The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study
Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training cen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2014-03, Vol.79 (3), p.490-497 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 497 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 490 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Ansell, James, MBBCh Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh Horwood, James, MS Rizan, Chantelle, BSc Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil Goddard, Stuart, PGCE Warren, Neil, PhD Torkington, Jared, MS |
description | Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499153488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0016510713022487</els_id><sourcerecordid>1499153488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1d439b7d9b63f814f5203cb1b3fbb3ecc8fd046b5195e6035047ad078e6fd2223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCILoUfwAX5yIEs4zifICFVFYVKRRwo4mg59qTrrTdePM5K-W_8uDrdAhIHTvZo3nsevzdZ9pLDmgOv327XNxbXBXCxhnYNIB5lKw5dk9dN0z3OVpBAecWhOcmeEW0BoC0Ef5qdFGXBoa6qVfbreoPsBzrasMuRoo1TRDb4wL7Y0e6UY2daIxFLsKD2M9Pe-dGT9ulOk41aEbKNotRI9DDpyNRolkpPIeAY2UE5a2yc71X_0q1me-_mPerod0nr1jpHLAaV3h1v3jHF9sHT0rYHfMN0KiinpfRjGoviZObn2ZNBOcIXD-dp9v3i4_X55_zq66fL87OrXJfQxpybUnR9Y7q-FkPLy6EqQOie92Loe4Fat4OBsu4r3lVYg6igbJSBpsV6MEVRiNPs9VE3jfRzQopyZ0mjc2pEP5HkZdfxSpRtm6D8CL0fOOAg9yH5GGbJQS6hya1MocklNAmtTKElzqsH-anfofnD-J1SArw_AlJOeLAYJGmLo0ZjQ3JEGm__K__hH7Z2yWSt3C3OSFs_heRo-oWkQoL8tmzNsjRcQFGUbSPuAMVdwhc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499153488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ansell, James, MBBCh ; Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh ; Horwood, James, MS ; Rizan, Chantelle, BSc ; Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil ; Goddard, Stuart, PGCE ; Warren, Neil, PhD ; Torkington, Jared, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James, MBBCh ; Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh ; Horwood, James, MS ; Rizan, Chantelle, BSc ; Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil ; Goddard, Stuart, PGCE ; Warren, Neil, PhD ; Torkington, Jared, MS</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P < .01, N vs E; P < .01, I vs Ad; P < .01, I vs E; P < .01, and Ad vs E; P = .46. Intergroup comparisons for B were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P < .01, N vs E; P < .01, I vs Ad; P = .03, I vs E; P <.01, and Ad vs E; P = .06. There was no difference between real-life DOPyS scores and simulator scores (0.07). Limitations The model does not have inbuilt assessment parameters. Conclusion This simulator demonstrates construct and concurrent validity for colon polypectomy training.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24210655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Clinical Competence ; Colonic Polyps - surgery ; Colonoscopy - education ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Models, Animal ; Prospective Studies ; Swine ; Task Performance and Analysis</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2014-03, Vol.79 (3), p.490-497</ispartof><rights>American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1d439b7d9b63f814f5203cb1b3fbb3ecc8fd046b5195e6035047ad078e6fd2223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1d439b7d9b63f814f5203cb1b3fbb3ecc8fd046b5195e6035047ad078e6fd2223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510713022487$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24210655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James, MBBCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, James, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizan, Chantelle, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Stuart, PGCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Neil, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torkington, Jared, MS</creatorcontrib><title>The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P < .01, N vs E; P < .01, I vs Ad; P < .01, I vs E; P < .01, and Ad vs E; P = .46. Intergroup comparisons for B were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P < .01, N vs E; P < .01, I vs Ad; P = .03, I vs E; P <.01, and Ad vs E; P = .06. There was no difference between real-life DOPyS scores and simulator scores (0.07). Limitations The model does not have inbuilt assessment parameters. Conclusion This simulator demonstrates construct and concurrent validity for colon polypectomy training.]]></description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - education</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQjRCILoUfwAX5yIEs4zifICFVFYVKRRwo4mg59qTrrTdePM5K-W_8uDrdAhIHTvZo3nsevzdZ9pLDmgOv327XNxbXBXCxhnYNIB5lKw5dk9dN0z3OVpBAecWhOcmeEW0BoC0Ef5qdFGXBoa6qVfbreoPsBzrasMuRoo1TRDb4wL7Y0e6UY2daIxFLsKD2M9Pe-dGT9ulOk41aEbKNotRI9DDpyNRolkpPIeAY2UE5a2yc71X_0q1me-_mPerod0nr1jpHLAaV3h1v3jHF9sHT0rYHfMN0KiinpfRjGoviZObn2ZNBOcIXD-dp9v3i4_X55_zq66fL87OrXJfQxpybUnR9Y7q-FkPLy6EqQOie92Loe4Fat4OBsu4r3lVYg6igbJSBpsV6MEVRiNPs9VE3jfRzQopyZ0mjc2pEP5HkZdfxSpRtm6D8CL0fOOAg9yH5GGbJQS6hya1MocklNAmtTKElzqsH-anfofnD-J1SArw_AlJOeLAYJGmLo0ZjQ3JEGm__K__hH7Z2yWSt3C3OSFs_heRo-oWkQoL8tmzNsjRcQFGUbSPuAMVdwhc</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Ansell, James, MBBCh</creator><creator>Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh</creator><creator>Horwood, James, MS</creator><creator>Rizan, Chantelle, BSc</creator><creator>Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil</creator><creator>Goddard, Stuart, PGCE</creator><creator>Warren, Neil, PhD</creator><creator>Torkington, Jared, MS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study</title><author>Ansell, James, MBBCh ; Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh ; Horwood, James, MS ; Rizan, Chantelle, BSc ; Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil ; Goddard, Stuart, PGCE ; Warren, Neil, PhD ; Torkington, Jared, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-1d439b7d9b63f814f5203cb1b3fbb3ecc8fd046b5195e6035047ad078e6fd2223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - education</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ansell, James, MBBCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horwood, James, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizan, Chantelle, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Stuart, PGCE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Neil, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torkington, Jared, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ansell, James, MBBCh</au><au>Hurley, Joanna J., MBBCh</au><au>Horwood, James, MS</au><au>Rizan, Chantelle, BSc</au><au>Arnaoutakis, Konstantinos, MPhil</au><au>Goddard, Stuart, PGCE</au><au>Warren, Neil, PhD</au><au>Torkington, Jared, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>490-497</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P < .01, N vs E; P < .01, I vs Ad; P < .01, I vs E; P < .01, and Ad vs E; P = .46. Intergroup comparisons for B were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P < .01, N vs E; P < .01, I vs Ad; P = .03, I vs E; P <.01, and Ad vs E; P = .06. There was no difference between real-life DOPyS scores and simulator scores (0.07). Limitations The model does not have inbuilt assessment parameters. Conclusion This simulator demonstrates construct and concurrent validity for colon polypectomy training.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>24210655</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2014-03, Vol.79 (3), p.490-497 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499153488 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Clinical Competence Colonic Polyps - surgery Colonoscopy - education Cross-Sectional Studies Gastroenterology and Hepatology Humans Models, Animal Prospective Studies Swine Task Performance and Analysis |
title | The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy colonoscopy suitcase has construct and concurrent validity for colonoscopic polypectomy skills training: a prospective, cross-sectional study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A25%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Welsh%20Institute%20for%20Minimal%20Access%20Therapy%20colonoscopy%20suitcase%20has%20construct%20and%20concurrent%20validity%20for%20colonoscopic%20polypectomy%20skills%20training:%20a%20prospective,%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Ansell,%20James,%20MBBCh&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=490-497&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1499153488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499153488&rft_id=info:pmid/24210655&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0016510713022487&rfr_iscdi=true |