Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada

Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2014-02, Vol.32 (5), p.438-443
Hauptverfasser: MAHMUD, Salaheddin M, KLIEWER, Erich V, LAMBERT, Pascal, BOZAT-EMRE, Songul, DEMERS, Alain A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 443
container_issue 5
container_start_page 438
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 32
creator MAHMUD, Salaheddin M
KLIEWER, Erich V
LAMBERT, Pascal
BOZAT-EMRE, Songul
DEMERS, Alain A
description Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba. Females ≥ 15 years old who received the QHPV vaccine in Manitoba between September 2006 and April 2010 privately (n = 3,541) were matched on age to up to three nonvaccinated females (n = 9,594). We used Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios for three outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HSILs). Among the 15- to 17-year-olds, the adjusted VE estimates were 35% (95% CI, -19% to 65%), 21% (-10% to 43%), and -1% (-44% to 29%) against the detection of HSILs, LSILs, and ASCUS, respectively. The corresponding estimates were higher (46% [0% to 71%], 35% [10% to 54%], and 23% [-8% to 45%]) among those who had ≥ one Pap smear after enrollment. The QHPV vaccine was associated with 23% (-17% to 48%) reduction in HSIL risk among those ≥ 18 with no history of abnormal cytology, but there was no evidence of protection among those with such a history (-8% [-59% to 27%]). A significant percentage of vaccinated women may not be protected against HSIL and lesser dysplasia especially if they were vaccinated at older age (≥ 18) or had abnormal cytology before vaccination. These findings affirm the importance of vaccination before any significant exposure to HPV occurs and underscore the need for screening programs that cover all sexually active women, even if they were vaccinated.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4645
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499146103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1499146103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e17d2c2879aaa1ae2f44ba9f2ea3dbba216a52e535ee5b108c96d2448aa1cc453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpN0D1v1EAQh_EVApEj0FOhbZAo8LGvZ7uMTEhAQQEJEN1qvB7nNlqvjx37UL59fMrxUk3zm3_xMPZSirVUQrz71FyvlZB6bdXabIx9xFbSqrIoS2sfs5UotSpkpX-esGdEt0JIU2n7lJ0oo2tb2XLFhvO-Rz-FPSYk4mPPpy3yrzN0OewhYpr45TxA4l9gF2IcB9iHPBP_Ad6HhPzsBkKiiTeY98FD5O_vaBeBAvCQ-GdIYRpbeMsbSNDBc_akh0j44nhP2fcP59-ay-Lq-uJjc3ZVeG3rqUBZdsqrqqwBQAKq3pgW6l4h6K5tQckNWIVWW0TbSlH5etMpY6pFe2-sPmVvHnZ3efw1I01uCOQxRkg4zuSkqWtpNlLohYoH6vNIlLF3uxwGyHdOCneI7JbI7hDZWeUOkZeXV8f1uR2w-_vwp-oCXh8B0NKkz5B8oH-uUkLL8j-3DTfb3yGjowFiXGaVu_WjVs46oyt9D1Kbktc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499146103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M ; KLIEWER, Erich V ; LAMBERT, Pascal ; BOZAT-EMRE, Songul ; DEMERS, Alain A</creator><creatorcontrib>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M ; KLIEWER, Erich V ; LAMBERT, Pascal ; BOZAT-EMRE, Songul ; DEMERS, Alain A</creatorcontrib><description>Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba. Females ≥ 15 years old who received the QHPV vaccine in Manitoba between September 2006 and April 2010 privately (n = 3,541) were matched on age to up to three nonvaccinated females (n = 9,594). We used Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios for three outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HSILs). Among the 15- to 17-year-olds, the adjusted VE estimates were 35% (95% CI, -19% to 65%), 21% (-10% to 43%), and -1% (-44% to 29%) against the detection of HSILs, LSILs, and ASCUS, respectively. The corresponding estimates were higher (46% [0% to 71%], 35% [10% to 54%], and 23% [-8% to 45%]) among those who had ≥ one Pap smear after enrollment. The QHPV vaccine was associated with 23% (-17% to 48%) reduction in HSIL risk among those ≥ 18 with no history of abnormal cytology, but there was no evidence of protection among those with such a history (-8% [-59% to 27%]). A significant percentage of vaccinated women may not be protected against HSIL and lesser dysplasia especially if they were vaccinated at older age (≥ 18) or had abnormal cytology before vaccination. These findings affirm the importance of vaccination before any significant exposure to HPV occurs and underscore the need for screening programs that cover all sexually active women, even if they were vaccinated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4645</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24395857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention &amp; control ; Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology ; Female ; Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18 ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infectious diseases ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Manitoba - epidemiology ; Medical sciences ; Neoplasm Grading ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology ; Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Papillomavirus Infections - virology ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Program Evaluation ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Registries ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - prevention &amp; control ; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - virology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology ; Vaccination ; Vaginal Smears ; Viral diseases ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2014-02, Vol.32 (5), p.438-443</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e17d2c2879aaa1ae2f44ba9f2ea3dbba216a52e535ee5b108c96d2448aa1cc453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e17d2c2879aaa1ae2f44ba9f2ea3dbba216a52e535ee5b108c96d2448aa1cc453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3716,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28203177$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24395857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLIEWER, Erich V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAMBERT, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOZAT-EMRE, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEMERS, Alain A</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba. Females ≥ 15 years old who received the QHPV vaccine in Manitoba between September 2006 and April 2010 privately (n = 3,541) were matched on age to up to three nonvaccinated females (n = 9,594). We used Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios for three outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HSILs). Among the 15- to 17-year-olds, the adjusted VE estimates were 35% (95% CI, -19% to 65%), 21% (-10% to 43%), and -1% (-44% to 29%) against the detection of HSILs, LSILs, and ASCUS, respectively. The corresponding estimates were higher (46% [0% to 71%], 35% [10% to 54%], and 23% [-8% to 45%]) among those who had ≥ one Pap smear after enrollment. The QHPV vaccine was associated with 23% (-17% to 48%) reduction in HSIL risk among those ≥ 18 with no history of abnormal cytology, but there was no evidence of protection among those with such a history (-8% [-59% to 27%]). A significant percentage of vaccinated women may not be protected against HSIL and lesser dysplasia especially if they were vaccinated at older age (≥ 18) or had abnormal cytology before vaccination. These findings affirm the importance of vaccination before any significant exposure to HPV occurs and underscore the need for screening programs that cover all sexually active women, even if they were vaccinated.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Manitoba - epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - virology</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - virology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpN0D1v1EAQh_EVApEj0FOhbZAo8LGvZ7uMTEhAQQEJEN1qvB7nNlqvjx37UL59fMrxUk3zm3_xMPZSirVUQrz71FyvlZB6bdXabIx9xFbSqrIoS2sfs5UotSpkpX-esGdEt0JIU2n7lJ0oo2tb2XLFhvO-Rz-FPSYk4mPPpy3yrzN0OewhYpr45TxA4l9gF2IcB9iHPBP_Ad6HhPzsBkKiiTeY98FD5O_vaBeBAvCQ-GdIYRpbeMsbSNDBc_akh0j44nhP2fcP59-ay-Lq-uJjc3ZVeG3rqUBZdsqrqqwBQAKq3pgW6l4h6K5tQckNWIVWW0TbSlH5etMpY6pFe2-sPmVvHnZ3efw1I01uCOQxRkg4zuSkqWtpNlLohYoH6vNIlLF3uxwGyHdOCneI7JbI7hDZWeUOkZeXV8f1uR2w-_vwp-oCXh8B0NKkz5B8oH-uUkLL8j-3DTfb3yGjowFiXGaVu_WjVs46oyt9D1Kbktc</recordid><startdate>20140210</startdate><enddate>20140210</enddate><creator>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M</creator><creator>KLIEWER, Erich V</creator><creator>LAMBERT, Pascal</creator><creator>BOZAT-EMRE, Songul</creator><creator>DEMERS, Alain A</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140210</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada</title><author>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M ; KLIEWER, Erich V ; LAMBERT, Pascal ; BOZAT-EMRE, Songul ; DEMERS, Alain A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-e17d2c2879aaa1ae2f44ba9f2ea3dbba216a52e535ee5b108c96d2448aa1cc453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Manitoba - epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - virology</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - virology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLIEWER, Erich V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAMBERT, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOZAT-EMRE, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEMERS, Alain A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MAHMUD, Salaheddin M</au><au>KLIEWER, Erich V</au><au>LAMBERT, Pascal</au><au>BOZAT-EMRE, Songul</au><au>DEMERS, Alain A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2014-02-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>438</spage><epage>443</epage><pages>438-443</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (QHPV) vaccine against cervical dysplasia has not been estimated using population-based individual level data. We assessed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the QHPV vaccine against cervical dysplasia using data collected routinely in Manitoba. Females ≥ 15 years old who received the QHPV vaccine in Manitoba between September 2006 and April 2010 privately (n = 3,541) were matched on age to up to three nonvaccinated females (n = 9,594). We used Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios for three outcomes: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), and high-grade SILs (HSILs). Among the 15- to 17-year-olds, the adjusted VE estimates were 35% (95% CI, -19% to 65%), 21% (-10% to 43%), and -1% (-44% to 29%) against the detection of HSILs, LSILs, and ASCUS, respectively. The corresponding estimates were higher (46% [0% to 71%], 35% [10% to 54%], and 23% [-8% to 45%]) among those who had ≥ one Pap smear after enrollment. The QHPV vaccine was associated with 23% (-17% to 48%) reduction in HSIL risk among those ≥ 18 with no history of abnormal cytology, but there was no evidence of protection among those with such a history (-8% [-59% to 27%]). A significant percentage of vaccinated women may not be protected against HSIL and lesser dysplasia especially if they were vaccinated at older age (≥ 18) or had abnormal cytology before vaccination. These findings affirm the importance of vaccination before any significant exposure to HPV occurs and underscore the need for screening programs that cover all sexually active women, even if they were vaccinated.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>24395857</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4645</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2014-02, Vol.32 (5), p.438-443
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499146103
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Age Factors
Biological and medical sciences
Case-Control Studies
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - epidemiology
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - pathology
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - prevention & control
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia - virology
Female
Human Papillomavirus Recombinant Vaccine Quadrivalent, Types 6, 11, 16, 18
Humans
Incidence
Infectious diseases
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Manitoba - epidemiology
Medical sciences
Neoplasm Grading
Papillomavirus Infections - complications
Papillomavirus Infections - epidemiology
Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control
Papillomavirus Infections - virology
Papillomavirus Vaccines - therapeutic use
Program Evaluation
Proportional Hazards Models
Registries
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - epidemiology
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - prevention & control
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - virology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - epidemiology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology
Vaccination
Vaginal Smears
Viral diseases
Young Adult
title Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Dysplasia in Manitoba, Canada
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A33%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20the%20Quadrivalent%20Human%20Papillomavirus%20Vaccine%20Against%20Cervical%20Dysplasia%20in%20Manitoba,%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=MAHMUD,%20Salaheddin%20M&rft.date=2014-02-10&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=438&rft.epage=443&rft.pages=438-443&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1499146103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499146103&rft_id=info:pmid/24395857&rfr_iscdi=true