High Rates of Shiny Cowbird Parasitism on The Brown-and-Yellow Marshbird Select for Complementary Host Defenses

Hosts of brood parasites may have not developed antiparasitic defenses either because host and parasite are recently sympatric or because costs of potential defenses outweigh their benefits. We studied antiparasitic defenses of the Brown-and-yellow Marshbird (Pseudoleistes virescens) against the Shi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.) Calif.), 2013-11, Vol.115 (4), p.910-920
Hauptverfasser: Mermoz, Myriam E, Reboreda, Juan C, Fernández, Gustavo J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 920
container_issue 4
container_start_page 910
container_title The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)
container_volume 115
creator Mermoz, Myriam E
Reboreda, Juan C
Fernández, Gustavo J
description Hosts of brood parasites may have not developed antiparasitic defenses either because host and parasite are recently sympatric or because costs of potential defenses outweigh their benefits. We studied antiparasitic defenses of the Brown-and-yellow Marshbird (Pseudoleistes virescens) against the Shiny Cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis), evaluating recognition and aggression toward female and male Shiny Cowbirds, estimating rates of rejection of cowbird eggs of different colors, and testing the effect of the size of parasite eggs on host rejection. We also observed and video-recorded host nests to estimate hosts' nest attentiveness, frequency of cowbird visits, and interactions between marshbirds and cowbirds. When marshbirds were faced with dummy models, they attacked first and more intensively those of cowbirds (both sexes) than those of a control species. Frequency of egg ejection increased as differences between cowbird and spotted marshbird eggs increased (immaculate > intermediate > spotted), and spotted eggs were ejected more frequently when laid before than during or after the hosts' laying. Marshbirds ejected artificially added immaculate eggs independently of their size. Cowbirds visited marshbird nests only at the egg stage. Hosts' nest attention was low during egg laying and increased during incubation and after hatching, but aggressiveness against cowbirds was always high. Nest defense was inefficient, as losses due to egg pecking by cowbirds were high. Ejection of cowbird eggs avoided the cost of lower survival of marshbird nestlings in highly parasitized nests. As this defense is cost-free, this small benefit would be sufficient to select for the evolutionary maintenance of egg ejection.
doi_str_mv 10.1525/cond.2013.120146
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496887987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1525/cond.2013.120146</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1525/cond.2013.120146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-5a63b2b2f2ea92ee46f00d424d1053a69cad5bd0bb07698ed9dbd4b0542929213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwEvXrYm2exHjlo_KlQUWw-elmQz627ZTWqypfS_N3U9eVEGZhj4veEND6FzSiY0YclVaY2eMELjCQ2dpwdoREWcRwll4hCNCKEkSjhjx-jE-xUJO-NshOys-ajxq-zBY1vhRd2YHZ7arWqcxi_SSd_0je-wNXhZA75xdmsiaXT0Dm1rt_hJOl9_wwtooexxZV3Qd-sWOjC9dDs8s77Ht1CB8eBP0VElWw9nP3OM3u7vltNZNH9-eJxezyMVJ3EfJTKNFVOsYiAFA-BpRYjmjGtKklimopQ6UZooRbJU5KCFVporEj4UoWg8RpfD3bWznxvwfdE1vgyepQG78QXlIs3zTORZQC9-oSu7cSa4C1RGOMlTtqfIQJXOeu-gKtau6cJ_BSXFPoFin0CxT6AYEgiSaJCsfG_df_jJwKvGWgN_C74AHQ6WaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1470408627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>High Rates of Shiny Cowbird Parasitism on The Brown-and-Yellow Marshbird Select for Complementary Host Defenses</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Mermoz, Myriam E ; Reboreda, Juan C ; Fernández, Gustavo J</creator><creatorcontrib>Mermoz, Myriam E ; Reboreda, Juan C ; Fernández, Gustavo J</creatorcontrib><description>Hosts of brood parasites may have not developed antiparasitic defenses either because host and parasite are recently sympatric or because costs of potential defenses outweigh their benefits. We studied antiparasitic defenses of the Brown-and-yellow Marshbird (Pseudoleistes virescens) against the Shiny Cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis), evaluating recognition and aggression toward female and male Shiny Cowbirds, estimating rates of rejection of cowbird eggs of different colors, and testing the effect of the size of parasite eggs on host rejection. We also observed and video-recorded host nests to estimate hosts' nest attentiveness, frequency of cowbird visits, and interactions between marshbirds and cowbirds. When marshbirds were faced with dummy models, they attacked first and more intensively those of cowbirds (both sexes) than those of a control species. Frequency of egg ejection increased as differences between cowbird and spotted marshbird eggs increased (immaculate &gt; intermediate &gt; spotted), and spotted eggs were ejected more frequently when laid before than during or after the hosts' laying. Marshbirds ejected artificially added immaculate eggs independently of their size. Cowbirds visited marshbird nests only at the egg stage. Hosts' nest attention was low during egg laying and increased during incubation and after hatching, but aggressiveness against cowbirds was always high. Nest defense was inefficient, as losses due to egg pecking by cowbirds were high. Ejection of cowbird eggs avoided the cost of lower survival of marshbird nestlings in highly parasitized nests. As this defense is cost-free, this small benefit would be sufficient to select for the evolutionary maintenance of egg ejection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-5422</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1525/cond.2013.120146</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNDRAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco: University of California Press</publisher><subject>Aggressiveness ; Animal behavior ; Animal nesting ; Birds ; Brood parasitism ; Chicks ; cowbird nest searches ; Defense mechanisms ; egg rejection ; Eggs ; enemy recognition ; Female animals ; Hatching ; host defenses ; Incubation ; Male animals ; Molothrus ; Molothrus bonariensis ; nest attention ; Ornithology ; Pampas ; Parasites ; Parasitism ; Pecking order ; Predation ; Pseudoleistes virescens ; Reproductive success ; Research Papers</subject><ispartof>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 2013-11, Vol.115 (4), p.910-920</ispartof><rights>2013 by The Cooper Ornithological Society. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions website, http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintInfo.asp.</rights><rights>2013 by The Cooper Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-5a63b2b2f2ea92ee46f00d424d1053a69cad5bd0bb07698ed9dbd4b0542929213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-5a63b2b2f2ea92ee46f00d424d1053a69cad5bd0bb07698ed9dbd4b0542929213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mermoz, Myriam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reboreda, Juan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Gustavo J</creatorcontrib><title>High Rates of Shiny Cowbird Parasitism on The Brown-and-Yellow Marshbird Select for Complementary Host Defenses</title><title>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</title><description>Hosts of brood parasites may have not developed antiparasitic defenses either because host and parasite are recently sympatric or because costs of potential defenses outweigh their benefits. We studied antiparasitic defenses of the Brown-and-yellow Marshbird (Pseudoleistes virescens) against the Shiny Cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis), evaluating recognition and aggression toward female and male Shiny Cowbirds, estimating rates of rejection of cowbird eggs of different colors, and testing the effect of the size of parasite eggs on host rejection. We also observed and video-recorded host nests to estimate hosts' nest attentiveness, frequency of cowbird visits, and interactions between marshbirds and cowbirds. When marshbirds were faced with dummy models, they attacked first and more intensively those of cowbirds (both sexes) than those of a control species. Frequency of egg ejection increased as differences between cowbird and spotted marshbird eggs increased (immaculate &gt; intermediate &gt; spotted), and spotted eggs were ejected more frequently when laid before than during or after the hosts' laying. Marshbirds ejected artificially added immaculate eggs independently of their size. Cowbirds visited marshbird nests only at the egg stage. Hosts' nest attention was low during egg laying and increased during incubation and after hatching, but aggressiveness against cowbirds was always high. Nest defense was inefficient, as losses due to egg pecking by cowbirds were high. Ejection of cowbird eggs avoided the cost of lower survival of marshbird nestlings in highly parasitized nests. As this defense is cost-free, this small benefit would be sufficient to select for the evolutionary maintenance of egg ejection.</description><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Brood parasitism</subject><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>cowbird nest searches</subject><subject>Defense mechanisms</subject><subject>egg rejection</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>enemy recognition</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>host defenses</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Molothrus</subject><subject>Molothrus bonariensis</subject><subject>nest attention</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Pampas</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Pecking order</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Pseudoleistes virescens</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><issn>0010-5422</issn><issn>1938-5129</issn><issn>2732-4621</issn><issn>1938-5422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMoWKt3jwEvXrYm2exHjlo_KlQUWw-elmQz627ZTWqypfS_N3U9eVEGZhj4veEND6FzSiY0YclVaY2eMELjCQ2dpwdoREWcRwll4hCNCKEkSjhjx-jE-xUJO-NshOys-ajxq-zBY1vhRd2YHZ7arWqcxi_SSd_0je-wNXhZA75xdmsiaXT0Dm1rt_hJOl9_wwtooexxZV3Qd-sWOjC9dDs8s77Ht1CB8eBP0VElWw9nP3OM3u7vltNZNH9-eJxezyMVJ3EfJTKNFVOsYiAFA-BpRYjmjGtKklimopQ6UZooRbJU5KCFVporEj4UoWg8RpfD3bWznxvwfdE1vgyepQG78QXlIs3zTORZQC9-oSu7cSa4C1RGOMlTtqfIQJXOeu-gKtau6cJ_BSXFPoFin0CxT6AYEgiSaJCsfG_df_jJwKvGWgN_C74AHQ6WaQ</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Mermoz, Myriam E</creator><creator>Reboreda, Juan C</creator><creator>Fernández, Gustavo J</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>High Rates of Shiny Cowbird Parasitism on The Brown-and-Yellow Marshbird Select for Complementary Host Defenses</title><author>Mermoz, Myriam E ; Reboreda, Juan C ; Fernández, Gustavo J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b353t-5a63b2b2f2ea92ee46f00d424d1053a69cad5bd0bb07698ed9dbd4b0542929213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Brood parasitism</topic><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>cowbird nest searches</topic><topic>Defense mechanisms</topic><topic>egg rejection</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>enemy recognition</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>host defenses</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Molothrus</topic><topic>Molothrus bonariensis</topic><topic>nest attention</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Pampas</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Pecking order</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Pseudoleistes virescens</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mermoz, Myriam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reboreda, Juan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Gustavo J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mermoz, Myriam E</au><au>Reboreda, Juan C</au><au>Fernández, Gustavo J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High Rates of Shiny Cowbird Parasitism on The Brown-and-Yellow Marshbird Select for Complementary Host Defenses</atitle><jtitle>The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>910</spage><epage>920</epage><pages>910-920</pages><issn>0010-5422</issn><eissn>1938-5129</eissn><eissn>2732-4621</eissn><eissn>1938-5422</eissn><coden>CNDRAB</coden><abstract>Hosts of brood parasites may have not developed antiparasitic defenses either because host and parasite are recently sympatric or because costs of potential defenses outweigh their benefits. We studied antiparasitic defenses of the Brown-and-yellow Marshbird (Pseudoleistes virescens) against the Shiny Cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis), evaluating recognition and aggression toward female and male Shiny Cowbirds, estimating rates of rejection of cowbird eggs of different colors, and testing the effect of the size of parasite eggs on host rejection. We also observed and video-recorded host nests to estimate hosts' nest attentiveness, frequency of cowbird visits, and interactions between marshbirds and cowbirds. When marshbirds were faced with dummy models, they attacked first and more intensively those of cowbirds (both sexes) than those of a control species. Frequency of egg ejection increased as differences between cowbird and spotted marshbird eggs increased (immaculate &gt; intermediate &gt; spotted), and spotted eggs were ejected more frequently when laid before than during or after the hosts' laying. Marshbirds ejected artificially added immaculate eggs independently of their size. Cowbirds visited marshbird nests only at the egg stage. Hosts' nest attention was low during egg laying and increased during incubation and after hatching, but aggressiveness against cowbirds was always high. Nest defense was inefficient, as losses due to egg pecking by cowbirds were high. Ejection of cowbird eggs avoided the cost of lower survival of marshbird nestlings in highly parasitized nests. As this defense is cost-free, this small benefit would be sufficient to select for the evolutionary maintenance of egg ejection.</abstract><cop>Waco</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1525/cond.2013.120146</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-5422
ispartof The Condor (Los Angeles, Calif.), 2013-11, Vol.115 (4), p.910-920
issn 0010-5422
1938-5129
2732-4621
1938-5422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1496887987
source Freely Accessible Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Aggressiveness
Animal behavior
Animal nesting
Birds
Brood parasitism
Chicks
cowbird nest searches
Defense mechanisms
egg rejection
Eggs
enemy recognition
Female animals
Hatching
host defenses
Incubation
Male animals
Molothrus
Molothrus bonariensis
nest attention
Ornithology
Pampas
Parasites
Parasitism
Pecking order
Predation
Pseudoleistes virescens
Reproductive success
Research Papers
title High Rates of Shiny Cowbird Parasitism on The Brown-and-Yellow Marshbird Select for Complementary Host Defenses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A24%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High%20Rates%20of%20Shiny%20Cowbird%20Parasitism%20on%20The%20Brown-and-Yellow%20Marshbird%20Select%20for%20Complementary%20Host%20Defenses&rft.jtitle=The%20Condor%20(Los%20Angeles,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Mermoz,%20Myriam%20E&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=910&rft.epage=920&rft.pages=910-920&rft.issn=0010-5422&rft.eissn=1938-5129&rft.coden=CNDRAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1525/cond.2013.120146&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1525/cond.2013.120146%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1470408627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1525/cond.2013.120146&rfr_iscdi=true