Evaluation of a subject-specific finite-element model of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint under physiological load
Abstract The equine metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint is frequently injured, especially by racehorses in training. Most injuries result from repetitive loading of the subchondral bone and articular cartilage rather than from acute events. The likelihood of injury is multi-factorial but the magnitude o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2014-01, Vol.47 (1), p.65-73 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 73 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 65 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Harrison, Simon M Chris Whitton, R Kawcak, Chris E Stover, Susan M Pandy, Marcus G |
description | Abstract The equine metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint is frequently injured, especially by racehorses in training. Most injuries result from repetitive loading of the subchondral bone and articular cartilage rather than from acute events. The likelihood of injury is multi-factorial but the magnitude of mechanical loading and the number of loading cycles are believed to play an important role. Therefore, an important step in understanding injury is to determine the distribution of load across the articular surface during normal locomotion. A subject-specific finite-element model of the MCP joint was developed (including deformable cartilage, elastic ligaments, muscle forces and rigid representations of bone), evaluated against measurements obtained from cadaver experiments, and then loaded using data from gait experiments. The sensitivity of the model to force inputs, cartilage stiffness, and cartilage geometry was studied. The FE model predicted MCP joint torque and sesamoid bone flexion angles within 5% of experimental measurements. Muscle–tendon forces, joint loads and cartilage stresses all increased as locomotion speed increased from walking to trotting and finally cantering. Perturbations to muscle–tendon forces resulted in small changes in articular cartilage stresses, whereas variations in joint torque, cartilage geometry and stiffness produced much larger effects. Non-subject-specific cartilage geometry changed the magnitude and distribution of pressure and the von Mises stress markedly. The mean and peak cartilage stresses generally increased with an increase in cartilage stiffness. Areas of peak stress correlated qualitatively with sites of common injury, suggesting that further modelling work may elucidate the types of loading that precede joint injury and may assist in the development of techniques for injury mitigation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492650847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021929013004557</els_id><sourcerecordid>3161895231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-d3ebe177261f7775eebc88e051bb9f216a74a435d5a79e7e6fbeb76988f7c24a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFq3DAQQEVpabZpfyEYeunFm5EsWfaltIS0DQR6SHoWsjzOypUtR7IX9u8js0kLuSQnwejNSDNvCDmjsKVAy_N-2zfWD2h2Wwa0SMEtAH1DNrSSRc6KCt6SDQCjec1qOCEfYuwBQHJZvycnjDMKFa82ZH-5127Rs_Vj5rtMZ3FpejRzHic0trMm6-xoZ8zR4YDjnA2-Rbei8w4zvF_siNmAszY6TH7aaafHO9Qu671N9DK2GLJpd4jWO39nTbpxXrcfybtOu4ifHs9T8ufH5e3Fr_z698-ri-_XuREC5rwtsEEqJStpJ6UUiI2pKgRBm6buGC215JoXohVa1iix7BpsZFlXVScN47o4JV-Odafg7xeMsxpsNOjSL9EvUVFes1KkUcjXoCALQSVP6OdnaO-XMKZGElXWEigXVaLKI2WCjzFgp6ZgBx0OioJaJapePUlUq8Q1niSmxLPH8kszYPsv7claAr4dAUyj21sMKhqLo8HWhuROtd6-_MbXZyWMS6KTn794wPi_HxWZAnWzrtK6SbQA4ELI4gFH78bM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1469701458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of a subject-specific finite-element model of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint under physiological load</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Harrison, Simon M ; Chris Whitton, R ; Kawcak, Chris E ; Stover, Susan M ; Pandy, Marcus G</creator><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Simon M ; Chris Whitton, R ; Kawcak, Chris E ; Stover, Susan M ; Pandy, Marcus G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The equine metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint is frequently injured, especially by racehorses in training. Most injuries result from repetitive loading of the subchondral bone and articular cartilage rather than from acute events. The likelihood of injury is multi-factorial but the magnitude of mechanical loading and the number of loading cycles are believed to play an important role. Therefore, an important step in understanding injury is to determine the distribution of load across the articular surface during normal locomotion. A subject-specific finite-element model of the MCP joint was developed (including deformable cartilage, elastic ligaments, muscle forces and rigid representations of bone), evaluated against measurements obtained from cadaver experiments, and then loaded using data from gait experiments. The sensitivity of the model to force inputs, cartilage stiffness, and cartilage geometry was studied. The FE model predicted MCP joint torque and sesamoid bone flexion angles within 5% of experimental measurements. Muscle–tendon forces, joint loads and cartilage stresses all increased as locomotion speed increased from walking to trotting and finally cantering. Perturbations to muscle–tendon forces resulted in small changes in articular cartilage stresses, whereas variations in joint torque, cartilage geometry and stiffness produced much larger effects. Non-subject-specific cartilage geometry changed the magnitude and distribution of pressure and the von Mises stress markedly. The mean and peak cartilage stresses generally increased with an increase in cartilage stiffness. Areas of peak stress correlated qualitatively with sites of common injury, suggesting that further modelling work may elucidate the types of loading that precede joint injury and may assist in the development of techniques for injury mitigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24210848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone and Bones ; Cartilage stress ; Cartilage, Articular - physiology ; Contact pressure ; Equine locomotion ; Experiments ; Fetlock injury ; Gait ; Geometry ; Horses ; Injuries ; Joints - physiology ; Knee ; Ligaments ; Ligaments - physiology ; Load ; Locomotion ; Mechanical properties ; Metacarpophalangeal Joint - physiology ; Musculoskeletal model ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Pressure ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tendons ; Torque ; Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2014-01, Vol.47 (1), p.65-73</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-d3ebe177261f7775eebc88e051bb9f216a74a435d5a79e7e6fbeb76988f7c24a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-d3ebe177261f7775eebc88e051bb9f216a74a435d5a79e7e6fbeb76988f7c24a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1469701458?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000,64390,64392,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24210848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Simon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chris Whitton, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawcak, Chris E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stover, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandy, Marcus G</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of a subject-specific finite-element model of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint under physiological load</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Abstract The equine metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint is frequently injured, especially by racehorses in training. Most injuries result from repetitive loading of the subchondral bone and articular cartilage rather than from acute events. The likelihood of injury is multi-factorial but the magnitude of mechanical loading and the number of loading cycles are believed to play an important role. Therefore, an important step in understanding injury is to determine the distribution of load across the articular surface during normal locomotion. A subject-specific finite-element model of the MCP joint was developed (including deformable cartilage, elastic ligaments, muscle forces and rigid representations of bone), evaluated against measurements obtained from cadaver experiments, and then loaded using data from gait experiments. The sensitivity of the model to force inputs, cartilage stiffness, and cartilage geometry was studied. The FE model predicted MCP joint torque and sesamoid bone flexion angles within 5% of experimental measurements. Muscle–tendon forces, joint loads and cartilage stresses all increased as locomotion speed increased from walking to trotting and finally cantering. Perturbations to muscle–tendon forces resulted in small changes in articular cartilage stresses, whereas variations in joint torque, cartilage geometry and stiffness produced much larger effects. Non-subject-specific cartilage geometry changed the magnitude and distribution of pressure and the von Mises stress markedly. The mean and peak cartilage stresses generally increased with an increase in cartilage stiffness. Areas of peak stress correlated qualitatively with sites of common injury, suggesting that further modelling work may elucidate the types of loading that precede joint injury and may assist in the development of techniques for injury mitigation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone and Bones</subject><subject>Cartilage stress</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Contact pressure</subject><subject>Equine locomotion</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fetlock injury</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Joints - physiology</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Ligaments - physiology</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Locomotion</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Metacarpophalangeal Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal model</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><subject>Torque</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFq3DAQQEVpabZpfyEYeunFm5EsWfaltIS0DQR6SHoWsjzOypUtR7IX9u8js0kLuSQnwejNSDNvCDmjsKVAy_N-2zfWD2h2Wwa0SMEtAH1DNrSSRc6KCt6SDQCjec1qOCEfYuwBQHJZvycnjDMKFa82ZH-5127Rs_Vj5rtMZ3FpejRzHic0trMm6-xoZ8zR4YDjnA2-Rbei8w4zvF_siNmAszY6TH7aaafHO9Qu671N9DK2GLJpd4jWO39nTbpxXrcfybtOu4ifHs9T8ufH5e3Fr_z698-ri-_XuREC5rwtsEEqJStpJ6UUiI2pKgRBm6buGC215JoXohVa1iix7BpsZFlXVScN47o4JV-Odafg7xeMsxpsNOjSL9EvUVFes1KkUcjXoCALQSVP6OdnaO-XMKZGElXWEigXVaLKI2WCjzFgp6ZgBx0OioJaJapePUlUq8Q1niSmxLPH8kszYPsv7claAr4dAUyj21sMKhqLo8HWhuROtd6-_MbXZyWMS6KTn794wPi_HxWZAnWzrtK6SbQA4ELI4gFH78bM</recordid><startdate>20140103</startdate><enddate>20140103</enddate><creator>Harrison, Simon M</creator><creator>Chris Whitton, R</creator><creator>Kawcak, Chris E</creator><creator>Stover, Susan M</creator><creator>Pandy, Marcus G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140103</creationdate><title>Evaluation of a subject-specific finite-element model of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint under physiological load</title><author>Harrison, Simon M ; Chris Whitton, R ; Kawcak, Chris E ; Stover, Susan M ; Pandy, Marcus G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-d3ebe177261f7775eebc88e051bb9f216a74a435d5a79e7e6fbeb76988f7c24a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone and Bones</topic><topic>Cartilage stress</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Contact pressure</topic><topic>Equine locomotion</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fetlock injury</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Joints - physiology</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Ligaments - physiology</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Locomotion</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Metacarpophalangeal Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal model</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><topic>Torque</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Simon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chris Whitton, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawcak, Chris E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stover, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandy, Marcus G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harrison, Simon M</au><au>Chris Whitton, R</au><au>Kawcak, Chris E</au><au>Stover, Susan M</au><au>Pandy, Marcus G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of a subject-specific finite-element model of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint under physiological load</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2014-01-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>65-73</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Abstract The equine metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint is frequently injured, especially by racehorses in training. Most injuries result from repetitive loading of the subchondral bone and articular cartilage rather than from acute events. The likelihood of injury is multi-factorial but the magnitude of mechanical loading and the number of loading cycles are believed to play an important role. Therefore, an important step in understanding injury is to determine the distribution of load across the articular surface during normal locomotion. A subject-specific finite-element model of the MCP joint was developed (including deformable cartilage, elastic ligaments, muscle forces and rigid representations of bone), evaluated against measurements obtained from cadaver experiments, and then loaded using data from gait experiments. The sensitivity of the model to force inputs, cartilage stiffness, and cartilage geometry was studied. The FE model predicted MCP joint torque and sesamoid bone flexion angles within 5% of experimental measurements. Muscle–tendon forces, joint loads and cartilage stresses all increased as locomotion speed increased from walking to trotting and finally cantering. Perturbations to muscle–tendon forces resulted in small changes in articular cartilage stresses, whereas variations in joint torque, cartilage geometry and stiffness produced much larger effects. Non-subject-specific cartilage geometry changed the magnitude and distribution of pressure and the von Mises stress markedly. The mean and peak cartilage stresses generally increased with an increase in cartilage stiffness. Areas of peak stress correlated qualitatively with sites of common injury, suggesting that further modelling work may elucidate the types of loading that precede joint injury and may assist in the development of techniques for injury mitigation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24210848</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.001</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2014-01, Vol.47 (1), p.65-73 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492650847 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Animals Bone and Bones Cartilage stress Cartilage, Articular - physiology Contact pressure Equine locomotion Experiments Fetlock injury Gait Geometry Horses Injuries Joints - physiology Knee Ligaments Ligaments - physiology Load Locomotion Mechanical properties Metacarpophalangeal Joint - physiology Musculoskeletal model NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Pressure Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Stress, Mechanical Tendons Torque Weight-Bearing - physiology |
title | Evaluation of a subject-specific finite-element model of the equine metacarpophalangeal joint under physiological load |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T08%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20a%20subject-specific%20finite-element%20model%20of%20the%20equine%20metacarpophalangeal%20joint%20under%20physiological%20load&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Harrison,%20Simon%20M&rft.date=2014-01-03&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=65-73&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3161895231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1469701458&rft_id=info:pmid/24210848&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0021929013004557&rfr_iscdi=true |