Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom
Aim As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking informati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Early intervention in psychiatry 2014-02, Vol.8 (1), p.91-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | Early intervention in psychiatry |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Phillipson, Adrian Akroyd, Mike Carley, Joanne |
description | Aim
As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking information on service structure, interventions and outcomes. The background places the service in the context of national and international guidelines.
Methods
All discharges between service inception in 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively examined and audited according to identified standards, based upon international and national guidelines. A total of 110 patients were discharged from the EI service after a period of involvement of at least 6 months.
Results
A high proportion of service users (55%) had their care transferred back to primary care after discharge. Physical health and social needs were well addressed, and almost half of individuals were in education, training or employment upon discharge. Most service users (69%) did not require inpatient admission during their involvement with the service. Although the majority had psychological, pharmacological and physical health needs addressed, there remained room for improvement when measured against identified standards.
Conclusions
This paper details outcomes of every patient seen by an EI service since inception, providing valuable benchmarking information for those involved in management of similar services, service redevelopment, commissioning, and implementation of evidence‐based practice. The proportion of service users in education, training or employment after discharge exceeded expectations considerably. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/eip.12061 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492715982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3191178731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3171-a7de670951f4fcfdbd5fcf6f1f27fef34505a0e8a7ca8ac9ed98ae6af73e3fae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDlPAzEQhS0EIhAo-APIEg3NBnsdr9dlxBEQ4Sg4SstZj4Nhj2DvAvn3mARSMM2MNN8bvXkIHVAyoLFOwM0HNCUZ3UA7VHCaiFyyzfWc8x7aDeGVEC6ylG6jXsqEYMOU7aDRqDOuxY3FxoXiRfsZBGx9U2GNPcxcU-sSB_AfrgDsaty-AH6sXQsGX7t6ZppqD21ZXQbY_-199Hhx_nB6mUzuxleno0niGBU00cJAJojk1A5tYc3U8NgyS20qLFg25IRrArkWhc51IcHIXEOmrWDArAbWR8eru3PfvHcQWlVFx1CWuoamC4oOZSool3ka0aN_6GvT-fjJkopupCRZpA5_qW5agVFz7yrtF-ovnAicrIBPV8JivadE_aSuYupqmbo6v7pfDlGRrBQutPC1Vmj_pjLBBFfPt2M1vsxTeXP2pBj7Bliugro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1491719906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Phillipson, Adrian ; Akroyd, Mike ; Carley, Joanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillipson, Adrian ; Akroyd, Mike ; Carley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking information on service structure, interventions and outcomes. The background places the service in the context of national and international guidelines.
Methods
All discharges between service inception in 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively examined and audited according to identified standards, based upon international and national guidelines. A total of 110 patients were discharged from the EI service after a period of involvement of at least 6 months.
Results
A high proportion of service users (55%) had their care transferred back to primary care after discharge. Physical health and social needs were well addressed, and almost half of individuals were in education, training or employment upon discharge. Most service users (69%) did not require inpatient admission during their involvement with the service. Although the majority had psychological, pharmacological and physical health needs addressed, there remained room for improvement when measured against identified standards.
Conclusions
This paper details outcomes of every patient seen by an EI service since inception, providing valuable benchmarking information for those involved in management of similar services, service redevelopment, commissioning, and implementation of evidence‐based practice. The proportion of service users in education, training or employment after discharge exceeded expectations considerably.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-7893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eip.12061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23773423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; clinical audit ; Early intervention ; early intervention in psychosis ; Early Medical Intervention ; evidence-based practice ; Humans ; Medical Audit ; Mental Health Services ; Patient Discharge ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; quality ; Retrospective Studies ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Early intervention in psychiatry, 2014-02, Vol.8 (1), p.91-97</ispartof><rights>2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Feip.12061$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Feip.12061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23773423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillipson, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akroyd, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><title>Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom</title><title>Early intervention in psychiatry</title><addtitle>Early Intervention in Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Aim
As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking information on service structure, interventions and outcomes. The background places the service in the context of national and international guidelines.
Methods
All discharges between service inception in 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively examined and audited according to identified standards, based upon international and national guidelines. A total of 110 patients were discharged from the EI service after a period of involvement of at least 6 months.
Results
A high proportion of service users (55%) had their care transferred back to primary care after discharge. Physical health and social needs were well addressed, and almost half of individuals were in education, training or employment upon discharge. Most service users (69%) did not require inpatient admission during their involvement with the service. Although the majority had psychological, pharmacological and physical health needs addressed, there remained room for improvement when measured against identified standards.
Conclusions
This paper details outcomes of every patient seen by an EI service since inception, providing valuable benchmarking information for those involved in management of similar services, service redevelopment, commissioning, and implementation of evidence‐based practice. The proportion of service users in education, training or employment after discharge exceeded expectations considerably.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>clinical audit</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>early intervention in psychosis</subject><subject>Early Medical Intervention</subject><subject>evidence-based practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Mental Health Services</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1751-7885</issn><issn>1751-7893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkDlPAzEQhS0EIhAo-APIEg3NBnsdr9dlxBEQ4Sg4SstZj4Nhj2DvAvn3mARSMM2MNN8bvXkIHVAyoLFOwM0HNCUZ3UA7VHCaiFyyzfWc8x7aDeGVEC6ylG6jXsqEYMOU7aDRqDOuxY3FxoXiRfsZBGx9U2GNPcxcU-sSB_AfrgDsaty-AH6sXQsGX7t6ZppqD21ZXQbY_-199Hhx_nB6mUzuxleno0niGBU00cJAJojk1A5tYc3U8NgyS20qLFg25IRrArkWhc51IcHIXEOmrWDArAbWR8eru3PfvHcQWlVFx1CWuoamC4oOZSool3ka0aN_6GvT-fjJkopupCRZpA5_qW5agVFz7yrtF-ovnAicrIBPV8JivadE_aSuYupqmbo6v7pfDlGRrBQutPC1Vmj_pjLBBFfPt2M1vsxTeXP2pBj7Bliugro</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Phillipson, Adrian</creator><creator>Akroyd, Mike</creator><creator>Carley, Joanne</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom</title><author>Phillipson, Adrian ; Akroyd, Mike ; Carley, Joanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3171-a7de670951f4fcfdbd5fcf6f1f27fef34505a0e8a7ca8ac9ed98ae6af73e3fae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>clinical audit</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>early intervention in psychosis</topic><topic>Early Medical Intervention</topic><topic>evidence-based practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Mental Health Services</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillipson, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akroyd, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carley, Joanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Early intervention in psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillipson, Adrian</au><au>Akroyd, Mike</au><au>Carley, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom</atitle><jtitle>Early intervention in psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Early Intervention in Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>91-97</pages><issn>1751-7885</issn><eissn>1751-7893</eissn><abstract>Aim
As early intervention in psychosis (EI) continues to develop, clinical governance maintains an important role in the ‘real world’ analysis of services. This paper details an audit of all discharges from a regional early intervention service in the United Kingdom, providing benchmarking information on service structure, interventions and outcomes. The background places the service in the context of national and international guidelines.
Methods
All discharges between service inception in 2004 and February 2011 were retrospectively examined and audited according to identified standards, based upon international and national guidelines. A total of 110 patients were discharged from the EI service after a period of involvement of at least 6 months.
Results
A high proportion of service users (55%) had their care transferred back to primary care after discharge. Physical health and social needs were well addressed, and almost half of individuals were in education, training or employment upon discharge. Most service users (69%) did not require inpatient admission during their involvement with the service. Although the majority had psychological, pharmacological and physical health needs addressed, there remained room for improvement when measured against identified standards.
Conclusions
This paper details outcomes of every patient seen by an EI service since inception, providing valuable benchmarking information for those involved in management of similar services, service redevelopment, commissioning, and implementation of evidence‐based practice. The proportion of service users in education, training or employment after discharge exceeded expectations considerably.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23773423</pmid><doi>10.1111/eip.12061</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1751-7885 |
ispartof | Early intervention in psychiatry, 2014-02, Vol.8 (1), p.91-97 |
issn | 1751-7885 1751-7893 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492715982 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Benchmarking clinical audit Early intervention early intervention in psychosis Early Medical Intervention evidence-based practice Humans Medical Audit Mental Health Services Patient Discharge Practice Guidelines as Topic quality Retrospective Studies United Kingdom |
title | Audit of discharges from a regional service in the United Kingdom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T23%3A29%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Audit%20of%20discharges%20from%20a%20regional%20service%20in%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.jtitle=Early%20intervention%20in%20psychiatry&rft.au=Phillipson,%20Adrian&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=91-97&rft.issn=1751-7885&rft.eissn=1751-7893&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eip.12061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3191178731%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1491719906&rft_id=info:pmid/23773423&rfr_iscdi=true |