A randomised controlled trial of parecoxib, celecoxib and paracetamol as adjuncts to patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery
The benefit of combining non-opioid analgesics with neuraxial opioids for analgesia after caesarean delivery has not been clearly established. Larger doses of paracetamol or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have not been evaluated. A randomised, double blind, double-dummy, parallel group placebo-controll...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anaesthesia and intensive care 2014-01, Vol.42 (1), p.15-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | Anaesthesia and intensive care |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Paech, M J McDonnell, N J Sinha, A Baber, C Nathan, E A |
description | The benefit of combining non-opioid analgesics with neuraxial opioids for analgesia after caesarean delivery has not been clearly established. Larger doses of paracetamol or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have not been evaluated. A randomised, double blind, double-dummy, parallel group placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted among women having elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, followed by pethidine patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Patients received placebos (group C); intravenous parecoxib 40 mg then oral celecoxib 400 mg at 12 hours (group PC); intravenous paracetamol 2 g then oral 1 g six-hourly (group PA); or these regimens combined (group PCPA). The primary outcome was 24-hour postoperative patient-controlled epidural pethidine use and the main secondary outcome was postoperative pain. One hundred and thirty-eight women were recruited but 27 subsequently met exclusion criteria, leaving 111 who were randomised, allocated and analysed by intention-to-treat (n=23, 30, 32 and 26 in groups C, PC, PA and PCPA respectively). There were no differences between groups for pethidine consumption, based on either intention-to-treat (median 365, 365, 405 and 360 mg in groups C, PC, PA and PCPA respectively, P=0.84) or per protocol analysis (17 major violations). Dynamic pain scores did not differ between groups but requirement for, and dose of, supplementary oral tramadol was least in group PCPA (incidence 23% versus 48%, 70% and 58% in groups C, PC and PA respectively, P=0.004). The addition of regular paracetamol, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors or both to pethidine patient-controlled epidural post-caesarean analgesia did not provide a pethidine dose-sparing effect during the first 24 hours. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0310057X1404200105 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492700727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1492700727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-74df3125b4c54c91e9c9a98cd3abe5a05aa2d09f4c64752812614be58542a18e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkc1KxDAUhYMoOv68gAsJuHFhNUmTSbsU8Q8ENwruyp3kVjpkmjFJRZ_DFzZ1VERXuXC-c8K9h5B9zk441_qUlZwxpR-5ZFIwxplaIxMuZVUwofk6mYxAMRJbZDvGeUZqodUm2RJSaj5V9YS8n9EAvfWLLqKlxvcpeOfymEIHjvqWLiGg8a_d7JgadKuRZssogMEEC-8oRAp2PvQmRZp8llKHfSp-5eGys0PIkdCDe8LYAYU2YaAGMOYvoKcWXfeC4W2XbLTgIu59vTvk4fLi_vy6uL27ujk_uy1MyVQqtLRtyYWaSaOkqTnWpoa6MraEGSpgCkBYVrfSTKVWouJiymVWKiUF8ArLHXK0yl0G_zxgTE2-Qt7RQY9-iA2X-VyMaaEzevgHnfsh5E0-qRxZSz1SYkWZ4GMM2DbL0C0gvDWcNWNlzf_KsungK3qYLdD-WL47Kj8AerGTRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1495859477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomised controlled trial of parecoxib, celecoxib and paracetamol as adjuncts to patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Paech, M J ; McDonnell, N J ; Sinha, A ; Baber, C ; Nathan, E A</creator><creatorcontrib>Paech, M J ; McDonnell, N J ; Sinha, A ; Baber, C ; Nathan, E A</creatorcontrib><description>The benefit of combining non-opioid analgesics with neuraxial opioids for analgesia after caesarean delivery has not been clearly established. Larger doses of paracetamol or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have not been evaluated. A randomised, double blind, double-dummy, parallel group placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted among women having elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, followed by pethidine patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Patients received placebos (group C); intravenous parecoxib 40 mg then oral celecoxib 400 mg at 12 hours (group PC); intravenous paracetamol 2 g then oral 1 g six-hourly (group PA); or these regimens combined (group PCPA). The primary outcome was 24-hour postoperative patient-controlled epidural pethidine use and the main secondary outcome was postoperative pain. One hundred and thirty-eight women were recruited but 27 subsequently met exclusion criteria, leaving 111 who were randomised, allocated and analysed by intention-to-treat (n=23, 30, 32 and 26 in groups C, PC, PA and PCPA respectively). There were no differences between groups for pethidine consumption, based on either intention-to-treat (median 365, 365, 405 and 360 mg in groups C, PC, PA and PCPA respectively, P=0.84) or per protocol analysis (17 major violations). Dynamic pain scores did not differ between groups but requirement for, and dose of, supplementary oral tramadol was least in group PCPA (incidence 23% versus 48%, 70% and 58% in groups C, PC and PA respectively, P=0.004). The addition of regular paracetamol, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors or both to pethidine patient-controlled epidural post-caesarean analgesia did not provide a pethidine dose-sparing effect during the first 24 hours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1404200105</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24471659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Sage Publications Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Acetaminophen - administration & dosage ; Adult ; Analgesia, Epidural - methods ; Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods ; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage ; Celecoxib ; Cesarean Section ; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Isoxazoles - administration & dosage ; Pregnancy ; Pyrazoles - administration & dosage ; Sulfonamides - administration & dosage]]></subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2014-01, Vol.42 (1), p.15-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australian Society of Anaesthetists Jan 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-74df3125b4c54c91e9c9a98cd3abe5a05aa2d09f4c64752812614be58542a18e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-74df3125b4c54c91e9c9a98cd3abe5a05aa2d09f4c64752812614be58542a18e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24471659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paech, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baber, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathan, E A</creatorcontrib><title>A randomised controlled trial of parecoxib, celecoxib and paracetamol as adjuncts to patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>The benefit of combining non-opioid analgesics with neuraxial opioids for analgesia after caesarean delivery has not been clearly established. Larger doses of paracetamol or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have not been evaluated. A randomised, double blind, double-dummy, parallel group placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted among women having elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, followed by pethidine patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Patients received placebos (group C); intravenous parecoxib 40 mg then oral celecoxib 400 mg at 12 hours (group PC); intravenous paracetamol 2 g then oral 1 g six-hourly (group PA); or these regimens combined (group PCPA). The primary outcome was 24-hour postoperative patient-controlled epidural pethidine use and the main secondary outcome was postoperative pain. One hundred and thirty-eight women were recruited but 27 subsequently met exclusion criteria, leaving 111 who were randomised, allocated and analysed by intention-to-treat (n=23, 30, 32 and 26 in groups C, PC, PA and PCPA respectively). There were no differences between groups for pethidine consumption, based on either intention-to-treat (median 365, 365, 405 and 360 mg in groups C, PC, PA and PCPA respectively, P=0.84) or per protocol analysis (17 major violations). Dynamic pain scores did not differ between groups but requirement for, and dose of, supplementary oral tramadol was least in group PCPA (incidence 23% versus 48%, 70% and 58% in groups C, PC and PA respectively, P=0.004). The addition of regular paracetamol, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors or both to pethidine patient-controlled epidural post-caesarean analgesia did not provide a pethidine dose-sparing effect during the first 24 hours.</description><subject>Acetaminophen - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Celecoxib</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isoxazoles - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pyrazoles - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Sulfonamides - administration & dosage</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkc1KxDAUhYMoOv68gAsJuHFhNUmTSbsU8Q8ENwruyp3kVjpkmjFJRZ_DFzZ1VERXuXC-c8K9h5B9zk441_qUlZwxpR-5ZFIwxplaIxMuZVUwofk6mYxAMRJbZDvGeUZqodUm2RJSaj5V9YS8n9EAvfWLLqKlxvcpeOfymEIHjvqWLiGg8a_d7JgadKuRZssogMEEC-8oRAp2PvQmRZp8llKHfSp-5eGys0PIkdCDe8LYAYU2YaAGMOYvoKcWXfeC4W2XbLTgIu59vTvk4fLi_vy6uL27ujk_uy1MyVQqtLRtyYWaSaOkqTnWpoa6MraEGSpgCkBYVrfSTKVWouJiymVWKiUF8ArLHXK0yl0G_zxgTE2-Qt7RQY9-iA2X-VyMaaEzevgHnfsh5E0-qRxZSz1SYkWZ4GMM2DbL0C0gvDWcNWNlzf_KsungK3qYLdD-WL47Kj8AerGTRg</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Paech, M J</creator><creator>McDonnell, N J</creator><creator>Sinha, A</creator><creator>Baber, C</creator><creator>Nathan, E A</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>A randomised controlled trial of parecoxib, celecoxib and paracetamol as adjuncts to patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery</title><author>Paech, M J ; McDonnell, N J ; Sinha, A ; Baber, C ; Nathan, E A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-74df3125b4c54c91e9c9a98cd3abe5a05aa2d09f4c64752812614be58542a18e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acetaminophen - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Celecoxib</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isoxazoles - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pyrazoles - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Sulfonamides - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paech, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinha, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baber, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathan, E A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paech, M J</au><au>McDonnell, N J</au><au>Sinha, A</au><au>Baber, C</au><au>Nathan, E A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomised controlled trial of parecoxib, celecoxib and paracetamol as adjuncts to patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>15-22</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><abstract>The benefit of combining non-opioid analgesics with neuraxial opioids for analgesia after caesarean delivery has not been clearly established. Larger doses of paracetamol or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have not been evaluated. A randomised, double blind, double-dummy, parallel group placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted among women having elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia, followed by pethidine patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Patients received placebos (group C); intravenous parecoxib 40 mg then oral celecoxib 400 mg at 12 hours (group PC); intravenous paracetamol 2 g then oral 1 g six-hourly (group PA); or these regimens combined (group PCPA). The primary outcome was 24-hour postoperative patient-controlled epidural pethidine use and the main secondary outcome was postoperative pain. One hundred and thirty-eight women were recruited but 27 subsequently met exclusion criteria, leaving 111 who were randomised, allocated and analysed by intention-to-treat (n=23, 30, 32 and 26 in groups C, PC, PA and PCPA respectively). There were no differences between groups for pethidine consumption, based on either intention-to-treat (median 365, 365, 405 and 360 mg in groups C, PC, PA and PCPA respectively, P=0.84) or per protocol analysis (17 major violations). Dynamic pain scores did not differ between groups but requirement for, and dose of, supplementary oral tramadol was least in group PCPA (incidence 23% versus 48%, 70% and 58% in groups C, PC and PA respectively, P=0.004). The addition of regular paracetamol, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors or both to pethidine patient-controlled epidural post-caesarean analgesia did not provide a pethidine dose-sparing effect during the first 24 hours.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd</pub><pmid>24471659</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057X1404200105</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0310-057X |
ispartof | Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2014-01, Vol.42 (1), p.15-22 |
issn | 0310-057X 1448-0271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492700727 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acetaminophen - administration & dosage Adult Analgesia, Epidural - methods Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods Analgesics, Non-Narcotic - administration & dosage Celecoxib Cesarean Section Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors - administration & dosage Double-Blind Method Female Humans Isoxazoles - administration & dosage Pregnancy Pyrazoles - administration & dosage Sulfonamides - administration & dosage |
title | A randomised controlled trial of parecoxib, celecoxib and paracetamol as adjuncts to patient-controlled epidural analgesia after caesarean delivery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A46%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomised%20controlled%20trial%20of%20parecoxib,%20celecoxib%20and%20paracetamol%20as%20adjuncts%20to%20patient-controlled%20epidural%20analgesia%20after%20caesarean%20delivery&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=Paech,%20M%20J&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=15-22&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057X1404200105&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492700727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1495859477&rft_id=info:pmid/24471659&rfr_iscdi=true |