverfasser: Casteleyn, Ludwine, Dumez, Birgit, Van Damme, Karel, Anwar, Wagida A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 605
container_issue 5
container_start_page 599
container_title International journal of hygiene and environmental health
container_volume 216
creator Casteleyn, Ludwine
Dumez, Birgit
Van Damme, Karel
Anwar, Wagida A.
description Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.03.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500774797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1438463913000540</els_id><sourcerecordid>1500774797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7f05dbeac8fb1d1cfca3d4df1cc6dc40f9bc72ca1e9959f1e6cb53066cffef663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMozof-AkG6Edz0mtO0SbNwIcPoCCNuZsBdSE9OaK5tOibtwPz7ab1X3TlwIIE8OefNE8beAN8BB_lhvwv7nvpdxUHs-Fogn7FTkNCWIODH83Vfi7aspdAn7CznPecV8Fa_ZCeVkJJXAk7Zt8u5D5gLG13h7GyLuzTNhHOYYhFi0S-jjUUXptGmn5SKPC8uUN6OKN6HNMWR4myHoic7zP0r9sLbIdPr43rObj9f3lxcldffv3y9-HRdYl1Vc6k8b1xHFlvfgQP0aIWrnQdE6bDmXneoKrRAWjfaA0nsGsGlRO_JSynO2ftD3zXtr4XybMaQkYbBRpqWbKDhXKlaafU0KrTmjeSqXlFxQDFNOSfy5i6F9eEPBrjZlJu9-a3cbMoNXwu2LG-PA5ZuJPf3zh_HK_DuCNiMdvDJRgz5H6cUSNlujT4eOFrN3QdKJmOgiORCWn_EuCn8N8gjGE6hlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399056074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Casteleyn, Ludwine ; Dumez, Birgit ; Van Damme, Karel ; Anwar, Wagida A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Casteleyn, Ludwine ; Dumez, Birgit ; Van Damme, Karel ; Anwar, Wagida A.</creatorcontrib><description>Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-4639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-131X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.03.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23660231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>München: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers ; Challenges ; Communication ; Computer Security - ethics ; Data protection ; Environment. Living conditions ; Environmental Health - ethics ; Ethics ; European Union ; Human biomarkers ; Humans ; Information Dissemination - ethics ; Informed Consent - ethics ; Internationality ; Medical sciences ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2013-08, Vol.216 (5), p.599-605</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier GmbH</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7f05dbeac8fb1d1cfca3d4df1cc6dc40f9bc72ca1e9959f1e6cb53066cffef663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7f05dbeac8fb1d1cfca3d4df1cc6dc40f9bc72ca1e9959f1e6cb53066cffef663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463913000540$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27716686$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23660231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casteleyn, Ludwine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumez, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Wagida A.</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health</title><title>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</title><addtitle>Int J Hyg Environ Health</addtitle><description>Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action.</description><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Challenges</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer Security - ethics</subject><subject>Data protection</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Health - ethics</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Human biomarkers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination - ethics</subject><subject>Informed Consent - ethics</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1438-4639</issn><issn>1618-131X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMozof-AkG6Edz0mtO0SbNwIcPoCCNuZsBdSE9OaK5tOibtwPz7ab1X3TlwIIE8OefNE8beAN8BB_lhvwv7nvpdxUHs-Fogn7FTkNCWIODH83Vfi7aspdAn7CznPecV8Fa_ZCeVkJJXAk7Zt8u5D5gLG13h7GyLuzTNhHOYYhFi0S-jjUUXptGmn5SKPC8uUN6OKN6HNMWR4myHoic7zP0r9sLbIdPr43rObj9f3lxcldffv3y9-HRdYl1Vc6k8b1xHFlvfgQP0aIWrnQdE6bDmXneoKrRAWjfaA0nsGsGlRO_JSynO2ftD3zXtr4XybMaQkYbBRpqWbKDhXKlaafU0KrTmjeSqXlFxQDFNOSfy5i6F9eEPBrjZlJu9-a3cbMoNXwu2LG-PA5ZuJPf3zh_HK_DuCNiMdvDJRgz5H6cUSNlujT4eOFrN3QdKJmOgiORCWn_EuCn8N8gjGE6hlg</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Casteleyn, Ludwine</creator><creator>Dumez, Birgit</creator><creator>Van Damme, Karel</creator><creator>Anwar, Wagida A.</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health</title><author>Casteleyn, Ludwine ; Dumez, Birgit ; Van Damme, Karel ; Anwar, Wagida A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7f05dbeac8fb1d1cfca3d4df1cc6dc40f9bc72ca1e9959f1e6cb53066cffef663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Challenges</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer Security - ethics</topic><topic>Data protection</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Health - ethics</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Human biomarkers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination - ethics</topic><topic>Informed Consent - ethics</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casteleyn, Ludwine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumez, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Wagida A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casteleyn, Ludwine</au><au>Dumez, Birgit</au><au>Van Damme, Karel</au><au>Anwar, Wagida A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health</atitle><jtitle>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Hyg Environ Health</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>216</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>599-605</pages><issn>1438-4639</issn><eissn>1618-131X</eissn><abstract>Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action.</abstract><cop>München</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>23660231</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.03.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1438-4639
ispartof International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2013-08, Vol.216 (5), p.599-605
issn 1438-4639
1618-131X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500774797
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers
Challenges
Communication
Computer Security - ethics
Data protection
Environment. Living conditions
Environmental Health - ethics
Ethics
European Union
Human biomarkers
Humans
Information Dissemination - ethics
Informed Consent - ethics
Internationality
Medical sciences
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Toxicology
title Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T22%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20and%20data%20protection%20in%20human%20biomarker%20studies%20in%20environmental%20health&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20hygiene%20and%20environmental%20health&rft.au=Casteleyn,%20Ludwine&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=216&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=599-605&rft.issn=1438-4639&rft.eissn=1618-131X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.03.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500774797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399056074&rft_id=info:pmid/23660231&rft_els_id=S1438463913000540&rfr_iscdi=true