The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study

Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training cen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2014-03, Vol.79 (3), p.490-497
Hauptverfasser: Ansell, James, MBBCh, Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh, Horwood, James, MS, Rizan, Chantelle, BSc, Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil, Goddard, Stuart, PGCE, Warren, Neil, PhD, Torkington, Jared, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 497
container_issue 3
container_start_page 490
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume 79
creator Ansell, James, MBBCh
Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh
Horwood, James, MS
Rizan, Chantelle, BSc
Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil
Goddard, Stuart, PGCE
Warren, Neil, PhD
Torkington, Jared, MS
description Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P  < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P  = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P  = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P  = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P  < .01, N vs Ad; P  
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499153488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0016510713022487</els_id><sourcerecordid>1499153488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1d439b7d9b63f814f5203cb1b3fbb3ecc8fd046b5195e6035047ad078e6fd2223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCILoUfwAX5yIEs4zifICFVFYVKRRwo4mg59qTrrTdePM5K-W_8uDrdAhIHTvZo3nsevzdZ9pLDmgOv327XNxbXBXCxhnYNIB5lKw5dk9dN0z3OVpBAecWhOcmeEW0BoC0Ef5qdFGXBoa6qVfbreoPsBzrasMuRoo1TRDb4wL7Y0e6UY2daIxFLsKD2M9Pe-dGT9ulOk41aEbKNotRI9DDpyNRolkpPIeAY2UE5a2yc71X_0q1me-_mPerod0nr1jpHLAaV3h1v3jHF9sHT0rYHfMN0KiinpfRjGoviZObn2ZNBOcIXD-dp9v3i4_X55_zq66fL87OrXJfQxpybUnR9Y7q-FkPLy6EqQOie92Loe4Fat4OBsu4r3lVYg6igbJSBpsV6MEVRiNPs9VE3jfRzQopyZ0mjc2pEP5HkZdfxSpRtm6D8CL0fOOAg9yH5GGbJQS6hya1MocklNAmtTKElzqsH-anfofnD-J1SArw_AlJOeLAYJGmLo0ZjQ3JEGm__K__hH7Z2yWSt3C3OSFs_heRo-oWkQoL8tmzNsjRcQFGUbSPuAMVdwhc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499153488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ansell, James, MBBCh ; Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh ; Horwood, James, MS ; Rizan, Chantelle, BSc ; Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil ; Goddard, Stuart, PGCE ; Warren, Neil, PhD ; Torkington, Jared, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James, MBBCh ; Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh ; Horwood, James, MS ; Rizan, Chantelle, BSc ; Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil ; Goddard, Stuart, PGCE ; Warren, Neil, PhD ; Torkington, Jared, MS</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P  < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P  = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P  = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P  = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P  < .01, N vs Ad; P  < .01, N vs E; P  < .01, I vs Ad; P  < .01, I vs E; P  < .01, and Ad vs E; P  = .46. Intergroup comparisons for B were, N vs I; P  < .01, N vs Ad; P  < .01, N vs E; P  < .01, I vs Ad; P  = .03, I vs E; P  <.01, and Ad vs E; P  = .06. There was no difference between real-life DOPyS scores and simulator scores (0.07). Limitations The model does not have inbuilt assessment parameters. Conclusion This simulator demonstrates construct and concurrent validity for colon polypectomy training.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24210655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Clinical Competence ; Colonic Polyps - surgery ; Colonoscopy - education ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Models, Animal ; Prospective Studies ; Swine ; Task Performance and Analysis</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2014-03, Vol.79 (3), p.490-497</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1d439b7d9b63f814f5203cb1b3fbb3ecc8fd046b5195e6035047ad078e6fd2223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1d439b7d9b63f814f5203cb1b3fbb3ecc8fd046b5195e6035047ad078e6fd2223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510713022487$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24210655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James, MBBCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, James, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizan, Chantelle, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Stuart, PGCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Neil, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torkington, Jared, MS</creatorcontrib><title>The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P  < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P  = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P  = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P  = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P  < .01, N vs Ad; P  < .01, N vs E; P  < .01, I vs Ad; P  < .01, I vs E; P  < .01, and Ad vs E; P  = .46. Intergroup comparisons for B were, N vs I; P  < .01, N vs Ad; P  < .01, N vs E; P  < .01, I vs Ad; P  = .03, I vs E; P  <.01, and Ad vs E; P  = .06. There was no difference between real-life DOPyS scores and simulator scores (0.07). Limitations The model does not have inbuilt assessment parameters. Conclusion This simulator demonstrates construct and concurrent validity for colon polypectomy training.]]></description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - education</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCILoUfwAX5yIEs4zifICFVFYVKRRwo4mg59qTrrTdePM5K-W_8uDrdAhIHTvZo3nsevzdZ9pLDmgOv327XNxbXBXCxhnYNIB5lKw5dk9dN0z3OVpBAecWhOcmeEW0BoC0Ef5qdFGXBoa6qVfbreoPsBzrasMuRoo1TRDb4wL7Y0e6UY2daIxFLsKD2M9Pe-dGT9ulOk41aEbKNotRI9DDpyNRolkpPIeAY2UE5a2yc71X_0q1me-_mPerod0nr1jpHLAaV3h1v3jHF9sHT0rYHfMN0KiinpfRjGoviZObn2ZNBOcIXD-dp9v3i4_X55_zq66fL87OrXJfQxpybUnR9Y7q-FkPLy6EqQOie92Loe4Fat4OBsu4r3lVYg6igbJSBpsV6MEVRiNPs9VE3jfRzQopyZ0mjc2pEP5HkZdfxSpRtm6D8CL0fOOAg9yH5GGbJQS6hya1MocklNAmtTKElzqsH-anfofnD-J1SArw_AlJOeLAYJGmLo0ZjQ3JEGm__K__hH7Z2yWSt3C3OSFs_heRo-oWkQoL8tmzNsjRcQFGUbSPuAMVdwhc</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Ansell, James, MBBCh</creator><creator>Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh</creator><creator>Horwood, James, MS</creator><creator>Rizan, Chantelle, BSc</creator><creator>Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil</creator><creator>Goddard, Stuart, PGCE</creator><creator>Warren, Neil, PhD</creator><creator>Torkington, Jared, MS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study</title><author>Ansell, James, MBBCh ; Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh ; Horwood, James, MS ; Rizan, Chantelle, BSc ; Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil ; Goddard, Stuart, PGCE ; Warren, Neil, PhD ; Torkington, Jared, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1d439b7d9b63f814f5203cb1b3fbb3ecc8fd046b5195e6035047ad078e6fd2223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - education</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James, MBBCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, James, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizan, Chantelle, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Stuart, PGCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Neil, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torkington, Jared, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansell, James, MBBCh</au><au>Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh</au><au>Horwood, James, MS</au><au>Rizan, Chantelle, BSc</au><au>Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil</au><au>Goddard, Stuart, PGCE</au><au>Warren, Neil, PhD</au><au>Torkington, Jared, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>490-497</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P  < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P  = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P  = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P  = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P  < .01, N vs Ad; P  < .01, N vs E; P  < .01, I vs Ad; P  < .01, I vs E; P  < .01, and Ad vs E; P  = .46. Intergroup comparisons for B were, N vs I; P  < .01, N vs Ad; P  < .01, N vs E; P  < .01, I vs Ad; P  = .03, I vs E; P  <.01, and Ad vs E; P  = .06. There was no difference between real-life DOPyS scores and simulator scores (0.07). Limitations The model does not have inbuilt assessment parameters. Conclusion This simulator demonstrates construct and concurrent validity for colon polypectomy training.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>24210655</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2014-03, Vol.79 (3), p.490-497
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499153488
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Clinical Competence
Colonic Polyps - surgery
Colonoscopy - education
Cross-Sectional Studies
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Humans
Models, Animal
Prospective Studies
Swine
Task Performance and Analysis
title The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A25%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Welsh%20Institute%20for%20Minimal%20Access%20Therapy%20colonoscopy%20suitcase%20has%20construct%20and%20concurrent%20validity%20for%20colonoscopic%20polypectomy%20skills%20training:%20a%20prospective,%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Ansell,%20James,%20MBBCh&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=490-497&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1499153488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499153488&rft_id=info:pmid/24210655&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0016510713022487&rfr_iscdi=true