Halophytes as forages in saline landscapes: Interactions between plant genotype and environment change their feeding value to ruminants

► We review the factors affecting livestock production using halophyte fodders. ► We focus on biomass production, nutritive value and voluntary feed intake. ► Halophytes have lower metabolisable energy concentrations than other fodders. ► Voluntary feed intake is also decreased by high indigestible...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental and experimental botany 2013-08, Vol.92, p.96-109
Hauptverfasser: Norman, Hayley C., Masters, David G., Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue
container_start_page 96
container_title Environmental and experimental botany
container_volume 92
creator Norman, Hayley C.
Masters, David G.
Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.
description ► We review the factors affecting livestock production using halophyte fodders. ► We focus on biomass production, nutritive value and voluntary feed intake. ► Halophytes have lower metabolisable energy concentrations than other fodders. ► Voluntary feed intake is also decreased by high indigestible fibre, salt and oxalate. ► Improving metabolisable energy concentrations is a realistic plant selection goal. Although the growth of halophytic forages is widely recognised as a means for using saline land and water, factors affecting the utilisation of this biomass by ruminants such as sheep, cattle and goats have received less attention. This review focuses on three factors that affect livestock production using halophytes – biomass production, nutritive value (NV) of the biomass and voluntary feed intake (VFI). Biomass production depends on plant species, genotype, the degree of abiotic stress (salinity, aridity, waterlogging), agronomic management and the interaction between genotypes and the abiotic environment. Production in irrigated systems is about 10-times that of dryland systems. NV relates to the efficiency of nutrient use by animals and is influenced by plant species, genotype and genotype×environment interactions. Halophytes typically contain lower metabolisable energy than traditional forages and most do not have enough energy for liveweight maintenance. Chenopods generally have high crude protein, sulphur and minerals, which are critical to ruminant production, however oxalate, mineral toxicities and induced deficiencies can have adverse effects on animals. Antioxidants that halophytes synthesise to detoxify reactive oxygen species may provide precursors of vitamins A and E, helping to alleviate deficiency and improve meat quality. VFI refers to the amount of feed that can be ingested by grazing animals. It is regulated by complex feedback between the stomach and central nervous system. VFI may be restricted by high concentrations of indigestible fibre, salt, and minerals and toxins, such as oxalate and nitrate. The productivity of saline agricultural systems may be improved by increasing halophyte feeding value. Increasing metabolisable energy is the most important factor. Measurement of relative palatability by grazing animals may assist in identifying genotypes with higher NV.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.07.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500772412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S009884721200144X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1500772412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ff79163d7326d6dca6e5edf321da4ee7325e260d05839a2db9b5615667d33ea43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEQgFcIJELhGeoLEpdd_LNrb7hVFdBKlThAz9bEHm8cbezFdkLzBLw2jlL1ysnWzDc__tw014x2jDL5eddhOOLTsoml45TxjqqOUvGqWbFRiVYJql43K0rXYzv2ir9t3uW8o5QqoeSq-XsHc1y2p4KZQCYuJpjq1QeSYfYByQzBZgML5i_kPhRMYIqPIZMNlj-IgSyVKGTCEMtpQVJxUhfyKYY91oTZQpiQlC36RByi9WEiR5gPNRZJOux9qPX5ffPGwZzxw_N51Tx--_rr9q59-PH9_vbmoTX9wErrnFozKawSXFppDUgc0DrBmYUesYYH5JJaOoxiDdxu1ptBskFKZYVA6MVV8-nSd0nx9wFz0XufDc71ERgPWbOhmlG8Z7yi6oKaFHNO6PSS_B7SSTOqz-r1Tr-o12f1mipd1dfKj89DoKqbXYJgfH4p52rgQqrzhOsL5yBqmFJlHn_WRj2l9e_G_rzuzYXA6uToMelsPAZTNSY0Rdvo_7vNP-i9qvI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500772412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Halophytes as forages in saline landscapes: Interactions between plant genotype and environment change their feeding value to ruminants</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Norman, Hayley C. ; Masters, David G. ; Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Norman, Hayley C. ; Masters, David G. ; Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.</creatorcontrib><description>► We review the factors affecting livestock production using halophyte fodders. ► We focus on biomass production, nutritive value and voluntary feed intake. ► Halophytes have lower metabolisable energy concentrations than other fodders. ► Voluntary feed intake is also decreased by high indigestible fibre, salt and oxalate. ► Improving metabolisable energy concentrations is a realistic plant selection goal. Although the growth of halophytic forages is widely recognised as a means for using saline land and water, factors affecting the utilisation of this biomass by ruminants such as sheep, cattle and goats have received less attention. This review focuses on three factors that affect livestock production using halophytes – biomass production, nutritive value (NV) of the biomass and voluntary feed intake (VFI). Biomass production depends on plant species, genotype, the degree of abiotic stress (salinity, aridity, waterlogging), agronomic management and the interaction between genotypes and the abiotic environment. Production in irrigated systems is about 10-times that of dryland systems. NV relates to the efficiency of nutrient use by animals and is influenced by plant species, genotype and genotype×environment interactions. Halophytes typically contain lower metabolisable energy than traditional forages and most do not have enough energy for liveweight maintenance. Chenopods generally have high crude protein, sulphur and minerals, which are critical to ruminant production, however oxalate, mineral toxicities and induced deficiencies can have adverse effects on animals. Antioxidants that halophytes synthesise to detoxify reactive oxygen species may provide precursors of vitamins A and E, helping to alleviate deficiency and improve meat quality. VFI refers to the amount of feed that can be ingested by grazing animals. It is regulated by complex feedback between the stomach and central nervous system. VFI may be restricted by high concentrations of indigestible fibre, salt, and minerals and toxins, such as oxalate and nitrate. The productivity of saline agricultural systems may be improved by increasing halophyte feeding value. Increasing metabolisable energy is the most important factor. Measurement of relative palatability by grazing animals may assist in identifying genotypes with higher NV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7307</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.07.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EEBODM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>abiotic stress ; adverse effects ; antioxidants ; Atriplex ; Biological and medical sciences ; biomass production ; cattle ; central nervous system ; crude protein ; Distichlis ; energy ; feeds ; flooded conditions ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genotype ; genotype-environment interaction ; goats ; halophytes ; Herbivore ; land use ; landscapes ; livestock production ; Maireana ; meat quality ; Melilotus ; metabolizable energy ; minerals ; nitrates ; nutrient use efficiency ; palatability ; production technology ; Puccinellia ; reactive oxygen species ; Ruminantia ; saline water ; Salinity ; Salt-tolerant ; sheep ; stomach ; sulfur ; toxicity ; toxins ; vitamin E ; voluntary intake</subject><ispartof>Environmental and experimental botany, 2013-08, Vol.92, p.96-109</ispartof><rights>2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ff79163d7326d6dca6e5edf321da4ee7325e260d05839a2db9b5615667d33ea43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ff79163d7326d6dca6e5edf321da4ee7325e260d05839a2db9b5615667d33ea43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009884721200144X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27523672$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Norman, Hayley C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masters, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.</creatorcontrib><title>Halophytes as forages in saline landscapes: Interactions between plant genotype and environment change their feeding value to ruminants</title><title>Environmental and experimental botany</title><description>► We review the factors affecting livestock production using halophyte fodders. ► We focus on biomass production, nutritive value and voluntary feed intake. ► Halophytes have lower metabolisable energy concentrations than other fodders. ► Voluntary feed intake is also decreased by high indigestible fibre, salt and oxalate. ► Improving metabolisable energy concentrations is a realistic plant selection goal. Although the growth of halophytic forages is widely recognised as a means for using saline land and water, factors affecting the utilisation of this biomass by ruminants such as sheep, cattle and goats have received less attention. This review focuses on three factors that affect livestock production using halophytes – biomass production, nutritive value (NV) of the biomass and voluntary feed intake (VFI). Biomass production depends on plant species, genotype, the degree of abiotic stress (salinity, aridity, waterlogging), agronomic management and the interaction between genotypes and the abiotic environment. Production in irrigated systems is about 10-times that of dryland systems. NV relates to the efficiency of nutrient use by animals and is influenced by plant species, genotype and genotype×environment interactions. Halophytes typically contain lower metabolisable energy than traditional forages and most do not have enough energy for liveweight maintenance. Chenopods generally have high crude protein, sulphur and minerals, which are critical to ruminant production, however oxalate, mineral toxicities and induced deficiencies can have adverse effects on animals. Antioxidants that halophytes synthesise to detoxify reactive oxygen species may provide precursors of vitamins A and E, helping to alleviate deficiency and improve meat quality. VFI refers to the amount of feed that can be ingested by grazing animals. It is regulated by complex feedback between the stomach and central nervous system. VFI may be restricted by high concentrations of indigestible fibre, salt, and minerals and toxins, such as oxalate and nitrate. The productivity of saline agricultural systems may be improved by increasing halophyte feeding value. Increasing metabolisable energy is the most important factor. Measurement of relative palatability by grazing animals may assist in identifying genotypes with higher NV.</description><subject>abiotic stress</subject><subject>adverse effects</subject><subject>antioxidants</subject><subject>Atriplex</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biomass production</subject><subject>cattle</subject><subject>central nervous system</subject><subject>crude protein</subject><subject>Distichlis</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>feeds</subject><subject>flooded conditions</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>genotype-environment interaction</subject><subject>goats</subject><subject>halophytes</subject><subject>Herbivore</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>livestock production</subject><subject>Maireana</subject><subject>meat quality</subject><subject>Melilotus</subject><subject>metabolizable energy</subject><subject>minerals</subject><subject>nitrates</subject><subject>nutrient use efficiency</subject><subject>palatability</subject><subject>production technology</subject><subject>Puccinellia</subject><subject>reactive oxygen species</subject><subject>Ruminantia</subject><subject>saline water</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salt-tolerant</subject><subject>sheep</subject><subject>stomach</subject><subject>sulfur</subject><subject>toxicity</subject><subject>toxins</subject><subject>vitamin E</subject><subject>voluntary intake</subject><issn>0098-8472</issn><issn>1873-7307</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEQgFcIJELhGeoLEpdd_LNrb7hVFdBKlThAz9bEHm8cbezFdkLzBLw2jlL1ysnWzDc__tw014x2jDL5eddhOOLTsoml45TxjqqOUvGqWbFRiVYJql43K0rXYzv2ir9t3uW8o5QqoeSq-XsHc1y2p4KZQCYuJpjq1QeSYfYByQzBZgML5i_kPhRMYIqPIZMNlj-IgSyVKGTCEMtpQVJxUhfyKYY91oTZQpiQlC36RByi9WEiR5gPNRZJOux9qPX5ffPGwZzxw_N51Tx--_rr9q59-PH9_vbmoTX9wErrnFozKawSXFppDUgc0DrBmYUesYYH5JJaOoxiDdxu1ptBskFKZYVA6MVV8-nSd0nx9wFz0XufDc71ERgPWbOhmlG8Z7yi6oKaFHNO6PSS_B7SSTOqz-r1Tr-o12f1mipd1dfKj89DoKqbXYJgfH4p52rgQqrzhOsL5yBqmFJlHn_WRj2l9e_G_rzuzYXA6uToMelsPAZTNSY0Rdvo_7vNP-i9qvI</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Norman, Hayley C.</creator><creator>Masters, David G.</creator><creator>Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Halophytes as forages in saline landscapes: Interactions between plant genotype and environment change their feeding value to ruminants</title><author>Norman, Hayley C. ; Masters, David G. ; Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ff79163d7326d6dca6e5edf321da4ee7325e260d05839a2db9b5615667d33ea43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>abiotic stress</topic><topic>adverse effects</topic><topic>antioxidants</topic><topic>Atriplex</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biomass production</topic><topic>cattle</topic><topic>central nervous system</topic><topic>crude protein</topic><topic>Distichlis</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>feeds</topic><topic>flooded conditions</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>genotype-environment interaction</topic><topic>goats</topic><topic>halophytes</topic><topic>Herbivore</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>livestock production</topic><topic>Maireana</topic><topic>meat quality</topic><topic>Melilotus</topic><topic>metabolizable energy</topic><topic>minerals</topic><topic>nitrates</topic><topic>nutrient use efficiency</topic><topic>palatability</topic><topic>production technology</topic><topic>Puccinellia</topic><topic>reactive oxygen species</topic><topic>Ruminantia</topic><topic>saline water</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salt-tolerant</topic><topic>sheep</topic><topic>stomach</topic><topic>sulfur</topic><topic>toxicity</topic><topic>toxins</topic><topic>vitamin E</topic><topic>voluntary intake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Norman, Hayley C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masters, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental and experimental botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Norman, Hayley C.</au><au>Masters, David G.</au><au>Barrett-Lennard, Edward G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Halophytes as forages in saline landscapes: Interactions between plant genotype and environment change their feeding value to ruminants</atitle><jtitle>Environmental and experimental botany</jtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>92</volume><spage>96</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>96-109</pages><issn>0098-8472</issn><eissn>1873-7307</eissn><coden>EEBODM</coden><abstract>► We review the factors affecting livestock production using halophyte fodders. ► We focus on biomass production, nutritive value and voluntary feed intake. ► Halophytes have lower metabolisable energy concentrations than other fodders. ► Voluntary feed intake is also decreased by high indigestible fibre, salt and oxalate. ► Improving metabolisable energy concentrations is a realistic plant selection goal. Although the growth of halophytic forages is widely recognised as a means for using saline land and water, factors affecting the utilisation of this biomass by ruminants such as sheep, cattle and goats have received less attention. This review focuses on three factors that affect livestock production using halophytes – biomass production, nutritive value (NV) of the biomass and voluntary feed intake (VFI). Biomass production depends on plant species, genotype, the degree of abiotic stress (salinity, aridity, waterlogging), agronomic management and the interaction between genotypes and the abiotic environment. Production in irrigated systems is about 10-times that of dryland systems. NV relates to the efficiency of nutrient use by animals and is influenced by plant species, genotype and genotype×environment interactions. Halophytes typically contain lower metabolisable energy than traditional forages and most do not have enough energy for liveweight maintenance. Chenopods generally have high crude protein, sulphur and minerals, which are critical to ruminant production, however oxalate, mineral toxicities and induced deficiencies can have adverse effects on animals. Antioxidants that halophytes synthesise to detoxify reactive oxygen species may provide precursors of vitamins A and E, helping to alleviate deficiency and improve meat quality. VFI refers to the amount of feed that can be ingested by grazing animals. It is regulated by complex feedback between the stomach and central nervous system. VFI may be restricted by high concentrations of indigestible fibre, salt, and minerals and toxins, such as oxalate and nitrate. The productivity of saline agricultural systems may be improved by increasing halophyte feeding value. Increasing metabolisable energy is the most important factor. Measurement of relative palatability by grazing animals may assist in identifying genotypes with higher NV.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.07.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-8472
ispartof Environmental and experimental botany, 2013-08, Vol.92, p.96-109
issn 0098-8472
1873-7307
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500772412
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects abiotic stress
adverse effects
antioxidants
Atriplex
Biological and medical sciences
biomass production
cattle
central nervous system
crude protein
Distichlis
energy
feeds
flooded conditions
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genotype
genotype-environment interaction
goats
halophytes
Herbivore
land use
landscapes
livestock production
Maireana
meat quality
Melilotus
metabolizable energy
minerals
nitrates
nutrient use efficiency
palatability
production technology
Puccinellia
reactive oxygen species
Ruminantia
saline water
Salinity
Salt-tolerant
sheep
stomach
sulfur
toxicity
toxins
vitamin E
voluntary intake
title Halophytes as forages in saline landscapes: Interactions between plant genotype and environment change their feeding value to ruminants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T13%3A43%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Halophytes%20as%20forages%20in%20saline%20landscapes:%20Interactions%20between%20plant%20genotype%20and%20environment%20change%20their%20feeding%20value%20to%20ruminants&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20and%20experimental%20botany&rft.au=Norman,%20Hayley%20C.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=92&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=96-109&rft.issn=0098-8472&rft.eissn=1873-7307&rft.coden=EEBODM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500772412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500772412&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S009884721200144X&rfr_iscdi=true