The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture fixation: A population-based study

Abstract Introduction The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture (SCF) fixation has not been evaluated at a population level. The purpose of this study was to: (1) determine the incidence density rate (IDR) of SCF fixation and (2) determine the rate of and risk factors for re-operation. M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2014-04, Vol.45 (4), p.701-708
Hauptverfasser: Khoshbin, Amir, Leroux, Timothy, Wasserstein, David, Wolfstadt, Jesse, Law, Peggy W, Mahomed, Nizar, Wright, James G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 708
container_issue 4
container_start_page 701
container_title Injury
container_volume 45
creator Khoshbin, Amir
Leroux, Timothy
Wasserstein, David
Wolfstadt, Jesse
Law, Peggy W
Mahomed, Nizar
Wright, James G
description Abstract Introduction The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture (SCF) fixation has not been evaluated at a population level. The purpose of this study was to: (1) determine the incidence density rate (IDR) of SCF fixation and (2) determine the rate of and risk factors for re-operation. Methods Using administrative databases, all patients who underwent SCF fixation (closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction (OR)) in Ontario between April 2002 and March 2010 were identified. Exclusion criteria included age (>12 years), a prior or concurrent non-SCF elbow fracture or previous humeral osteotomy. The overall IDR of SCF fixation and for subgroups of age, sex and season were calculated. A multivariate regression (immediate and short-term re-operation) and a Cox proportional hazards model (long-term re-operation) were used to identify patient, injury and provider factors that influenced re-operation risk and were reported as odds ratios or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results A total of 3235 patients with a median age of 6.0 years (interquartile range (IQR): 3.0) underwent SCF fixation. The median follow-up was 6.0 years (IQR: 3.7). The majority underwent a CRPP (78.7%) which were performed after hours (75.6%). The overall IDR was 20.7/100,000 person-years (py), but it varied significantly by season and age. Re-operation was uncommon in the immediate (1.0%), short-term (1.4%) and long-term (0.3%) follow-up period. As compared to CRPP, patients who underwent OR were more likely to undergo early nerve exploration (odds ratio: 7.8 (CI: 3.0–20.6)) and re-operation in the long term (HR: 3.0 (CI: 1.0–8.7)). Increased surgeon volume of SCF fixation was protective against repeat fixation (odds ratio: 0.9 (CI: 0.9–1.0)) and re-operation in the long term (HR: 0.9 (CI: 0.8–1.0)). Conclusions While SCF fixation is common, the rate of re-operation is low. No differences existed between the sexes and a higher volume of fixations occurred during the summer months.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500684053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002013831300452X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1500684053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f04b51b0ef1db1a02019b7d74f356e188ef14c3936c32cbf30d09793c2a497ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhi0EoofCGyDkJZscxpfcWCBVFdBKlVi0SN1Zjj0Bh5w42DFq3r4Op7DopqvxjP9_xv6GkLcM9gxY9WHYu2lIYd1zYCKX9gDyGdmxpm4L4FX9nOwAOBRMNOKEvIpxAGA1CPGSnHDJGiFaviO3Nz-R4uwsHpwf_Y-V-p7OGq3TS3CGxjQHbfxk11EH2ufzkgLS3t3pxfnpIz2js5_T-DcrOh3R0rgku74mL3o9RnzzEE_J9y-fb84viqtvXy_Pz64KI1m9FD3IrmQdYM9sx3R-MGu72tayF2WFrGnyhTSiFZUR3HS9AAtt3QrDtWxr1OKUvD_2nYP_nTAu6uCiwXHUE_oUFSsBqkZCKbJUHqUm-BgD9moO7qDDqhiojaka1JGp2phu1cw02949TEjdAe1_0z-IWfDpKMD8zz8Og4rG4WQyxIBmUda7pyY8bmBGNzmjx1-4Yhx8ClNmqJiKXIG63va6rZWJ7C75rbgHW-afwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1500684053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture fixation: A population-based study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Khoshbin, Amir ; Leroux, Timothy ; Wasserstein, David ; Wolfstadt, Jesse ; Law, Peggy W ; Mahomed, Nizar ; Wright, James G</creator><creatorcontrib>Khoshbin, Amir ; Leroux, Timothy ; Wasserstein, David ; Wolfstadt, Jesse ; Law, Peggy W ; Mahomed, Nizar ; Wright, James G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture (SCF) fixation has not been evaluated at a population level. The purpose of this study was to: (1) determine the incidence density rate (IDR) of SCF fixation and (2) determine the rate of and risk factors for re-operation. Methods Using administrative databases, all patients who underwent SCF fixation (closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction (OR)) in Ontario between April 2002 and March 2010 were identified. Exclusion criteria included age (&gt;12 years), a prior or concurrent non-SCF elbow fracture or previous humeral osteotomy. The overall IDR of SCF fixation and for subgroups of age, sex and season were calculated. A multivariate regression (immediate and short-term re-operation) and a Cox proportional hazards model (long-term re-operation) were used to identify patient, injury and provider factors that influenced re-operation risk and were reported as odds ratios or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results A total of 3235 patients with a median age of 6.0 years (interquartile range (IQR): 3.0) underwent SCF fixation. The median follow-up was 6.0 years (IQR: 3.7). The majority underwent a CRPP (78.7%) which were performed after hours (75.6%). The overall IDR was 20.7/100,000 person-years (py), but it varied significantly by season and age. Re-operation was uncommon in the immediate (1.0%), short-term (1.4%) and long-term (0.3%) follow-up period. As compared to CRPP, patients who underwent OR were more likely to undergo early nerve exploration (odds ratio: 7.8 (CI: 3.0–20.6)) and re-operation in the long term (HR: 3.0 (CI: 1.0–8.7)). Increased surgeon volume of SCF fixation was protective against repeat fixation (odds ratio: 0.9 (CI: 0.9–1.0)) and re-operation in the long term (HR: 0.9 (CI: 0.8–1.0)). Conclusions While SCF fixation is common, the rate of re-operation is low. No differences existed between the sexes and a higher volume of fixations occurred during the summer months.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24183392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Canada - epidemiology ; Casts, Surgical ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Complications ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Fracture Healing ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - epidemiology ; Humeral Fractures - physiopathology ; Humeral Fractures - surgery ; Humerus ; Immobilization - methods ; Infant ; Injury Severity Score ; Male ; Odds Ratio ; Orthopedics ; Paediatric ; Population ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Risk Assessment ; Supracondylar fractures ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2014-04, Vol.45 (4), p.701-708</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f04b51b0ef1db1a02019b7d74f356e188ef14c3936c32cbf30d09793c2a497ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f04b51b0ef1db1a02019b7d74f356e188ef14c3936c32cbf30d09793c2a497ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24183392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khoshbin, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroux, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserstein, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfstadt, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Peggy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahomed, Nizar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, James G</creatorcontrib><title>The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture fixation: A population-based study</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture (SCF) fixation has not been evaluated at a population level. The purpose of this study was to: (1) determine the incidence density rate (IDR) of SCF fixation and (2) determine the rate of and risk factors for re-operation. Methods Using administrative databases, all patients who underwent SCF fixation (closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction (OR)) in Ontario between April 2002 and March 2010 were identified. Exclusion criteria included age (&gt;12 years), a prior or concurrent non-SCF elbow fracture or previous humeral osteotomy. The overall IDR of SCF fixation and for subgroups of age, sex and season were calculated. A multivariate regression (immediate and short-term re-operation) and a Cox proportional hazards model (long-term re-operation) were used to identify patient, injury and provider factors that influenced re-operation risk and were reported as odds ratios or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results A total of 3235 patients with a median age of 6.0 years (interquartile range (IQR): 3.0) underwent SCF fixation. The median follow-up was 6.0 years (IQR: 3.7). The majority underwent a CRPP (78.7%) which were performed after hours (75.6%). The overall IDR was 20.7/100,000 person-years (py), but it varied significantly by season and age. Re-operation was uncommon in the immediate (1.0%), short-term (1.4%) and long-term (0.3%) follow-up period. As compared to CRPP, patients who underwent OR were more likely to undergo early nerve exploration (odds ratio: 7.8 (CI: 3.0–20.6)) and re-operation in the long term (HR: 3.0 (CI: 1.0–8.7)). Increased surgeon volume of SCF fixation was protective against repeat fixation (odds ratio: 0.9 (CI: 0.9–1.0)) and re-operation in the long term (HR: 0.9 (CI: 0.8–1.0)). Conclusions While SCF fixation is common, the rate of re-operation is low. No differences existed between the sexes and a higher volume of fixations occurred during the summer months.</description><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Casts, Surgical</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal</subject><subject>Fracture Healing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Humerus</subject><subject>Immobilization - methods</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Paediatric</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Supracondylar fractures</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhi0EoofCGyDkJZscxpfcWCBVFdBKlVi0SN1Zjj0Bh5w42DFq3r4Op7DopqvxjP9_xv6GkLcM9gxY9WHYu2lIYd1zYCKX9gDyGdmxpm4L4FX9nOwAOBRMNOKEvIpxAGA1CPGSnHDJGiFaviO3Nz-R4uwsHpwf_Y-V-p7OGq3TS3CGxjQHbfxk11EH2ufzkgLS3t3pxfnpIz2js5_T-DcrOh3R0rgku74mL3o9RnzzEE_J9y-fb84viqtvXy_Pz64KI1m9FD3IrmQdYM9sx3R-MGu72tayF2WFrGnyhTSiFZUR3HS9AAtt3QrDtWxr1OKUvD_2nYP_nTAu6uCiwXHUE_oUFSsBqkZCKbJUHqUm-BgD9moO7qDDqhiojaka1JGp2phu1cw02949TEjdAe1_0z-IWfDpKMD8zz8Og4rG4WQyxIBmUda7pyY8bmBGNzmjx1-4Yhx8ClNmqJiKXIG63va6rZWJ7C75rbgHW-afwg</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Khoshbin, Amir</creator><creator>Leroux, Timothy</creator><creator>Wasserstein, David</creator><creator>Wolfstadt, Jesse</creator><creator>Law, Peggy W</creator><creator>Mahomed, Nizar</creator><creator>Wright, James G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture fixation: A population-based study</title><author>Khoshbin, Amir ; Leroux, Timothy ; Wasserstein, David ; Wolfstadt, Jesse ; Law, Peggy W ; Mahomed, Nizar ; Wright, James G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-f04b51b0ef1db1a02019b7d74f356e188ef14c3936c32cbf30d09793c2a497ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Casts, Surgical</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal</topic><topic>Fracture Healing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Humerus</topic><topic>Immobilization - methods</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Paediatric</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Supracondylar fractures</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khoshbin, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroux, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserstein, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolfstadt, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Peggy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahomed, Nizar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, James G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khoshbin, Amir</au><au>Leroux, Timothy</au><au>Wasserstein, David</au><au>Wolfstadt, Jesse</au><au>Law, Peggy W</au><au>Mahomed, Nizar</au><au>Wright, James G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture fixation: A population-based study</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>701</spage><epage>708</epage><pages>701-708</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture (SCF) fixation has not been evaluated at a population level. The purpose of this study was to: (1) determine the incidence density rate (IDR) of SCF fixation and (2) determine the rate of and risk factors for re-operation. Methods Using administrative databases, all patients who underwent SCF fixation (closed reduction percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction (OR)) in Ontario between April 2002 and March 2010 were identified. Exclusion criteria included age (&gt;12 years), a prior or concurrent non-SCF elbow fracture or previous humeral osteotomy. The overall IDR of SCF fixation and for subgroups of age, sex and season were calculated. A multivariate regression (immediate and short-term re-operation) and a Cox proportional hazards model (long-term re-operation) were used to identify patient, injury and provider factors that influenced re-operation risk and were reported as odds ratios or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results A total of 3235 patients with a median age of 6.0 years (interquartile range (IQR): 3.0) underwent SCF fixation. The median follow-up was 6.0 years (IQR: 3.7). The majority underwent a CRPP (78.7%) which were performed after hours (75.6%). The overall IDR was 20.7/100,000 person-years (py), but it varied significantly by season and age. Re-operation was uncommon in the immediate (1.0%), short-term (1.4%) and long-term (0.3%) follow-up period. As compared to CRPP, patients who underwent OR were more likely to undergo early nerve exploration (odds ratio: 7.8 (CI: 3.0–20.6)) and re-operation in the long term (HR: 3.0 (CI: 1.0–8.7)). Increased surgeon volume of SCF fixation was protective against repeat fixation (odds ratio: 0.9 (CI: 0.9–1.0)) and re-operation in the long term (HR: 0.9 (CI: 0.8–1.0)). Conclusions While SCF fixation is common, the rate of re-operation is low. No differences existed between the sexes and a higher volume of fixations occurred during the summer months.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24183392</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.004</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2014-04, Vol.45 (4), p.701-708
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1500684053
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Canada - epidemiology
Casts, Surgical
Child
Child, Preschool
Complications
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal
Fracture Healing
Humans
Humeral Fractures - epidemiology
Humeral Fractures - physiopathology
Humeral Fractures - surgery
Humerus
Immobilization - methods
Infant
Injury Severity Score
Male
Odds Ratio
Orthopedics
Paediatric
Population
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Risk Assessment
Supracondylar fractures
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title The epidemiology of paediatric supracondylar fracture fixation: A population-based study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A41%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20epidemiology%20of%20paediatric%20supracondylar%20fracture%20fixation:%20A%20population-based%20study&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Khoshbin,%20Amir&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=701&rft.epage=708&rft.pages=701-708&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500684053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1500684053&rft_id=info:pmid/24183392&rft_els_id=S002013831300452X&rfr_iscdi=true