A cat's tale: the impact of genetic restoration on Florida panther population dynamics and persistence

1. Genetic restoration has been suggested as a management tool for mitigating detrimental effects of inbreeding depression in small, inbred populations, but the demographic mechanisms underlying population-level responses to genetic restoration remain poorly understood. 2. We studied the dynamics an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of animal ecology 2013-05, Vol.82 (3), p.608-620
Hauptverfasser: Hostetler, Jeffrey A., Onorato, David P., Jansen, Deborah, Oli, Madan K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 620
container_issue 3
container_start_page 608
container_title The Journal of animal ecology
container_volume 82
creator Hostetler, Jeffrey A.
Onorato, David P.
Jansen, Deborah
Oli, Madan K.
description 1. Genetic restoration has been suggested as a management tool for mitigating detrimental effects of inbreeding depression in small, inbred populations, but the demographic mechanisms underlying population-level responses to genetic restoration remain poorly understood. 2. We studied the dynamics and persistence of the endangered Florida panther Puma concolor coryi population and evaluated the potential influence of genetic restoration on population growth and persistence parameters. As part of the genetic restoration programme, eight female Texas pumas P. c. stanleyana were released into Florida panther habitat in southern Florida in 1995. 3. The overall asymptotic population growth rate (λ) was 1·04 (5th and 95th percentiles: 0·95–1·14), suggesting an increase in the panther population of approximately 4% per year. Considering the effects of environmental and demographic stochasticities and density-dependence, the probability that the population will fall below 10 panthers within 100 years was 0·072 (0–0·606). 4. Our results suggest that the population would have declined at 5% per year (λ = 0·95; 0·83–1·08) in the absence of genetic restoration. Retrospective life table response experiment analysis revealed that the positive effect of genetic restoration on survival of kittens was primarily responsible for the substantial growth of the panther population that would otherwise have been declining. 5. For comparative purposes, we also estimated probability of quasi-extinction under two scenarios – implementation of genetic restoration and no genetic restoration initiative – using the estimated abundance of panthers in 1995, the year genetic restoration was initiated. Assuming no density-dependence, the probability that the panther population would fall below 10 panthers by 2010 was 0·098 (0·002–0·332) for the restoration scenario and 0·445 (0·032–0·944) for the no restoration scenario, providing further evidence that the panther population would have faced a substantially higher risk of extinction if the genetic restoration initiative had not been implemented. 6. Our results, along with those reporting increases in population size and improvements in biomedical correlates of inbreeding depression, provide strong evidence that genetic restoration substantially contributed to the observed increases in the Florida panther population.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2656.12033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499131744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24034628</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24034628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4983-2ccac0b59c260459d2c8a9070a6246f785aff463188edb1982a42e860881e7d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1rFDEYh4Modls9e1ICUvQybb4n8baU1g-KXvQ8vJvJaJaZZExmkP3vzTjbFrw0BALJ8_7yJg9Cryi5oGVcUq5kxZRUF5QRzp-gzf3OU7QhhNFK14acoNOc94SQulDP0QnjTDJV0w3qttjC9C7jCXr3AU-_HPbDCHbCscM_XXCTtzi5PMUEk48Bl3nTx-RbwCOEwic8xnHu19P2EGDwNmMILR5dyj5PLlj3Aj3roM_u5XE9Qz9urr9ffapuv338fLW9rawwmlfMWrBkJ41lighpWmY1GFITUEyortYSuk4oTrV27Y4azUAwpxXRmrq6pfwMvV9zxxR_z6XtZvDZur6H4OKcGyqMoZzWQjyOcsmYltwsqW__Q_dxTqE8pFDlH4VmihfqcqVsijkn1zVj8gOkQ0NJs9hqFjfN4qb5Z6tUvDnmzrvBtff8nZ4CnB8ByBb6LkGwPj9wNaOMSlk4tXJ_fO8Oj93bfNl-vb7r4PVauF8MPwQLwoVimv8FR2azLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326748263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cat's tale: the impact of genetic restoration on Florida panther population dynamics and persistence</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hostetler, Jeffrey A. ; Onorato, David P. ; Jansen, Deborah ; Oli, Madan K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hostetler, Jeffrey A. ; Onorato, David P. ; Jansen, Deborah ; Oli, Madan K.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Genetic restoration has been suggested as a management tool for mitigating detrimental effects of inbreeding depression in small, inbred populations, but the demographic mechanisms underlying population-level responses to genetic restoration remain poorly understood. 2. We studied the dynamics and persistence of the endangered Florida panther Puma concolor coryi population and evaluated the potential influence of genetic restoration on population growth and persistence parameters. As part of the genetic restoration programme, eight female Texas pumas P. c. stanleyana were released into Florida panther habitat in southern Florida in 1995. 3. The overall asymptotic population growth rate (λ) was 1·04 (5th and 95th percentiles: 0·95–1·14), suggesting an increase in the panther population of approximately 4% per year. Considering the effects of environmental and demographic stochasticities and density-dependence, the probability that the population will fall below 10 panthers within 100 years was 0·072 (0–0·606). 4. Our results suggest that the population would have declined at 5% per year (λ = 0·95; 0·83–1·08) in the absence of genetic restoration. Retrospective life table response experiment analysis revealed that the positive effect of genetic restoration on survival of kittens was primarily responsible for the substantial growth of the panther population that would otherwise have been declining. 5. For comparative purposes, we also estimated probability of quasi-extinction under two scenarios – implementation of genetic restoration and no genetic restoration initiative – using the estimated abundance of panthers in 1995, the year genetic restoration was initiated. Assuming no density-dependence, the probability that the panther population would fall below 10 panthers by 2010 was 0·098 (0·002–0·332) for the restoration scenario and 0·445 (0·032–0·944) for the no restoration scenario, providing further evidence that the panther population would have faced a substantially higher risk of extinction if the genetic restoration initiative had not been implemented. 6. Our results, along with those reporting increases in population size and improvements in biomedical correlates of inbreeding depression, provide strong evidence that genetic restoration substantially contributed to the observed increases in the Florida panther population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23252671</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Demecology ; Demography ; density‐dependence ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Extinction, Biological ; Female ; Florida ; Florida panther ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Genetic diversity ; genetic introgression ; genetic restoration ; Genetics ; Inbreeding ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Panthers ; Population ecology ; Population estimates ; Population genetics ; Population Growth ; Population growth rate ; Population size ; population viability analysis ; probability of extinction ; Puma - genetics ; Puma - physiology ; Puma concolor coryi ; stochastic population growth rate ; Stochastic Processes ; stochasticity ; uncertainty ; Wildcats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2013-05, Vol.82 (3), p.608-620</ispartof><rights>2013 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4983-2ccac0b59c260459d2c8a9070a6246f785aff463188edb1982a42e860881e7d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4983-2ccac0b59c260459d2c8a9070a6246f785aff463188edb1982a42e860881e7d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24034628$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24034628$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27212155$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23252671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hostetler, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onorato, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oli, Madan K.</creatorcontrib><title>A cat's tale: the impact of genetic restoration on Florida panther population dynamics and persistence</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>1. Genetic restoration has been suggested as a management tool for mitigating detrimental effects of inbreeding depression in small, inbred populations, but the demographic mechanisms underlying population-level responses to genetic restoration remain poorly understood. 2. We studied the dynamics and persistence of the endangered Florida panther Puma concolor coryi population and evaluated the potential influence of genetic restoration on population growth and persistence parameters. As part of the genetic restoration programme, eight female Texas pumas P. c. stanleyana were released into Florida panther habitat in southern Florida in 1995. 3. The overall asymptotic population growth rate (λ) was 1·04 (5th and 95th percentiles: 0·95–1·14), suggesting an increase in the panther population of approximately 4% per year. Considering the effects of environmental and demographic stochasticities and density-dependence, the probability that the population will fall below 10 panthers within 100 years was 0·072 (0–0·606). 4. Our results suggest that the population would have declined at 5% per year (λ = 0·95; 0·83–1·08) in the absence of genetic restoration. Retrospective life table response experiment analysis revealed that the positive effect of genetic restoration on survival of kittens was primarily responsible for the substantial growth of the panther population that would otherwise have been declining. 5. For comparative purposes, we also estimated probability of quasi-extinction under two scenarios – implementation of genetic restoration and no genetic restoration initiative – using the estimated abundance of panthers in 1995, the year genetic restoration was initiated. Assuming no density-dependence, the probability that the panther population would fall below 10 panthers by 2010 was 0·098 (0·002–0·332) for the restoration scenario and 0·445 (0·032–0·944) for the no restoration scenario, providing further evidence that the panther population would have faced a substantially higher risk of extinction if the genetic restoration initiative had not been implemented. 6. Our results, along with those reporting increases in population size and improvements in biomedical correlates of inbreeding depression, provide strong evidence that genetic restoration substantially contributed to the observed increases in the Florida panther population.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>density‐dependence</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Extinction, Biological</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Florida panther</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>genetic introgression</subject><subject>genetic restoration</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Panthers</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population Growth</subject><subject>Population growth rate</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>population viability analysis</subject><subject>probability of extinction</subject><subject>Puma - genetics</subject><subject>Puma - physiology</subject><subject>Puma concolor coryi</subject><subject>stochastic population growth rate</subject><subject>Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>stochasticity</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>Wildcats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1rFDEYh4Modls9e1ICUvQybb4n8baU1g-KXvQ8vJvJaJaZZExmkP3vzTjbFrw0BALJ8_7yJg9Cryi5oGVcUq5kxZRUF5QRzp-gzf3OU7QhhNFK14acoNOc94SQulDP0QnjTDJV0w3qttjC9C7jCXr3AU-_HPbDCHbCscM_XXCTtzi5PMUEk48Bl3nTx-RbwCOEwic8xnHu19P2EGDwNmMILR5dyj5PLlj3Aj3roM_u5XE9Qz9urr9ffapuv338fLW9rawwmlfMWrBkJ41lighpWmY1GFITUEyortYSuk4oTrV27Y4azUAwpxXRmrq6pfwMvV9zxxR_z6XtZvDZur6H4OKcGyqMoZzWQjyOcsmYltwsqW__Q_dxTqE8pFDlH4VmihfqcqVsijkn1zVj8gOkQ0NJs9hqFjfN4qb5Z6tUvDnmzrvBtff8nZ4CnB8ByBb6LkGwPj9wNaOMSlk4tXJ_fO8Oj93bfNl-vb7r4PVauF8MPwQLwoVimv8FR2azLA</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Hostetler, Jeffrey A.</creator><creator>Onorato, David P.</creator><creator>Jansen, Deborah</creator><creator>Oli, Madan K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>A cat's tale: the impact of genetic restoration on Florida panther population dynamics and persistence</title><author>Hostetler, Jeffrey A. ; Onorato, David P. ; Jansen, Deborah ; Oli, Madan K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4983-2ccac0b59c260459d2c8a9070a6246f785aff463188edb1982a42e860881e7d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>density‐dependence</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Extinction, Biological</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Florida panther</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>genetic introgression</topic><topic>genetic restoration</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Panthers</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population Growth</topic><topic>Population growth rate</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>population viability analysis</topic><topic>probability of extinction</topic><topic>Puma - genetics</topic><topic>Puma - physiology</topic><topic>Puma concolor coryi</topic><topic>stochastic population growth rate</topic><topic>Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>stochasticity</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>Wildcats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hostetler, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onorato, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oli, Madan K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hostetler, Jeffrey A.</au><au>Onorato, David P.</au><au>Jansen, Deborah</au><au>Oli, Madan K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cat's tale: the impact of genetic restoration on Florida panther population dynamics and persistence</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>608</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>608-620</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>1. Genetic restoration has been suggested as a management tool for mitigating detrimental effects of inbreeding depression in small, inbred populations, but the demographic mechanisms underlying population-level responses to genetic restoration remain poorly understood. 2. We studied the dynamics and persistence of the endangered Florida panther Puma concolor coryi population and evaluated the potential influence of genetic restoration on population growth and persistence parameters. As part of the genetic restoration programme, eight female Texas pumas P. c. stanleyana were released into Florida panther habitat in southern Florida in 1995. 3. The overall asymptotic population growth rate (λ) was 1·04 (5th and 95th percentiles: 0·95–1·14), suggesting an increase in the panther population of approximately 4% per year. Considering the effects of environmental and demographic stochasticities and density-dependence, the probability that the population will fall below 10 panthers within 100 years was 0·072 (0–0·606). 4. Our results suggest that the population would have declined at 5% per year (λ = 0·95; 0·83–1·08) in the absence of genetic restoration. Retrospective life table response experiment analysis revealed that the positive effect of genetic restoration on survival of kittens was primarily responsible for the substantial growth of the panther population that would otherwise have been declining. 5. For comparative purposes, we also estimated probability of quasi-extinction under two scenarios – implementation of genetic restoration and no genetic restoration initiative – using the estimated abundance of panthers in 1995, the year genetic restoration was initiated. Assuming no density-dependence, the probability that the panther population would fall below 10 panthers by 2010 was 0·098 (0·002–0·332) for the restoration scenario and 0·445 (0·032–0·944) for the no restoration scenario, providing further evidence that the panther population would have faced a substantially higher risk of extinction if the genetic restoration initiative had not been implemented. 6. Our results, along with those reporting increases in population size and improvements in biomedical correlates of inbreeding depression, provide strong evidence that genetic restoration substantially contributed to the observed increases in the Florida panther population.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><pmid>23252671</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.12033</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8790
ispartof The Journal of animal ecology, 2013-05, Vol.82 (3), p.608-620
issn 0021-8790
1365-2656
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1499131744
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal ecology
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation of Natural Resources
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Demecology
Demography
density‐dependence
Endangered & extinct species
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Extinction, Biological
Female
Florida
Florida panther
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Genetic diversity
genetic introgression
genetic restoration
Genetics
Inbreeding
Male
Models, Biological
Panthers
Population ecology
Population estimates
Population genetics
Population Growth
Population growth rate
Population size
population viability analysis
probability of extinction
Puma - genetics
Puma - physiology
Puma concolor coryi
stochastic population growth rate
Stochastic Processes
stochasticity
uncertainty
Wildcats
Wildlife management
title A cat's tale: the impact of genetic restoration on Florida panther population dynamics and persistence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cat's%20tale:%20the%20impact%20of%20genetic%20restoration%20on%20Florida%20panther%20population%20dynamics%20and%20persistence&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Hostetler,%20Jeffrey%20A.&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=608&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=608-620&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.12033&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24034628%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326748263&rft_id=info:pmid/23252671&rft_jstor_id=24034628&rfr_iscdi=true