The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?
Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Converse...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American naturalist 1987-10, Vol.130 (4), p.507-525 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 525 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 507 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Freed, Leonard A. |
description | Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Conversely, each member may be constrained to remain with the current mate because of limited opportunities to acquire new mates. These alternative hypotheses were evaluated for permanently monogamous tropical house wrens in lowland central Panama. Mates gain no reproductive advantage by reuniting from one breeding season to the next or by reuniting within breeding seasons. In contrast, the scarcity of openings within the stable breeding population limits the opportunities for each sex to re-sort. Moreover, pairs must guard against encroachment by neighboring pairs and takeover by non-neighboring pairs. The same constraints that shape the long-term pair bond appear to influence the structure of the floater population, which includes transient pairs as well as individuals. Mates usually do not defend each other against single intruders, even when takeovers occur, suggesting that mate choice is a recurring phenomenon even in this permanently monogamous mating system. These results probably pertain to other tropical monogamous species with long-term pair bonds, but detailed studies of other species are required to establish generality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/284728 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14935145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2461701</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2461701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-b3f73cb7ecef7cca08aeadfe76d7092ee4464fde238ec8925ad7d76a4a11cfa43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxVf4GHBcVbdL-STbxILX4UCnqIeAzTzWxNSXfrbir4701pqeBpGObhZXgJOefshrM8uxW50iI_IAOeSp2kUshDMmCMyYRxpY_JSYyLfi1UkQ7IpPxEOvVunpQYlvQNmkAfvKupt7QMftUYaOmLX0ekHwFdvKOj-htcB3OkPtCxd7EL0Lju_pQcWWgjnu3mkLw_PZbjl2T6-jwZj6aJkZJ1yUxaLc1Mo0GrjQGWA0JtUWe1ZoVAVCpTtkYhczR5IVKoda0zUMC5saDkkFxvc1fBf60xdtWyiQbbFhz2f1ZcFTLlKu3h5T-48Ovg-t8qLlkuZcHy9C_OBB9jQFutQrOE8FNxVm36rLZ99vBqFwexL8UGcKaJe60Zl4JnPbvYskXsfNifhcr4hvwCLJJ8Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1308339085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Freed, Leonard A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Freed, Leonard A.</creatorcontrib><description>Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Conversely, each member may be constrained to remain with the current mate because of limited opportunities to acquire new mates. These alternative hypotheses were evaluated for permanently monogamous tropical house wrens in lowland central Panama. Mates gain no reproductive advantage by reuniting from one breeding season to the next or by reuniting within breeding seasons. In contrast, the scarcity of openings within the stable breeding population limits the opportunities for each sex to re-sort. Moreover, pairs must guard against encroachment by neighboring pairs and takeover by non-neighboring pairs. The same constraints that shape the long-term pair bond appear to influence the structure of the floater population, which includes transient pairs as well as individuals. Mates usually do not defend each other against single intruders, even when takeovers occur, suggesting that mate choice is a recurring phenomenon even in this permanently monogamous mating system. These results probably pertain to other tropical monogamous species with long-term pair bonds, but detailed studies of other species are required to establish generality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/284728</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal ethology ; Animal social behavior ; Aves ; Aviculture ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male animals ; Mating behavior ; Monogamy ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Troglodytes musculus ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 1987-10, Vol.130 (4), p.507-525</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1987 The University of Chicago</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-b3f73cb7ecef7cca08aeadfe76d7092ee4464fde238ec8925ad7d76a4a11cfa43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2461701$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2461701$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27868,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=7013216$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freed, Leonard A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?</title><title>The American naturalist</title><description>Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Conversely, each member may be constrained to remain with the current mate because of limited opportunities to acquire new mates. These alternative hypotheses were evaluated for permanently monogamous tropical house wrens in lowland central Panama. Mates gain no reproductive advantage by reuniting from one breeding season to the next or by reuniting within breeding seasons. In contrast, the scarcity of openings within the stable breeding population limits the opportunities for each sex to re-sort. Moreover, pairs must guard against encroachment by neighboring pairs and takeover by non-neighboring pairs. The same constraints that shape the long-term pair bond appear to influence the structure of the floater population, which includes transient pairs as well as individuals. Mates usually do not defend each other against single intruders, even when takeovers occur, suggesting that mate choice is a recurring phenomenon even in this permanently monogamous mating system. These results probably pertain to other tropical monogamous species with long-term pair bonds, but detailed studies of other species are required to establish generality.</description><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Animal social behavior</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Aviculture</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Monogamy</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Troglodytes musculus</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxVf4GHBcVbdL-STbxILX4UCnqIeAzTzWxNSXfrbir4701pqeBpGObhZXgJOefshrM8uxW50iI_IAOeSp2kUshDMmCMyYRxpY_JSYyLfi1UkQ7IpPxEOvVunpQYlvQNmkAfvKupt7QMftUYaOmLX0ekHwFdvKOj-htcB3OkPtCxd7EL0Lju_pQcWWgjnu3mkLw_PZbjl2T6-jwZj6aJkZJ1yUxaLc1Mo0GrjQGWA0JtUWe1ZoVAVCpTtkYhczR5IVKoda0zUMC5saDkkFxvc1fBf60xdtWyiQbbFhz2f1ZcFTLlKu3h5T-48Ovg-t8qLlkuZcHy9C_OBB9jQFutQrOE8FNxVm36rLZ99vBqFwexL8UGcKaJe60Zl4JnPbvYskXsfNifhcr4hvwCLJJ8Aw</recordid><startdate>19871001</startdate><enddate>19871001</enddate><creator>Freed, Leonard A.</creator><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19871001</creationdate><title>The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?</title><author>Freed, Leonard A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-b3f73cb7ecef7cca08aeadfe76d7092ee4464fde238ec8925ad7d76a4a11cfa43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Animal social behavior</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Aviculture</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Monogamy</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Troglodytes musculus</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freed, Leonard A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freed, Leonard A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><date>1987-10-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>507-525</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Permanent monogamy may be the most prevalent mating system in birds because most birds are tropical residents found as pairs in territories that are defended throughout the year. Long-term pair bonds may be advantageous to individuals with respect to current and future reproductive success. Conversely, each member may be constrained to remain with the current mate because of limited opportunities to acquire new mates. These alternative hypotheses were evaluated for permanently monogamous tropical house wrens in lowland central Panama. Mates gain no reproductive advantage by reuniting from one breeding season to the next or by reuniting within breeding seasons. In contrast, the scarcity of openings within the stable breeding population limits the opportunities for each sex to re-sort. Moreover, pairs must guard against encroachment by neighboring pairs and takeover by non-neighboring pairs. The same constraints that shape the long-term pair bond appear to influence the structure of the floater population, which includes transient pairs as well as individuals. Mates usually do not defend each other against single intruders, even when takeovers occur, suggesting that mate choice is a recurring phenomenon even in this permanently monogamous mating system. These results probably pertain to other tropical monogamous species with long-term pair bonds, but detailed studies of other species are required to establish generality.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/284728</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 1987-10, Vol.130 (4), p.507-525 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14935145 |
source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal ethology Animal social behavior Aves Aviculture Biological and medical sciences Bird nesting Birds Breeding Breeding seasons Female animals Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Male animals Mating behavior Monogamy Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Troglodytes musculus Vertebrata |
title | The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A31%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Long-Term%20Pair%20Bond%20of%20Tropical%20House%20Wrens:%20Advantage%20or%20Constraint?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Freed,%20Leonard%20A.&rft.date=1987-10-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=507-525&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/284728&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2461701%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1308339085&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2461701&rfr_iscdi=true |