Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan
Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) >150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis >50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex vel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2014-02, Vol.59 (2), p.435-439 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 439 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 435 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Matos, Jesus M., MD Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD Pisimisis, George, MD Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT Kougias, Panos, MD Lin, Peter H., MD Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS |
description | Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) >150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis >50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex velocities with angiographic findings of significant stenosis >60%. Methods We reviewed the carotid duplex records from 2008 to 2011 looking for patients with isolated CCA stenosis and no ipsilateral internal or contralateral carotid artery disease who received either a carotid angiogram or a computed tomography scan. We identified 25 patients who had significant CCA disease >60%. We also selected 74 controls without known CCA stenosis. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis to correlate PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) with angiographic stenosis >60%. The degree of stenosis was determined by measuring the luminal stenosis in comparison to the proximal normal CCA diameter. Results Most patients had a carotid angiogram (21/25), four only had a computed tomography angiography and four had both. Eighteen patients had history of neck radiation. The CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s had a sensitivity of 98.7% (81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 95.7% (92.0%-99.9%), CCA PSV ≥300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 90.9% (69.4%-98.4%) and a specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%). The CCA EDV ≥40 cm/s had a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval of 75.1-99.8%) and specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%), EDV ≥60 cm/s had a sensitivity of 100% (75.1%-99.8%) and specificity of 87% (94.1-100%), and EDV ≥70 cm/s had a sensitivity of 86.4% (64.0%-96.4%) and specificity of 100% (94.1%-100%). The presence of both PSV |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492703702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0741521413015814</els_id><sourcerecordid>1492703702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fcde5bc4a073b49ca216c99b90a21d6bd5e7a51ea5cf3bc0c6b15463de2925c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhB7BBXrJJuNd5CwkJVbykSixa2FqOfWfqkNjBdkrn35NoShcsurJlfedI_g5jrxFyBKzfDflwG3MBWOTQ5lDAE7ZD6JqsbqF7ynbQlJhVAssz9iLGAQCxapvn7EyU0AKKZseGn2q0RiXrDlz7afKOaxV8sobHRM5HG3l_5GaZR7rjy5iCin5xhv-x6eYBVe5g_SGoifuw1cxLIsOTn7bH-ebIo1buJXu2V2OkV_fnOfvx-dP1xdfs8vuXbxcfLzNdVpiydq8NVb0uFTRFX3ZaCax11_UdrDdT96aiRlVIqtL7oteg6x6rsi4MiU5Uujhnb0-9c_C_F4pJTjZqGkflyC9RYtmJBooGxIriCdXBxxhoL-dgJxWOEkFuiuUgV8VyUyyhlaviNfPmvn7pJzIPiX9OV-D9CaD1k7eWgozaktNkbCCdpPH20foP_6X1aJ3VavxFR4qDX4Jb7UmUUUiQV9vG28RYwDoulsVfp0Sj9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492703702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Matos, Jesus M., MD ; Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH ; Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD ; Pisimisis, George, MD ; Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT ; Kougias, Panos, MD ; Lin, Peter H., MD ; Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Matos, Jesus M., MD ; Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH ; Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD ; Pisimisis, George, MD ; Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT ; Kougias, Panos, MD ; Lin, Peter H., MD ; Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) >150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis >50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex velocities with angiographic findings of significant stenosis >60%. Methods We reviewed the carotid duplex records from 2008 to 2011 looking for patients with isolated CCA stenosis and no ipsilateral internal or contralateral carotid artery disease who received either a carotid angiogram or a computed tomography scan. We identified 25 patients who had significant CCA disease >60%. We also selected 74 controls without known CCA stenosis. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis to correlate PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) with angiographic stenosis >60%. The degree of stenosis was determined by measuring the luminal stenosis in comparison to the proximal normal CCA diameter. Results Most patients had a carotid angiogram (21/25), four only had a computed tomography angiography and four had both. Eighteen patients had history of neck radiation. The CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s had a sensitivity of 98.7% (81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 95.7% (92.0%-99.9%), CCA PSV ≥300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 90.9% (69.4%-98.4%) and a specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%). The CCA EDV ≥40 cm/s had a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval of 75.1-99.8%) and specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%), EDV ≥60 cm/s had a sensitivity of 100% (75.1%-99.8%) and specificity of 87% (94.1-100%), and EDV ≥70 cm/s had a sensitivity of 86.4% (64.0%-96.4%) and specificity of 100% (94.1%-100%). The presence of both PSV <250 cm/s and EDV <60 cm/s had a 98.7% negative predictive value, and the presence of both PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s had 100% positive predictive value. Conclusions Establishing CCA duplex criteria to screen patients with significant stenosis is crucial to identify those who will need further imaging modality or treatment. In our laboratory, CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s are thresholds that can be used to identify significant (>60%) CCA stenosis with a high degree of accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24080127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2014-02, Vol.59 (2), p.435-439</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fcde5bc4a073b49ca216c99b90a21d6bd5e7a51ea5cf3bc0c6b15463de2925c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fcde5bc4a073b49ca216c99b90a21d6bd5e7a51ea5cf3bc0c6b15463de2925c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521413015814$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24080127$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matos, Jesus M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisimisis, George, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kougias, Panos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Peter H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) >150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis >50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex velocities with angiographic findings of significant stenosis >60%. Methods We reviewed the carotid duplex records from 2008 to 2011 looking for patients with isolated CCA stenosis and no ipsilateral internal or contralateral carotid artery disease who received either a carotid angiogram or a computed tomography scan. We identified 25 patients who had significant CCA disease >60%. We also selected 74 controls without known CCA stenosis. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis to correlate PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) with angiographic stenosis >60%. The degree of stenosis was determined by measuring the luminal stenosis in comparison to the proximal normal CCA diameter. Results Most patients had a carotid angiogram (21/25), four only had a computed tomography angiography and four had both. Eighteen patients had history of neck radiation. The CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s had a sensitivity of 98.7% (81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 95.7% (92.0%-99.9%), CCA PSV ≥300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 90.9% (69.4%-98.4%) and a specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%). The CCA EDV ≥40 cm/s had a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval of 75.1-99.8%) and specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%), EDV ≥60 cm/s had a sensitivity of 100% (75.1%-99.8%) and specificity of 87% (94.1-100%), and EDV ≥70 cm/s had a sensitivity of 86.4% (64.0%-96.4%) and specificity of 100% (94.1%-100%). The presence of both PSV <250 cm/s and EDV <60 cm/s had a 98.7% negative predictive value, and the presence of both PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s had 100% positive predictive value. Conclusions Establishing CCA duplex criteria to screen patients with significant stenosis is crucial to identify those who will need further imaging modality or treatment. In our laboratory, CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s are thresholds that can be used to identify significant (>60%) CCA stenosis with a high degree of accuracy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhB7BBXrJJuNd5CwkJVbykSixa2FqOfWfqkNjBdkrn35NoShcsurJlfedI_g5jrxFyBKzfDflwG3MBWOTQ5lDAE7ZD6JqsbqF7ynbQlJhVAssz9iLGAQCxapvn7EyU0AKKZseGn2q0RiXrDlz7afKOaxV8sobHRM5HG3l_5GaZR7rjy5iCin5xhv-x6eYBVe5g_SGoifuw1cxLIsOTn7bH-ebIo1buJXu2V2OkV_fnOfvx-dP1xdfs8vuXbxcfLzNdVpiydq8NVb0uFTRFX3ZaCax11_UdrDdT96aiRlVIqtL7oteg6x6rsi4MiU5Uujhnb0-9c_C_F4pJTjZqGkflyC9RYtmJBooGxIriCdXBxxhoL-dgJxWOEkFuiuUgV8VyUyyhlaviNfPmvn7pJzIPiX9OV-D9CaD1k7eWgozaktNkbCCdpPH20foP_6X1aJ3VavxFR4qDX4Jb7UmUUUiQV9vG28RYwDoulsVfp0Sj9g</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Matos, Jesus M., MD</creator><creator>Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD</creator><creator>Pisimisis, George, MD</creator><creator>Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT</creator><creator>Kougias, Panos, MD</creator><creator>Lin, Peter H., MD</creator><creator>Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan</title><author>Matos, Jesus M., MD ; Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH ; Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD ; Pisimisis, George, MD ; Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT ; Kougias, Panos, MD ; Lin, Peter H., MD ; Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fcde5bc4a073b49ca216c99b90a21d6bd5e7a51ea5cf3bc0c6b15463de2925c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matos, Jesus M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisimisis, George, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kougias, Panos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Peter H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matos, Jesus M., MD</au><au>Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH</au><au>Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD</au><au>Pisimisis, George, MD</au><au>Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT</au><au>Kougias, Panos, MD</au><au>Lin, Peter H., MD</au><au>Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>435-439</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) >150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis >50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex velocities with angiographic findings of significant stenosis >60%. Methods We reviewed the carotid duplex records from 2008 to 2011 looking for patients with isolated CCA stenosis and no ipsilateral internal or contralateral carotid artery disease who received either a carotid angiogram or a computed tomography scan. We identified 25 patients who had significant CCA disease >60%. We also selected 74 controls without known CCA stenosis. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis to correlate PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) with angiographic stenosis >60%. The degree of stenosis was determined by measuring the luminal stenosis in comparison to the proximal normal CCA diameter. Results Most patients had a carotid angiogram (21/25), four only had a computed tomography angiography and four had both. Eighteen patients had history of neck radiation. The CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s had a sensitivity of 98.7% (81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 95.7% (92.0%-99.9%), CCA PSV ≥300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 90.9% (69.4%-98.4%) and a specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%). The CCA EDV ≥40 cm/s had a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval of 75.1-99.8%) and specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%), EDV ≥60 cm/s had a sensitivity of 100% (75.1%-99.8%) and specificity of 87% (94.1-100%), and EDV ≥70 cm/s had a sensitivity of 86.4% (64.0%-96.4%) and specificity of 100% (94.1%-100%). The presence of both PSV <250 cm/s and EDV <60 cm/s had a 98.7% negative predictive value, and the presence of both PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s had 100% positive predictive value. Conclusions Establishing CCA duplex criteria to screen patients with significant stenosis is crucial to identify those who will need further imaging modality or treatment. In our laboratory, CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s are thresholds that can be used to identify significant (>60%) CCA stenosis with a high degree of accuracy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>24080127</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.030</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2014-02, Vol.59 (2), p.435-439 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492703702 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging Humans Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies ROC Curve Severity of Illness Index Surgery Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex |
title | Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A23%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20common%20carotid%20stenosis%20by%20duplex%20ultrasound%20with%20carotid%20angiogram%20or%20computed%20tomography%20scan&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Matos,%20Jesus%20M.,%20MD&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=435-439&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492703702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492703702&rft_id=info:pmid/24080127&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0741521413015814&rfr_iscdi=true |