Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diagnostic cytopathology 2013-07, Vol.41 (7), p.595-598 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 598 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 595 |
container_title | Diagnostic cytopathology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Bozzetti, Cecilia Negri, Francesca V. Azzoni, Cinzia Naldi, Nadia Nizzoli, Rita Bortesi, Beatrice Zobbi, Valentina Bottarelli, Lorena Tiseo, Marcello Silini, Enrico Maria Ardizzoni, Andrea |
description | Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/dc.22905 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492644940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1492644940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-68497c21bf036a39898fdb6ebbbd77eddcb20ef2bd38d7452018a78e0011fff23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZeCxC9AlrhwSeuPJI65oaW0tKtFoEUcLcceLy5JnNqJ2vz7Zum2lZAQl5mR_ejRjF6E3lByTAlhJ9YcMyZJ8QwtKJEiI5zL52hRiaLIKOHyEL1M6YoQIhktX6BDxirOc0YWaDjtvYXY6gZvY7gZfmGnzRAijmCg3w26s_gy6oS30AGG2z5CSj50H_B3aLyufeOHCQeH23HQw_wxq_RcpuQTDh020xCasPVmfk-67RtIr9CB002C1_t-hH58Pt0sz7PV17Mvy4-rzMy7FVlZ5VIYRmtHeKm5rGTlbF1CXddWCLDW1IyAY7XllRV5wQittKiAEEqdc4wfoff33j6G6xHSoFqfDDSN7iCMSdFcsjLPZU7-j3JBSs5EXs7ou7_QqzDG-eIdVcqi4kzKJ6GJIaUITvXRtzpOihK1C01Zo_6ENqNv98KxbsE-gg8pzUB2D9z4BqZ_itSn5YNwz_s0wO0jr-NvVQouCvVzfaZW_NvFxXqzVht-B500r50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1369583299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bozzetti, Cecilia ; Negri, Francesca V. ; Azzoni, Cinzia ; Naldi, Nadia ; Nizzoli, Rita ; Bortesi, Beatrice ; Zobbi, Valentina ; Bottarelli, Lorena ; Tiseo, Marcello ; Silini, Enrico Maria ; Ardizzoni, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Bozzetti, Cecilia ; Negri, Francesca V. ; Azzoni, Cinzia ; Naldi, Nadia ; Nizzoli, Rita ; Bortesi, Beatrice ; Zobbi, Valentina ; Bottarelli, Lorena ; Tiseo, Marcello ; Silini, Enrico Maria ; Ardizzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-1039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dc.22905</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22833420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - genetics ; Adenocarcinoma - metabolism ; Adenocarcinoma - secondary ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Biopsy ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - genetics ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - genetics ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary ; colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; cytology ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; EGFR ; Gene Expression ; Humans ; Kras ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - genetics ; Lung Neoplasms - metabolism ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) ; ras Proteins - genetics ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic cytopathology, 2013-07, Vol.41 (7), p.595-598</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-68497c21bf036a39898fdb6ebbbd77eddcb20ef2bd38d7452018a78e0011fff23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-68497c21bf036a39898fdb6ebbbd77eddcb20ef2bd38d7452018a78e0011fff23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdc.22905$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdc.22905$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22833420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bozzetti, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negri, Francesca V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzoni, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldi, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nizzoli, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortesi, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zobbi, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottarelli, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiseo, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silini, Enrico Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardizzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples</title><title>Diagnostic cytopathology</title><addtitle>Diagn. Cytopathol</addtitle><description>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - genetics</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - metabolism</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>cytology</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>EGFR</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kras</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</subject><subject>ras Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>8755-1039</issn><issn>1097-0339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZeCxC9AlrhwSeuPJI65oaW0tKtFoEUcLcceLy5JnNqJ2vz7Zum2lZAQl5mR_ejRjF6E3lByTAlhJ9YcMyZJ8QwtKJEiI5zL52hRiaLIKOHyEL1M6YoQIhktX6BDxirOc0YWaDjtvYXY6gZvY7gZfmGnzRAijmCg3w26s_gy6oS30AGG2z5CSj50H_B3aLyufeOHCQeH23HQw_wxq_RcpuQTDh020xCasPVmfk-67RtIr9CB002C1_t-hH58Pt0sz7PV17Mvy4-rzMy7FVlZ5VIYRmtHeKm5rGTlbF1CXddWCLDW1IyAY7XllRV5wQittKiAEEqdc4wfoff33j6G6xHSoFqfDDSN7iCMSdFcsjLPZU7-j3JBSs5EXs7ou7_QqzDG-eIdVcqi4kzKJ6GJIaUITvXRtzpOihK1C01Zo_6ENqNv98KxbsE-gg8pzUB2D9z4BqZ_itSn5YNwz_s0wO0jr-NvVQouCvVzfaZW_NvFxXqzVht-B500r50</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Bozzetti, Cecilia</creator><creator>Negri, Francesca V.</creator><creator>Azzoni, Cinzia</creator><creator>Naldi, Nadia</creator><creator>Nizzoli, Rita</creator><creator>Bortesi, Beatrice</creator><creator>Zobbi, Valentina</creator><creator>Bottarelli, Lorena</creator><creator>Tiseo, Marcello</creator><creator>Silini, Enrico Maria</creator><creator>Ardizzoni, Andrea</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples</title><author>Bozzetti, Cecilia ; Negri, Francesca V. ; Azzoni, Cinzia ; Naldi, Nadia ; Nizzoli, Rita ; Bortesi, Beatrice ; Zobbi, Valentina ; Bottarelli, Lorena ; Tiseo, Marcello ; Silini, Enrico Maria ; Ardizzoni, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-68497c21bf036a39898fdb6ebbbd77eddcb20ef2bd38d7452018a78e0011fff23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - genetics</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - metabolism</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>cytology</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>EGFR</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kras</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</topic><topic>ras Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bozzetti, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negri, Francesca V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzoni, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldi, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nizzoli, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortesi, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zobbi, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottarelli, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiseo, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silini, Enrico Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardizzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic cytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bozzetti, Cecilia</au><au>Negri, Francesca V.</au><au>Azzoni, Cinzia</au><au>Naldi, Nadia</au><au>Nizzoli, Rita</au><au>Bortesi, Beatrice</au><au>Zobbi, Valentina</au><au>Bottarelli, Lorena</au><au>Tiseo, Marcello</au><au>Silini, Enrico Maria</au><au>Ardizzoni, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic cytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn. Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>595</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>595-598</pages><issn>8755-1039</issn><eissn>1097-0339</eissn><abstract>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22833420</pmid><doi>10.1002/dc.22905</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-1039 |
ispartof | Diagnostic cytopathology, 2013-07, Vol.41 (7), p.595-598 |
issn | 8755-1039 1097-0339 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492644940 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - genetics Adenocarcinoma - metabolism Adenocarcinoma - secondary Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism Biopsy Carcinoma, Large Cell - genetics Carcinoma, Large Cell - metabolism Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - genetics Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology cytology DNA Mutational Analysis EGFR Gene Expression Humans Kras Liver Neoplasms - secondary lung cancer Lung Neoplasms - genetics Lung Neoplasms - metabolism Lung Neoplasms - pathology Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic Metastasis Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) ras Proteins - genetics Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics Reproducibility of Results |
title | Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T02%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidermal%20growth%20factor%20receptor%20and%20Kras%20gene%20expression:%20Reliability%20of%20mutational%20analysis%20on%20cytological%20samples&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20cytopathology&rft.au=Bozzetti,%20Cecilia&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=595-598&rft.issn=8755-1039&rft.eissn=1097-0339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dc.22905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492644940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1369583299&rft_id=info:pmid/22833420&rfr_iscdi=true |