3D electrical resistivity tomography survey for the basement of the Abeokuta terrain of Southwestern Nigeria

Geological structures are 3-Dimensional (3D) in nature, thus 1-Dimensional and 2-Dimensional surveys cannot adequately model them. However, sophisticated 3D survey equipment are very expensive. In this study, a singlechannel ABEM SAS 300B Terrameter was used to obtain 3D models of the subsurface. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Geological Society of India 2012-12, Vol.80 (6), p.845-854
Hauptverfasser: Badmus, B. S., Akinyemi, O. D., Olowofela, J. A., Folarin, G. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 854
container_issue 6
container_start_page 845
container_title Journal of the Geological Society of India
container_volume 80
creator Badmus, B. S.
Akinyemi, O. D.
Olowofela, J. A.
Folarin, G. M.
description Geological structures are 3-Dimensional (3D) in nature, thus 1-Dimensional and 2-Dimensional surveys cannot adequately model them. However, sophisticated 3D survey equipment are very expensive. In this study, a singlechannel ABEM SAS 300B Terrameter was used to obtain 3D models of the subsurface. This survey was carried out at three different locations within Abeokuta, a basement complex terrain of southwestern Nigeria. The area falls within longitudes 3.35° and 3.38° East and latitudes 7.22° and 7.46° North respectively, with coordinates of 2550.0 m North and 1724.2 m East. A manual 4-electrode system was used in the Electrical Resistivity Tomography survey at the three locations. Each location was marked into 7 by 7 square grids with 1 m, 3 m and 5 m unit electrode spacings in succession. The pole-pole array was used with the two remote electrodes placed at distances of 23 m, 40 m and 65 m from the grids of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m unit electrode spacings respectively, to reduce their telluric effects on the measured apparent resistivity values. To reduce survey time consumption, the cross-diagonal survey method was adopted. The data obtained were analysed using a 3D inversion software called RES3DINV and 3-Dimensional models of the subsurface were also generated using Slicer Dicer graphics software. The study revealed layers extending to depths of 7.75 m, 23.2 m and 38.7 m for unit electrode spacings of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m respectively. It revealed resistivity values ranging from 7.3 Ωm to 300 Ωm for electrode spacing of 1.0 m; 13.8 Ωm to 200 Ωm for electrode spacing of 3 m and 3.9 Ωm to 200 Ωm for electrode spacing of 5 m at the first location. At the second location, it revealed resistivity values ranging from 0.53 Ωm to 120.0 Ωm for electrode spacing of 3 m and 0.30 Ωm to 100 Ωm for electrode spacing of 5 m. For electrode spacings of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m, resistivity values ranging from 6.1 Ωm to 600 Ωm, 12 Ωm to 600 Ωm and 0.85 Ωm to 1700 Ωm were obtained respectively at the third location. Generally, this study revealed lithologies composed of lateritic soil, sand, sandstone, sandyclay, clayeysand, weathered rock, fractured rock, clay and fresh basement; to a depth of about 39 m. Also, location 3 was discovered to have good groundwater prospects; though not as good as for locations 1 and 2.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12594-012-0213-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1494350339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3140711311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-f248ca3af9c008fd69057ace124baddd128d03a2a90093461bb553e6463b21a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQhqOqSKXAD-BmiUsvKeOPOPER0UIrITgAZ2uSTHa9ZOOt7WzZf4-3y6Gq1NN86HlfzbxFcc7hKweoLyMXlVElcFGC4LJ8_VAcg6lVqZvGfMw9cF3WWohPxecYVwBaQSOPi1F-YzRSl4LrcGSBoovJbV3aseTXfhFws9yxOIct7djgA0tLYi1GWtOUmB_-zFct-Zc5IUsUArppv3_0c1r-pphXE7t3CwoOT4ujAcdIZ-_1pHi--f50_aO8e7j9eX11V6KsRSoHoZoOJQ6mA2iGXhuoauyIC9Vi3_dcND1IFGgAjFSat21VSdJKy1Zw5PKk-HLw3QT_a8432LWLHY0jTuTnaLkySlYgpcnoxT_oys9hytdlSgtpuJB7Q36guuBjDDTYTXBrDDvLwe7zt4f8bc7f7vO3r1kjDpqY2Sn__5fzf0Vvow6JjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1462391231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>3D electrical resistivity tomography survey for the basement of the Abeokuta terrain of Southwestern Nigeria</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Badmus, B. S. ; Akinyemi, O. D. ; Olowofela, J. A. ; Folarin, G. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Badmus, B. S. ; Akinyemi, O. D. ; Olowofela, J. A. ; Folarin, G. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Geological structures are 3-Dimensional (3D) in nature, thus 1-Dimensional and 2-Dimensional surveys cannot adequately model them. However, sophisticated 3D survey equipment are very expensive. In this study, a singlechannel ABEM SAS 300B Terrameter was used to obtain 3D models of the subsurface. This survey was carried out at three different locations within Abeokuta, a basement complex terrain of southwestern Nigeria. The area falls within longitudes 3.35° and 3.38° East and latitudes 7.22° and 7.46° North respectively, with coordinates of 2550.0 m North and 1724.2 m East. A manual 4-electrode system was used in the Electrical Resistivity Tomography survey at the three locations. Each location was marked into 7 by 7 square grids with 1 m, 3 m and 5 m unit electrode spacings in succession. The pole-pole array was used with the two remote electrodes placed at distances of 23 m, 40 m and 65 m from the grids of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m unit electrode spacings respectively, to reduce their telluric effects on the measured apparent resistivity values. To reduce survey time consumption, the cross-diagonal survey method was adopted. The data obtained were analysed using a 3D inversion software called RES3DINV and 3-Dimensional models of the subsurface were also generated using Slicer Dicer graphics software. The study revealed layers extending to depths of 7.75 m, 23.2 m and 38.7 m for unit electrode spacings of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m respectively. It revealed resistivity values ranging from 7.3 Ωm to 300 Ωm for electrode spacing of 1.0 m; 13.8 Ωm to 200 Ωm for electrode spacing of 3 m and 3.9 Ωm to 200 Ωm for electrode spacing of 5 m at the first location. At the second location, it revealed resistivity values ranging from 0.53 Ωm to 120.0 Ωm for electrode spacing of 3 m and 0.30 Ωm to 100 Ωm for electrode spacing of 5 m. For electrode spacings of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m, resistivity values ranging from 6.1 Ωm to 600 Ωm, 12 Ωm to 600 Ωm and 0.85 Ωm to 1700 Ωm were obtained respectively at the third location. Generally, this study revealed lithologies composed of lateritic soil, sand, sandstone, sandyclay, clayeysand, weathered rock, fractured rock, clay and fresh basement; to a depth of about 39 m. Also, location 3 was discovered to have good groundwater prospects; though not as good as for locations 1 and 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-6889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12594-012-0213-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Basements ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Electrical resistivity ; Electrodes ; Geological structures ; Geology ; Geomorphology ; Hydrogeology ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Rocks ; Sandstone ; Studies ; Three dimensional imaging ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2012-12, Vol.80 (6), p.845-854</ispartof><rights>Geological Society of India 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-f248ca3af9c008fd69057ace124baddd128d03a2a90093461bb553e6463b21a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-f248ca3af9c008fd69057ace124baddd128d03a2a90093461bb553e6463b21a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12594-012-0213-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12594-012-0213-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badmus, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinyemi, O. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olowofela, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folarin, G. M.</creatorcontrib><title>3D electrical resistivity tomography survey for the basement of the Abeokuta terrain of Southwestern Nigeria</title><title>Journal of the Geological Society of India</title><addtitle>J Geol Soc India</addtitle><description>Geological structures are 3-Dimensional (3D) in nature, thus 1-Dimensional and 2-Dimensional surveys cannot adequately model them. However, sophisticated 3D survey equipment are very expensive. In this study, a singlechannel ABEM SAS 300B Terrameter was used to obtain 3D models of the subsurface. This survey was carried out at three different locations within Abeokuta, a basement complex terrain of southwestern Nigeria. The area falls within longitudes 3.35° and 3.38° East and latitudes 7.22° and 7.46° North respectively, with coordinates of 2550.0 m North and 1724.2 m East. A manual 4-electrode system was used in the Electrical Resistivity Tomography survey at the three locations. Each location was marked into 7 by 7 square grids with 1 m, 3 m and 5 m unit electrode spacings in succession. The pole-pole array was used with the two remote electrodes placed at distances of 23 m, 40 m and 65 m from the grids of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m unit electrode spacings respectively, to reduce their telluric effects on the measured apparent resistivity values. To reduce survey time consumption, the cross-diagonal survey method was adopted. The data obtained were analysed using a 3D inversion software called RES3DINV and 3-Dimensional models of the subsurface were also generated using Slicer Dicer graphics software. The study revealed layers extending to depths of 7.75 m, 23.2 m and 38.7 m for unit electrode spacings of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m respectively. It revealed resistivity values ranging from 7.3 Ωm to 300 Ωm for electrode spacing of 1.0 m; 13.8 Ωm to 200 Ωm for electrode spacing of 3 m and 3.9 Ωm to 200 Ωm for electrode spacing of 5 m at the first location. At the second location, it revealed resistivity values ranging from 0.53 Ωm to 120.0 Ωm for electrode spacing of 3 m and 0.30 Ωm to 100 Ωm for electrode spacing of 5 m. For electrode spacings of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m, resistivity values ranging from 6.1 Ωm to 600 Ωm, 12 Ωm to 600 Ωm and 0.85 Ωm to 1700 Ωm were obtained respectively at the third location. Generally, this study revealed lithologies composed of lateritic soil, sand, sandstone, sandyclay, clayeysand, weathered rock, fractured rock, clay and fresh basement; to a depth of about 39 m. Also, location 3 was discovered to have good groundwater prospects; though not as good as for locations 1 and 2.</description><subject>Basements</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Geological structures</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Three dimensional imaging</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0016-7622</issn><issn>0974-6889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQhqOqSKXAD-BmiUsvKeOPOPER0UIrITgAZ2uSTHa9ZOOt7WzZf4-3y6Gq1NN86HlfzbxFcc7hKweoLyMXlVElcFGC4LJ8_VAcg6lVqZvGfMw9cF3WWohPxecYVwBaQSOPi1F-YzRSl4LrcGSBoovJbV3aseTXfhFws9yxOIct7djgA0tLYi1GWtOUmB_-zFct-Zc5IUsUArppv3_0c1r-pphXE7t3CwoOT4ujAcdIZ-_1pHi--f50_aO8e7j9eX11V6KsRSoHoZoOJQ6mA2iGXhuoauyIC9Vi3_dcND1IFGgAjFSat21VSdJKy1Zw5PKk-HLw3QT_a8432LWLHY0jTuTnaLkySlYgpcnoxT_oys9hytdlSgtpuJB7Q36guuBjDDTYTXBrDDvLwe7zt4f8bc7f7vO3r1kjDpqY2Sn__5fzf0Vvow6JjQ</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Badmus, B. S.</creator><creator>Akinyemi, O. D.</creator><creator>Olowofela, J. A.</creator><creator>Folarin, G. M.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>3D electrical resistivity tomography survey for the basement of the Abeokuta terrain of Southwestern Nigeria</title><author>Badmus, B. S. ; Akinyemi, O. D. ; Olowofela, J. A. ; Folarin, G. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a372t-f248ca3af9c008fd69057ace124baddd128d03a2a90093461bb553e6463b21a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Basements</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Geological structures</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Three dimensional imaging</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badmus, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinyemi, O. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olowofela, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folarin, G. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Science &amp; Technology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Geological Society of India</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badmus, B. S.</au><au>Akinyemi, O. D.</au><au>Olowofela, J. A.</au><au>Folarin, G. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>3D electrical resistivity tomography survey for the basement of the Abeokuta terrain of Southwestern Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Geological Society of India</jtitle><stitle>J Geol Soc India</stitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>845-854</pages><issn>0016-7622</issn><eissn>0974-6889</eissn><abstract>Geological structures are 3-Dimensional (3D) in nature, thus 1-Dimensional and 2-Dimensional surveys cannot adequately model them. However, sophisticated 3D survey equipment are very expensive. In this study, a singlechannel ABEM SAS 300B Terrameter was used to obtain 3D models of the subsurface. This survey was carried out at three different locations within Abeokuta, a basement complex terrain of southwestern Nigeria. The area falls within longitudes 3.35° and 3.38° East and latitudes 7.22° and 7.46° North respectively, with coordinates of 2550.0 m North and 1724.2 m East. A manual 4-electrode system was used in the Electrical Resistivity Tomography survey at the three locations. Each location was marked into 7 by 7 square grids with 1 m, 3 m and 5 m unit electrode spacings in succession. The pole-pole array was used with the two remote electrodes placed at distances of 23 m, 40 m and 65 m from the grids of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m unit electrode spacings respectively, to reduce their telluric effects on the measured apparent resistivity values. To reduce survey time consumption, the cross-diagonal survey method was adopted. The data obtained were analysed using a 3D inversion software called RES3DINV and 3-Dimensional models of the subsurface were also generated using Slicer Dicer graphics software. The study revealed layers extending to depths of 7.75 m, 23.2 m and 38.7 m for unit electrode spacings of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m respectively. It revealed resistivity values ranging from 7.3 Ωm to 300 Ωm for electrode spacing of 1.0 m; 13.8 Ωm to 200 Ωm for electrode spacing of 3 m and 3.9 Ωm to 200 Ωm for electrode spacing of 5 m at the first location. At the second location, it revealed resistivity values ranging from 0.53 Ωm to 120.0 Ωm for electrode spacing of 3 m and 0.30 Ωm to 100 Ωm for electrode spacing of 5 m. For electrode spacings of 1 m, 3 m and 5 m, resistivity values ranging from 6.1 Ωm to 600 Ωm, 12 Ωm to 600 Ωm and 0.85 Ωm to 1700 Ωm were obtained respectively at the third location. Generally, this study revealed lithologies composed of lateritic soil, sand, sandstone, sandyclay, clayeysand, weathered rock, fractured rock, clay and fresh basement; to a depth of about 39 m. Also, location 3 was discovered to have good groundwater prospects; though not as good as for locations 1 and 2.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s12594-012-0213-x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7622
ispartof Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2012-12, Vol.80 (6), p.845-854
issn 0016-7622
0974-6889
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1494350339
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Basements
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Electrical resistivity
Electrodes
Geological structures
Geology
Geomorphology
Hydrogeology
Polls & surveys
Rocks
Sandstone
Studies
Three dimensional imaging
Tomography
title 3D electrical resistivity tomography survey for the basement of the Abeokuta terrain of Southwestern Nigeria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T04%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=3D%20electrical%20resistivity%20tomography%20survey%20for%20the%20basement%20of%20the%20Abeokuta%20terrain%20of%20Southwestern%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Geological%20Society%20of%20India&rft.au=Badmus,%20B.%20S.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=845-854&rft.issn=0016-7622&rft.eissn=0974-6889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12594-012-0213-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3140711311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1462391231&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true