Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry

Although symmetry is hailed as a fundamental goal of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery, our tools for measuring this outcome have been limited and subjective. With the advent of three-dimensional photogrammetry, surface geometry can be captured, manipulated, and measured quantitatively. Until now...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2014-01, Vol.25 (1), p.124-128
Hauptverfasser: Taylor, Helena O, Morrison, Clinton S, Linden, Olivia, Phillips, Benjamin, Chang, Johnny, Byrne, Margaret E, Sullivan, Stephen R, Forrest, Christopher R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 1
container_start_page 124
container_title The Journal of craniofacial surgery
container_volume 25
creator Taylor, Helena O
Morrison, Clinton S
Linden, Olivia
Phillips, Benjamin
Chang, Johnny
Byrne, Margaret E
Sullivan, Stephen R
Forrest, Christopher R
description Although symmetry is hailed as a fundamental goal of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery, our tools for measuring this outcome have been limited and subjective. With the advent of three-dimensional photogrammetry, surface geometry can be captured, manipulated, and measured quantitatively. Until now, few normative data existed with regard to facial surface symmetry. Here, we present a method for reproducibly calculating overall facial symmetry and present normative data on 100 subjects. We enrolled 100 volunteers who underwent three-dimensional photogrammetry of their faces in repose. We collected demographic data on age, sex, and race and subjectively scored facial symmetry. We calculated the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the native and reflected faces, reflecting about a plane of maximum symmetry. We analyzed the interobserver reliability of the subjective assessment of facial asymmetry and the quantitative measurements and compared the subjective and objective values. We also classified areas of greatest asymmetry as localized to the upper, middle, or lower facial thirds. This cluster of normative data was compared with a group of patients with subtle but increasing amounts of facial asymmetry. We imaged 100 subjects by three-dimensional photogrammetry. There was a poor interobserver correlation between subjective assessments of asymmetry (r = 0.56). There was a high interobserver reliability for quantitative measurements of facial symmetry RMSD calculations (r = 0.91-0.95). The mean RMSD for this normative population was found to be 0.80 ± 0.24 mm. Areas of greatest asymmetry were distributed as follows: 10% upper facial third, 49% central facial third, and 41% lower facial third. Precise measurement permitted discrimination of subtle facial asymmetry within this normative group and distinguished norms from patients with subtle facial asymmetry, with placement of RMSDs along an asymmetry ruler. Facial surface symmetry, which is poorly assessed subjectively, can be easily and reproducibly measured using three-dimensional photogrammetry. The RMSD for facial asymmetry of healthy volunteers clusters at approximately 0.80 ± 0.24 mm. Patients with facial asymmetry due to a pathologic process can be differentiated from normative facial asymmetry based on their RMSDs.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2e99d
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490767532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1490767532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b13d4e459cec41b6e37cb5f661ebf97708b0195f2bc208e16674f6f9252fbf2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMotlb_gcgs3UzNO407Kb6gIFJdD8nMTRuZR5tkhP57R2q7cHUPl3PO5X4IXRM8JViru-V8OcUWEwaMzKihoHV1gsZEMJkzxejpoDHXOaVKjNBFjF8YU0KoPEcjyjmWQvIx2r73pk0-meS_IXOm9KbOTNw1DaSwu8_66NtVltYBIK98A230XTtYNusudatg9r4sdVkDJvYBMmsi1L49lg3LQUF26LxEZ87UEa7-5gR9Pj1-zF_yxdvz6_xhkZdUyJRbwioOXOgSSk6sBKZKK5yUBKzTSuHZ8LsWjtqS4hkQKRV30mkqqLOOApug233vJnTbHmIqGh9LqGvTQtfHgnCNlVSC0cHK99YydDEGcMUm-MaEXUFw8Qu7GGAX_2EPsZu_C71toDqGDnTZDxhNf1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1490767532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Taylor, Helena O ; Morrison, Clinton S ; Linden, Olivia ; Phillips, Benjamin ; Chang, Johnny ; Byrne, Margaret E ; Sullivan, Stephen R ; Forrest, Christopher R</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Helena O ; Morrison, Clinton S ; Linden, Olivia ; Phillips, Benjamin ; Chang, Johnny ; Byrne, Margaret E ; Sullivan, Stephen R ; Forrest, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><description>Although symmetry is hailed as a fundamental goal of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery, our tools for measuring this outcome have been limited and subjective. With the advent of three-dimensional photogrammetry, surface geometry can be captured, manipulated, and measured quantitatively. Until now, few normative data existed with regard to facial surface symmetry. Here, we present a method for reproducibly calculating overall facial symmetry and present normative data on 100 subjects. We enrolled 100 volunteers who underwent three-dimensional photogrammetry of their faces in repose. We collected demographic data on age, sex, and race and subjectively scored facial symmetry. We calculated the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the native and reflected faces, reflecting about a plane of maximum symmetry. We analyzed the interobserver reliability of the subjective assessment of facial asymmetry and the quantitative measurements and compared the subjective and objective values. We also classified areas of greatest asymmetry as localized to the upper, middle, or lower facial thirds. This cluster of normative data was compared with a group of patients with subtle but increasing amounts of facial asymmetry. We imaged 100 subjects by three-dimensional photogrammetry. There was a poor interobserver correlation between subjective assessments of asymmetry (r = 0.56). There was a high interobserver reliability for quantitative measurements of facial symmetry RMSD calculations (r = 0.91-0.95). The mean RMSD for this normative population was found to be 0.80 ± 0.24 mm. Areas of greatest asymmetry were distributed as follows: 10% upper facial third, 49% central facial third, and 41% lower facial third. Precise measurement permitted discrimination of subtle facial asymmetry within this normative group and distinguished norms from patients with subtle facial asymmetry, with placement of RMSDs along an asymmetry ruler. Facial surface symmetry, which is poorly assessed subjectively, can be easily and reproducibly measured using three-dimensional photogrammetry. The RMSD for facial asymmetry of healthy volunteers clusters at approximately 0.80 ± 0.24 mm. Patients with facial asymmetry due to a pathologic process can be differentiated from normative facial asymmetry based on their RMSDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2e99d</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24406564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cephalometry - methods ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dentistry ; Face - abnormalities ; Facial Asymmetry - congenital ; Facial Asymmetry - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Photogrammetry - methods ; Reference Values ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2014-01, Vol.25 (1), p.124-128</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b13d4e459cec41b6e37cb5f661ebf97708b0195f2bc208e16674f6f9252fbf2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Helena O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Clinton S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Johnny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Margaret E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>Although symmetry is hailed as a fundamental goal of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery, our tools for measuring this outcome have been limited and subjective. With the advent of three-dimensional photogrammetry, surface geometry can be captured, manipulated, and measured quantitatively. Until now, few normative data existed with regard to facial surface symmetry. Here, we present a method for reproducibly calculating overall facial symmetry and present normative data on 100 subjects. We enrolled 100 volunteers who underwent three-dimensional photogrammetry of their faces in repose. We collected demographic data on age, sex, and race and subjectively scored facial symmetry. We calculated the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the native and reflected faces, reflecting about a plane of maximum symmetry. We analyzed the interobserver reliability of the subjective assessment of facial asymmetry and the quantitative measurements and compared the subjective and objective values. We also classified areas of greatest asymmetry as localized to the upper, middle, or lower facial thirds. This cluster of normative data was compared with a group of patients with subtle but increasing amounts of facial asymmetry. We imaged 100 subjects by three-dimensional photogrammetry. There was a poor interobserver correlation between subjective assessments of asymmetry (r = 0.56). There was a high interobserver reliability for quantitative measurements of facial symmetry RMSD calculations (r = 0.91-0.95). The mean RMSD for this normative population was found to be 0.80 ± 0.24 mm. Areas of greatest asymmetry were distributed as follows: 10% upper facial third, 49% central facial third, and 41% lower facial third. Precise measurement permitted discrimination of subtle facial asymmetry within this normative group and distinguished norms from patients with subtle facial asymmetry, with placement of RMSDs along an asymmetry ruler. Facial surface symmetry, which is poorly assessed subjectively, can be easily and reproducibly measured using three-dimensional photogrammetry. The RMSD for facial asymmetry of healthy volunteers clusters at approximately 0.80 ± 0.24 mm. Patients with facial asymmetry due to a pathologic process can be differentiated from normative facial asymmetry based on their RMSDs.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Face - abnormalities</subject><subject>Facial Asymmetry - congenital</subject><subject>Facial Asymmetry - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperplasia</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Photogrammetry - methods</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMotlb_gcgs3UzNO407Kb6gIFJdD8nMTRuZR5tkhP57R2q7cHUPl3PO5X4IXRM8JViru-V8OcUWEwaMzKihoHV1gsZEMJkzxejpoDHXOaVKjNBFjF8YU0KoPEcjyjmWQvIx2r73pk0-meS_IXOm9KbOTNw1DaSwu8_66NtVltYBIK98A230XTtYNusudatg9r4sdVkDJvYBMmsi1L49lg3LQUF26LxEZ87UEa7-5gR9Pj1-zF_yxdvz6_xhkZdUyJRbwioOXOgSSk6sBKZKK5yUBKzTSuHZ8LsWjtqS4hkQKRV30mkqqLOOApug233vJnTbHmIqGh9LqGvTQtfHgnCNlVSC0cHK99YydDEGcMUm-MaEXUFw8Qu7GGAX_2EPsZu_C71toDqGDnTZDxhNf1w</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Taylor, Helena O</creator><creator>Morrison, Clinton S</creator><creator>Linden, Olivia</creator><creator>Phillips, Benjamin</creator><creator>Chang, Johnny</creator><creator>Byrne, Margaret E</creator><creator>Sullivan, Stephen R</creator><creator>Forrest, Christopher R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry</title><author>Taylor, Helena O ; Morrison, Clinton S ; Linden, Olivia ; Phillips, Benjamin ; Chang, Johnny ; Byrne, Margaret E ; Sullivan, Stephen R ; Forrest, Christopher R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b13d4e459cec41b6e37cb5f661ebf97708b0195f2bc208e16674f6f9252fbf2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Face - abnormalities</topic><topic>Facial Asymmetry - congenital</topic><topic>Facial Asymmetry - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperplasia</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Photogrammetry - methods</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Helena O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Clinton S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linden, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Johnny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Margaret E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Helena O</au><au>Morrison, Clinton S</au><au>Linden, Olivia</au><au>Phillips, Benjamin</au><au>Chang, Johnny</au><au>Byrne, Margaret E</au><au>Sullivan, Stephen R</au><au>Forrest, Christopher R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>124-128</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><eissn>1536-3732</eissn><abstract>Although symmetry is hailed as a fundamental goal of aesthetic and reconstructive surgery, our tools for measuring this outcome have been limited and subjective. With the advent of three-dimensional photogrammetry, surface geometry can be captured, manipulated, and measured quantitatively. Until now, few normative data existed with regard to facial surface symmetry. Here, we present a method for reproducibly calculating overall facial symmetry and present normative data on 100 subjects. We enrolled 100 volunteers who underwent three-dimensional photogrammetry of their faces in repose. We collected demographic data on age, sex, and race and subjectively scored facial symmetry. We calculated the root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the native and reflected faces, reflecting about a plane of maximum symmetry. We analyzed the interobserver reliability of the subjective assessment of facial asymmetry and the quantitative measurements and compared the subjective and objective values. We also classified areas of greatest asymmetry as localized to the upper, middle, or lower facial thirds. This cluster of normative data was compared with a group of patients with subtle but increasing amounts of facial asymmetry. We imaged 100 subjects by three-dimensional photogrammetry. There was a poor interobserver correlation between subjective assessments of asymmetry (r = 0.56). There was a high interobserver reliability for quantitative measurements of facial symmetry RMSD calculations (r = 0.91-0.95). The mean RMSD for this normative population was found to be 0.80 ± 0.24 mm. Areas of greatest asymmetry were distributed as follows: 10% upper facial third, 49% central facial third, and 41% lower facial third. Precise measurement permitted discrimination of subtle facial asymmetry within this normative group and distinguished norms from patients with subtle facial asymmetry, with placement of RMSDs along an asymmetry ruler. Facial surface symmetry, which is poorly assessed subjectively, can be easily and reproducibly measured using three-dimensional photogrammetry. The RMSD for facial asymmetry of healthy volunteers clusters at approximately 0.80 ± 0.24 mm. Patients with facial asymmetry due to a pathologic process can be differentiated from normative facial asymmetry based on their RMSDs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>24406564</pmid><doi>10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2e99d</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-2275
ispartof The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2014-01, Vol.25 (1), p.124-128
issn 1049-2275
1536-3732
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1490767532
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cephalometry - methods
Child
Child, Preschool
Dentistry
Face - abnormalities
Facial Asymmetry - congenital
Facial Asymmetry - diagnosis
Female
Humans
Hyperplasia
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Photogrammetry - methods
Reference Values
Young Adult
title Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A41%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20facial%20asymmetry:%20using%20three-dimensional%20photogrammetry%20to%20measure%20baseline%20facial%20surface%20symmetry&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Taylor,%20Helena%20O&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=124-128&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft.eissn=1536-3732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2e99d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1490767532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1490767532&rft_id=info:pmid/24406564&rfr_iscdi=true