Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health
Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of hygiene and environmental health 2013-08, Vol.216 (5), p.599-605 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 605 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 599 |
container_title | International journal of hygiene and environmental health |
container_volume | 216 |
creator | Casteleyn, Ludwine Dumez, Birgit Van Damme, Karel Anwar, Wagida A. |
description | Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.03.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500774797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1438463913000540</els_id><sourcerecordid>1500774797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7f05dbeac8fb1d1cfca3d4df1cc6dc40f9bc72ca1e9959f1e6cb53066cffef663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMozof-AkG6Edz0mtO0SbNwIcPoCCNuZsBdSE9OaK5tOibtwPz7ab1X3TlwIIE8OefNE8beAN8BB_lhvwv7nvpdxUHs-Fogn7FTkNCWIODH83Vfi7aspdAn7CznPecV8Fa_ZCeVkJJXAk7Zt8u5D5gLG13h7GyLuzTNhHOYYhFi0S-jjUUXptGmn5SKPC8uUN6OKN6HNMWR4myHoic7zP0r9sLbIdPr43rObj9f3lxcldffv3y9-HRdYl1Vc6k8b1xHFlvfgQP0aIWrnQdE6bDmXneoKrRAWjfaA0nsGsGlRO_JSynO2ftD3zXtr4XybMaQkYbBRpqWbKDhXKlaafU0KrTmjeSqXlFxQDFNOSfy5i6F9eEPBrjZlJu9-a3cbMoNXwu2LG-PA5ZuJPf3zh_HK_DuCNiMdvDJRgz5H6cUSNlujT4eOFrN3QdKJmOgiORCWn_EuCn8N8gjGE6hlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1399056074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Casteleyn, Ludwine ; Dumez, Birgit ; Van Damme, Karel ; Anwar, Wagida A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Casteleyn, Ludwine ; Dumez, Birgit ; Van Damme, Karel ; Anwar, Wagida A.</creatorcontrib><description>Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-4639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-131X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.03.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23660231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>München: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers ; Challenges ; Communication ; Computer Security - ethics ; Data protection ; Environment. Living conditions ; Environmental Health - ethics ; Ethics ; European Union ; Human biomarkers ; Humans ; Information Dissemination - ethics ; Informed Consent - ethics ; Internationality ; Medical sciences ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2013-08, Vol.216 (5), p.599-605</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier GmbH</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7f05dbeac8fb1d1cfca3d4df1cc6dc40f9bc72ca1e9959f1e6cb53066cffef663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7f05dbeac8fb1d1cfca3d4df1cc6dc40f9bc72ca1e9959f1e6cb53066cffef663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463913000540$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27716686$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23660231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casteleyn, Ludwine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumez, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Wagida A.</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health</title><title>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</title><addtitle>Int J Hyg Environ Health</addtitle><description>Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action.</description><subject>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Challenges</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer Security - ethics</subject><subject>Data protection</subject><subject>Environment. Living conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Health - ethics</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Human biomarkers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Dissemination - ethics</subject><subject>Informed Consent - ethics</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1438-4639</issn><issn>1618-131X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMozof-AkG6Edz0mtO0SbNwIcPoCCNuZsBdSE9OaK5tOibtwPz7ab1X3TlwIIE8OefNE8beAN8BB_lhvwv7nvpdxUHs-Fogn7FTkNCWIODH83Vfi7aspdAn7CznPecV8Fa_ZCeVkJJXAk7Zt8u5D5gLG13h7GyLuzTNhHOYYhFi0S-jjUUXptGmn5SKPC8uUN6OKN6HNMWR4myHoic7zP0r9sLbIdPr43rObj9f3lxcldffv3y9-HRdYl1Vc6k8b1xHFlvfgQP0aIWrnQdE6bDmXneoKrRAWjfaA0nsGsGlRO_JSynO2ftD3zXtr4XybMaQkYbBRpqWbKDhXKlaafU0KrTmjeSqXlFxQDFNOSfy5i6F9eEPBrjZlJu9-a3cbMoNXwu2LG-PA5ZuJPf3zh_HK_DuCNiMdvDJRgz5H6cUSNlujT4eOFrN3QdKJmOgiORCWn_EuCn8N8gjGE6hlg</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Casteleyn, Ludwine</creator><creator>Dumez, Birgit</creator><creator>Van Damme, Karel</creator><creator>Anwar, Wagida A.</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health</title><author>Casteleyn, Ludwine ; Dumez, Birgit ; Van Damme, Karel ; Anwar, Wagida A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7f05dbeac8fb1d1cfca3d4df1cc6dc40f9bc72ca1e9959f1e6cb53066cffef663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Challenges</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer Security - ethics</topic><topic>Data protection</topic><topic>Environment. Living conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Health - ethics</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Human biomarkers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Dissemination - ethics</topic><topic>Informed Consent - ethics</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casteleyn, Ludwine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumez, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Damme, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Wagida A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casteleyn, Ludwine</au><au>Dumez, Birgit</au><au>Van Damme, Karel</au><au>Anwar, Wagida A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health</atitle><jtitle>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Hyg Environ Health</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>216</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>599-605</pages><issn>1438-4639</issn><eissn>1618-131X</eissn><abstract>Human biomarker studies in environmental health are essential tools to study the relationship between health and environment. They should ultimately contribute to a better understanding of environmentally induced adverse health effects and to appropriate preventive actions. To ensure the protection of the rights and dignity of study participants a complex legal and ethical framework is applied, consisting of several international directives, conventions, and guidelines, whether or not translated in domestic laws. Main characteristics of ethics and data protection in studies using biomarkers in the field of environmental health are summarized and current discussions on related questions and bottlenecks highlighted. In the current regulatory context, dominated by the protection of the individual study participant, difficulties are reported due to the different interpretation and implementation of the regulations of concern within and across borders. Advancement of consistency and compatibility is recommended and efforts are ongoing. An increasing demand for secondary use of data and samples poses additional challenges in finding a right balance between the individual rights of the study participants on the one hand and the common interest of, and potential benefit for the public or community at large on the other. Ethics committees could play a key role in assessing problems originating from the sometimes competing needs at individual and societal level. Building trust in science amongst (potential) study participants and within the community allows the inclusion of arguments from the societal perspective. This requires increased attention for respectful communication efforts. Striving for public participation in decision making processes may promote policy relevant research and the related translation of study results into action.</abstract><cop>München</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>23660231</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.03.016</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1438-4639 |
ispartof | International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2013-08, Vol.216 (5), p.599-605 |
issn | 1438-4639 1618-131X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500774797 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Air. Soil. Water. Waste. Feeding Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers Challenges Communication Computer Security - ethics Data protection Environment. Living conditions Environmental Health - ethics Ethics European Union Human biomarkers Humans Information Dissemination - ethics Informed Consent - ethics Internationality Medical sciences Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Toxicology |
title | Ethics and data protection in human biomarker studies in environmental health |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T22%3A54%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics%20and%20data%20protection%20in%20human%20biomarker%20studies%20in%20environmental%20health&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20hygiene%20and%20environmental%20health&rft.au=Casteleyn,%20Ludwine&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=216&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=599-605&rft.issn=1438-4639&rft.eissn=1618-131X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.03.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500774797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1399056074&rft_id=info:pmid/23660231&rft_els_id=S1438463913000540&rfr_iscdi=true |