Corticosteroids and Allergies to Contrast Material

To the Editor: The data presented and the conclusions drawn by Lasser et al. (Oct. 1 issue)* about the effect of steroids on the incidence of severe (their Grade III) reactions in patients given ionic contrast mediums seem likely to mislead all but the most careful reader. Patients receiving the ion...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 1988-03, Vol.318 (13), p.856-857
1. Verfasser: Ackroyd, J F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 857
container_issue 13
container_start_page 856
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 318
creator Ackroyd, J F
description To the Editor: The data presented and the conclusions drawn by Lasser et al. (Oct. 1 issue)* about the effect of steroids on the incidence of severe (their Grade III) reactions in patients given ionic contrast mediums seem likely to mislead all but the most careful reader. Patients receiving the ionic contrast mediums were given either one or two doses of oral methylprednisolone before the medium was injected. Two control groups received one or two placebo tablets. The single dose of methylprednisolone did not reduce the incidence of adverse reactions. As compared with placebo, two doses of steroid did not . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJM198803313181314
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14929980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14929980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-6f6ba59cbe3a8aa2bf6d5f66061229b19c564ec6d11e79d695bd69d8c80870452</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUDaKM4-gXiNCVG6nm3WQ5lPHFjG50HdIklQ5tMyaZhX9vpIMr8cK9d3EecA4AlwjeIsj43cvqeYOkEJAQRJDIS4_AHDFCSkohPwZzCLEoaSXJKTiLcQvzICpnYEYIw5yLOcC1D6kzPiYXfGdjoUdbLPvehY_OxSL5ovZjCjqmYqMzp9P9OThpdR_dxeEvwPv96q1-LNevD0_1cl0awqtU8pY3mknTOKKF1rhpuWUt55AjjGWDpGGcOsMtQq6SlkvW5GOFEVBUkDK8ANeT7y74z72LSQ1dNK7v9ej8PqqcBEspYCaSiWiCjzG4Vu1CN-jwpRBUP02pP5rKqquD_b4ZnP3VHKrJ-M2ED0NUo9sO_7p9A_1lbuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14929980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corticosteroids and Allergies to Contrast Material</title><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ackroyd, J F</creator><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, J F</creatorcontrib><description>To the Editor: The data presented and the conclusions drawn by Lasser et al. (Oct. 1 issue)* about the effect of steroids on the incidence of severe (their Grade III) reactions in patients given ionic contrast mediums seem likely to mislead all but the most careful reader. Patients receiving the ionic contrast mediums were given either one or two doses of oral methylprednisolone before the medium was injected. Two control groups received one or two placebo tablets. The single dose of methylprednisolone did not reduce the incidence of adverse reactions. As compared with placebo, two doses of steroid did not . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198803313181314</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3352668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Contrast Media - adverse effects ; Drug Hypersensitivity - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1988-03, Vol.318 (13), p.856-857</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-6f6ba59cbe3a8aa2bf6d5f66061229b19c564ec6d11e79d695bd69d8c80870452</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-6f6ba59cbe3a8aa2bf6d5f66061229b19c564ec6d11e79d695bd69d8c80870452</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3352668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, J F</creatorcontrib><title>Corticosteroids and Allergies to Contrast Material</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>To the Editor: The data presented and the conclusions drawn by Lasser et al. (Oct. 1 issue)* about the effect of steroids on the incidence of severe (their Grade III) reactions in patients given ionic contrast mediums seem likely to mislead all but the most careful reader. Patients receiving the ionic contrast mediums were given either one or two doses of oral methylprednisolone before the medium was injected. Two control groups received one or two placebo tablets. The single dose of methylprednisolone did not reduce the incidence of adverse reactions. As compared with placebo, two doses of steroid did not . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</description><subject>Contrast Media - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drug Hypersensitivity - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtKxDAUDaKM4-gXiNCVG6nm3WQ5lPHFjG50HdIklQ5tMyaZhX9vpIMr8cK9d3EecA4AlwjeIsj43cvqeYOkEJAQRJDIS4_AHDFCSkohPwZzCLEoaSXJKTiLcQvzICpnYEYIw5yLOcC1D6kzPiYXfGdjoUdbLPvehY_OxSL5ovZjCjqmYqMzp9P9OThpdR_dxeEvwPv96q1-LNevD0_1cl0awqtU8pY3mknTOKKF1rhpuWUt55AjjGWDpGGcOsMtQq6SlkvW5GOFEVBUkDK8ANeT7y74z72LSQ1dNK7v9ej8PqqcBEspYCaSiWiCjzG4Vu1CN-jwpRBUP02pP5rKqquD_b4ZnP3VHKrJ-M2ED0NUo9sO_7p9A_1lbuc</recordid><startdate>19880331</startdate><enddate>19880331</enddate><creator>Ackroyd, J F</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880331</creationdate><title>Corticosteroids and Allergies to Contrast Material</title><author>Ackroyd, J F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-6f6ba59cbe3a8aa2bf6d5f66061229b19c564ec6d11e79d695bd69d8c80870452</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Contrast Media - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drug Hypersensitivity - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ackroyd, J F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ackroyd, J F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corticosteroids and Allergies to Contrast Material</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1988-03-31</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>318</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>856</spage><epage>857</epage><pages>856-857</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>To the Editor: The data presented and the conclusions drawn by Lasser et al. (Oct. 1 issue)* about the effect of steroids on the incidence of severe (their Grade III) reactions in patients given ionic contrast mediums seem likely to mislead all but the most careful reader. Patients receiving the ionic contrast mediums were given either one or two doses of oral methylprednisolone before the medium was injected. Two control groups received one or two placebo tablets. The single dose of methylprednisolone did not reduce the incidence of adverse reactions. As compared with placebo, two doses of steroid did not . . . No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>3352668</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM198803313181314</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext no_fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 1988-03, Vol.318 (13), p.856-857
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_14929980
source MEDLINE
subjects Contrast Media - adverse effects
Drug Hypersensitivity - prevention & control
Humans
Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use
title Corticosteroids and Allergies to Contrast Material
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corticosteroids%20and%20Allergies%20to%20Contrast%20Material&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Ackroyd,%20J%20F&rft.date=1988-03-31&rft.volume=318&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=857&rft.pages=856-857&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM198803313181314&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14929980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14929980&rft_id=info:pmid/3352668&rfr_iscdi=true