The Impact of Private Interest Contributions on RPS Adoption
In the last two decades, many U.S. states introduced policies to promote electricity generation from renewable energy sources (RES‐E). Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are considered to be the key RES‐E policy tool to date. This article tackles the question on why some state legislators were fron...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economics and politics 2013-11, Vol.25 (3), p.411-423 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 423 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 411 |
container_title | Economics and politics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Jenner, Steffen Ovaere, Lotte Schindele, Stephan |
description | In the last two decades, many U.S. states introduced policies to promote electricity generation from renewable energy sources (RES‐E). Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are considered to be the key RES‐E policy tool to date. This article tackles the question on why some state legislators were front‐running the trend of RPS implementation whereas others adopted policies just recently, and why others have not adopted them at all. We compile data on financial contributions of conventional energy interest groups (CEI) and renewable energy interest groups (REI) to state‐level policy‐makers between 1998 and 2010. By means of hazard and tobit regressions, we test the effect of these financial contributions on the probability of RPS adoption and on RPS stringency. The article provides evidence in favor of interest group theory. First, CEI have donated more to state‐level legislators affiliated with the Republican Party than to Democrats while contributions from REI went largely to the latter. Second, there are statistically significant links between the likelihood of RPS adoption and private interest contributions. Contributions from CEI have a negative effect on the likelihood of RPS adoption whereas REI contributions have a positive effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ecpo.12018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1497658930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1497658930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-c538ed703eceb586f957dc048af81bb32a7327d2b508ca3c1475bbfeec668f003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1LwzAcBvAgCs7pxU9Q8CJCZ9IkTQpeRpnbYGxD58stpGmKnVtTk1bdt7e16sGDmEMCf35PSB4AThEcoGZdalWaAQog4nugh0jIfYgJ3gc9GFHio4jTQ3Dk3BpCGCDCe-Bq9aS96baUqvJM5i1t_iqrZlJU2mpXebEpKpsndZWbwnmm8G6Wt94wNWU7OAYHmdw4ffJ19sHd9WgVT_zZYjyNhzNfUUh5s2OuUwaxVjqhPMwiylIFCZcZR0mCA8lwwNIgoZAriRUijCZJprUKQ55BiPvgvLu3tOalbp4ltrlTerORhTa1E4hELKQ8wv-hhGOGOGvp2S-6NrUtmo-0CnIUEowbddEpZY1zVmeitPlW2p1AULSdi7Zz8dl5g1GH3_KN3v0hxSheLr4zfpfJXaXffzLSPouQYUbFw3wsJhF8vI_4XMT4A3iokLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1440816433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Private Interest Contributions on RPS Adoption</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Jenner, Steffen ; Ovaere, Lotte ; Schindele, Stephan</creator><creatorcontrib>Jenner, Steffen ; Ovaere, Lotte ; Schindele, Stephan</creatorcontrib><description>In the last two decades, many U.S. states introduced policies to promote electricity generation from renewable energy sources (RES‐E). Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are considered to be the key RES‐E policy tool to date. This article tackles the question on why some state legislators were front‐running the trend of RPS implementation whereas others adopted policies just recently, and why others have not adopted them at all. We compile data on financial contributions of conventional energy interest groups (CEI) and renewable energy interest groups (REI) to state‐level policy‐makers between 1998 and 2010. By means of hazard and tobit regressions, we test the effect of these financial contributions on the probability of RPS adoption and on RPS stringency. The article provides evidence in favor of interest group theory. First, CEI have donated more to state‐level legislators affiliated with the Republican Party than to Democrats while contributions from REI went largely to the latter. Second, there are statistically significant links between the likelihood of RPS adoption and private interest contributions. Contributions from CEI have a negative effect on the likelihood of RPS adoption whereas REI contributions have a positive effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-1985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Contributions (Donations) ; Economic theory ; Electricity ; Energy industry ; Energy Policy ; Implementation ; Interest Groups ; Legislators ; Policy making ; Political theory ; Probability ; Renewable Energy Sources ; Renewable resources ; State government ; State legislatures ; Studies ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Economics and politics, 2013-11, Vol.25 (3), p.411-423</ispartof><rights>2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-c538ed703eceb586f957dc048af81bb32a7327d2b508ca3c1475bbfeec668f003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-c538ed703eceb586f957dc048af81bb32a7327d2b508ca3c1475bbfeec668f003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecpo.12018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecpo.12018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jenner, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovaere, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindele, Stephan</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Private Interest Contributions on RPS Adoption</title><title>Economics and politics</title><addtitle>Econ Polit</addtitle><description>In the last two decades, many U.S. states introduced policies to promote electricity generation from renewable energy sources (RES‐E). Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are considered to be the key RES‐E policy tool to date. This article tackles the question on why some state legislators were front‐running the trend of RPS implementation whereas others adopted policies just recently, and why others have not adopted them at all. We compile data on financial contributions of conventional energy interest groups (CEI) and renewable energy interest groups (REI) to state‐level policy‐makers between 1998 and 2010. By means of hazard and tobit regressions, we test the effect of these financial contributions on the probability of RPS adoption and on RPS stringency. The article provides evidence in favor of interest group theory. First, CEI have donated more to state‐level legislators affiliated with the Republican Party than to Democrats while contributions from REI went largely to the latter. Second, there are statistically significant links between the likelihood of RPS adoption and private interest contributions. Contributions from CEI have a negative effect on the likelihood of RPS adoption whereas REI contributions have a positive effect.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Contributions (Donations)</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy Policy</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Interest Groups</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Renewable Energy Sources</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>State legislatures</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0954-1985</issn><issn>1468-0343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0E1LwzAcBvAgCs7pxU9Q8CJCZ9IkTQpeRpnbYGxD58stpGmKnVtTk1bdt7e16sGDmEMCf35PSB4AThEcoGZdalWaAQog4nugh0jIfYgJ3gc9GFHio4jTQ3Dk3BpCGCDCe-Bq9aS96baUqvJM5i1t_iqrZlJU2mpXebEpKpsndZWbwnmm8G6Wt94wNWU7OAYHmdw4ffJ19sHd9WgVT_zZYjyNhzNfUUh5s2OuUwaxVjqhPMwiylIFCZcZR0mCA8lwwNIgoZAriRUijCZJprUKQ55BiPvgvLu3tOalbp4ltrlTerORhTa1E4hELKQ8wv-hhGOGOGvp2S-6NrUtmo-0CnIUEowbddEpZY1zVmeitPlW2p1AULSdi7Zz8dl5g1GH3_KN3v0hxSheLr4zfpfJXaXffzLSPouQYUbFw3wsJhF8vI_4XMT4A3iokLs</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Jenner, Steffen</creator><creator>Ovaere, Lotte</creator><creator>Schindele, Stephan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>The Impact of Private Interest Contributions on RPS Adoption</title><author>Jenner, Steffen ; Ovaere, Lotte ; Schindele, Stephan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5058-c538ed703eceb586f957dc048af81bb32a7327d2b508ca3c1475bbfeec668f003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Contributions (Donations)</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy Policy</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Interest Groups</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Renewable Energy Sources</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>State legislatures</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jenner, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovaere, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindele, Stephan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economics and politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jenner, Steffen</au><au>Ovaere, Lotte</au><au>Schindele, Stephan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Private Interest Contributions on RPS Adoption</atitle><jtitle>Economics and politics</jtitle><addtitle>Econ Polit</addtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>423</epage><pages>411-423</pages><issn>0954-1985</issn><eissn>1468-0343</eissn><abstract>In the last two decades, many U.S. states introduced policies to promote electricity generation from renewable energy sources (RES‐E). Renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are considered to be the key RES‐E policy tool to date. This article tackles the question on why some state legislators were front‐running the trend of RPS implementation whereas others adopted policies just recently, and why others have not adopted them at all. We compile data on financial contributions of conventional energy interest groups (CEI) and renewable energy interest groups (REI) to state‐level policy‐makers between 1998 and 2010. By means of hazard and tobit regressions, we test the effect of these financial contributions on the probability of RPS adoption and on RPS stringency. The article provides evidence in favor of interest group theory. First, CEI have donated more to state‐level legislators affiliated with the Republican Party than to Democrats while contributions from REI went largely to the latter. Second, there are statistically significant links between the likelihood of RPS adoption and private interest contributions. Contributions from CEI have a negative effect on the likelihood of RPS adoption whereas REI contributions have a positive effect.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ecpo.12018</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-1985 |
ispartof | Economics and politics, 2013-11, Vol.25 (3), p.411-423 |
issn | 0954-1985 1468-0343 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1497658930 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Contributions (Donations) Economic theory Electricity Energy industry Energy Policy Implementation Interest Groups Legislators Policy making Political theory Probability Renewable Energy Sources Renewable resources State government State legislatures Studies U.S.A |
title | The Impact of Private Interest Contributions on RPS Adoption |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A10%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Private%20Interest%20Contributions%20on%20RPS%20Adoption&rft.jtitle=Economics%20and%20politics&rft.au=Jenner,%20Steffen&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=423&rft.pages=411-423&rft.issn=0954-1985&rft.eissn=1468-0343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecpo.12018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1497658930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1440816433&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |