Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan

Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) >150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis >50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex vel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2014-02, Vol.59 (2), p.435-439
Hauptverfasser: Matos, Jesus M., MD, Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH, Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD, Pisimisis, George, MD, Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT, Kougias, Panos, MD, Lin, Peter H., MD, Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 439
container_issue 2
container_start_page 435
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 59
creator Matos, Jesus M., MD
Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH
Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD
Pisimisis, George, MD
Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT
Kougias, Panos, MD
Lin, Peter H., MD
Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS
description Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) >150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis >50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex velocities with angiographic findings of significant stenosis >60%. Methods We reviewed the carotid duplex records from 2008 to 2011 looking for patients with isolated CCA stenosis and no ipsilateral internal or contralateral carotid artery disease who received either a carotid angiogram or a computed tomography scan. We identified 25 patients who had significant CCA disease >60%. We also selected 74 controls without known CCA stenosis. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis to correlate PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) with angiographic stenosis >60%. The degree of stenosis was determined by measuring the luminal stenosis in comparison to the proximal normal CCA diameter. Results Most patients had a carotid angiogram (21/25), four only had a computed tomography angiography and four had both. Eighteen patients had history of neck radiation. The CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s had a sensitivity of 98.7% (81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 95.7% (92.0%-99.9%), CCA PSV ≥300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 90.9% (69.4%-98.4%) and a specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%). The CCA EDV ≥40 cm/s had a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval of 75.1-99.8%) and specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%), EDV ≥60 cm/s had a sensitivity of 100% (75.1%-99.8%) and specificity of 87% (94.1-100%), and EDV ≥70 cm/s had a sensitivity of 86.4% (64.0%-96.4%) and specificity of 100% (94.1%-100%). The presence of both PSV 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492703702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0741521413015814</els_id><sourcerecordid>1492703702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fcde5bc4a073b49ca216c99b90a21d6bd5e7a51ea5cf3bc0c6b15463de2925c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhB7BBXrJJuNd5CwkJVbykSixa2FqOfWfqkNjBdkrn35NoShcsurJlfedI_g5jrxFyBKzfDflwG3MBWOTQ5lDAE7ZD6JqsbqF7ynbQlJhVAssz9iLGAQCxapvn7EyU0AKKZseGn2q0RiXrDlz7afKOaxV8sobHRM5HG3l_5GaZR7rjy5iCin5xhv-x6eYBVe5g_SGoifuw1cxLIsOTn7bH-ebIo1buJXu2V2OkV_fnOfvx-dP1xdfs8vuXbxcfLzNdVpiydq8NVb0uFTRFX3ZaCax11_UdrDdT96aiRlVIqtL7oteg6x6rsi4MiU5Uujhnb0-9c_C_F4pJTjZqGkflyC9RYtmJBooGxIriCdXBxxhoL-dgJxWOEkFuiuUgV8VyUyyhlaviNfPmvn7pJzIPiX9OV-D9CaD1k7eWgozaktNkbCCdpPH20foP_6X1aJ3VavxFR4qDX4Jb7UmUUUiQV9vG28RYwDoulsVfp0Sj9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492703702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Matos, Jesus M., MD ; Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH ; Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD ; Pisimisis, George, MD ; Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT ; Kougias, Panos, MD ; Lin, Peter H., MD ; Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Matos, Jesus M., MD ; Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH ; Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD ; Pisimisis, George, MD ; Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT ; Kougias, Panos, MD ; Lin, Peter H., MD ; Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) &gt;150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis &gt;50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex velocities with angiographic findings of significant stenosis &gt;60%. Methods We reviewed the carotid duplex records from 2008 to 2011 looking for patients with isolated CCA stenosis and no ipsilateral internal or contralateral carotid artery disease who received either a carotid angiogram or a computed tomography scan. We identified 25 patients who had significant CCA disease &gt;60%. We also selected 74 controls without known CCA stenosis. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis to correlate PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) with angiographic stenosis &gt;60%. The degree of stenosis was determined by measuring the luminal stenosis in comparison to the proximal normal CCA diameter. Results Most patients had a carotid angiogram (21/25), four only had a computed tomography angiography and four had both. Eighteen patients had history of neck radiation. The CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s had a sensitivity of 98.7% (81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 95.7% (92.0%-99.9%), CCA PSV ≥300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 90.9% (69.4%-98.4%) and a specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%). The CCA EDV ≥40 cm/s had a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval of 75.1-99.8%) and specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%), EDV ≥60 cm/s had a sensitivity of 100% (75.1%-99.8%) and specificity of 87% (94.1-100%), and EDV ≥70 cm/s had a sensitivity of 86.4% (64.0%-96.4%) and specificity of 100% (94.1%-100%). The presence of both PSV &lt;250 cm/s and EDV &lt;60 cm/s had a 98.7% negative predictive value, and the presence of both PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s had 100% positive predictive value. Conclusions Establishing CCA duplex criteria to screen patients with significant stenosis is crucial to identify those who will need further imaging modality or treatment. In our laboratory, CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s are thresholds that can be used to identify significant (&gt;60%) CCA stenosis with a high degree of accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24080127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; ROC Curve ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2014-02, Vol.59 (2), p.435-439</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><rights>Published by Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fcde5bc4a073b49ca216c99b90a21d6bd5e7a51ea5cf3bc0c6b15463de2925c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fcde5bc4a073b49ca216c99b90a21d6bd5e7a51ea5cf3bc0c6b15463de2925c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521413015814$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24080127$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matos, Jesus M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisimisis, George, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kougias, Panos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Peter H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) &gt;150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis &gt;50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex velocities with angiographic findings of significant stenosis &gt;60%. Methods We reviewed the carotid duplex records from 2008 to 2011 looking for patients with isolated CCA stenosis and no ipsilateral internal or contralateral carotid artery disease who received either a carotid angiogram or a computed tomography scan. We identified 25 patients who had significant CCA disease &gt;60%. We also selected 74 controls without known CCA stenosis. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis to correlate PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) with angiographic stenosis &gt;60%. The degree of stenosis was determined by measuring the luminal stenosis in comparison to the proximal normal CCA diameter. Results Most patients had a carotid angiogram (21/25), four only had a computed tomography angiography and four had both. Eighteen patients had history of neck radiation. The CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s had a sensitivity of 98.7% (81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 95.7% (92.0%-99.9%), CCA PSV ≥300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 90.9% (69.4%-98.4%) and a specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%). The CCA EDV ≥40 cm/s had a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval of 75.1-99.8%) and specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%), EDV ≥60 cm/s had a sensitivity of 100% (75.1%-99.8%) and specificity of 87% (94.1-100%), and EDV ≥70 cm/s had a sensitivity of 86.4% (64.0%-96.4%) and specificity of 100% (94.1%-100%). The presence of both PSV &lt;250 cm/s and EDV &lt;60 cm/s had a 98.7% negative predictive value, and the presence of both PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s had 100% positive predictive value. Conclusions Establishing CCA duplex criteria to screen patients with significant stenosis is crucial to identify those who will need further imaging modality or treatment. In our laboratory, CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s are thresholds that can be used to identify significant (&gt;60%) CCA stenosis with a high degree of accuracy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EokPhB7BBXrJJuNd5CwkJVbykSixa2FqOfWfqkNjBdkrn35NoShcsurJlfedI_g5jrxFyBKzfDflwG3MBWOTQ5lDAE7ZD6JqsbqF7ynbQlJhVAssz9iLGAQCxapvn7EyU0AKKZseGn2q0RiXrDlz7afKOaxV8sobHRM5HG3l_5GaZR7rjy5iCin5xhv-x6eYBVe5g_SGoifuw1cxLIsOTn7bH-ebIo1buJXu2V2OkV_fnOfvx-dP1xdfs8vuXbxcfLzNdVpiydq8NVb0uFTRFX3ZaCax11_UdrDdT96aiRlVIqtL7oteg6x6rsi4MiU5Uujhnb0-9c_C_F4pJTjZqGkflyC9RYtmJBooGxIriCdXBxxhoL-dgJxWOEkFuiuUgV8VyUyyhlaviNfPmvn7pJzIPiX9OV-D9CaD1k7eWgozaktNkbCCdpPH20foP_6X1aJ3VavxFR4qDX4Jb7UmUUUiQV9vG28RYwDoulsVfp0Sj9g</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Matos, Jesus M., MD</creator><creator>Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD</creator><creator>Pisimisis, George, MD</creator><creator>Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT</creator><creator>Kougias, Panos, MD</creator><creator>Lin, Peter H., MD</creator><creator>Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan</title><author>Matos, Jesus M., MD ; Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH ; Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD ; Pisimisis, George, MD ; Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT ; Kougias, Panos, MD ; Lin, Peter H., MD ; Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-8fcde5bc4a073b49ca216c99b90a21d6bd5e7a51ea5cf3bc0c6b15463de2925c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matos, Jesus M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisimisis, George, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kougias, Panos, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Peter H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matos, Jesus M., MD</au><au>Barshes, Neal R., MD, MPH</au><au>Mccoy, Sally, RN, PhD</au><au>Pisimisis, George, MD</au><au>Felkai, Deborah, RN, RVT</au><au>Kougias, Panos, MD</au><au>Lin, Peter H., MD</au><au>Bechara, Carlos F., MD, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>435-439</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Background No consensus exists for duplex ultrasound criteria in the diagnosis of significant common carotid artery (CCA) stenosis. In general, peak systolic velocity (PSV) &gt;150 cm/s with poststenotic turbulence indicates a stenosis &gt;50%. The purpose of our study is to correlate CCA duplex velocities with angiographic findings of significant stenosis &gt;60%. Methods We reviewed the carotid duplex records from 2008 to 2011 looking for patients with isolated CCA stenosis and no ipsilateral internal or contralateral carotid artery disease who received either a carotid angiogram or a computed tomography scan. We identified 25 patients who had significant CCA disease &gt;60%. We also selected 74 controls without known CCA stenosis. We performed receiver operating characteristics analysis to correlate PSV and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) with angiographic stenosis &gt;60%. The degree of stenosis was determined by measuring the luminal stenosis in comparison to the proximal normal CCA diameter. Results Most patients had a carotid angiogram (21/25), four only had a computed tomography angiography and four had both. Eighteen patients had history of neck radiation. The CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s had a sensitivity of 98.7% (81.5%-100%) and a specificity of 95.7% (92.0%-99.9%), CCA PSV ≥300 cm/s had a sensitivity of 90.9% (69.4%-98.4%) and a specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%). The CCA EDV ≥40 cm/s had a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval of 75.1-99.8%) and specificity of 98.7% (92.0%-99.9%), EDV ≥60 cm/s had a sensitivity of 100% (75.1%-99.8%) and specificity of 87% (94.1-100%), and EDV ≥70 cm/s had a sensitivity of 86.4% (64.0%-96.4%) and specificity of 100% (94.1%-100%). The presence of both PSV &lt;250 cm/s and EDV &lt;60 cm/s had a 98.7% negative predictive value, and the presence of both PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s had 100% positive predictive value. Conclusions Establishing CCA duplex criteria to screen patients with significant stenosis is crucial to identify those who will need further imaging modality or treatment. In our laboratory, CCA PSV ≥250 cm/s and EDV ≥60 cm/s are thresholds that can be used to identify significant (&gt;60%) CCA stenosis with a high degree of accuracy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>24080127</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.030</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2014-02, Vol.59 (2), p.435-439
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492703702
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Stenosis - diagnosis
Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
ROC Curve
Severity of Illness Index
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex
title Validating common carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound with carotid angiogram or computed tomography scan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A23%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20common%20carotid%20stenosis%20by%20duplex%20ultrasound%20with%20carotid%20angiogram%20or%20computed%20tomography%20scan&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Matos,%20Jesus%20M.,%20MD&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=435-439&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492703702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492703702&rft_id=info:pmid/24080127&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0741521413015814&rfr_iscdi=true