Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort

Cam impingement is characterized by abnormal contact between the proximal femur and acetabulum caused by a non-spherical femoral head, known as a cam deformity. A cam deformity is usually quantified by the alpha angle; greater alpha angles substantially increase the risk for osteoarthritis (OA). How...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2014-02, Vol.22 (2), p.218-225
Hauptverfasser: Agricola, R, Waarsing, J H, Thomas, G E, Carr, A J, Reijman, M, Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A, Glyn-Jones, S, Weinans, H, Arden, N K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 2
container_start_page 218
container_title Osteoarthritis and cartilage
container_volume 22
creator Agricola, R
Waarsing, J H
Thomas, G E
Carr, A J
Reijman, M
Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A
Glyn-Jones, S
Weinans, H
Arden, N K
description Cam impingement is characterized by abnormal contact between the proximal femur and acetabulum caused by a non-spherical femoral head, known as a cam deformity. A cam deformity is usually quantified by the alpha angle; greater alpha angles substantially increase the risk for osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no consensus on which alpha angle threshold to use to define the presence of a cam deformity. To determine alpha angle thresholds that define the presence of a cam deformity and a pathological cam deformity based on development of OA. Data from both the prospective CHECK cohort of 1002 individuals (45-65 years) and the prospective population-based Chingford cohort of 1003 women (45-64 years) with respective follow-up times of 5 and 19 years were combined. The alpha angle was measured at baseline on anteroposterior radiographs, from which a threshold for the presence of a cam deformity was determined based on its distribution. Further, a pathological alpha angle threshold was determined based on the highest discriminative ability for development of end-stage OA at follow-up. A definite bimodal distribution of the alpha angle was found in both cohorts with a normal distribution up to 60°, indicating a clear distinction between normal and abnormal alpha angles. A pathological threshold of 78° resulted in the maximum area under the ROC curve. Epidemiological data of two large cohorts shows a bimodal distribution of the alpha angle. Alpha angle thresholds of 60° to define the presence of a cam deformity and 78° for a pathological cam deformity are proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499136781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1499136781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-9bc4ee6114ac84b1874717856f02a147bf7c4e239a6ece361154e72b95e6ff923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10LFOwzAQBmALCdFSeAEG5JElwWc7TsKGokIRlVhgjhzn3KSK45CkQwfeHauU6XR33_3DEXIHLAYG6nEf773RMWcgYoCYsfSCLCHhPMpVIhbkepr2jDEBwK7IgkuuciXUkvwU2tHWDW2_Q4f9_ERrtG0fWjo3SIcRJ-wNUm-ppibYsPaja-cjrY4noruh0VT3uw7DsZ41taN3p1WxWRfv1PjGj3MQNS2aEBzu6_Pwhlxa3U14e64r8vWy_iw20fbj9a143kYDcDVHeWUkogKQ2mSygiyVKaRZoizjGmRa2TQALnKt0KAIMJGY8ipPUFmbc7EiD3-5w-i_DzjNpWsng12ne_SHqQSZ5yBUmkGg92d6qBzW5TC2To_H8v9l4hfwKmyh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499136781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Agricola, R ; Waarsing, J H ; Thomas, G E ; Carr, A J ; Reijman, M ; Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A ; Glyn-Jones, S ; Weinans, H ; Arden, N K</creator><creatorcontrib>Agricola, R ; Waarsing, J H ; Thomas, G E ; Carr, A J ; Reijman, M ; Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A ; Glyn-Jones, S ; Weinans, H ; Arden, N K</creatorcontrib><description>Cam impingement is characterized by abnormal contact between the proximal femur and acetabulum caused by a non-spherical femoral head, known as a cam deformity. A cam deformity is usually quantified by the alpha angle; greater alpha angles substantially increase the risk for osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no consensus on which alpha angle threshold to use to define the presence of a cam deformity. To determine alpha angle thresholds that define the presence of a cam deformity and a pathological cam deformity based on development of OA. Data from both the prospective CHECK cohort of 1002 individuals (45-65 years) and the prospective population-based Chingford cohort of 1003 women (45-64 years) with respective follow-up times of 5 and 19 years were combined. The alpha angle was measured at baseline on anteroposterior radiographs, from which a threshold for the presence of a cam deformity was determined based on its distribution. Further, a pathological alpha angle threshold was determined based on the highest discriminative ability for development of end-stage OA at follow-up. A definite bimodal distribution of the alpha angle was found in both cohorts with a normal distribution up to 60°, indicating a clear distinction between normal and abnormal alpha angles. A pathological threshold of 78° resulted in the maximum area under the ROC curve. Epidemiological data of two large cohorts shows a bimodal distribution of the alpha angle. Alpha angle thresholds of 60° to define the presence of a cam deformity and 78° for a pathological cam deformity are proposed.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24269636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cohort Studies ; England - epidemiology ; Female ; Femoracetabular Impingement - complications ; Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging ; Femoracetabular Impingement - epidemiology ; Femoracetabular Impingement - pathology ; Femur Head - diagnostic imaging ; Femur Head - pathology ; Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Joint - pathology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - epidemiology ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - etiology ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - pathology ; Radiography ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2014-02, Vol.22 (2), p.218-225</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24269636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agricola, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waarsing, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reijman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glyn-Jones, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinans, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arden, N K</creatorcontrib><title>Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort</title><title>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</title><addtitle>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</addtitle><description>Cam impingement is characterized by abnormal contact between the proximal femur and acetabulum caused by a non-spherical femoral head, known as a cam deformity. A cam deformity is usually quantified by the alpha angle; greater alpha angles substantially increase the risk for osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no consensus on which alpha angle threshold to use to define the presence of a cam deformity. To determine alpha angle thresholds that define the presence of a cam deformity and a pathological cam deformity based on development of OA. Data from both the prospective CHECK cohort of 1002 individuals (45-65 years) and the prospective population-based Chingford cohort of 1003 women (45-64 years) with respective follow-up times of 5 and 19 years were combined. The alpha angle was measured at baseline on anteroposterior radiographs, from which a threshold for the presence of a cam deformity was determined based on its distribution. Further, a pathological alpha angle threshold was determined based on the highest discriminative ability for development of end-stage OA at follow-up. A definite bimodal distribution of the alpha angle was found in both cohorts with a normal distribution up to 60°, indicating a clear distinction between normal and abnormal alpha angles. A pathological threshold of 78° resulted in the maximum area under the ROC curve. Epidemiological data of two large cohorts shows a bimodal distribution of the alpha angle. Alpha angle thresholds of 60° to define the presence of a cam deformity and 78° for a pathological cam deformity are proposed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - complications</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - epidemiology</subject><subject>Femoracetabular Impingement - pathology</subject><subject>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur Head - pathology</subject><subject>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - etiology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - pathology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1522-9653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo10LFOwzAQBmALCdFSeAEG5JElwWc7TsKGokIRlVhgjhzn3KSK45CkQwfeHauU6XR33_3DEXIHLAYG6nEf773RMWcgYoCYsfSCLCHhPMpVIhbkepr2jDEBwK7IgkuuciXUkvwU2tHWDW2_Q4f9_ERrtG0fWjo3SIcRJ-wNUm-ppibYsPaja-cjrY4noruh0VT3uw7DsZ41taN3p1WxWRfv1PjGj3MQNS2aEBzu6_Pwhlxa3U14e64r8vWy_iw20fbj9a143kYDcDVHeWUkogKQ2mSygiyVKaRZoizjGmRa2TQALnKt0KAIMJGY8ipPUFmbc7EiD3-5w-i_DzjNpWsng12ne_SHqQSZ5yBUmkGg92d6qBzW5TC2To_H8v9l4hfwKmyh</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Agricola, R</creator><creator>Waarsing, J H</creator><creator>Thomas, G E</creator><creator>Carr, A J</creator><creator>Reijman, M</creator><creator>Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A</creator><creator>Glyn-Jones, S</creator><creator>Weinans, H</creator><creator>Arden, N K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort</title><author>Agricola, R ; Waarsing, J H ; Thomas, G E ; Carr, A J ; Reijman, M ; Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A ; Glyn-Jones, S ; Weinans, H ; Arden, N K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-9bc4ee6114ac84b1874717856f02a147bf7c4e239a6ece361154e72b95e6ff923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - complications</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - epidemiology</topic><topic>Femoracetabular Impingement - pathology</topic><topic>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur Head - pathology</topic><topic>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - etiology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - pathology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agricola, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waarsing, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, G E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reijman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glyn-Jones, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinans, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arden, N K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agricola, R</au><au>Waarsing, J H</au><au>Thomas, G E</au><au>Carr, A J</au><au>Reijman, M</au><au>Bierma-Zeinstra, S M A</au><au>Glyn-Jones, S</au><au>Weinans, H</au><au>Arden, N K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort</atitle><jtitle>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>218</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>218-225</pages><eissn>1522-9653</eissn><abstract>Cam impingement is characterized by abnormal contact between the proximal femur and acetabulum caused by a non-spherical femoral head, known as a cam deformity. A cam deformity is usually quantified by the alpha angle; greater alpha angles substantially increase the risk for osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no consensus on which alpha angle threshold to use to define the presence of a cam deformity. To determine alpha angle thresholds that define the presence of a cam deformity and a pathological cam deformity based on development of OA. Data from both the prospective CHECK cohort of 1002 individuals (45-65 years) and the prospective population-based Chingford cohort of 1003 women (45-64 years) with respective follow-up times of 5 and 19 years were combined. The alpha angle was measured at baseline on anteroposterior radiographs, from which a threshold for the presence of a cam deformity was determined based on its distribution. Further, a pathological alpha angle threshold was determined based on the highest discriminative ability for development of end-stage OA at follow-up. A definite bimodal distribution of the alpha angle was found in both cohorts with a normal distribution up to 60°, indicating a clear distinction between normal and abnormal alpha angles. A pathological threshold of 78° resulted in the maximum area under the ROC curve. Epidemiological data of two large cohorts shows a bimodal distribution of the alpha angle. Alpha angle thresholds of 60° to define the presence of a cam deformity and 78° for a pathological cam deformity are proposed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>24269636</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.007</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1522-9653
ispartof Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2014-02, Vol.22 (2), p.218-225
issn 1522-9653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499136781
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Cohort Studies
England - epidemiology
Female
Femoracetabular Impingement - complications
Femoracetabular Impingement - diagnostic imaging
Femoracetabular Impingement - epidemiology
Femoracetabular Impingement - pathology
Femur Head - diagnostic imaging
Femur Head - pathology
Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging
Hip Joint - pathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands - epidemiology
Osteoarthritis, Hip - epidemiology
Osteoarthritis, Hip - etiology
Osteoarthritis, Hip - pathology
Radiography
Reproducibility of Results
title Cam impingement: defining the presence of a cam deformity by the alpha angle: data from the CHECK cohort and Chingford cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A39%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cam%20impingement:%20defining%20the%20presence%20of%20a%20cam%20deformity%20by%20the%20alpha%20angle:%20data%20from%20the%20CHECK%20cohort%20and%20Chingford%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Osteoarthritis%20and%20cartilage&rft.au=Agricola,%20R&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=218&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=218-225&rft.eissn=1522-9653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1499136781%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499136781&rft_id=info:pmid/24269636&rfr_iscdi=true