The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?

Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Converse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American naturalist 1987-10, Vol.130 (4), p.507-525
1. Verfasser: Freed, Leonard A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 525
container_issue 4
container_start_page 507
container_title The American naturalist
container_volume 130
creator Freed, Leonard A.
description Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Conversely, each member may be constrained to remain with the current mate because of limited opportunities to acquire new mates. These alternative hypotheses were evaluated for permanently monogamous tropical house wrens in lowland central Panama. Mates gain no reproductive advantage by reuniting from one breeding season to the next or by reuniting within breeding seasons. In contrast, the scarcity of openings within the stable breeding population limits the opportunities for each sex to re-sort. Moreover, pairs must guard against encroachment by neighboring pairs and takeover by non-neighboring pairs. The same constraints that shape the long-term pair bond appear to influence the structure of the floater population, which includes transient pairs as well as individuals. Mates usually do not defend each other against single intruders, even when takeovers occur, suggesting that mate choice is a recurring phenomenon even in this permanently monogamous mating system. These results probably pertain to other tropical monogamous species with long-term pair bonds, but detailed studies of other species are required to establish generality.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/284728
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14935145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2461701</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2461701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-b3f73cb7ecef7cca08aeadfe76d7092ee4464fde238ec8925ad7d76a4a11cfa43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxVf4GHBcVbdL-STbxILX4UCnqIeAzTzWxNSXfrbir4701pqeBpGObhZXgJOefshrM8uxW50iI_IAOeSp2kUshDMmCMyYRxpY_JSYyLfi1UkQ7IpPxEOvVunpQYlvQNmkAfvKupt7QMftUYaOmLX0ekHwFdvKOj-htcB3OkPtCxd7EL0Lju_pQcWWgjnu3mkLw_PZbjl2T6-jwZj6aJkZJ1yUxaLc1Mo0GrjQGWA0JtUWe1ZoVAVCpTtkYhczR5IVKoda0zUMC5saDkkFxvc1fBf60xdtWyiQbbFhz2f1ZcFTLlKu3h5T-48Ovg-t8qLlkuZcHy9C_OBB9jQFutQrOE8FNxVm36rLZ99vBqFwexL8UGcKaJe60Zl4JnPbvYskXsfNifhcr4hvwCLJJ8Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308339085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Freed, Leonard A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freed, Leonard A.</creatorcontrib><description>Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Conversely, each member may be constrained to remain with the current mate because of limited opportunities to acquire new mates. These alternative hypotheses were evaluated for permanently monogamous tropical house wrens in lowland central Panama. Mates gain no reproductive advantage by reuniting from one breeding season to the next or by reuniting within breeding seasons. In contrast, the scarcity of openings within the stable breeding population limits the opportunities for each sex to re-sort. Moreover, pairs must guard against encroachment by neighboring pairs and takeover by non-neighboring pairs. The same constraints that shape the long-term pair bond appear to influence the structure of the floater population, which includes transient pairs as well as individuals. Mates usually do not defend each other against single intruders, even when takeovers occur, suggesting that mate choice is a recurring phenomenon even in this permanently monogamous mating system. These results probably pertain to other tropical monogamous species with long-term pair bonds, but detailed studies of other species are required to establish generality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/284728</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Animal social behavior ; Aves ; Aviculture ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Monogamy ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Troglodytes musculus ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 1987-10, Vol.130 (4), p.507-525</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 The University of Chicago</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-b3f73cb7ecef7cca08aeadfe76d7092ee4464fde238ec8925ad7d76a4a11cfa43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2461701$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2461701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7013216$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freed, Leonard A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?</title><title>The American naturalist</title><description>Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Conversely, each member may be constrained to remain with the current mate because of limited opportunities to acquire new mates. These alternative hypotheses were evaluated for permanently monogamous tropical house wrens in lowland central Panama. Mates gain no reproductive advantage by reuniting from one breeding season to the next or by reuniting within breeding seasons. In contrast, the scarcity of openings within the stable breeding population limits the opportunities for each sex to re-sort. Moreover, pairs must guard against encroachment by neighboring pairs and takeover by non-neighboring pairs. The same constraints that shape the long-term pair bond appear to influence the structure of the floater population, which includes transient pairs as well as individuals. Mates usually do not defend each other against single intruders, even when takeovers occur, suggesting that mate choice is a recurring phenomenon even in this permanently monogamous mating system. These results probably pertain to other tropical monogamous species with long-term pair bonds, but detailed studies of other species are required to establish generality.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animal social behavior</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Aviculture</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Monogamy</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Troglodytes musculus</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxVf4GHBcVbdL-STbxILX4UCnqIeAzTzWxNSXfrbir4701pqeBpGObhZXgJOefshrM8uxW50iI_IAOeSp2kUshDMmCMyYRxpY_JSYyLfi1UkQ7IpPxEOvVunpQYlvQNmkAfvKupt7QMftUYaOmLX0ekHwFdvKOj-htcB3OkPtCxd7EL0Lju_pQcWWgjnu3mkLw_PZbjl2T6-jwZj6aJkZJ1yUxaLc1Mo0GrjQGWA0JtUWe1ZoVAVCpTtkYhczR5IVKoda0zUMC5saDkkFxvc1fBf60xdtWyiQbbFhz2f1ZcFTLlKu3h5T-48Ovg-t8qLlkuZcHy9C_OBB9jQFutQrOE8FNxVm36rLZ99vBqFwexL8UGcKaJe60Zl4JnPbvYskXsfNifhcr4hvwCLJJ8Aw</recordid><startdate>19871001</startdate><enddate>19871001</enddate><creator>Freed, Leonard A.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871001</creationdate><title>The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?</title><author>Freed, Leonard A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-b3f73cb7ecef7cca08aeadfe76d7092ee4464fde238ec8925ad7d76a4a11cfa43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animal social behavior</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Aviculture</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Monogamy</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Troglodytes musculus</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freed, Leonard A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freed, Leonard A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><date>1987-10-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>507-525</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Conversely, each member may be constrained to remain with the current mate because of limited opportunities to acquire new mates. These alternative hypotheses were evaluated for permanently monogamous tropical house wrens in lowland central Panama. Mates gain no reproductive advantage by reuniting from one breeding season to the next or by reuniting within breeding seasons. In contrast, the scarcity of openings within the stable breeding population limits the opportunities for each sex to re-sort. Moreover, pairs must guard against encroachment by neighboring pairs and takeover by non-neighboring pairs. The same constraints that shape the long-term pair bond appear to influence the structure of the floater population, which includes transient pairs as well as individuals. Mates usually do not defend each other against single intruders, even when takeovers occur, suggesting that mate choice is a recurring phenomenon even in this permanently monogamous mating system. These results probably pertain to other tropical monogamous species with long-term pair bonds, but detailed studies of other species are required to establish generality.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/284728</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0147
ispartof The American naturalist, 1987-10, Vol.130 (4), p.507-525
issn 0003-0147
1537-5323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14935145
source Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal ethology
Animal social behavior
Aves
Aviculture
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Birds
Breeding
Breeding seasons
Female animals
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Male animals
Mating behavior
Monogamy
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Troglodytes musculus
Vertebrata
title The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A31%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Long-Term%20Pair%20Bond%20of%20Tropical%20House%20Wrens:%20Advantage%20or%20Constraint?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Freed,%20Leonard%20A.&rft.date=1987-10-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=507-525&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/284728&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2461701%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308339085&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2461701&rfr_iscdi=true