Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom

Aim As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking informati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Early intervention in psychiatry 2014-02, Vol.8 (1), p.91-97
Hauptverfasser: Phillipson, Adrian, Akroyd, Mike, Carley, Joanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
container_title Early intervention in psychiatry
container_volume 8
creator Phillipson, Adrian
Akroyd, Mike
Carley, Joanne
description Aim As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking information on service structure, interventions and outcomes. The background places the service in the context of national and international guidelines. Methods All discharges between service inception in 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively examined and audited according to identified standards, based upon international and national guidelines. A total of 110 patients were discharged from the EI service after a period of involvement of at least 6 months. Results A high proportion of service users (55%) had their care transferred back to primary care after discharge. Physical health and social needs were well addressed, and almost half of individuals were in education, training or employment upon discharge. Most service users (69%) did not require inpatient admission during their involvement with the service. Although the majority had psychological, pharmacological and physical health needs addressed, there remained room for improvement when measured against identified standards. Conclusions This paper details outcomes of every patient seen by an EI service since inception, providing valuable benchmarking information for those involved in management of similar services, service redevelopment, commissioning, and implementation of evidence‐based practice. The proportion of service users in education, training or employment after discharge exceeded expectations considerably.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/eip.12061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492715982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3191178731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3171-a7de670951f4fcfdbd5fcf6f1f27fef34505a0e8a7ca8ac9ed98ae6af73e3fae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDlPAzEQhS0EIhAo-APIEg3NBnsdr9dlxBEQ4Sg4SstZj4Nhj2DvAvn3mARSMM2MNN8bvXkIHVAyoLFOwM0HNCUZ3UA7VHCaiFyyzfWc8x7aDeGVEC6ylG6jXsqEYMOU7aDRqDOuxY3FxoXiRfsZBGx9U2GNPcxcU-sSB_AfrgDsaty-AH6sXQsGX7t6ZppqD21ZXQbY_-199Hhx_nB6mUzuxleno0niGBU00cJAJojk1A5tYc3U8NgyS20qLFg25IRrArkWhc51IcHIXEOmrWDArAbWR8eru3PfvHcQWlVFx1CWuoamC4oOZSool3ka0aN_6GvT-fjJkopupCRZpA5_qW5agVFz7yrtF-ovnAicrIBPV8JivadE_aSuYupqmbo6v7pfDlGRrBQutPC1Vmj_pjLBBFfPt2M1vsxTeXP2pBj7Bliugro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491719906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Phillipson, Adrian ; Akroyd, Mike ; Carley, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillipson, Adrian ; Akroyd, Mike ; Carley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>Aim As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking information on service structure, interventions and outcomes. The background places the service in the context of national and international guidelines. Methods All discharges between service inception in 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively examined and audited according to identified standards, based upon international and national guidelines. A total of 110 patients were discharged from the EI service after a period of involvement of at least 6 months. Results A high proportion of service users (55%) had their care transferred back to primary care after discharge. Physical health and social needs were well addressed, and almost half of individuals were in education, training or employment upon discharge. Most service users (69%) did not require inpatient admission during their involvement with the service. Although the majority had psychological, pharmacological and physical health needs addressed, there remained room for improvement when measured against identified standards. Conclusions This paper details outcomes of every patient seen by an EI service since inception, providing valuable benchmarking information for those involved in management of similar services, service redevelopment, commissioning, and implementation of evidence‐based practice. The proportion of service users in education, training or employment after discharge exceeded expectations considerably.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eip.12061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23773423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; clinical audit ; Early intervention ; early intervention in psychosis ; Early Medical Intervention ; evidence-based practice ; Humans ; Medical Audit ; Mental Health Services ; Patient Discharge ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; quality ; Retrospective Studies ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Early intervention in psychiatry, 2014-02, Vol.8 (1), p.91-97</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Feip.12061$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Feip.12061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillipson, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akroyd, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom</title><title>Early intervention in psychiatry</title><addtitle>Early Intervention in Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Aim As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking information on service structure, interventions and outcomes. The background places the service in the context of national and international guidelines. Methods All discharges between service inception in 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively examined and audited according to identified standards, based upon international and national guidelines. A total of 110 patients were discharged from the EI service after a period of involvement of at least 6 months. Results A high proportion of service users (55%) had their care transferred back to primary care after discharge. Physical health and social needs were well addressed, and almost half of individuals were in education, training or employment upon discharge. Most service users (69%) did not require inpatient admission during their involvement with the service. Although the majority had psychological, pharmacological and physical health needs addressed, there remained room for improvement when measured against identified standards. Conclusions This paper details outcomes of every patient seen by an EI service since inception, providing valuable benchmarking information for those involved in management of similar services, service redevelopment, commissioning, and implementation of evidence‐based practice. The proportion of service users in education, training or employment after discharge exceeded expectations considerably.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>clinical audit</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>early intervention in psychosis</subject><subject>Early Medical Intervention</subject><subject>evidence-based practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Mental Health Services</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1751-7885</issn><issn>1751-7893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkDlPAzEQhS0EIhAo-APIEg3NBnsdr9dlxBEQ4Sg4SstZj4Nhj2DvAvn3mARSMM2MNN8bvXkIHVAyoLFOwM0HNCUZ3UA7VHCaiFyyzfWc8x7aDeGVEC6ylG6jXsqEYMOU7aDRqDOuxY3FxoXiRfsZBGx9U2GNPcxcU-sSB_AfrgDsaty-AH6sXQsGX7t6ZppqD21ZXQbY_-199Hhx_nB6mUzuxleno0niGBU00cJAJojk1A5tYc3U8NgyS20qLFg25IRrArkWhc51IcHIXEOmrWDArAbWR8eru3PfvHcQWlVFx1CWuoamC4oOZSool3ka0aN_6GvT-fjJkopupCRZpA5_qW5agVFz7yrtF-ovnAicrIBPV8JivadE_aSuYupqmbo6v7pfDlGRrBQutPC1Vmj_pjLBBFfPt2M1vsxTeXP2pBj7Bliugro</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Phillipson, Adrian</creator><creator>Akroyd, Mike</creator><creator>Carley, Joanne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom</title><author>Phillipson, Adrian ; Akroyd, Mike ; Carley, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3171-a7de670951f4fcfdbd5fcf6f1f27fef34505a0e8a7ca8ac9ed98ae6af73e3fae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>clinical audit</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>early intervention in psychosis</topic><topic>Early Medical Intervention</topic><topic>evidence-based practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Mental Health Services</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillipson, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akroyd, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Early intervention in psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillipson, Adrian</au><au>Akroyd, Mike</au><au>Carley, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom</atitle><jtitle>Early intervention in psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Early Intervention in Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>91-97</pages><issn>1751-7885</issn><eissn>1751-7893</eissn><abstract>Aim As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking information on service structure, interventions and outcomes. The background places the service in the context of national and international guidelines. Methods All discharges between service inception in 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively examined and audited according to identified standards, based upon international and national guidelines. A total of 110 patients were discharged from the EI service after a period of involvement of at least 6 months. Results A high proportion of service users (55%) had their care transferred back to primary care after discharge. Physical health and social needs were well addressed, and almost half of individuals were in education, training or employment upon discharge. Most service users (69%) did not require inpatient admission during their involvement with the service. Although the majority had psychological, pharmacological and physical health needs addressed, there remained room for improvement when measured against identified standards. Conclusions This paper details outcomes of every patient seen by an EI service since inception, providing valuable benchmarking information for those involved in management of similar services, service redevelopment, commissioning, and implementation of evidence‐based practice. The proportion of service users in education, training or employment after discharge exceeded expectations considerably.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23773423</pmid><doi>10.1111/eip.12061</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-7885
ispartof Early intervention in psychiatry, 2014-02, Vol.8 (1), p.91-97
issn 1751-7885
1751-7893
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492715982
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Benchmarking
clinical audit
Early intervention
early intervention in psychosis
Early Medical Intervention
evidence-based practice
Humans
Medical Audit
Mental Health Services
Patient Discharge
Practice Guidelines as Topic
quality
Retrospective Studies
United Kingdom
title Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T23%3A29%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Audit%20of%20discharges%20from%20a%20regional%20service%20in%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.jtitle=Early%20intervention%20in%20psychiatry&rft.au=Phillipson,%20Adrian&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=91-97&rft.issn=1751-7885&rft.eissn=1751-7893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eip.12061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3191178731%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491719906&rft_id=info:pmid/23773423&rfr_iscdi=true