Effects of shade cocoa plantation on artificial fruit consumption by birds in two contrasting landscapes in Southern Bahia, Brazil
To investigate the influence of forests and agroforestry systems on fruit consumption by birds, we studied two landscapes, one covered predominantly with forests and the other dominated by traditional shade cocoa plantations. In each landscape, we sampled three forest fragments and three shade cocoa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of tropical ecology 2013-07, Vol.29 (4), p.313-319 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 319 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 313 |
container_title | Journal of tropical ecology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Bomfim, Jamille de Assis Silva, Roberta Mariano de Fernandes Souza, Virgínia de Andrade, Edyla Ribeiro Cazetta, Eliana |
description | To investigate the influence of forests and agroforestry systems on fruit consumption by birds, we studied two landscapes, one covered predominantly with forests and the other dominated by traditional shade cocoa plantations. In each landscape, we sampled three forest fragments and three shade cocoa plantations. We placed 15 artificial fruits in 25, 1–2-m-tall shrubs spaced every 50 m and evaluated the detection and consumption of fruits after 72 h. We used hemispherical photographs positioned above each fruit station to evaluate canopy openness. We found a statistically significant difference in fruit consumption between landscapes, which means that more fruits were detected and consumed in the forest-dominated landscape. However, forests and shade cocoa plantations within each landscape exhibited similar fruit consumption. Canopy openness was similar between the landscapes, however, the cocoa plantations exhibited greater canopy openness than forests. The results of this study reinforce the importance of the presence of forests in the agricultural landscape. Thus, to evaluate the capacity of agroforest to protect species and maintain ecological interactions it is also necessary to consider the landscape context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266467413000369 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492620448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266467413000369</cupid><jstor_id>23464276</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23464276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fc0e53be07a2c8b0c93c84313808dc391706d688d898e92d2f88d184af3adffd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9AR6EgAgebE0l6XRydJf1AxY8rJ6b6nzsZOjptEkaWY_-cjM7g4oiBBJ4nqp6STXNU6CvgUL_5poyKYXsBXBKKZf6XrMBIXXbKw73m80Btwf-sHmU8646uuv4pvlx6b0zJZPoSd6idcREE5EsE84FS4gzqQdTCT6YgBPxaQ2lSnNe98sdH2_JGJLNJMykfIsHVhLmEuYbUrvYbHBxd_Q6rmXr0kzOcRvwFTlP-D1Mj5sHHqfsnpzus-bLu8vPFx_aq0_vP168vWqNoKy03lDX8dHRHplRIzWaGyU4cEWVNVxDT6WVSlmlldPMMl_foAR6jtZ7y8-al8e-S4pfV5fLsA_ZuKlmdHHNAwjNJKNCqKo-_0vdxTXNNV21QEEHGli14GiZFHNOzg9LCntMtwPQ4bCV4Z-t1JoXp85Y_2XyCWcT8q9C1ndMAIPqPTt6u1xi-s25kIL1snJ-mo37MQV74_6I-N_pPwFm0KYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1418151912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of shade cocoa plantation on artificial fruit consumption by birds in two contrasting landscapes in Southern Bahia, Brazil</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Bomfim, Jamille de Assis ; Silva, Roberta Mariano ; de Fernandes Souza, Virgínia ; de Andrade, Edyla Ribeiro ; Cazetta, Eliana</creator><creatorcontrib>Bomfim, Jamille de Assis ; Silva, Roberta Mariano ; de Fernandes Souza, Virgínia ; de Andrade, Edyla Ribeiro ; Cazetta, Eliana</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the influence of forests and agroforestry systems on fruit consumption by birds, we studied two landscapes, one covered predominantly with forests and the other dominated by traditional shade cocoa plantations. In each landscape, we sampled three forest fragments and three shade cocoa plantations. We placed 15 artificial fruits in 25, 1–2-m-tall shrubs spaced every 50 m and evaluated the detection and consumption of fruits after 72 h. We used hemispherical photographs positioned above each fruit station to evaluate canopy openness. We found a statistically significant difference in fruit consumption between landscapes, which means that more fruits were detected and consumed in the forest-dominated landscape. However, forests and shade cocoa plantations within each landscape exhibited similar fruit consumption. Canopy openness was similar between the landscapes, however, the cocoa plantations exhibited greater canopy openness than forests. The results of this study reinforce the importance of the presence of forests in the agricultural landscape. Thus, to evaluate the capacity of agroforest to protect species and maintain ecological interactions it is also necessary to consider the landscape context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266467413000369</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JTECEQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agroforestry ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biodiversity conservation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Canopies ; Cocoa ; Conservation biology ; Economic plant physiology ; Forest conservation ; Forest cover ; Forest habitats ; Fructification, ripening. Postharvest physiology ; Fruits ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Growth and development ; Landscape ; Landscape ecology ; Landscapes ; Plantations ; Protected species</subject><ispartof>Journal of tropical ecology, 2013-07, Vol.29 (4), p.313-319</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fc0e53be07a2c8b0c93c84313808dc391706d688d898e92d2f88d184af3adffd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fc0e53be07a2c8b0c93c84313808dc391706d688d898e92d2f88d184af3adffd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23464276$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266467413000369/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27524121$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bomfim, Jamille de Assis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Roberta Mariano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Fernandes Souza, Virgínia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, Edyla Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazetta, Eliana</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of shade cocoa plantation on artificial fruit consumption by birds in two contrasting landscapes in Southern Bahia, Brazil</title><title>Journal of tropical ecology</title><addtitle>J. Trop. Ecol</addtitle><description>To investigate the influence of forests and agroforestry systems on fruit consumption by birds, we studied two landscapes, one covered predominantly with forests and the other dominated by traditional shade cocoa plantations. In each landscape, we sampled three forest fragments and three shade cocoa plantations. We placed 15 artificial fruits in 25, 1–2-m-tall shrubs spaced every 50 m and evaluated the detection and consumption of fruits after 72 h. We used hemispherical photographs positioned above each fruit station to evaluate canopy openness. We found a statistically significant difference in fruit consumption between landscapes, which means that more fruits were detected and consumed in the forest-dominated landscape. However, forests and shade cocoa plantations within each landscape exhibited similar fruit consumption. Canopy openness was similar between the landscapes, however, the cocoa plantations exhibited greater canopy openness than forests. The results of this study reinforce the importance of the presence of forests in the agricultural landscape. Thus, to evaluate the capacity of agroforest to protect species and maintain ecological interactions it is also necessary to consider the landscape context.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Cocoa</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest cover</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Fructification, ripening. Postharvest physiology</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Growth and development</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><issn>0266-4674</issn><issn>1469-7831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9AR6EgAgebE0l6XRydJf1AxY8rJ6b6nzsZOjptEkaWY_-cjM7g4oiBBJ4nqp6STXNU6CvgUL_5poyKYXsBXBKKZf6XrMBIXXbKw73m80Btwf-sHmU8646uuv4pvlx6b0zJZPoSd6idcREE5EsE84FS4gzqQdTCT6YgBPxaQ2lSnNe98sdH2_JGJLNJMykfIsHVhLmEuYbUrvYbHBxd_Q6rmXr0kzOcRvwFTlP-D1Mj5sHHqfsnpzus-bLu8vPFx_aq0_vP168vWqNoKy03lDX8dHRHplRIzWaGyU4cEWVNVxDT6WVSlmlldPMMl_foAR6jtZ7y8-al8e-S4pfV5fLsA_ZuKlmdHHNAwjNJKNCqKo-_0vdxTXNNV21QEEHGli14GiZFHNOzg9LCntMtwPQ4bCV4Z-t1JoXp85Y_2XyCWcT8q9C1ndMAIPqPTt6u1xi-s25kIL1snJ-mo37MQV74_6I-N_pPwFm0KYk</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Bomfim, Jamille de Assis</creator><creator>Silva, Roberta Mariano</creator><creator>de Fernandes Souza, Virgínia</creator><creator>de Andrade, Edyla Ribeiro</creator><creator>Cazetta, Eliana</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>Effects of shade cocoa plantation on artificial fruit consumption by birds in two contrasting landscapes in Southern Bahia, Brazil</title><author>Bomfim, Jamille de Assis ; Silva, Roberta Mariano ; de Fernandes Souza, Virgínia ; de Andrade, Edyla Ribeiro ; Cazetta, Eliana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-fc0e53be07a2c8b0c93c84313808dc391706d688d898e92d2f88d184af3adffd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Cocoa</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest cover</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Fructification, ripening. Postharvest physiology</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Growth and development</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bomfim, Jamille de Assis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Roberta Mariano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Fernandes Souza, Virgínia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, Edyla Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazetta, Eliana</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of tropical ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bomfim, Jamille de Assis</au><au>Silva, Roberta Mariano</au><au>de Fernandes Souza, Virgínia</au><au>de Andrade, Edyla Ribeiro</au><au>Cazetta, Eliana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of shade cocoa plantation on artificial fruit consumption by birds in two contrasting landscapes in Southern Bahia, Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of tropical ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Trop. Ecol</addtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>313-319</pages><issn>0266-4674</issn><eissn>1469-7831</eissn><coden>JTECEQ</coden><abstract>To investigate the influence of forests and agroforestry systems on fruit consumption by birds, we studied two landscapes, one covered predominantly with forests and the other dominated by traditional shade cocoa plantations. In each landscape, we sampled three forest fragments and three shade cocoa plantations. We placed 15 artificial fruits in 25, 1–2-m-tall shrubs spaced every 50 m and evaluated the detection and consumption of fruits after 72 h. We used hemispherical photographs positioned above each fruit station to evaluate canopy openness. We found a statistically significant difference in fruit consumption between landscapes, which means that more fruits were detected and consumed in the forest-dominated landscape. However, forests and shade cocoa plantations within each landscape exhibited similar fruit consumption. Canopy openness was similar between the landscapes, however, the cocoa plantations exhibited greater canopy openness than forests. The results of this study reinforce the importance of the presence of forests in the agricultural landscape. Thus, to evaluate the capacity of agroforest to protect species and maintain ecological interactions it is also necessary to consider the landscape context.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0266467413000369</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4674 |
ispartof | Journal of tropical ecology, 2013-07, Vol.29 (4), p.313-319 |
issn | 0266-4674 1469-7831 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1492620448 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Agricultural land Agroforestry Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biodiversity conservation Biological and medical sciences Birds Canopies Cocoa Conservation biology Economic plant physiology Forest conservation Forest cover Forest habitats Fructification, ripening. Postharvest physiology Fruits Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Growth and development Landscape Landscape ecology Landscapes Plantations Protected species |
title | Effects of shade cocoa plantation on artificial fruit consumption by birds in two contrasting landscapes in Southern Bahia, Brazil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A11%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20shade%20cocoa%20plantation%20on%20artificial%20fruit%20consumption%20by%20birds%20in%20two%20contrasting%20landscapes%20in%20Southern%20Bahia,%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20tropical%20ecology&rft.au=Bomfim,%20Jamille%20de%20Assis&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=313-319&rft.issn=0266-4674&rft.eissn=1469-7831&rft.coden=JTECEQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266467413000369&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23464276%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1418151912&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266467413000369&rft_jstor_id=23464276&rfr_iscdi=true |