Quality of life and functional outcomes 10 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Abstract Background. Minimally invasive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has proven equally effective as open surgery in terms of cancer control and peroperative complication rate with less bleeding and postoperative pain. However, long-term follow-up data after LRP are scarce, especially as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Upsala journal of medical sciences 2014-03, Vol.119 (1), p.32-37
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Eugen Y-H., Eriksson, Hans G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 32
container_title Upsala journal of medical sciences
container_volume 119
creator Wang, Eugen Y-H.
Eriksson, Hans G.
description Abstract Background. Minimally invasive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has proven equally effective as open surgery in terms of cancer control and peroperative complication rate with less bleeding and postoperative pain. However, long-term follow-up data after LRP are scarce, especially as related to quality of life (QoL). Aim. To compare QoL and functional outcomes at least 10 years after LRP with a population-based control group matched for age and region. Methods. Follow-up data were obtained by mailed questionnaires from patients who responded anonymously to five international questionnaires (EQ-5D, QLQ-C30, QLQ-PR25, IPSS, and IIEF). We collected self-reported outcome data directly from 49 patients who underwent LRP more than 10 years ago in our centre. The results of the patients' overall QoL and urinary continence rates were compared with 918 controls matched for region and age. Results. Forty-two patients (86%) and 808 (88%) controls reported having no urinary leakage. Only 11 patients (24%) still had sexual activities 10 years after LRP, and three were without erectile dysfunction. There was no difference in four of five statements of the self-assessed QoL questionnaires between the LRP and control group. Anxiety level was higher in the LRP group (44%) than in the control group (23%). Conclusion. Patients reported high self-assessed QoL, although they also reported low sexual activity 10 years after LRP. Prevalence of urinary leakage was similar in both groups. However, anxiety was more common in LRP patients.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/03009734.2013.868560
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499139246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2199207756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-207174225fb696a2c780d3709a819aceb7e25db2365e4842f9cb31a985e65d5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1r1TAYxoso7mz6H4gUvPHCHvPRpM3NZMxPGIigglfhbZrsZKTNMUkd_e-X0m16vNhVIO_veZLnfYriBUZbipF4iyhCoqH1liBMty1vGUePig1BCFVY8OZxsVmQamGOiuMYr_KEo4Y-LY5ITUnLGNoUv75N4GyaS29KZ40uYexLM40qWT-CK_2UlB90LDEqZw0hlmCSDqWDPQQfld9bVQborcrwPt8kSFolP8zPiicGXNTPb8-T4sfHD9_PP1cXXz99OT-7qBRr61QR1OCmJoSZjgsORDUt6mmDBLRYgNJdownrO0I503VbEyNURzGIlmnOeqbpSfFm9Y3Xej91ch_sAGGWHqx8b3-eSR8u5TRJQhAVKOOnK57ZQfdKjymAO1AdTka7k5f-j6QC8wazbPD61iD435OOSQ42Ku0cjNpPUeJaCEwFqXlGX_2HXvkp5LVGSbAQOXrDFqpeKZXXF4M295_BSC5Vy7uq5VK1XKvOspf_BrkX3XWbgXcrYEfjwwDXPrheJpidDybAqGxc7B984vTAYafBpZ2CoP8GedDgBmSRzBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2199207756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of life and functional outcomes 10 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wang, Eugen Y-H. ; Eriksson, Hans G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Eugen Y-H. ; Eriksson, Hans G.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background. Minimally invasive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has proven equally effective as open surgery in terms of cancer control and peroperative complication rate with less bleeding and postoperative pain. However, long-term follow-up data after LRP are scarce, especially as related to quality of life (QoL). Aim. To compare QoL and functional outcomes at least 10 years after LRP with a population-based control group matched for age and region. Methods. Follow-up data were obtained by mailed questionnaires from patients who responded anonymously to five international questionnaires (EQ-5D, QLQ-C30, QLQ-PR25, IPSS, and IIEF). We collected self-reported outcome data directly from 49 patients who underwent LRP more than 10 years ago in our centre. The results of the patients' overall QoL and urinary continence rates were compared with 918 controls matched for region and age. Results. Forty-two patients (86%) and 808 (88%) controls reported having no urinary leakage. Only 11 patients (24%) still had sexual activities 10 years after LRP, and three were without erectile dysfunction. There was no difference in four of five statements of the self-assessed QoL questionnaires between the LRP and control group. Anxiety level was higher in the LRP group (44%) than in the control group (23%). Conclusion. Patients reported high self-assessed QoL, although they also reported low sexual activity 10 years after LRP. Prevalence of urinary leakage was similar in both groups. However, anxiety was more common in LRP patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9734</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2000-1967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2000-1967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/03009734.2013.868560</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24328550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer surgery ; Case-Control Studies ; Erectile dysfunction ; Functional outcome ; Humans ; laparoscopic radical prostatectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Male ; Original ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome ; Urological surgery</subject><ispartof>Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2014-03, Vol.119 (1), p.32-37</ispartof><rights>Informa Healthcare 2014</rights><rights>Informa Healthcare. 2014. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-207174225fb696a2c780d3709a819aceb7e25db2365e4842f9cb31a985e65d5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-207174225fb696a2c780d3709a819aceb7e25db2365e4842f9cb31a985e65d5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916715/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916715/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27501,27923,27924,53790,53792,59142,59143,61217,61218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24328550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-220390$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Eugen Y-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Hans G.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of life and functional outcomes 10 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy</title><title>Upsala journal of medical sciences</title><addtitle>Ups J Med Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract Background. Minimally invasive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has proven equally effective as open surgery in terms of cancer control and peroperative complication rate with less bleeding and postoperative pain. However, long-term follow-up data after LRP are scarce, especially as related to quality of life (QoL). Aim. To compare QoL and functional outcomes at least 10 years after LRP with a population-based control group matched for age and region. Methods. Follow-up data were obtained by mailed questionnaires from patients who responded anonymously to five international questionnaires (EQ-5D, QLQ-C30, QLQ-PR25, IPSS, and IIEF). We collected self-reported outcome data directly from 49 patients who underwent LRP more than 10 years ago in our centre. The results of the patients' overall QoL and urinary continence rates were compared with 918 controls matched for region and age. Results. Forty-two patients (86%) and 808 (88%) controls reported having no urinary leakage. Only 11 patients (24%) still had sexual activities 10 years after LRP, and three were without erectile dysfunction. There was no difference in four of five statements of the self-assessed QoL questionnaires between the LRP and control group. Anxiety level was higher in the LRP group (44%) than in the control group (23%). Conclusion. Patients reported high self-assessed QoL, although they also reported low sexual activity 10 years after LRP. Prevalence of urinary leakage was similar in both groups. However, anxiety was more common in LRP patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Erectile dysfunction</subject><subject>Functional outcome</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopic radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><issn>0300-9734</issn><issn>2000-1967</issn><issn>2000-1967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1r1TAYxoso7mz6H4gUvPHCHvPRpM3NZMxPGIigglfhbZrsZKTNMUkd_e-X0m16vNhVIO_veZLnfYriBUZbipF4iyhCoqH1liBMty1vGUePig1BCFVY8OZxsVmQamGOiuMYr_KEo4Y-LY5ITUnLGNoUv75N4GyaS29KZ40uYexLM40qWT-CK_2UlB90LDEqZw0hlmCSDqWDPQQfld9bVQborcrwPt8kSFolP8zPiicGXNTPb8-T4sfHD9_PP1cXXz99OT-7qBRr61QR1OCmJoSZjgsORDUt6mmDBLRYgNJdownrO0I503VbEyNURzGIlmnOeqbpSfFm9Y3Xej91ch_sAGGWHqx8b3-eSR8u5TRJQhAVKOOnK57ZQfdKjymAO1AdTka7k5f-j6QC8wazbPD61iD435OOSQ42Ku0cjNpPUeJaCEwFqXlGX_2HXvkp5LVGSbAQOXrDFqpeKZXXF4M295_BSC5Vy7uq5VK1XKvOspf_BrkX3XWbgXcrYEfjwwDXPrheJpidDybAqGxc7B984vTAYafBpZ2CoP8GedDgBmSRzBo</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Wang, Eugen Y-H.</creator><creator>Eriksson, Hans G.</creator><general>Informa Healthcare</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Open Academia</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>DF2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Quality of life and functional outcomes 10 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy</title><author>Wang, Eugen Y-H. ; Eriksson, Hans G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-207174225fb696a2c780d3709a819aceb7e25db2365e4842f9cb31a985e65d5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Erectile dysfunction</topic><topic>Functional outcome</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopic radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Eugen Y-H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eriksson, Hans G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><jtitle>Upsala journal of medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Eugen Y-H.</au><au>Eriksson, Hans G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of life and functional outcomes 10 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy</atitle><jtitle>Upsala journal of medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Ups J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>32-37</pages><issn>0300-9734</issn><issn>2000-1967</issn><eissn>2000-1967</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background. Minimally invasive laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) has proven equally effective as open surgery in terms of cancer control and peroperative complication rate with less bleeding and postoperative pain. However, long-term follow-up data after LRP are scarce, especially as related to quality of life (QoL). Aim. To compare QoL and functional outcomes at least 10 years after LRP with a population-based control group matched for age and region. Methods. Follow-up data were obtained by mailed questionnaires from patients who responded anonymously to five international questionnaires (EQ-5D, QLQ-C30, QLQ-PR25, IPSS, and IIEF). We collected self-reported outcome data directly from 49 patients who underwent LRP more than 10 years ago in our centre. The results of the patients' overall QoL and urinary continence rates were compared with 918 controls matched for region and age. Results. Forty-two patients (86%) and 808 (88%) controls reported having no urinary leakage. Only 11 patients (24%) still had sexual activities 10 years after LRP, and three were without erectile dysfunction. There was no difference in four of five statements of the self-assessed QoL questionnaires between the LRP and control group. Anxiety level was higher in the LRP group (44%) than in the control group (23%). Conclusion. Patients reported high self-assessed QoL, although they also reported low sexual activity 10 years after LRP. Prevalence of urinary leakage was similar in both groups. However, anxiety was more common in LRP patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare</pub><pmid>24328550</pmid><doi>10.3109/03009734.2013.868560</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-9734
ispartof Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2014-03, Vol.119 (1), p.32-37
issn 0300-9734
2000-1967
2000-1967
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499139246
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cancer surgery
Case-Control Studies
Erectile dysfunction
Functional outcome
Humans
laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Male
Original
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy - adverse effects
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - physiopathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Urological surgery
title Quality of life and functional outcomes 10 years after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T05%3A51%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20life%20and%20functional%20outcomes%2010%20years%20after%20laparoscopic%20radical%20prostatectomy&rft.jtitle=Upsala%20journal%20of%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Wang,%20Eugen%20Y-H.&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=32-37&rft.issn=0300-9734&rft.eissn=2000-1967&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/03009734.2013.868560&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2199207756%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2199207756&rft_id=info:pmid/24328550&rfr_iscdi=true