Measuring and validating social program replacement rates
Despite similar conceptual underpinnings, estimates of program replacement rates in the Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset and the Social Citizenship Indicators Project do not always correspond with each other. Understanding why these similar conceptual measures vary is important both for unde...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of European public policy 2013-10, Vol.20 (9), p.1267-1284 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1284 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1267 |
| container_title | Journal of European public policy |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Scruggs, Lyle |
| description | Despite similar conceptual underpinnings, estimates of program replacement rates in the Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset and the Social Citizenship Indicators Project do not always correspond with each other. Understanding why these similar conceptual measures vary is important both for understanding replacement rate generosity and for promoting the comparative study of social rights. We find that major differences in estimates of replacement rates in the two projects hinge on a few operational assumptions and some less obvious measurement errors. It seems likely that many of these differences can (and should) be reconciled to produce much more closely correlated measures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13501763.2013.822909 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1497674044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1435359053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9647b7488cd45980bf93bbf4e02e38259d247a0be6d695ced5383883d526418e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw89euk6-U5OIotfsOJFzyFN0qWStmvSVfz3tlSvsqeZgWdehnkQusSwwqDgGlMOWAq6IoDpShGiQR-hBWZClIwRfTz2I1JOzCk6y_kdALhSeoH0c7B5n5puW9jOF582Nt4O05h719hY7FK_TbYtUthF60IbuqFIdgj5HJ3UNuZw8VuX6O3-7nX9WG5eHp7Wt5vSMaqHUgsmK8mUcp5xraCqNa2qmgUggSrCtSdMWqiC8EJzFzyniipFPSeCYRXoEl3NueMlH_uQB9M22YUYbRf6fTaYaSkkA8YOQcdvSCHoISgRgImEA1DKKdfAp1Q2oy71OadQm11qWpu-DQYzqTJ_qsykysyqxrWbea3p6j619qtP0ZvBfsc-1cl2rsmG_pvwA9CMl6I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1435359053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring and validating social program replacement rates</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Scruggs, Lyle</creator><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, Lyle</creatorcontrib><description>Despite similar conceptual underpinnings, estimates of program replacement rates in the Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset and the Social Citizenship Indicators Project do not always correspond with each other. Understanding why these similar conceptual measures vary is important both for understanding replacement rate generosity and for promoting the comparative study of social rights. We find that major differences in estimates of replacement rates in the two projects hinge on a few operational assumptions and some less obvious measurement errors. It seems likely that many of these differences can (and should) be reconciled to produce much more closely correlated measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-1763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2013.822909</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPPFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Citizenship ; Comparative Analysis ; Conceptualization ; Error of Measurement ; Errors ; Estimation ; Indexes (Measures) ; Measurement ; Pensions ; Public policy ; Rates ; replacement rates ; Rights ; sick pay ; social insurance ; Social Programs ; Social rights ; Social security ; Unemployment insurance ; Validity ; Welfare economics ; Welfare state</subject><ispartof>Journal of European public policy, 2013-10, Vol.20 (9), p.1267-1284</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9647b7488cd45980bf93bbf4e02e38259d247a0be6d695ced5383883d526418e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9647b7488cd45980bf93bbf4e02e38259d247a0be6d695ced5383883d526418e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27842,27901,27902,33752</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, Lyle</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring and validating social program replacement rates</title><title>Journal of European public policy</title><description>Despite similar conceptual underpinnings, estimates of program replacement rates in the Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset and the Social Citizenship Indicators Project do not always correspond with each other. Understanding why these similar conceptual measures vary is important both for understanding replacement rate generosity and for promoting the comparative study of social rights. We find that major differences in estimates of replacement rates in the two projects hinge on a few operational assumptions and some less obvious measurement errors. It seems likely that many of these differences can (and should) be reconciled to produce much more closely correlated measures.</description><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Error of Measurement</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Indexes (Measures)</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Pensions</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Rates</subject><subject>replacement rates</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>sick pay</subject><subject>social insurance</subject><subject>Social Programs</subject><subject>Social rights</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Unemployment insurance</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Welfare economics</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><issn>1350-1763</issn><issn>1466-4429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw89euk6-U5OIotfsOJFzyFN0qWStmvSVfz3tlSvsqeZgWdehnkQusSwwqDgGlMOWAq6IoDpShGiQR-hBWZClIwRfTz2I1JOzCk6y_kdALhSeoH0c7B5n5puW9jOF582Nt4O05h719hY7FK_TbYtUthF60IbuqFIdgj5HJ3UNuZw8VuX6O3-7nX9WG5eHp7Wt5vSMaqHUgsmK8mUcp5xraCqNa2qmgUggSrCtSdMWqiC8EJzFzyniipFPSeCYRXoEl3NueMlH_uQB9M22YUYbRf6fTaYaSkkA8YOQcdvSCHoISgRgImEA1DKKdfAp1Q2oy71OadQm11qWpu-DQYzqTJ_qsykysyqxrWbea3p6j619qtP0ZvBfsc-1cl2rsmG_pvwA9CMl6I</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Scruggs, Lyle</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Measuring and validating social program replacement rates</title><author>Scruggs, Lyle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9647b7488cd45980bf93bbf4e02e38259d247a0be6d695ced5383883d526418e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Error of Measurement</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Indexes (Measures)</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Pensions</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Rates</topic><topic>replacement rates</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>sick pay</topic><topic>social insurance</topic><topic>Social Programs</topic><topic>Social rights</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Unemployment insurance</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Welfare economics</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scruggs, Lyle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of European public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scruggs, Lyle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring and validating social program replacement rates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of European public policy</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1267</spage><epage>1284</epage><pages>1267-1284</pages><issn>1350-1763</issn><eissn>1466-4429</eissn><coden>JEPPFG</coden><abstract>Despite similar conceptual underpinnings, estimates of program replacement rates in the Comparative Welfare Entitlements Dataset and the Social Citizenship Indicators Project do not always correspond with each other. Understanding why these similar conceptual measures vary is important both for understanding replacement rate generosity and for promoting the comparative study of social rights. We find that major differences in estimates of replacement rates in the two projects hinge on a few operational assumptions and some less obvious measurement errors. It seems likely that many of these differences can (and should) be reconciled to produce much more closely correlated measures.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13501763.2013.822909</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1350-1763 |
| ispartof | Journal of European public policy, 2013-10, Vol.20 (9), p.1267-1284 |
| issn | 1350-1763 1466-4429 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1497674044 |
| source | Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Citizenship Comparative Analysis Conceptualization Error of Measurement Errors Estimation Indexes (Measures) Measurement Pensions Public policy Rates replacement rates Rights sick pay social insurance Social Programs Social rights Social security Unemployment insurance Validity Welfare economics Welfare state |
| title | Measuring and validating social program replacement rates |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A34%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20and%20validating%20social%20program%20replacement%20rates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20European%20public%20policy&rft.au=Scruggs,%20Lyle&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1267&rft.epage=1284&rft.pages=1267-1284&rft.issn=1350-1763&rft.eissn=1466-4429&rft.coden=JEPPFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13501763.2013.822909&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1435359053%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1435359053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |