Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada
Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 2014-02, Vol.32 (5), p.438-443 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 443 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 438 |
container_title | Journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | MAHMUD, Salaheddin M KLIEWER, Erich V LAMBERT, Pascal BOZAT-EMRE, Songul DEMERS, Alain A |
description | Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba.
Females ≥ 15 years old who received the QHPV vaccine in Manitoba between September 2006 and April 2010 privately (n = 3,541) were matched on age to up to three nonvaccinated females (n = 9,594). We used Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios for three outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HSILs).
Among the 15- to 17-year-olds, the adjusted VE estimates were 35% (95% CI, -19% to 65%), 21% (-10% to 43%), and -1% (-44% to 29%) against the detection of HSILs, LSILs, and ASCUS, respectively. The corresponding estimates were higher (46% [0% to 71%], 35% [10% to 54%], and 23% [-8% to 45%]) among those who had ≥ one Pap smear after enrollment. The QHPV vaccine was associated with 23% (-17% to 48%) reduction in HSIL risk among those ≥ 18 with no history of abnormal cytology, but there was no evidence of protection among those with such a history (-8% [-59% to 27%]).
A significant percentage of vaccinated women may not be protected against HSIL and lesser dysplasia especially if they were vaccinated at older age (≥ 18) or had abnormal cytology before vaccination. These findings affirm the importance of vaccination before any significant exposure to HPV occurs and underscore the need for screening programs that cover all sexually active women, even if they were vaccinated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4645 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499146103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1499146103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e17d2c2879aaa1ae2f44ba9f2ea3dbba216a52e535ee5b108c96d2448aa1cc453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0D1v1EAQh_EVApEj0FOhbZAo8LGvZ7uMTEhAQQEJEN1qvB7nNlqvjx37UL59fMrxUk3zm3_xMPZSirVUQrz71FyvlZB6bdXabIx9xFbSqrIoS2sfs5UotSpkpX-esGdEt0JIU2n7lJ0oo2tb2XLFhvO-Rz-FPSYk4mPPpy3yrzN0OewhYpr45TxA4l9gF2IcB9iHPBP_Ad6HhPzsBkKiiTeY98FD5O_vaBeBAvCQ-GdIYRpbeMsbSNDBc_akh0j44nhP2fcP59-ay-Lq-uJjc3ZVeG3rqUBZdsqrqqwBQAKq3pgW6l4h6K5tQckNWIVWW0TbSlH5etMpY6pFe2-sPmVvHnZ3efw1I01uCOQxRkg4zuSkqWtpNlLohYoH6vNIlLF3uxwGyHdOCneI7JbI7hDZWeUOkZeXV8f1uR2w-_vwp-oCXh8B0NKkz5B8oH-uUkLL8j-3DTfb3yGjowFiXGaVu_WjVs46oyt9D1Kbktc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499146103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M ; KLIEWER, Erich V ; LAMBERT, Pascal ; BOZAT-EMRE, Songul ; DEMERS, Alain A</creator><creatorcontrib>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M ; KLIEWER, Erich V ; LAMBERT, Pascal ; BOZAT-EMRE, Songul ; DEMERS, Alain A</creatorcontrib><description>Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba.
Females ≥ 15 years old who received the QHPV vaccine in Manitoba between September 2006 and April 2010 privately (n = 3,541) were matched on age to up to three nonvaccinated females (n = 9,594). We used Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios for three outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HSILs).
Among the 15- to 17-year-olds, the adjusted VE estimates were 35% (95% CI, -19% to 65%), 21% (-10% to 43%), and -1% (-44% to 29%) against the detection of HSILs, LSILs, and ASCUS, respectively. The corresponding estimates were higher (46% [0% to 71%], 35% [10% to 54%], and 23% [-8% to 45%]) among those who had ≥ one Pap smear after enrollment. The QHPV vaccine was associated with 23% (-17% to 48%) reduction in HSIL risk among those ≥ 18 with no history of abnormal cytology, but there was no evidence of protection among those with such a history (-8% [-59% to 27%]).
A significant percentage of vaccinated women may not be protected against HSIL and lesser dysplasia especially if they were vaccinated at older age (≥ 18) or had abnormal cytology before vaccination. These findings affirm the importance of vaccination before any significant exposure to HPV occurs and underscore the need for screening programs that cover all sexually active women, even if they were vaccinated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4645</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24395857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention & control ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology ; Female ; Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18 ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infectious diseases ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Manitoba - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasm Grading ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology ; Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control ; Papillomavirus Infections - virology ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Program Evaluation ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Registries ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - prevention & control ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - virology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology ; Vaccination ; Vaginal Smears ; Viral diseases ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2014-02, Vol.32 (5), p.438-443</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e17d2c2879aaa1ae2f44ba9f2ea3dbba216a52e535ee5b108c96d2448aa1cc453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e17d2c2879aaa1ae2f44ba9f2ea3dbba216a52e535ee5b108c96d2448aa1cc453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3716,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28203177$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLIEWER, Erich V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAMBERT, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOZAT-EMRE, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEMERS, Alain A</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba.
Females ≥ 15 years old who received the QHPV vaccine in Manitoba between September 2006 and April 2010 privately (n = 3,541) were matched on age to up to three nonvaccinated females (n = 9,594). We used Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios for three outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HSILs).
Among the 15- to 17-year-olds, the adjusted VE estimates were 35% (95% CI, -19% to 65%), 21% (-10% to 43%), and -1% (-44% to 29%) against the detection of HSILs, LSILs, and ASCUS, respectively. The corresponding estimates were higher (46% [0% to 71%], 35% [10% to 54%], and 23% [-8% to 45%]) among those who had ≥ one Pap smear after enrollment. The QHPV vaccine was associated with 23% (-17% to 48%) reduction in HSIL risk among those ≥ 18 with no history of abnormal cytology, but there was no evidence of protection among those with such a history (-8% [-59% to 27%]).
A significant percentage of vaccinated women may not be protected against HSIL and lesser dysplasia especially if they were vaccinated at older age (≥ 18) or had abnormal cytology before vaccination. These findings affirm the importance of vaccination before any significant exposure to HPV occurs and underscore the need for screening programs that cover all sexually active women, even if they were vaccinated.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Manitoba - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - virology</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - prevention & control</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - virology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpN0D1v1EAQh_EVApEj0FOhbZAo8LGvZ7uMTEhAQQEJEN1qvB7nNlqvjx37UL59fMrxUk3zm3_xMPZSirVUQrz71FyvlZB6bdXabIx9xFbSqrIoS2sfs5UotSpkpX-esGdEt0JIU2n7lJ0oo2tb2XLFhvO-Rz-FPSYk4mPPpy3yrzN0OewhYpr45TxA4l9gF2IcB9iHPBP_Ad6HhPzsBkKiiTeY98FD5O_vaBeBAvCQ-GdIYRpbeMsbSNDBc_akh0j44nhP2fcP59-ay-Lq-uJjc3ZVeG3rqUBZdsqrqqwBQAKq3pgW6l4h6K5tQckNWIVWW0TbSlH5etMpY6pFe2-sPmVvHnZ3efw1I01uCOQxRkg4zuSkqWtpNlLohYoH6vNIlLF3uxwGyHdOCneI7JbI7hDZWeUOkZeXV8f1uR2w-_vwp-oCXh8B0NKkz5B8oH-uUkLL8j-3DTfb3yGjowFiXGaVu_WjVs46oyt9D1Kbktc</recordid><startdate>20140210</startdate><enddate>20140210</enddate><creator>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M</creator><creator>KLIEWER, Erich V</creator><creator>LAMBERT, Pascal</creator><creator>BOZAT-EMRE, Songul</creator><creator>DEMERS, Alain A</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140210</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada</title><author>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M ; KLIEWER, Erich V ; LAMBERT, Pascal ; BOZAT-EMRE, Songul ; DEMERS, Alain A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e17d2c2879aaa1ae2f44ba9f2ea3dbba216a52e535ee5b108c96d2448aa1cc453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Manitoba - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - virology</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - prevention & control</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - virology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLIEWER, Erich V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAMBERT, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOZAT-EMRE, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEMERS, Alain A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M</au><au>KLIEWER, Erich V</au><au>LAMBERT, Pascal</au><au>BOZAT-EMRE, Songul</au><au>DEMERS, Alain A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-02-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>438</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>438-443</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba.
Females ≥ 15 years old who received the QHPV vaccine in Manitoba between September 2006 and April 2010 privately (n = 3,541) were matched on age to up to three nonvaccinated females (n = 9,594). We used Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios for three outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HSILs).
Among the 15- to 17-year-olds, the adjusted VE estimates were 35% (95% CI, -19% to 65%), 21% (-10% to 43%), and -1% (-44% to 29%) against the detection of HSILs, LSILs, and ASCUS, respectively. The corresponding estimates were higher (46% [0% to 71%], 35% [10% to 54%], and 23% [-8% to 45%]) among those who had ≥ one Pap smear after enrollment. The QHPV vaccine was associated with 23% (-17% to 48%) reduction in HSIL risk among those ≥ 18 with no history of abnormal cytology, but there was no evidence of protection among those with such a history (-8% [-59% to 27%]).
A significant percentage of vaccinated women may not be protected against HSIL and lesser dysplasia especially if they were vaccinated at older age (≥ 18) or had abnormal cytology before vaccination. These findings affirm the importance of vaccination before any significant exposure to HPV occurs and underscore the need for screening programs that cover all sexually active women, even if they were vaccinated.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>24395857</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4645</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-183X |
ispartof | Journal of clinical oncology, 2014-02, Vol.32 (5), p.438-443 |
issn | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499146103 |
source | MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Age Factors Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention & control Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology Female Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18 Humans Incidence Infectious diseases Kaplan-Meier Estimate Manitoba - epidemiology Medical sciences Neoplasm Grading Papillomavirus Infections - complications Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control Papillomavirus Infections - virology Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use Program Evaluation Proportional Hazards Models Registries Time Factors Treatment Outcome Tumors Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - prevention & control Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - virology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology Vaccination Vaginal Smears Viral diseases Young Adult |
title | Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A33%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20the%20Quadrivalent%20Human%20Papillomavirus%20Vaccine%20Against%20Cervical%20Dysplasia%20in%20Manitoba,%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=MAHMUD,%20Salaheddin%20M&rft.date=2014-02-10&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=438&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=438-443&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1499146103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499146103&rft_id=info:pmid/24395857&rfr_iscdi=true |