Are Divided Attention Tasks Useful in the Assessment and Management of Sport-Related Concussion?
This article is a systematic review of the literature on divided attention assessment inclusive of a cognitive and motor task (balance or gait) for use in concussion management. The systematic review drew from published papers listed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search identi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychology review 2013-12, Vol.23 (4), p.300-313 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 313 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 300 |
container_title | Neuropsychology review |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Register-Mihalik, Johna K. Littleton, Ashley C. Guskiewicz, Kevin M. |
description | This article is a systematic review of the literature on divided attention assessment inclusive of a cognitive and motor task (balance or gait) for use in concussion management. The systematic review drew from published papers listed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search identified 19 empirical research papers meeting the inclusion criteria. Study results were considered for the psychometric properties of the paradigms, the influence of divided attention on measures of cognition and postural control and the comparison of divided attention task outcomes between individuals with concussion and healthy controls (all samples were age 17 years or older). The review highlights that the reliability of the tasks under a divided attention paradigm presented ranges from low to high (ICC: 0.1–0.9); however, only 3/19 articles included psychometric information. Response times are greater, gait strategies are less efficient, and postural control deficits are greater in concussed participants compared with healthy controls both immediately and for some period following concussive injury, specifically under divided attention conditions. Dual task assessments in some cases were more reliable than single task assessments and may be better able to detect lingering effects following concussion. Few of the studies have been replicated and applied across various age groups. A key limitation of these studies is that many include laboratory and time-intensive measures. Future research is needed to refine a time and cost efficient divided attention assessment paradigm, and more work is needed in younger (pre-teens) populations where the application may be of greatest utility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11065-013-9238-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492643391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1477563295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-436588939e07d0639d74b76d2311601b9c6e587e9ce2b8ac7107e4f17485f75b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rr6A7xIwIuXaOU7fZJh_IQVQXfPMd1dvfbakx5T3YL_3oyzigiC5JCEPPWmioexhxKeSgD_jKQEZwVILRqlg5C32Km0XgvnHNyuZzAgvIZwwu4RXQPUKqXushNl6gohnLJPm4L8xfht7LHnm2XBvIxz5heJvhC_JBzWiY-ZL5-Rb4iQaFcJnnLP36WcrvDndR74x_1cFvEBp7TUoO2cu5WoJj2_z-4MaSJ8cLOfsctXLy-2b8T5-9dvt5tz0RkTFmG0syE0ukHwPTjd9N603vVKS-lAtk3n0AaPTYeqDanzEjyaQXoT7OBtq8_Yk2PuvsxfV6Ql7kbqcJpSxnmlKE2jnNG6kf-Bem-dVo2t6OO_0Ot5LbkOUinnQVkDUCl5pLoyExUc4r6Mu1S-RwnxYCoeTcVqKh5MxUMTj26S13aH_e-KX2oqoI4A1ad8heWPr_-Z-gNs_pt6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1467025400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Divided Attention Tasks Useful in the Assessment and Management of Sport-Related Concussion?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Register-Mihalik, Johna K. ; Littleton, Ashley C. ; Guskiewicz, Kevin M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Register-Mihalik, Johna K. ; Littleton, Ashley C. ; Guskiewicz, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><description>This article is a systematic review of the literature on divided attention assessment inclusive of a cognitive and motor task (balance or gait) for use in concussion management. The systematic review drew from published papers listed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search identified 19 empirical research papers meeting the inclusion criteria. Study results were considered for the psychometric properties of the paradigms, the influence of divided attention on measures of cognition and postural control and the comparison of divided attention task outcomes between individuals with concussion and healthy controls (all samples were age 17 years or older). The review highlights that the reliability of the tasks under a divided attention paradigm presented ranges from low to high (ICC: 0.1–0.9); however, only 3/19 articles included psychometric information. Response times are greater, gait strategies are less efficient, and postural control deficits are greater in concussed participants compared with healthy controls both immediately and for some period following concussive injury, specifically under divided attention conditions. Dual task assessments in some cases were more reliable than single task assessments and may be better able to detect lingering effects following concussion. Few of the studies have been replicated and applied across various age groups. A key limitation of these studies is that many include laboratory and time-intensive measures. Future research is needed to refine a time and cost efficient divided attention assessment paradigm, and more work is needed in younger (pre-teens) populations where the application may be of greatest utility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-7308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11065-013-9238-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24242888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer US</publisher><subject>Age ; Athletic Injuries - complications ; Attention ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain Concussion - diagnosis ; Brain Concussion - etiology ; Brain Concussion - therapy ; Cognition - physiology ; Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data ; Disease Management ; Gait - physiology ; Humans ; Neurology ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Review ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychology review, 2013-12, Vol.23 (4), p.300-313</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-436588939e07d0639d74b76d2311601b9c6e587e9ce2b8ac7107e4f17485f75b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-436588939e07d0639d74b76d2311601b9c6e587e9ce2b8ac7107e4f17485f75b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11065-013-9238-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11065-013-9238-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907,41470,42539,51301</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24242888$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Register-Mihalik, Johna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Littleton, Ashley C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guskiewicz, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><title>Are Divided Attention Tasks Useful in the Assessment and Management of Sport-Related Concussion?</title><title>Neuropsychology review</title><addtitle>Neuropsychol Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychol Rev</addtitle><description>This article is a systematic review of the literature on divided attention assessment inclusive of a cognitive and motor task (balance or gait) for use in concussion management. The systematic review drew from published papers listed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search identified 19 empirical research papers meeting the inclusion criteria. Study results were considered for the psychometric properties of the paradigms, the influence of divided attention on measures of cognition and postural control and the comparison of divided attention task outcomes between individuals with concussion and healthy controls (all samples were age 17 years or older). The review highlights that the reliability of the tasks under a divided attention paradigm presented ranges from low to high (ICC: 0.1–0.9); however, only 3/19 articles included psychometric information. Response times are greater, gait strategies are less efficient, and postural control deficits are greater in concussed participants compared with healthy controls both immediately and for some period following concussive injury, specifically under divided attention conditions. Dual task assessments in some cases were more reliable than single task assessments and may be better able to detect lingering effects following concussion. Few of the studies have been replicated and applied across various age groups. A key limitation of these studies is that many include laboratory and time-intensive measures. Future research is needed to refine a time and cost efficient divided attention assessment paradigm, and more work is needed in younger (pre-teens) populations where the application may be of greatest utility.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Athletic Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain Concussion - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brain Concussion - etiology</subject><subject>Brain Concussion - therapy</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1040-7308</issn><issn>1573-6660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rr6A7xIwIuXaOU7fZJh_IQVQXfPMd1dvfbakx5T3YL_3oyzigiC5JCEPPWmioexhxKeSgD_jKQEZwVILRqlg5C32Km0XgvnHNyuZzAgvIZwwu4RXQPUKqXushNl6gohnLJPm4L8xfht7LHnm2XBvIxz5heJvhC_JBzWiY-ZL5-Rb4iQaFcJnnLP36WcrvDndR74x_1cFvEBp7TUoO2cu5WoJj2_z-4MaSJ8cLOfsctXLy-2b8T5-9dvt5tz0RkTFmG0syE0ukHwPTjd9N603vVKS-lAtk3n0AaPTYeqDanzEjyaQXoT7OBtq8_Yk2PuvsxfV6Ql7kbqcJpSxnmlKE2jnNG6kf-Bem-dVo2t6OO_0Ot5LbkOUinnQVkDUCl5pLoyExUc4r6Mu1S-RwnxYCoeTcVqKh5MxUMTj26S13aH_e-KX2oqoI4A1ad8heWPr_-Z-gNs_pt6</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Register-Mihalik, Johna K.</creator><creator>Littleton, Ashley C.</creator><creator>Guskiewicz, Kevin M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Are Divided Attention Tasks Useful in the Assessment and Management of Sport-Related Concussion?</title><author>Register-Mihalik, Johna K. ; Littleton, Ashley C. ; Guskiewicz, Kevin M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-436588939e07d0639d74b76d2311601b9c6e587e9ce2b8ac7107e4f17485f75b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Athletic Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain Concussion - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brain Concussion - etiology</topic><topic>Brain Concussion - therapy</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Register-Mihalik, Johna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Littleton, Ashley C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guskiewicz, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Register-Mihalik, Johna K.</au><au>Littleton, Ashley C.</au><au>Guskiewicz, Kevin M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Divided Attention Tasks Useful in the Assessment and Management of Sport-Related Concussion?</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychology review</jtitle><stitle>Neuropsychol Rev</stitle><addtitle>Neuropsychol Rev</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>300-313</pages><issn>1040-7308</issn><eissn>1573-6660</eissn><abstract>This article is a systematic review of the literature on divided attention assessment inclusive of a cognitive and motor task (balance or gait) for use in concussion management. The systematic review drew from published papers listed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search identified 19 empirical research papers meeting the inclusion criteria. Study results were considered for the psychometric properties of the paradigms, the influence of divided attention on measures of cognition and postural control and the comparison of divided attention task outcomes between individuals with concussion and healthy controls (all samples were age 17 years or older). The review highlights that the reliability of the tasks under a divided attention paradigm presented ranges from low to high (ICC: 0.1–0.9); however, only 3/19 articles included psychometric information. Response times are greater, gait strategies are less efficient, and postural control deficits are greater in concussed participants compared with healthy controls both immediately and for some period following concussive injury, specifically under divided attention conditions. Dual task assessments in some cases were more reliable than single task assessments and may be better able to detect lingering effects following concussion. Few of the studies have been replicated and applied across various age groups. A key limitation of these studies is that many include laboratory and time-intensive measures. Future research is needed to refine a time and cost efficient divided attention assessment paradigm, and more work is needed in younger (pre-teens) populations where the application may be of greatest utility.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>24242888</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11065-013-9238-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-7308 |
ispartof | Neuropsychology review, 2013-12, Vol.23 (4), p.300-313 |
issn | 1040-7308 1573-6660 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492643391 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Age Athletic Injuries - complications Attention Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain Concussion - diagnosis Brain Concussion - etiology Brain Concussion - therapy Cognition - physiology Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data Disease Management Gait - physiology Humans Neurology Neuropsychology Neurosciences Postural Balance - physiology Review Systematic review |
title | Are Divided Attention Tasks Useful in the Assessment and Management of Sport-Related Concussion? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A06%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Divided%20Attention%20Tasks%20Useful%20in%20the%20Assessment%20and%20Management%20of%20Sport-Related%20Concussion?&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychology%20review&rft.au=Register-Mihalik,%20Johna%20K.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=300-313&rft.issn=1040-7308&rft.eissn=1573-6660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11065-013-9238-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1477563295%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1467025400&rft_id=info:pmid/24242888&rfr_iscdi=true |