Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults

A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psycholinguistic research 2014-02, Vol.43 (1), p.59-80
Hauptverfasser: Kemper, Susan, Bontempo, Daniel, Schmalzried, RaLynn, McKedy, Whitney, Tagliaferri, Bruno, Kieweg, Doug
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 80
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Journal of psycholinguistic research
container_volume 43
creator Kemper, Susan
Bontempo, Daniel
Schmalzried, RaLynn
McKedy, Whitney
Tagliaferri, Bruno
Kieweg, Doug
description A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexity, and readability and person-level predictors such as speaker age or working memory capacity predicted reading and tracking performance. In addition, sentence-by-sentence variation in tracking performance was examined during the production of individual sentences and during the pauses before upcoming sentences. The results suggest that dual tasking has a greater impact on older adults’ reading comprehension and tracking performance. At the level of individual sentences, young and older adults adopt different strategies to deal with grammatically complex and propositionally dense sentences.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1494319665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1041610</ericid><sourcerecordid>3199647481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f60f4e020dc82b9df448ed0fb340fd8b50753021340e807b6bd9997be1da97dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gAcl4MXL6mTzsRtvpdYvCgWpgqewu0lK2223JrsH--tN2VpE8DSZvM_MvLwInRO4IQDJrScgqYiA0EjGDKLNAeoSntBIcM4PURdAQiQk8A468X4OoU9Tcow6MWWCMuBdNJ64rFjMVlP8ajId6h2-b7ISTzK_wIPK1x5XFo9d-NoB2FYOf1RNeL0b5xuPx6U2Dvd1U9b-FB3ZrPTmbFd76O1hOBk8RaPx4_OgP4oKRpM6sgIsMxCDLtI4l9oylhoNNg-urE5zDgmnEJPQmhSSXORaSpnkhuhMJrqgPXTd7l276rMxvlbLmS9MWWYrUzVeESYZJVIIHtCrP-i8atwquNtSNETB0zhQpKUKV3nvjFVrN1tm7ksRUNu0VZu2CmmrbdpqE2Yud5ubfGn0fuIn3gBctIBxs2IvD18IMCIIBD1udR-01dS4X9b-vfoNSHeSCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1493346582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kemper, Susan ; Bontempo, Daniel ; Schmalzried, RaLynn ; McKedy, Whitney ; Tagliaferri, Bruno ; Kieweg, Doug</creator><creatorcontrib>Kemper, Susan ; Bontempo, Daniel ; Schmalzried, RaLynn ; McKedy, Whitney ; Tagliaferri, Bruno ; Kieweg, Doug</creatorcontrib><description>A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexity, and readability and person-level predictors such as speaker age or working memory capacity predicted reading and tracking performance. In addition, sentence-by-sentence variation in tracking performance was examined during the production of individual sentences and during the pauses before upcoming sentences. The results suggest that dual tasking has a greater impact on older adults’ reading comprehension and tracking performance. At the level of individual sentences, young and older adults adopt different strategies to deal with grammatically complex and propositionally dense sentences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23463405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Age ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Aging (Individuals) ; Aging - psychology ; Auditory Stimuli ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Communication ; Communication Disorders ; Communicative Competence (Languages) ; Executive Function ; Eye Movements ; Female ; Gerontology ; Grammar ; Humans ; Language ; Language Processing ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Male ; Memory, Short-Term ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Older Adults ; Older people ; Oral Reading ; Predictor Variables ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Reaction Time ; Readability ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Rate ; Reading Strategies ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Sentences ; Short Term Memory ; Speaking ; Speech ; Task Analysis ; Verbal Behavior ; Young Adult ; Young Adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2014-02, Vol.43 (1), p.59-80</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f60f4e020dc82b9df448ed0fb340fd8b50753021340e807b6bd9997be1da97dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f60f4e020dc82b9df448ed0fb340fd8b50753021340e807b6bd9997be1da97dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1041610$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23463405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kemper, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontempo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalzried, RaLynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKedy, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieweg, Doug</creatorcontrib><title>Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults</title><title>Journal of psycholinguistic research</title><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><description>A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexity, and readability and person-level predictors such as speaker age or working memory capacity predicted reading and tracking performance. In addition, sentence-by-sentence variation in tracking performance was examined during the production of individual sentences and during the pauses before upcoming sentences. The results suggest that dual tasking has a greater impact on older adults’ reading comprehension and tracking performance. At the level of individual sentences, young and older adults adopt different strategies to deal with grammatically complex and propositionally dense sentences.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>Aging - psychology</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication Disorders</subject><subject>Communicative Competence (Languages)</subject><subject>Executive Function</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Older Adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Readability</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Rate</subject><subject>Reading Strategies</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><issn>0090-6905</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gAcl4MXL6mTzsRtvpdYvCgWpgqewu0lK2223JrsH--tN2VpE8DSZvM_MvLwInRO4IQDJrScgqYiA0EjGDKLNAeoSntBIcM4PURdAQiQk8A468X4OoU9Tcow6MWWCMuBdNJ64rFjMVlP8ajId6h2-b7ISTzK_wIPK1x5XFo9d-NoB2FYOf1RNeL0b5xuPx6U2Dvd1U9b-FB3ZrPTmbFd76O1hOBk8RaPx4_OgP4oKRpM6sgIsMxCDLtI4l9oylhoNNg-urE5zDgmnEJPQmhSSXORaSpnkhuhMJrqgPXTd7l276rMxvlbLmS9MWWYrUzVeESYZJVIIHtCrP-i8atwquNtSNETB0zhQpKUKV3nvjFVrN1tm7ksRUNu0VZu2CmmrbdpqE2Yud5ubfGn0fuIn3gBctIBxs2IvD18IMCIIBD1udR-01dS4X9b-vfoNSHeSCw</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Kemper, Susan</creator><creator>Bontempo, Daniel</creator><creator>Schmalzried, RaLynn</creator><creator>McKedy, Whitney</creator><creator>Tagliaferri, Bruno</creator><creator>Kieweg, Doug</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults</title><author>Kemper, Susan ; Bontempo, Daniel ; Schmalzried, RaLynn ; McKedy, Whitney ; Tagliaferri, Bruno ; Kieweg, Doug</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f60f4e020dc82b9df448ed0fb340fd8b50753021340e807b6bd9997be1da97dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>Aging - psychology</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication Disorders</topic><topic>Communicative Competence (Languages)</topic><topic>Executive Function</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Older Adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Readability</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Rate</topic><topic>Reading Strategies</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kemper, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontempo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalzried, RaLynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKedy, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieweg, Doug</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kemper, Susan</au><au>Bontempo, Daniel</au><au>Schmalzried, RaLynn</au><au>McKedy, Whitney</au><au>Tagliaferri, Bruno</au><au>Kieweg, Doug</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1041610</ericid><atitle>Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle><stitle>J Psycholinguist Res</stitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>59-80</pages><issn>0090-6905</issn><eissn>1573-6555</eissn><abstract>A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexity, and readability and person-level predictors such as speaker age or working memory capacity predicted reading and tracking performance. In addition, sentence-by-sentence variation in tracking performance was examined during the production of individual sentences and during the pauses before upcoming sentences. The results suggest that dual tasking has a greater impact on older adults’ reading comprehension and tracking performance. At the level of individual sentences, young and older adults adopt different strategies to deal with grammatically complex and propositionally dense sentences.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23463405</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-6905
ispartof Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2014-02, Vol.43 (1), p.59-80
issn 0090-6905
1573-6555
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1494319665
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Age
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Aging (Individuals)
Aging - psychology
Auditory Stimuli
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Communication
Communication Disorders
Communicative Competence (Languages)
Executive Function
Eye Movements
Female
Gerontology
Grammar
Humans
Language
Language Processing
Linguistics
Listening Comprehension
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Neuropsychological Tests
Older Adults
Older people
Oral Reading
Predictor Variables
Psycholinguistics
Psychology
Reaction Time
Readability
Reading
Reading Comprehension
Reading Rate
Reading Strategies
Resistance (Psychology)
Sentences
Short Term Memory
Speaking
Speech
Task Analysis
Verbal Behavior
Young Adult
Young Adults
title Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A42%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracking%20Reading:%20Dual%20Task%20Costs%20of%20Oral%20Reading%20for%20Young%20Versus%20Older%20Adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psycholinguistic%20research&rft.au=Kemper,%20Susan&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=59-80&rft.issn=0090-6905&rft.eissn=1573-6555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3199647481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1493346582&rft_id=info:pmid/23463405&rft_ericid=EJ1041610&rfr_iscdi=true