Influence of soil bulk density and matric potential on microbial dynamics, inorganic N transformations, N2O and N2 fluxes following urea deposition
Transformation of ruminant urine-nitrogen (N) can contribute to negative environmental outcomes such as nitrate leaching which leads to eutrophication of waterways and production of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas. Although abiotic factors influencing urine-N processing have been well studied,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil biology & biochemistry 2013-10, Vol.65, p.1-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Soil biology & biochemistry |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Hamonts, Kelly Balaine, Nimlesh Moltchanova, Elena Beare, Mike Thomas, Steve Wakelin, Steven A. O'Callaghan, Maureen Condron, Leo M. Clough, Tim J. |
description | Transformation of ruminant urine-nitrogen (N) can contribute to negative environmental outcomes such as nitrate leaching which leads to eutrophication of waterways and production of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas. Although abiotic factors influencing urine-N processing have been well studied, detailed studies of the soil microbial community dynamics following urine application are required to improve mitigation strategies for reducing harmful N fluxes from urine deposition. A factorial laboratory experiment using packed silt-loam soil cores with two levels each of urea (±), soil matric potential (ψ −6.0 or −0.2 kPa) and soil bulk density (ρb 1.1 or 1.5 g cm−3) was performed to study the interaction of urea and soil physical conditions on both soil inorganic N transformations and the abundance of ammonia-oxidizers and denitrifiers. Soil ψ and ρb treatments had an immediate impact on soil pH, dissolved organic carbon, inorganic N pools and emissions of N2O and N2 following urea deposition, and microorganisms carrying the nosZ gene were present in lower numbers in the most aerobic soil (−6.0 kPa and 1.1 g cm−3) from day 7. In all treatments, both bacterial amoA and denitrifier nirS, nirK and nosZ gene copy numbers increased within 1 day following urea application. Dynamics in the NH4+ concentrations were significantly correlated with cumulative changes in the abundance of the ammonia-oxidizers, but no relation was found between cumulative changes in the denitrifier nirS, nirK and nosZ gene copy numbers and the dynamics in soil inorganic N, N2O or N2 emissions. Throughout most of the study period the specific soil conditions, induced by the ψ and ρb treatments, determined nitrifier and denitrifier activity rather than the size of the microbial communities involved. However, by day 35 soil ψ and ρb treatments exerted large treatment effects on bacterial amoA, nirS and nirK gene copy numbers. Thus, although nitrate concentrations and N2O emissions following urea deposition were determined by the soil ψ and ρb conditions in the short-term, our results indicate that changes in the population sizes of denitrifiers and AOB in ruminant urine patches may influence environmental N fluxes in the long-term.
•Population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifiers increased upon urea deposition.•Overall, soil bulk density and matric potential did not affect nitrifier and denitrifier abundance.•However, nosZ gene copy numbers were the lowest in the most aerob |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500769540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038071713001788</els_id><sourcerecordid>1500769540</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-eb072fbdab79153cad2cb406d2b3f0caacedba5c8f095fb259251c8b57c9cb6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiNEJZaWR0D4gsSBpGNnHScnhCr-VKq2B-jZGjv2yovXXuyksM_RF8ZhV1w5WSP_5vtm5quq1xQaCrS73jU5Oq9cbBjQtgHeAHTPqhXtxVC3a9Y_r1YAbV-DoOJF9TLnHQAwTttV9XQbrJ9N0IZESxYdomb_g4wmZDcdCYaR7HFKTpNDnEyYHHoSA9k7naJaivEYsFT5PXEhpi2Ggm7IlDBkG1PpdTGUzw27_yu2YaQY_jaZ2Oh9_OXClszJYHE8xGJZ6KvqwqLP5tX5vawePn_6fvO1vrv_cnvz8a7WrRBTbRQIZtWISgyUtxpHptUaupGp1oJG1GZUyHVvYeBWMT6UlXWvuNCDVh22l9W7k-4hxZ-zyZPcu6yN9xhMnLOkHEB0A19DQfkJLVvnnIyVh-T2mI6SglxCkDt5DkEuIUjgsoRQ-t6eLTBr9LZcRbv8r5mJbt3Tri_cmxNnMUrcpsI8fCtCZQKAHvii9OFEmHKRR2eSzNotuY0uGT3JMbr_zPIH5FGs-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500769540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of soil bulk density and matric potential on microbial dynamics, inorganic N transformations, N2O and N2 fluxes following urea deposition</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hamonts, Kelly ; Balaine, Nimlesh ; Moltchanova, Elena ; Beare, Mike ; Thomas, Steve ; Wakelin, Steven A. ; O'Callaghan, Maureen ; Condron, Leo M. ; Clough, Tim J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamonts, Kelly ; Balaine, Nimlesh ; Moltchanova, Elena ; Beare, Mike ; Thomas, Steve ; Wakelin, Steven A. ; O'Callaghan, Maureen ; Condron, Leo M. ; Clough, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><description>Transformation of ruminant urine-nitrogen (N) can contribute to negative environmental outcomes such as nitrate leaching which leads to eutrophication of waterways and production of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas. Although abiotic factors influencing urine-N processing have been well studied, detailed studies of the soil microbial community dynamics following urine application are required to improve mitigation strategies for reducing harmful N fluxes from urine deposition. A factorial laboratory experiment using packed silt-loam soil cores with two levels each of urea (±), soil matric potential (ψ −6.0 or −0.2 kPa) and soil bulk density (ρb 1.1 or 1.5 g cm−3) was performed to study the interaction of urea and soil physical conditions on both soil inorganic N transformations and the abundance of ammonia-oxidizers and denitrifiers. Soil ψ and ρb treatments had an immediate impact on soil pH, dissolved organic carbon, inorganic N pools and emissions of N2O and N2 following urea deposition, and microorganisms carrying the nosZ gene were present in lower numbers in the most aerobic soil (−6.0 kPa and 1.1 g cm−3) from day 7. In all treatments, both bacterial amoA and denitrifier nirS, nirK and nosZ gene copy numbers increased within 1 day following urea application. Dynamics in the NH4+ concentrations were significantly correlated with cumulative changes in the abundance of the ammonia-oxidizers, but no relation was found between cumulative changes in the denitrifier nirS, nirK and nosZ gene copy numbers and the dynamics in soil inorganic N, N2O or N2 emissions. Throughout most of the study period the specific soil conditions, induced by the ψ and ρb treatments, determined nitrifier and denitrifier activity rather than the size of the microbial communities involved. However, by day 35 soil ψ and ρb treatments exerted large treatment effects on bacterial amoA, nirS and nirK gene copy numbers. Thus, although nitrate concentrations and N2O emissions following urea deposition were determined by the soil ψ and ρb conditions in the short-term, our results indicate that changes in the population sizes of denitrifiers and AOB in ruminant urine patches may influence environmental N fluxes in the long-term.
•Population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifiers increased upon urea deposition.•Overall, soil bulk density and matric potential did not affect nitrifier and denitrifier abundance.•However, nosZ gene copy numbers were the lowest in the most aerobic soil from day 7.•Dynamics in soil NH4+-N correlated with cumulative changes in the abundance of ammonia-oxidizers.•Soil conditions rather than microbial abundance determined N2O and N2 emissions in the short-term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SBIOAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Ammonia-oxidizing archaea ; Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria ; amoA ; Biochemistry and biology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties ; Denitrification ; dissolved organic carbon ; emissions ; eutrophication ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genes ; greenhouse gases ; leaching ; microbial communities ; Microbiology ; nirK ; nirS ; nitrates ; Nitrification ; nitrogen ; nitrous oxide ; nosZ ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; population size ; Ruminantia ; ruminants ; silt loam soils ; soil density ; soil matric potential ; soil microorganisms ; soil pH ; Soil science ; urea ; Urine ; waterways</subject><ispartof>Soil biology & biochemistry, 2013-10, Vol.65, p.1-11</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-eb072fbdab79153cad2cb406d2b3f0caacedba5c8f095fb259251c8b57c9cb6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-eb072fbdab79153cad2cb406d2b3f0caacedba5c8f095fb259251c8b57c9cb6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27648168$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamonts, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaine, Nimlesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moltchanova, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beare, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakelin, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Callaghan, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Condron, Leo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clough, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of soil bulk density and matric potential on microbial dynamics, inorganic N transformations, N2O and N2 fluxes following urea deposition</title><title>Soil biology & biochemistry</title><description>Transformation of ruminant urine-nitrogen (N) can contribute to negative environmental outcomes such as nitrate leaching which leads to eutrophication of waterways and production of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas. Although abiotic factors influencing urine-N processing have been well studied, detailed studies of the soil microbial community dynamics following urine application are required to improve mitigation strategies for reducing harmful N fluxes from urine deposition. A factorial laboratory experiment using packed silt-loam soil cores with two levels each of urea (±), soil matric potential (ψ −6.0 or −0.2 kPa) and soil bulk density (ρb 1.1 or 1.5 g cm−3) was performed to study the interaction of urea and soil physical conditions on both soil inorganic N transformations and the abundance of ammonia-oxidizers and denitrifiers. Soil ψ and ρb treatments had an immediate impact on soil pH, dissolved organic carbon, inorganic N pools and emissions of N2O and N2 following urea deposition, and microorganisms carrying the nosZ gene were present in lower numbers in the most aerobic soil (−6.0 kPa and 1.1 g cm−3) from day 7. In all treatments, both bacterial amoA and denitrifier nirS, nirK and nosZ gene copy numbers increased within 1 day following urea application. Dynamics in the NH4+ concentrations were significantly correlated with cumulative changes in the abundance of the ammonia-oxidizers, but no relation was found between cumulative changes in the denitrifier nirS, nirK and nosZ gene copy numbers and the dynamics in soil inorganic N, N2O or N2 emissions. Throughout most of the study period the specific soil conditions, induced by the ψ and ρb treatments, determined nitrifier and denitrifier activity rather than the size of the microbial communities involved. However, by day 35 soil ψ and ρb treatments exerted large treatment effects on bacterial amoA, nirS and nirK gene copy numbers. Thus, although nitrate concentrations and N2O emissions following urea deposition were determined by the soil ψ and ρb conditions in the short-term, our results indicate that changes in the population sizes of denitrifiers and AOB in ruminant urine patches may influence environmental N fluxes in the long-term.
•Population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifiers increased upon urea deposition.•Overall, soil bulk density and matric potential did not affect nitrifier and denitrifier abundance.•However, nosZ gene copy numbers were the lowest in the most aerobic soil from day 7.•Dynamics in soil NH4+-N correlated with cumulative changes in the abundance of ammonia-oxidizers.•Soil conditions rather than microbial abundance determined N2O and N2 emissions in the short-term.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Ammonia-oxidizing archaea</subject><subject>Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria</subject><subject>amoA</subject><subject>Biochemistry and biology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>emissions</subject><subject>eutrophication</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>leaching</subject><subject>microbial communities</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>nirK</subject><subject>nirS</subject><subject>nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrification</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrous oxide</subject><subject>nosZ</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>Ruminantia</subject><subject>ruminants</subject><subject>silt loam soils</subject><subject>soil density</subject><subject>soil matric potential</subject><subject>soil microorganisms</subject><subject>soil pH</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>urea</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>waterways</subject><issn>0038-0717</issn><issn>1879-3428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiNEJZaWR0D4gsSBpGNnHScnhCr-VKq2B-jZGjv2yovXXuyksM_RF8ZhV1w5WSP_5vtm5quq1xQaCrS73jU5Oq9cbBjQtgHeAHTPqhXtxVC3a9Y_r1YAbV-DoOJF9TLnHQAwTttV9XQbrJ9N0IZESxYdomb_g4wmZDcdCYaR7HFKTpNDnEyYHHoSA9k7naJaivEYsFT5PXEhpi2Ggm7IlDBkG1PpdTGUzw27_yu2YaQY_jaZ2Oh9_OXClszJYHE8xGJZ6KvqwqLP5tX5vawePn_6fvO1vrv_cnvz8a7WrRBTbRQIZtWISgyUtxpHptUaupGp1oJG1GZUyHVvYeBWMT6UlXWvuNCDVh22l9W7k-4hxZ-zyZPcu6yN9xhMnLOkHEB0A19DQfkJLVvnnIyVh-T2mI6SglxCkDt5DkEuIUjgsoRQ-t6eLTBr9LZcRbv8r5mJbt3Tri_cmxNnMUrcpsI8fCtCZQKAHvii9OFEmHKRR2eSzNotuY0uGT3JMbr_zPIH5FGs-A</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Hamonts, Kelly</creator><creator>Balaine, Nimlesh</creator><creator>Moltchanova, Elena</creator><creator>Beare, Mike</creator><creator>Thomas, Steve</creator><creator>Wakelin, Steven A.</creator><creator>O'Callaghan, Maureen</creator><creator>Condron, Leo M.</creator><creator>Clough, Tim J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>Influence of soil bulk density and matric potential on microbial dynamics, inorganic N transformations, N2O and N2 fluxes following urea deposition</title><author>Hamonts, Kelly ; Balaine, Nimlesh ; Moltchanova, Elena ; Beare, Mike ; Thomas, Steve ; Wakelin, Steven A. ; O'Callaghan, Maureen ; Condron, Leo M. ; Clough, Tim J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-eb072fbdab79153cad2cb406d2b3f0caacedba5c8f095fb259251c8b57c9cb6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Ammonia-oxidizing archaea</topic><topic>Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria</topic><topic>amoA</topic><topic>Biochemistry and biology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>emissions</topic><topic>eutrophication</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>leaching</topic><topic>microbial communities</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>nirK</topic><topic>nirS</topic><topic>nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrification</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrous oxide</topic><topic>nosZ</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>Ruminantia</topic><topic>ruminants</topic><topic>silt loam soils</topic><topic>soil density</topic><topic>soil matric potential</topic><topic>soil microorganisms</topic><topic>soil pH</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>urea</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>waterways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamonts, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaine, Nimlesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moltchanova, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beare, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakelin, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Callaghan, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Condron, Leo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clough, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil biology & biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamonts, Kelly</au><au>Balaine, Nimlesh</au><au>Moltchanova, Elena</au><au>Beare, Mike</au><au>Thomas, Steve</au><au>Wakelin, Steven A.</au><au>O'Callaghan, Maureen</au><au>Condron, Leo M.</au><au>Clough, Tim J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of soil bulk density and matric potential on microbial dynamics, inorganic N transformations, N2O and N2 fluxes following urea deposition</atitle><jtitle>Soil biology & biochemistry</jtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>65</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>0038-0717</issn><eissn>1879-3428</eissn><coden>SBIOAH</coden><abstract>Transformation of ruminant urine-nitrogen (N) can contribute to negative environmental outcomes such as nitrate leaching which leads to eutrophication of waterways and production of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas. Although abiotic factors influencing urine-N processing have been well studied, detailed studies of the soil microbial community dynamics following urine application are required to improve mitigation strategies for reducing harmful N fluxes from urine deposition. A factorial laboratory experiment using packed silt-loam soil cores with two levels each of urea (±), soil matric potential (ψ −6.0 or −0.2 kPa) and soil bulk density (ρb 1.1 or 1.5 g cm−3) was performed to study the interaction of urea and soil physical conditions on both soil inorganic N transformations and the abundance of ammonia-oxidizers and denitrifiers. Soil ψ and ρb treatments had an immediate impact on soil pH, dissolved organic carbon, inorganic N pools and emissions of N2O and N2 following urea deposition, and microorganisms carrying the nosZ gene were present in lower numbers in the most aerobic soil (−6.0 kPa and 1.1 g cm−3) from day 7. In all treatments, both bacterial amoA and denitrifier nirS, nirK and nosZ gene copy numbers increased within 1 day following urea application. Dynamics in the NH4+ concentrations were significantly correlated with cumulative changes in the abundance of the ammonia-oxidizers, but no relation was found between cumulative changes in the denitrifier nirS, nirK and nosZ gene copy numbers and the dynamics in soil inorganic N, N2O or N2 emissions. Throughout most of the study period the specific soil conditions, induced by the ψ and ρb treatments, determined nitrifier and denitrifier activity rather than the size of the microbial communities involved. However, by day 35 soil ψ and ρb treatments exerted large treatment effects on bacterial amoA, nirS and nirK gene copy numbers. Thus, although nitrate concentrations and N2O emissions following urea deposition were determined by the soil ψ and ρb conditions in the short-term, our results indicate that changes in the population sizes of denitrifiers and AOB in ruminant urine patches may influence environmental N fluxes in the long-term.
•Population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifiers increased upon urea deposition.•Overall, soil bulk density and matric potential did not affect nitrifier and denitrifier abundance.•However, nosZ gene copy numbers were the lowest in the most aerobic soil from day 7.•Dynamics in soil NH4+-N correlated with cumulative changes in the abundance of ammonia-oxidizers.•Soil conditions rather than microbial abundance determined N2O and N2 emissions in the short-term.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.006</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0717 |
ispartof | Soil biology & biochemistry, 2013-10, Vol.65, p.1-11 |
issn | 0038-0717 1879-3428 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500769540 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Ammonia-oxidizing archaea Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria amoA Biochemistry and biology Biological and medical sciences Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties Denitrification dissolved organic carbon emissions eutrophication Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology genes greenhouse gases leaching microbial communities Microbiology nirK nirS nitrates Nitrification nitrogen nitrous oxide nosZ Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils population size Ruminantia ruminants silt loam soils soil density soil matric potential soil microorganisms soil pH Soil science urea Urine waterways |
title | Influence of soil bulk density and matric potential on microbial dynamics, inorganic N transformations, N2O and N2 fluxes following urea deposition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A40%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20soil%20bulk%20density%20and%20matric%20potential%20on%20microbial%20dynamics,%20inorganic%20N%20transformations,%20N2O%20and%20N2%20fluxes%20following%20urea%20deposition&rft.jtitle=Soil%20biology%20&%20biochemistry&rft.au=Hamonts,%20Kelly&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=65&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=0038-0717&rft.eissn=1879-3428&rft.coden=SBIOAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500769540%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500769540&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038071713001788&rfr_iscdi=true |