Masked hypertension in renal transplant recipients

Abstract Purpose: Arterial hypertension is a risk factor affecting graft function in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). In pediatric RTRs, high prevalence of masked and nocturnal hypertension was reported. Most of the RTRs had a history of hypertension and some of them were normotensive at outpatie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood pressure 2014-02, Vol.23 (1), p.47-53
Hauptverfasser: Kayrak, Mehmet, Gul, Enes Elvin, Kaya, Coskun, Solak, Yalcin, Turkmen, Kultigin, Yazici, Raziye, Guney, Ibrahim, Altintepe, Lutfullah, Turk, Suleyman, Ozdemir, Kurtulus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title Blood pressure
container_volume 23
creator Kayrak, Mehmet
Gul, Enes Elvin
Kaya, Coskun
Solak, Yalcin
Turkmen, Kultigin
Yazici, Raziye
Guney, Ibrahim
Altintepe, Lutfullah
Turk, Suleyman
Ozdemir, Kurtulus
description Abstract Purpose: Arterial hypertension is a risk factor affecting graft function in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). In pediatric RTRs, high prevalence of masked and nocturnal hypertension was reported. Most of the RTRs had a history of hypertension and some of them were normotensive at outpatient visits whereas home blood pressure (BP) levels were higher. Masked hypertension (MHT) is defined as a normal office BP but an elevated ambulatory BP. Previous reports have demonstrated the detrimental role of MHT in clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, the true prevalence of MHT in RTRs is yet to be defined. Methods: A total of 113 RTRs (mean age 44 ± 16 years, 72 males, 41 females) with normal office BP (< 140/90 mmHg) were enrolled to the study from the outpatient renal transplantation clinic. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all participants for a 24-h period. Average daytime BP values above 135 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic were defined as MHT. Results: The prevalence of MHT in our cohort was 39% (n = 45). Fasting glucose and C-reactive protein levels were higher in patients with MHT compared with normal BP group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). RTRs with deceased donor type had higher prevalence of MHT than RTRs with living donor (40% vs 19%, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, deceased donor type could predict the MHT independent of age, gender, office systolic BP level, diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, and glucose levels (OR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.16-11.31, p = 0.03). Conclusion: We demonstrated an increased prevalence of MHT in a typical renal transplant cohort. In addition, transplantation from a deceased donor may be a predictor of MHT. The prevalence of MHT may help to explain high rate of cardiovascular events in RTRs. Therefore, routine application of ABPM in RTRs may be plausible, particularly in RTRs with deceased donor type.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/08037051.2013.796688
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500689432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1500689432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-2091931b339727e7d868295fafde1b3e1a9192e239f361c93ba51a05f53ad8623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0R69NI1H5u2uSiy-AUrXvQcsu2Ezdo2NUmR_femdFfw4mlg5pl3hgehS4LnjGBxgwvMcszJnGLC5rnIsqI4QlOScZISIcQxmg5IOjATdOb9FkeQYXyKJpTllPCcThF9Vf4TqmSz68AFaL2xbWLaxEGr6iQ41fquVm2IjdJ0Btrgz9GJVrWHi32doY_Hh_flc7p6e3pZ3q_SckGKkFIsiGBkzZjIaQ55VWQFFVwrXUHsAlFxToEyoVlGSsHWihOFueZMRZayGboecztnv3rwQTbGl1DHd8D2XhKOcVaIBRvQxYiWznrvQMvOmUa5nSRYDrbkwZYcbMnRVly72l_o1w1Uv0sHPRG4GwHTausa9W1dXcmgdrV1OropjR_i_z1x-ydhA6oOm1I5kFvbuyjZ___jD9Faiwc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500689432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Masked hypertension in renal transplant recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kayrak, Mehmet ; Gul, Enes Elvin ; Kaya, Coskun ; Solak, Yalcin ; Turkmen, Kultigin ; Yazici, Raziye ; Guney, Ibrahim ; Altintepe, Lutfullah ; Turk, Suleyman ; Ozdemir, Kurtulus</creator><creatorcontrib>Kayrak, Mehmet ; Gul, Enes Elvin ; Kaya, Coskun ; Solak, Yalcin ; Turkmen, Kultigin ; Yazici, Raziye ; Guney, Ibrahim ; Altintepe, Lutfullah ; Turk, Suleyman ; Ozdemir, Kurtulus</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose: Arterial hypertension is a risk factor affecting graft function in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). In pediatric RTRs, high prevalence of masked and nocturnal hypertension was reported. Most of the RTRs had a history of hypertension and some of them were normotensive at outpatient visits whereas home blood pressure (BP) levels were higher. Masked hypertension (MHT) is defined as a normal office BP but an elevated ambulatory BP. Previous reports have demonstrated the detrimental role of MHT in clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, the true prevalence of MHT in RTRs is yet to be defined. Methods: A total of 113 RTRs (mean age 44 ± 16 years, 72 males, 41 females) with normal office BP (&lt; 140/90 mmHg) were enrolled to the study from the outpatient renal transplantation clinic. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all participants for a 24-h period. Average daytime BP values above 135 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic were defined as MHT. Results: The prevalence of MHT in our cohort was 39% (n = 45). Fasting glucose and C-reactive protein levels were higher in patients with MHT compared with normal BP group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). RTRs with deceased donor type had higher prevalence of MHT than RTRs with living donor (40% vs 19%, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, deceased donor type could predict the MHT independent of age, gender, office systolic BP level, diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, and glucose levels (OR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.16-11.31, p = 0.03). Conclusion: We demonstrated an increased prevalence of MHT in a typical renal transplant cohort. In addition, transplantation from a deceased donor may be a predictor of MHT. The prevalence of MHT may help to explain high rate of cardiovascular events in RTRs. Therefore, routine application of ABPM in RTRs may be plausible, particularly in RTRs with deceased donor type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0803-7051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-1999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/08037051.2013.796688</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23721572</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare</publisher><subject>Adult ; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Male ; masked hypertension ; Masked Hypertension - diagnosis ; Masked Hypertension - etiology ; Prevalence ; renal transplant recipients ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Blood pressure, 2014-02, Vol.23 (1), p.47-53</ispartof><rights>2014 Scandinavian Foundation for Cardiovascular Research 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-2091931b339727e7d868295fafde1b3e1a9192e239f361c93ba51a05f53ad8623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-2091931b339727e7d868295fafde1b3e1a9192e239f361c93ba51a05f53ad8623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23721572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kayrak, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gul, Enes Elvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Coskun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solak, Yalcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkmen, Kultigin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazici, Raziye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guney, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altintepe, Lutfullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, Suleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozdemir, Kurtulus</creatorcontrib><title>Masked hypertension in renal transplant recipients</title><title>Blood pressure</title><addtitle>Blood Press</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose: Arterial hypertension is a risk factor affecting graft function in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). In pediatric RTRs, high prevalence of masked and nocturnal hypertension was reported. Most of the RTRs had a history of hypertension and some of them were normotensive at outpatient visits whereas home blood pressure (BP) levels were higher. Masked hypertension (MHT) is defined as a normal office BP but an elevated ambulatory BP. Previous reports have demonstrated the detrimental role of MHT in clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, the true prevalence of MHT in RTRs is yet to be defined. Methods: A total of 113 RTRs (mean age 44 ± 16 years, 72 males, 41 females) with normal office BP (&lt; 140/90 mmHg) were enrolled to the study from the outpatient renal transplantation clinic. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all participants for a 24-h period. Average daytime BP values above 135 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic were defined as MHT. Results: The prevalence of MHT in our cohort was 39% (n = 45). Fasting glucose and C-reactive protein levels were higher in patients with MHT compared with normal BP group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). RTRs with deceased donor type had higher prevalence of MHT than RTRs with living donor (40% vs 19%, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, deceased donor type could predict the MHT independent of age, gender, office systolic BP level, diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, and glucose levels (OR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.16-11.31, p = 0.03). Conclusion: We demonstrated an increased prevalence of MHT in a typical renal transplant cohort. In addition, transplantation from a deceased donor may be a predictor of MHT. The prevalence of MHT may help to explain high rate of cardiovascular events in RTRs. Therefore, routine application of ABPM in RTRs may be plausible, particularly in RTRs with deceased donor type.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>ambulatory blood pressure monitoring</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>masked hypertension</subject><subject>Masked Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Masked Hypertension - etiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>renal transplant recipients</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0803-7051</issn><issn>1651-1999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0R69NI1H5u2uSiy-AUrXvQcsu2Ezdo2NUmR_femdFfw4mlg5pl3hgehS4LnjGBxgwvMcszJnGLC5rnIsqI4QlOScZISIcQxmg5IOjATdOb9FkeQYXyKJpTllPCcThF9Vf4TqmSz68AFaL2xbWLaxEGr6iQ41fquVm2IjdJ0Btrgz9GJVrWHi32doY_Hh_flc7p6e3pZ3q_SckGKkFIsiGBkzZjIaQ55VWQFFVwrXUHsAlFxToEyoVlGSsHWihOFueZMRZayGboecztnv3rwQTbGl1DHd8D2XhKOcVaIBRvQxYiWznrvQMvOmUa5nSRYDrbkwZYcbMnRVly72l_o1w1Uv0sHPRG4GwHTausa9W1dXcmgdrV1OropjR_i_z1x-ydhA6oOm1I5kFvbuyjZ___jD9Faiwc</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Kayrak, Mehmet</creator><creator>Gul, Enes Elvin</creator><creator>Kaya, Coskun</creator><creator>Solak, Yalcin</creator><creator>Turkmen, Kultigin</creator><creator>Yazici, Raziye</creator><creator>Guney, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Altintepe, Lutfullah</creator><creator>Turk, Suleyman</creator><creator>Ozdemir, Kurtulus</creator><general>Informa Healthcare</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Masked hypertension in renal transplant recipients</title><author>Kayrak, Mehmet ; Gul, Enes Elvin ; Kaya, Coskun ; Solak, Yalcin ; Turkmen, Kultigin ; Yazici, Raziye ; Guney, Ibrahim ; Altintepe, Lutfullah ; Turk, Suleyman ; Ozdemir, Kurtulus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-2091931b339727e7d868295fafde1b3e1a9192e239f361c93ba51a05f53ad8623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>ambulatory blood pressure monitoring</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>masked hypertension</topic><topic>Masked Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Masked Hypertension - etiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>renal transplant recipients</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kayrak, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gul, Enes Elvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Coskun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solak, Yalcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkmen, Kultigin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazici, Raziye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guney, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altintepe, Lutfullah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, Suleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozdemir, Kurtulus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Blood pressure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kayrak, Mehmet</au><au>Gul, Enes Elvin</au><au>Kaya, Coskun</au><au>Solak, Yalcin</au><au>Turkmen, Kultigin</au><au>Yazici, Raziye</au><au>Guney, Ibrahim</au><au>Altintepe, Lutfullah</au><au>Turk, Suleyman</au><au>Ozdemir, Kurtulus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Masked hypertension in renal transplant recipients</atitle><jtitle>Blood pressure</jtitle><addtitle>Blood Press</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>47-53</pages><issn>0803-7051</issn><eissn>1651-1999</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose: Arterial hypertension is a risk factor affecting graft function in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). In pediatric RTRs, high prevalence of masked and nocturnal hypertension was reported. Most of the RTRs had a history of hypertension and some of them were normotensive at outpatient visits whereas home blood pressure (BP) levels were higher. Masked hypertension (MHT) is defined as a normal office BP but an elevated ambulatory BP. Previous reports have demonstrated the detrimental role of MHT in clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, the true prevalence of MHT in RTRs is yet to be defined. Methods: A total of 113 RTRs (mean age 44 ± 16 years, 72 males, 41 females) with normal office BP (&lt; 140/90 mmHg) were enrolled to the study from the outpatient renal transplantation clinic. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all participants for a 24-h period. Average daytime BP values above 135 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic were defined as MHT. Results: The prevalence of MHT in our cohort was 39% (n = 45). Fasting glucose and C-reactive protein levels were higher in patients with MHT compared with normal BP group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). RTRs with deceased donor type had higher prevalence of MHT than RTRs with living donor (40% vs 19%, p = 0.003). In multivariate analysis, deceased donor type could predict the MHT independent of age, gender, office systolic BP level, diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, and glucose levels (OR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.16-11.31, p = 0.03). Conclusion: We demonstrated an increased prevalence of MHT in a typical renal transplant cohort. In addition, transplantation from a deceased donor may be a predictor of MHT. The prevalence of MHT may help to explain high rate of cardiovascular events in RTRs. Therefore, routine application of ABPM in RTRs may be plausible, particularly in RTRs with deceased donor type.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare</pub><pmid>23721572</pmid><doi>10.3109/08037051.2013.796688</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0803-7051
ispartof Blood pressure, 2014-02, Vol.23 (1), p.47-53
issn 0803-7051
1651-1999
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500689432
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects
Male
masked hypertension
Masked Hypertension - diagnosis
Masked Hypertension - etiology
Prevalence
renal transplant recipients
Risk Factors
title Masked hypertension in renal transplant recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A49%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Masked%20hypertension%20in%20renal%20transplant%20recipients&rft.jtitle=Blood%20pressure&rft.au=Kayrak,%20Mehmet&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=47-53&rft.issn=0803-7051&rft.eissn=1651-1999&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/08037051.2013.796688&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1500689432%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500689432&rft_id=info:pmid/23721572&rfr_iscdi=true