Synthesis and activity of novel tetrazole compounds and their pyrazole-4-carbonitrile precursors against Leishmania spp

A series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-tetrazole derivatives (4a–m) and their 1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitriles (3a–m) precursors were synthesized and evaluated for their antileishmanial activity. A new series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-tetrazole derivatives (4a–...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 2013-12, Vol.23 (23), p.6310-6312
Hauptverfasser: Faria, Jéssica V., dos Santos, Maurício S., Bernardino, Alice M.R., Becker, Klaus M., Machado, Gérzia M.C., Rodrigues, Raquel F., Canto-Cavalheiro, Marilene M., Leon, Leonor L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-tetrazole derivatives (4a–m) and their 1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitriles (3a–m) precursors were synthesized and evaluated for their antileishmanial activity. A new series of 5-(1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-tetrazole derivatives (4a–m) and their precursor 1-aryl-3-methyl-1H-pyrazole-4-carbonitriles (3a–m) were synthesized and evaluated as antileishmanials against Leishmania braziliensis and Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes in vitro. In parallel, the cytotoxicity of these compounds was evaluated on the RAW 264.7 cell line. The results showed that among the assayed compounds the substituted 3-chlorophenyl (4a) (IC50/24h=15±0.14μM) and 3,4-dichlorophenyl tetrazoles (4d) (IC50/24h=26±0.09μM) were the most potent against L. braziliensis promastigotes, as compared the reference drug pentamidine, which presented IC50=13±0.04μM. In addition, 4a and 4d derivatives were less cytotoxic than pentamidine. However, these tetrazole derivatives (4) and pyrazole-4-carbonitriles precursors (3) differ against each of the tested species and were more effective against L.braziliensis than on L. amazonensis.
ISSN:0960-894X
1464-3405
DOI:10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.09.062