Comparison of interpolation polynomials with divided differences, interpolation polynomials with finite differences, and quadratic functions obtained by the least squares method in modeling of chromatographic responses
A novel approach to mathematical modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomials with divided differences and with finite differences is discussed. These interpolational techniques as well as traditionally applied second‐order polynomial models obtained by least squares are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemometrics 2013-12, Vol.27 (12), p.466-474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 474 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 466 |
container_title | Journal of chemometrics |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Rakić, Tijana Stanimirović, Zorica Đenić, Aleksandar Marić, Miroslav Jančić-Stojanović, Biljana Medenica, Mirjana |
description | A novel approach to mathematical modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomials with divided differences and with finite differences is discussed. These interpolational techniques as well as traditionally applied second‐order polynomial models obtained by least squares are compared. Interpolation techniques can be useful in situations where commonly used linear or quadratic models are not applicable: when the nature of dependence is complex or the investigated factor intervals are broad. The three analyzed modeling techniques are incorporated in a design of experiments methodology for systematic development and optimization of liquid chromatographic methods. The direct modeling of retention factors is carried out first, while the objective function for final quality measurement is calculated last. An interpolation polynomial with divided differences resulted in a high quality fit compared with the results obtained by the other two modeling approaches and succeeded in locating the desired optimum. It is shown that this modeling technique can be a useful alternative for modeling of chromatographic responses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomial with divided differences, finite differences, and quadratic function is compared. Novel techniques are incorporated in Design of Experiments methodology for systematical development and optimization of liquid chromatographic method. Interpolation polynomial with divided differences succeeded to locate optimum and high agreement between theoretical and experimental chromatograms is obtained. Interpolation polynomial with finite differences and quadratic function failed to locate the optimum. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cem.2559 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1494352884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1494352884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3649-85a8225614a98b4e3fffe8ab2a6300929c9bc2e02bcecbca96fb6e607bedf09f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1uFSEUhSdGE4_VxEcg8cYLp2VghgOX5qStJq0_8ef0jgCz6VBnYAqM9byqT1NOajQ1MV5tAt9ae4VVVc8bfNhgTI4MTIek68SDatVgIeqG8IuH1QpzzmpBOX1cPUnpCuPyRttV9XMTpllFl4JHwSLnM8Q5jCq7clEOOx8mp8aEblweUO--ux76Mq2FCN5AevU_jXXeZbgvUb5H14vqY9EYZBdv9tqEgs7K-bJA71AeAI2gUkapoBESmiAPoS_70BR6GJ2_3Ec2QwyTyuEyqnkoboWcixekp9UjW1LAs1_zoPpycvx586Y-e3_6dvP6rDaUtaLmneKEdKxpleC6BWpLUK40UYyWXyLCCG0IYKINGG2UYFYzYHitobdYWHpQvbzznWO4XiBlOblkYByVh7Ak2bSipR3hvC3oi7_Qq7BEX9IViglOOMP8j6GJIaUIVs7RTSruZIPlvmRZSpb7kgta36E3boTdPzm5OT6_z7uU4cdvXsVvkq3pupPbd6fy4tPHD1-39Fxu6S3VrcAt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1469828608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of interpolation polynomials with divided differences, interpolation polynomials with finite differences, and quadratic functions obtained by the least squares method in modeling of chromatographic responses</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rakić, Tijana ; Stanimirović, Zorica ; Đenić, Aleksandar ; Marić, Miroslav ; Jančić-Stojanović, Biljana ; Medenica, Mirjana</creator><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Tijana ; Stanimirović, Zorica ; Đenić, Aleksandar ; Marić, Miroslav ; Jančić-Stojanović, Biljana ; Medenica, Mirjana</creatorcontrib><description>A novel approach to mathematical modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomials with divided differences and with finite differences is discussed. These interpolational techniques as well as traditionally applied second‐order polynomial models obtained by least squares are compared. Interpolation techniques can be useful in situations where commonly used linear or quadratic models are not applicable: when the nature of dependence is complex or the investigated factor intervals are broad. The three analyzed modeling techniques are incorporated in a design of experiments methodology for systematic development and optimization of liquid chromatographic methods. The direct modeling of retention factors is carried out first, while the objective function for final quality measurement is calculated last. An interpolation polynomial with divided differences resulted in a high quality fit compared with the results obtained by the other two modeling approaches and succeeded in locating the desired optimum. It is shown that this modeling technique can be a useful alternative for modeling of chromatographic responses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomial with divided differences, finite differences, and quadratic function is compared. Novel techniques are incorporated in Design of Experiments methodology for systematical development and optimization of liquid chromatographic method. Interpolation polynomial with divided differences succeeded to locate optimum and high agreement between theoretical and experimental chromatograms is obtained. Interpolation polynomial with finite differences and quadratic function failed to locate the optimum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-9383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-128X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cem.2559</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>chromatographic response modeling ; Chromatography ; Comparative analysis ; Design of experiments ; Interpolation ; interpolation polynomial with divided differences ; interpolation polynomial with finite differences ; liquid chromatography ; objective functions ; Optimization ; Polynomials ; Quadratic programming</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemometrics, 2013-12, Vol.27 (12), p.466-474</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3649-85a8225614a98b4e3fffe8ab2a6300929c9bc2e02bcecbca96fb6e607bedf09f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3649-85a8225614a98b4e3fffe8ab2a6300929c9bc2e02bcecbca96fb6e607bedf09f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcem.2559$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcem.2559$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Tijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanimirović, Zorica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Đenić, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marić, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jančić-Stojanović, Biljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medenica, Mirjana</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of interpolation polynomials with divided differences, interpolation polynomials with finite differences, and quadratic functions obtained by the least squares method in modeling of chromatographic responses</title><title>Journal of chemometrics</title><addtitle>J. Chemometrics</addtitle><description>A novel approach to mathematical modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomials with divided differences and with finite differences is discussed. These interpolational techniques as well as traditionally applied second‐order polynomial models obtained by least squares are compared. Interpolation techniques can be useful in situations where commonly used linear or quadratic models are not applicable: when the nature of dependence is complex or the investigated factor intervals are broad. The three analyzed modeling techniques are incorporated in a design of experiments methodology for systematic development and optimization of liquid chromatographic methods. The direct modeling of retention factors is carried out first, while the objective function for final quality measurement is calculated last. An interpolation polynomial with divided differences resulted in a high quality fit compared with the results obtained by the other two modeling approaches and succeeded in locating the desired optimum. It is shown that this modeling technique can be a useful alternative for modeling of chromatographic responses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomial with divided differences, finite differences, and quadratic function is compared. Novel techniques are incorporated in Design of Experiments methodology for systematical development and optimization of liquid chromatographic method. Interpolation polynomial with divided differences succeeded to locate optimum and high agreement between theoretical and experimental chromatograms is obtained. Interpolation polynomial with finite differences and quadratic function failed to locate the optimum.</description><subject>chromatographic response modeling</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>interpolation polynomial with divided differences</subject><subject>interpolation polynomial with finite differences</subject><subject>liquid chromatography</subject><subject>objective functions</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Quadratic programming</subject><issn>0886-9383</issn><issn>1099-128X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkd1uFSEUhSdGE4_VxEcg8cYLp2VghgOX5qStJq0_8ef0jgCz6VBnYAqM9byqT1NOajQ1MV5tAt9ae4VVVc8bfNhgTI4MTIek68SDatVgIeqG8IuH1QpzzmpBOX1cPUnpCuPyRttV9XMTpllFl4JHwSLnM8Q5jCq7clEOOx8mp8aEblweUO--ux76Mq2FCN5AevU_jXXeZbgvUb5H14vqY9EYZBdv9tqEgs7K-bJA71AeAI2gUkapoBESmiAPoS_70BR6GJ2_3Ec2QwyTyuEyqnkoboWcixekp9UjW1LAs1_zoPpycvx586Y-e3_6dvP6rDaUtaLmneKEdKxpleC6BWpLUK40UYyWXyLCCG0IYKINGG2UYFYzYHitobdYWHpQvbzznWO4XiBlOblkYByVh7Ak2bSipR3hvC3oi7_Qq7BEX9IViglOOMP8j6GJIaUIVs7RTSruZIPlvmRZSpb7kgta36E3boTdPzm5OT6_z7uU4cdvXsVvkq3pupPbd6fy4tPHD1-39Fxu6S3VrcAt</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>Rakić, Tijana</creator><creator>Stanimirović, Zorica</creator><creator>Đenić, Aleksandar</creator><creator>Marić, Miroslav</creator><creator>Jančić-Stojanović, Biljana</creator><creator>Medenica, Mirjana</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Comparison of interpolation polynomials with divided differences, interpolation polynomials with finite differences, and quadratic functions obtained by the least squares method in modeling of chromatographic responses</title><author>Rakić, Tijana ; Stanimirović, Zorica ; Đenić, Aleksandar ; Marić, Miroslav ; Jančić-Stojanović, Biljana ; Medenica, Mirjana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3649-85a8225614a98b4e3fffe8ab2a6300929c9bc2e02bcecbca96fb6e607bedf09f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>chromatographic response modeling</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>interpolation polynomial with divided differences</topic><topic>interpolation polynomial with finite differences</topic><topic>liquid chromatography</topic><topic>objective functions</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Quadratic programming</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rakić, Tijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanimirović, Zorica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Đenić, Aleksandar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marić, Miroslav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jančić-Stojanović, Biljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medenica, Mirjana</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rakić, Tijana</au><au>Stanimirović, Zorica</au><au>Đenić, Aleksandar</au><au>Marić, Miroslav</au><au>Jančić-Stojanović, Biljana</au><au>Medenica, Mirjana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of interpolation polynomials with divided differences, interpolation polynomials with finite differences, and quadratic functions obtained by the least squares method in modeling of chromatographic responses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemometrics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Chemometrics</addtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>466</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>466-474</pages><issn>0886-9383</issn><eissn>1099-128X</eissn><abstract>A novel approach to mathematical modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomials with divided differences and with finite differences is discussed. These interpolational techniques as well as traditionally applied second‐order polynomial models obtained by least squares are compared. Interpolation techniques can be useful in situations where commonly used linear or quadratic models are not applicable: when the nature of dependence is complex or the investigated factor intervals are broad. The three analyzed modeling techniques are incorporated in a design of experiments methodology for systematic development and optimization of liquid chromatographic methods. The direct modeling of retention factors is carried out first, while the objective function for final quality measurement is calculated last. An interpolation polynomial with divided differences resulted in a high quality fit compared with the results obtained by the other two modeling approaches and succeeded in locating the desired optimum. It is shown that this modeling technique can be a useful alternative for modeling of chromatographic responses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Modeling of chromatographic responses based on interpolation polynomial with divided differences, finite differences, and quadratic function is compared. Novel techniques are incorporated in Design of Experiments methodology for systematical development and optimization of liquid chromatographic method. Interpolation polynomial with divided differences succeeded to locate optimum and high agreement between theoretical and experimental chromatograms is obtained. Interpolation polynomial with finite differences and quadratic function failed to locate the optimum.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/cem.2559</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-9383 |
ispartof | Journal of chemometrics, 2013-12, Vol.27 (12), p.466-474 |
issn | 0886-9383 1099-128X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1494352884 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | chromatographic response modeling Chromatography Comparative analysis Design of experiments Interpolation interpolation polynomial with divided differences interpolation polynomial with finite differences liquid chromatography objective functions Optimization Polynomials Quadratic programming |
title | Comparison of interpolation polynomials with divided differences, interpolation polynomials with finite differences, and quadratic functions obtained by the least squares method in modeling of chromatographic responses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A25%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20interpolation%20polynomials%20with%20divided%20differences,%20interpolation%20polynomials%20with%20finite%20differences,%20and%20quadratic%20functions%20obtained%20by%20the%20least%20squares%20method%20in%20modeling%20of%20chromatographic%20responses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemometrics&rft.au=Raki%C4%87,%20Tijana&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=466&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=466-474&rft.issn=0886-9383&rft.eissn=1099-128X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cem.2559&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1494352884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1469828608&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |