Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults
A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psycholinguistic research 2014-02, Vol.43 (1), p.59-80 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 80 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Journal of psycholinguistic research |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Kemper, Susan Bontempo, Daniel Schmalzried, RaLynn McKedy, Whitney Tagliaferri, Bruno Kieweg, Doug |
description | A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexity, and readability and person-level predictors such as speaker age or working memory capacity predicted reading and tracking performance. In addition, sentence-by-sentence variation in tracking performance was examined during the production of individual sentences and during the pauses before upcoming sentences. The results suggest that dual tasking has a greater impact on older adults’ reading comprehension and tracking performance. At the level of individual sentences, young and older adults adopt different strategies to deal with grammatically complex and propositionally dense sentences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1494319665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1041610</ericid><sourcerecordid>3199647481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f60f4e020dc82b9df448ed0fb340fd8b50753021340e807b6bd9997be1da97dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gAcl4MXL6mTzsRtvpdYvCgWpgqewu0lK2223JrsH--tN2VpE8DSZvM_MvLwInRO4IQDJrScgqYiA0EjGDKLNAeoSntBIcM4PURdAQiQk8A468X4OoU9Tcow6MWWCMuBdNJ64rFjMVlP8ajId6h2-b7ISTzK_wIPK1x5XFo9d-NoB2FYOf1RNeL0b5xuPx6U2Dvd1U9b-FB3ZrPTmbFd76O1hOBk8RaPx4_OgP4oKRpM6sgIsMxCDLtI4l9oylhoNNg-urE5zDgmnEJPQmhSSXORaSpnkhuhMJrqgPXTd7l276rMxvlbLmS9MWWYrUzVeESYZJVIIHtCrP-i8atwquNtSNETB0zhQpKUKV3nvjFVrN1tm7ksRUNu0VZu2CmmrbdpqE2Yud5ubfGn0fuIn3gBctIBxs2IvD18IMCIIBD1udR-01dS4X9b-vfoNSHeSCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1493346582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kemper, Susan ; Bontempo, Daniel ; Schmalzried, RaLynn ; McKedy, Whitney ; Tagliaferri, Bruno ; Kieweg, Doug</creator><creatorcontrib>Kemper, Susan ; Bontempo, Daniel ; Schmalzried, RaLynn ; McKedy, Whitney ; Tagliaferri, Bruno ; Kieweg, Doug</creatorcontrib><description>A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexity, and readability and person-level predictors such as speaker age or working memory capacity predicted reading and tracking performance. In addition, sentence-by-sentence variation in tracking performance was examined during the production of individual sentences and during the pauses before upcoming sentences. The results suggest that dual tasking has a greater impact on older adults’ reading comprehension and tracking performance. At the level of individual sentences, young and older adults adopt different strategies to deal with grammatically complex and propositionally dense sentences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23463405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Age ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Aging (Individuals) ; Aging - psychology ; Auditory Stimuli ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Communication ; Communication Disorders ; Communicative Competence (Languages) ; Executive Function ; Eye Movements ; Female ; Gerontology ; Grammar ; Humans ; Language ; Language Processing ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Male ; Memory, Short-Term ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Older Adults ; Older people ; Oral Reading ; Predictor Variables ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Reaction Time ; Readability ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Rate ; Reading Strategies ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Sentences ; Short Term Memory ; Speaking ; Speech ; Task Analysis ; Verbal Behavior ; Young Adult ; Young Adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2014-02, Vol.43 (1), p.59-80</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f60f4e020dc82b9df448ed0fb340fd8b50753021340e807b6bd9997be1da97dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f60f4e020dc82b9df448ed0fb340fd8b50753021340e807b6bd9997be1da97dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1041610$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23463405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kemper, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontempo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalzried, RaLynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKedy, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieweg, Doug</creatorcontrib><title>Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults</title><title>Journal of psycholinguistic research</title><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><description>A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexity, and readability and person-level predictors such as speaker age or working memory capacity predicted reading and tracking performance. In addition, sentence-by-sentence variation in tracking performance was examined during the production of individual sentences and during the pauses before upcoming sentences. The results suggest that dual tasking has a greater impact on older adults’ reading comprehension and tracking performance. At the level of individual sentences, young and older adults adopt different strategies to deal with grammatically complex and propositionally dense sentences.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>Aging - psychology</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication Disorders</subject><subject>Communicative Competence (Languages)</subject><subject>Executive Function</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Older Adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Readability</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Rate</subject><subject>Reading Strategies</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><issn>0090-6905</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gAcl4MXL6mTzsRtvpdYvCgWpgqewu0lK2223JrsH--tN2VpE8DSZvM_MvLwInRO4IQDJrScgqYiA0EjGDKLNAeoSntBIcM4PURdAQiQk8A468X4OoU9Tcow6MWWCMuBdNJ64rFjMVlP8ajId6h2-b7ISTzK_wIPK1x5XFo9d-NoB2FYOf1RNeL0b5xuPx6U2Dvd1U9b-FB3ZrPTmbFd76O1hOBk8RaPx4_OgP4oKRpM6sgIsMxCDLtI4l9oylhoNNg-urE5zDgmnEJPQmhSSXORaSpnkhuhMJrqgPXTd7l276rMxvlbLmS9MWWYrUzVeESYZJVIIHtCrP-i8atwquNtSNETB0zhQpKUKV3nvjFVrN1tm7ksRUNu0VZu2CmmrbdpqE2Yud5ubfGn0fuIn3gBctIBxs2IvD18IMCIIBD1udR-01dS4X9b-vfoNSHeSCw</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Kemper, Susan</creator><creator>Bontempo, Daniel</creator><creator>Schmalzried, RaLynn</creator><creator>McKedy, Whitney</creator><creator>Tagliaferri, Bruno</creator><creator>Kieweg, Doug</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults</title><author>Kemper, Susan ; Bontempo, Daniel ; Schmalzried, RaLynn ; McKedy, Whitney ; Tagliaferri, Bruno ; Kieweg, Doug</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f60f4e020dc82b9df448ed0fb340fd8b50753021340e807b6bd9997be1da97dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>Aging - psychology</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication Disorders</topic><topic>Communicative Competence (Languages)</topic><topic>Executive Function</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Older Adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Readability</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Rate</topic><topic>Reading Strategies</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kemper, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bontempo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalzried, RaLynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKedy, Whitney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagliaferri, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kieweg, Doug</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kemper, Susan</au><au>Bontempo, Daniel</au><au>Schmalzried, RaLynn</au><au>McKedy, Whitney</au><au>Tagliaferri, Bruno</au><au>Kieweg, Doug</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1041610</ericid><atitle>Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle><stitle>J Psycholinguist Res</stitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>59-80</pages><issn>0090-6905</issn><eissn>1573-6555</eissn><abstract>A digital pursuit rotor was used to monitor oral reading costs by time-locking tracking performance to the auditory wave form produced as young and older adults were reading out short paragraphs. Multilevel modeling was used to determine how paragraph-level predictors of length, grammatical complexity, and readability and person-level predictors such as speaker age or working memory capacity predicted reading and tracking performance. In addition, sentence-by-sentence variation in tracking performance was examined during the production of individual sentences and during the pauses before upcoming sentences. The results suggest that dual tasking has a greater impact on older adults’ reading comprehension and tracking performance. At the level of individual sentences, young and older adults adopt different strategies to deal with grammatically complex and propositionally dense sentences.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>23463405</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-6905 |
ispartof | Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2014-02, Vol.43 (1), p.59-80 |
issn | 0090-6905 1573-6555 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1494319665 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Age Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Aging (Individuals) Aging - psychology Auditory Stimuli Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Communication Communication Disorders Communicative Competence (Languages) Executive Function Eye Movements Female Gerontology Grammar Humans Language Language Processing Linguistics Listening Comprehension Male Memory, Short-Term Neuropsychological Tests Older Adults Older people Oral Reading Predictor Variables Psycholinguistics Psychology Reaction Time Readability Reading Reading Comprehension Reading Rate Reading Strategies Resistance (Psychology) Sentences Short Term Memory Speaking Speech Task Analysis Verbal Behavior Young Adult Young Adults |
title | Tracking Reading: Dual Task Costs of Oral Reading for Young Versus Older Adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A42%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracking%20Reading:%20Dual%20Task%20Costs%20of%20Oral%20Reading%20for%20Young%20Versus%20Older%20Adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psycholinguistic%20research&rft.au=Kemper,%20Susan&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=59-80&rft.issn=0090-6905&rft.eissn=1573-6555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10936-013-9240-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3199647481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1493346582&rft_id=info:pmid/23463405&rft_ericid=EJ1041610&rfr_iscdi=true |