Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic cytopathology 2013-07, Vol.41 (7), p.595-598
Hauptverfasser: Bozzetti, Cecilia, Negri, Francesca V., Azzoni, Cinzia, Naldi, Nadia, Nizzoli, Rita, Bortesi, Beatrice, Zobbi, Valentina, Bottarelli, Lorena, Tiseo, Marcello, Silini, Enrico Maria, Ardizzoni, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 598
container_issue 7
container_start_page 595
container_title Diagnostic cytopathology
container_volume 41
creator Bozzetti, Cecilia
Negri, Francesca V.
Azzoni, Cinzia
Naldi, Nadia
Nizzoli, Rita
Bortesi, Beatrice
Zobbi, Valentina
Bottarelli, Lorena
Tiseo, Marcello
Silini, Enrico Maria
Ardizzoni, Andrea
description Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dc.22905
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492644940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1492644940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-68497c21bf036a39898fdb6ebbbd77eddcb20ef2bd38d7452018a78e0011fff23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZeCxC9AlrhwSeuPJI65oaW0tKtFoEUcLcceLy5JnNqJ2vz7Zum2lZAQl5mR_ejRjF6E3lByTAlhJ9YcMyZJ8QwtKJEiI5zL52hRiaLIKOHyEL1M6YoQIhktX6BDxirOc0YWaDjtvYXY6gZvY7gZfmGnzRAijmCg3w26s_gy6oS30AGG2z5CSj50H_B3aLyufeOHCQeH23HQw_wxq_RcpuQTDh020xCasPVmfk-67RtIr9CB002C1_t-hH58Pt0sz7PV17Mvy4-rzMy7FVlZ5VIYRmtHeKm5rGTlbF1CXddWCLDW1IyAY7XllRV5wQittKiAEEqdc4wfoff33j6G6xHSoFqfDDSN7iCMSdFcsjLPZU7-j3JBSs5EXs7ou7_QqzDG-eIdVcqi4kzKJ6GJIaUITvXRtzpOihK1C01Zo_6ENqNv98KxbsE-gg8pzUB2D9z4BqZ_itSn5YNwz_s0wO0jr-NvVQouCvVzfaZW_NvFxXqzVht-B500r50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1369583299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bozzetti, Cecilia ; Negri, Francesca V. ; Azzoni, Cinzia ; Naldi, Nadia ; Nizzoli, Rita ; Bortesi, Beatrice ; Zobbi, Valentina ; Bottarelli, Lorena ; Tiseo, Marcello ; Silini, Enrico Maria ; Ardizzoni, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Bozzetti, Cecilia ; Negri, Francesca V. ; Azzoni, Cinzia ; Naldi, Nadia ; Nizzoli, Rita ; Bortesi, Beatrice ; Zobbi, Valentina ; Bottarelli, Lorena ; Tiseo, Marcello ; Silini, Enrico Maria ; Ardizzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-1039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dc.22905</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22833420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - genetics ; Adenocarcinoma - metabolism ; Adenocarcinoma - secondary ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Biopsy ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - genetics ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - genetics ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary ; colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; cytology ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; EGFR ; Gene Expression ; Humans ; Kras ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - genetics ; Lung Neoplasms - metabolism ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) ; ras Proteins - genetics ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic cytopathology, 2013-07, Vol.41 (7), p.595-598</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-68497c21bf036a39898fdb6ebbbd77eddcb20ef2bd38d7452018a78e0011fff23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-68497c21bf036a39898fdb6ebbbd77eddcb20ef2bd38d7452018a78e0011fff23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdc.22905$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdc.22905$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22833420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bozzetti, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negri, Francesca V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzoni, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldi, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nizzoli, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortesi, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zobbi, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottarelli, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiseo, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silini, Enrico Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardizzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples</title><title>Diagnostic cytopathology</title><addtitle>Diagn. Cytopathol</addtitle><description>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - genetics</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - metabolism</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>cytology</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>EGFR</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kras</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</subject><subject>ras Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>8755-1039</issn><issn>1097-0339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZeCxC9AlrhwSeuPJI65oaW0tKtFoEUcLcceLy5JnNqJ2vz7Zum2lZAQl5mR_ejRjF6E3lByTAlhJ9YcMyZJ8QwtKJEiI5zL52hRiaLIKOHyEL1M6YoQIhktX6BDxirOc0YWaDjtvYXY6gZvY7gZfmGnzRAijmCg3w26s_gy6oS30AGG2z5CSj50H_B3aLyufeOHCQeH23HQw_wxq_RcpuQTDh020xCasPVmfk-67RtIr9CB002C1_t-hH58Pt0sz7PV17Mvy4-rzMy7FVlZ5VIYRmtHeKm5rGTlbF1CXddWCLDW1IyAY7XllRV5wQittKiAEEqdc4wfoff33j6G6xHSoFqfDDSN7iCMSdFcsjLPZU7-j3JBSs5EXs7ou7_QqzDG-eIdVcqi4kzKJ6GJIaUITvXRtzpOihK1C01Zo_6ENqNv98KxbsE-gg8pzUB2D9z4BqZ_itSn5YNwz_s0wO0jr-NvVQouCvVzfaZW_NvFxXqzVht-B500r50</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Bozzetti, Cecilia</creator><creator>Negri, Francesca V.</creator><creator>Azzoni, Cinzia</creator><creator>Naldi, Nadia</creator><creator>Nizzoli, Rita</creator><creator>Bortesi, Beatrice</creator><creator>Zobbi, Valentina</creator><creator>Bottarelli, Lorena</creator><creator>Tiseo, Marcello</creator><creator>Silini, Enrico Maria</creator><creator>Ardizzoni, Andrea</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples</title><author>Bozzetti, Cecilia ; Negri, Francesca V. ; Azzoni, Cinzia ; Naldi, Nadia ; Nizzoli, Rita ; Bortesi, Beatrice ; Zobbi, Valentina ; Bottarelli, Lorena ; Tiseo, Marcello ; Silini, Enrico Maria ; Ardizzoni, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4205-68497c21bf036a39898fdb6ebbbd77eddcb20ef2bd38d7452018a78e0011fff23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - genetics</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - metabolism</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - secondary</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>cytology</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>EGFR</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kras</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)</topic><topic>ras Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bozzetti, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negri, Francesca V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzoni, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naldi, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nizzoli, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortesi, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zobbi, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottarelli, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiseo, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silini, Enrico Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardizzoni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic cytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bozzetti, Cecilia</au><au>Negri, Francesca V.</au><au>Azzoni, Cinzia</au><au>Naldi, Nadia</au><au>Nizzoli, Rita</au><au>Bortesi, Beatrice</au><au>Zobbi, Valentina</au><au>Bottarelli, Lorena</au><au>Tiseo, Marcello</au><au>Silini, Enrico Maria</au><au>Ardizzoni, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic cytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn. Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>595</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>595-598</pages><issn>8755-1039</issn><eissn>1097-0339</eissn><abstract>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22833420</pmid><doi>10.1002/dc.22905</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8755-1039
ispartof Diagnostic cytopathology, 2013-07, Vol.41 (7), p.595-598
issn 8755-1039
1097-0339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492644940
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adenocarcinoma - genetics
Adenocarcinoma - metabolism
Adenocarcinoma - secondary
Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
Biopsy
Carcinoma, Large Cell - genetics
Carcinoma, Large Cell - metabolism
Carcinoma, Large Cell - secondary
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - secondary
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - genetics
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - metabolism
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary
colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics
Colorectal Neoplasms - metabolism
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
cytology
DNA Mutational Analysis
EGFR
Gene Expression
Humans
Kras
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - genetics
Lung Neoplasms - metabolism
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Proto-Oncogene Proteins - genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
ras Proteins - genetics
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - genetics
Reproducibility of Results
title Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T02%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidermal%20growth%20factor%20receptor%20and%20Kras%20gene%20expression:%20Reliability%20of%20mutational%20analysis%20on%20cytological%20samples&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20cytopathology&rft.au=Bozzetti,%20Cecilia&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=595-598&rft.issn=8755-1039&rft.eissn=1097-0339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dc.22905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1492644940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1369583299&rft_id=info:pmid/22833420&rfr_iscdi=true